Quote:
Originally Posted by rioisk
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I really liked the concept of the beastlord although the playable race should have been kerra.
|
Things I enjoyed about the Beastlord:
leather armor (to share with druids and monks)
Weapon choices that closely match monk: This was actually good for monks because it meant more of these types of weapons would be added to the game and made them a little less exclusive.
A source of group mana regen at higher levels.
As an enchanter I thought it was a good way to mix things up. You no longer needed a bard or enchanter for mana regen but using a beastlord instead meant that you were loosing the ability to mez. However if you had both in your group the mana regen became insane!
It was a good mix of shaman and monk. Were they OP? Hell yes. But the concept was interesting.
I think the Vah Shir were pretty silly as far as playable races go.
Guktans made way more sense when it came to EQ lore.