Worn haste not applying to bows

[Ciroco]

Windstriker w/ RBG (27%)

[Fri Jun 19 17:15:24 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 72 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:15:30 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 66 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:15:36 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 72 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:15:43 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 64 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:15:49 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 93 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:15:55 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 63 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:16:01 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 87 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:16:07 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 35 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:16:13 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 25 points of damage.
[Fri Jun 19 17:16:19 2015] You hit a thought spoiler for 81 points of damage.

Looks like a 6 sec delay for all of those shots besides one. So no difference for 0%, 27%, 40% worn haste on bow shots.

NOT CLASSIC

[Technique]

already reported (http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167376)

[Treats]

I think this is the way Quiver haste is supposed to work:

Range Attack button is hasted based on weight reduction of Quiver (Ranger/Bow only)

Quiver Haste + Item Haste + Spell Haste + Bard Haste

Quiver Haste = .25 * weight reduction (It is not 1/3) -- Found this in the Trilogy client

[Ciroco]

Quiver haste is intentionally not live yet; will be in Velious

[worch]

Quiver haste is intentionally not live yet; will be in Velious

This.

Also, http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1281

[Treats]

This.

Also, http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1281

That thread is closed.

[worch]

That thread is closed.

Because the issue was resolved. There should be no quiver haste until velious, and that is currently the state of p99. I linked that thread so OP could see why quiver haste was removed, if he was curious.

[Grimjaw]

lets just forget about quiver haste because it wont be implemented on p1999. its not classic.

lets stick to OP's topic about worn haste not affecting ranged attacks. should it in classic?

[kaev]

lets just forget about quiver haste because it wont be implemented on p1999. its not classic.

lets stick to OP's topic about worn haste not affecting ranged attacks. should it in classic?

That's what I recall, but lol memory.

If you want to apply reason to it (lol at reason vs. EQ players and EQ mechanics), would anybody have cared about tailored quiver 22% haste when FBSS (21%) & SCHW (22%) were readily available? Yet I recall tailored quiver being very popular (oops, lol memory again), I suppose popularity could have been because it was so cheap could be obtained much easier than melee haste item.

I wonder if there's an archive of the old EZ Board ranger class board? Can't even recall its name. Probably not, Paladin board archive is a joke that's about 99% empty posts/threads, but maybe...


Bleah, doubt there's any solid evidence either way.

[Treats]

lets just forget about quiver haste because it wont be implemented on p1999. its not classic.

lets stick to OP's topic about worn haste not affecting ranged attacks. should it in classic?

It was implemented on 5/8/2001...

That's what I recall, but lol memory.

If you want to apply reason to it (lol at reason vs. EQ players and EQ mechanics), would anybody have cared about tailored quiver 22% haste when FBSS (21%) & SCHW (22%) were readily available? Yet I recall tailored quiver being very popular (oops, lol memory again), I suppose popularity could have been because it was so cheap could be obtained much easier than melee haste item.


Worn Haste and Quiver Haste should be separate and stack.

[Cecily]

It was implemented on 5/8/2001...


You're not answering his question and you're talking about quiver haste patch date. Quiver haste is a derail of this thread, so please stop discussing it. This is about item haste not reducing range attack cool down like it should. The whole fleeting quiver discussion thread (http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=6186) on zam seems to agree that worn haste functions for bows.

[eqgmrdbz]

Goes to show how little people care about this issue, an issue primarily affecting Rangers, that they bring up a closed topic in a thread about why Rangers have been dick'd for years.

[Treats]

You're not answering his question and you're talking about quiver haste patch date. Quiver haste is a derail of this thread, so please stop discussing it. This is about item haste not reducing range attack cool down like it should. The whole fleeting quiver discussion thread (http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=6186) on zam seems to agree that worn haste functions for bows.

When Nilbog or Haynar or whoever implemented the code to introduce Quiver haste thats what may have broken your worn haste.

If you don't understand why quiver haste is relevant regarding worn haste I'm not sure what to tell you.

His question was already answered:

Worn Haste + Spell/Bard Haste + Quiver Haste

[Cecily]

It's not a ranged attack specific issue. It's a UI refresh issue which also effects all skills linked to worn haste, such as backstab / flying kick. Haynar's guess was that it happned when they took haste % off item links. Quite honestly, this isn't the important thread. This one is. (http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167376)

[eqgmrdbz]

Down the rabbit hole we go, well once again anyways...

[YendorLootmonkey]

I'm still trying to figure out how Cecily managed all those hits in a row without a miss. For me it was more like...

miss
5
miss
miss
10
miss
crit for ~400
guildmates say "Holy shit Yendor kickin some ass over there!!"
Yendor says "HAHA U KNOW IT"
miss
miss
12
miss
40
miss
miss