Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Can remove FFA if they want sure.
But that won't reduce poopsocking. Since it isn't generally Class R guilds doing that, though it sometimes is. Their eye gouging will just continue to be poop socking which will lead to longer variance which is retarded and not classic.
Something to make the poopsocking dissipate and the variance to be reduced would be ideal. No one wants to have shifts tracking for 96 hours again. That's dumb... Very very dumb.
I understand that the grey areas and limits of every rule will be pushed until a punishment is handed out and a line is drawn in the sand.
2 players in zone seems pretty clear. And punishment can pretty easily be handed out for breaking such a simple rule.
If you reduce variance enough limiting people to 2 per zone of tracking won't be a huge hindrance, people won't sock since many targets are spawning in overlapping windows which will spread people out and reduce petitions.
|
I honestly wish it were as easy as you want it to be, but consider some of these points.
-players camped in zone to avoid the footrace from the other zoneline, how is that policed?
-players bound in zone to avoid the footrace, how is that policed?
Each new wrinkle you add only complicates the amount of fraps/logs that must be kept to keep everyone playing nicely. The new rules themselves only moved the sock to the zoneline, it didn't change how people are actually playing the game.