[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's assume the biolab thing was true (it's not). How does that morally justify the invasion? Russia isn't Ukraine's dad. Russia agreed to permanently respect Ukraine's sovereignty in exchange for nuclear disarmament. Russia violated this in 2014 when it took Crimea.

Why does Russia get to tell Ukraine what to do and invade it if they don't. So, if I get your argument, if Ukraine told Russia to nuclear disarm, and Russia didn't, Ukraine would be perfectly justified to invade Russia in the same manner?

Again, I'm asking you to morally, ethically, and geopolitically justify this. You haven't done that yet.

PS: Since you brought it up, Iraq was a travesty and Bush is a war criminal. Don't try whataboutism again, please.

It's post hoc but just for fun - WMDs constitute jus ad bellum. Or so I've been told.

Bioweapons are WMDs.