Quote:
Originally Posted by Beastagoog
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's a round about way of saying: yeah when the competition got hot we parked the bus to prevent the PvE from been affected.
Your own guild was guilty of pelling raid targets during the initial phases of Rag v Apex to the point Cylock intervened and added a sub-clause to try allow raid PvP, this not true? Clarity reasons: Both sides were as guilty as each other so you cant sit on the fence over that one.
I remember specifically Gong and Colgate saying they didn't want to take Golems/VP/Kunark from <friends> and the other guilds getting Kunark content because it would break their guilds up. (They eventually did but after letting them have free reign for 4-5 months)...and lots of pressure form guildies who wanted VP loots etc..Lot's of ex friends admitted that when they lost vp/golems it broke their guild.
So if you cant see that your actions of parking a 50+ man guild in VP over kunark loot (most items are redudent to a velious guild) wasnt detrimental to the health of the server than your blinded by your own greed. Because not only have you done this once, you've done it twice now so obviously the first time wasnt a "opps" moment.
And you WILL do it a 3rd time if any guild gets back to the position of taking VP/Golems.
|
1) we have gone months without killing VP
2) colgate and gongshow didnt care about the server
3) colgate and gongshow took vp
4) what exactly is your point?