If pvp exp was increased, what % and why?
 

If the experience rate of the pvp server was increased, by what % should it be increased, and why?

This is a poll designed to gauge opinion.

20% was what SZ had, as only server lost xp on pvpdeath (even cons not greenie griefing) (like here)

Sounds fair, it really is a bit more difficult to level due to the disruption of pvp and the pvp exp loss (which isn't a big deal imo)

Agreed, if there's any increase to the exp rate it should be no more than 20%. No other Live pvp servers around the era had increased experience as far as I know. 20% is enough to offset the increased risk of pvp while not trivializing the difficulty of the game. I'm okay with keeping exp as it is though.

10-20% I don't wanna level too fast but it will help with soloing especially if you're a melee that can't port or find groups (+ people might actually make rangers)

i think searyx had a really good idea as far as increasing xp for players level 25 and below then spreading that xp required among the higher levels. so you could get to level 25 faster and retain players better. i think a slight xp bump would help also.

As someone who plays more than a casual but way less than a poopsocker I vote 50%

This makes a lot of sense. I voted 0 on the poll, but the idea quoted by Amelinda has my support.

I think people need to accept that red99 won't have 600+ for awhile at least, making low/mid lvl pvp rather shitty. Getting ppl through levels quicker and into the fight would be better - as well as countering the exp loss from pvp death/time loss. I'd probably say around 30 - SZ had teams/more population.

Nilbog there is nothing wrong with the server.

What you have is a bunch of whining ungratefuls that think because things are not the way THEY want it that it should be changed.

You give us a FREE EQ emu and the overwhelming majority enjoy what you have done.

Please do not let the few "dictate" the server direction to the many.