Game Mechanics: Kazon Stormhammer giving insufficient faction hits

[Amirite]

you guys are trying too hard.

[Shiftin]

now 472 MM kills + 26 Kazons and still threatening. Kazon is clearly giving 1 point of faction like a normal mob. Even at the post revamp +25 we'd be way out of KOS.

[Cyrano]

I'm sorry Shiftin, can you corroborate those numbers with a post from 2000? Otherwise I think he should give zero.

BTW Hook 'Em

[Motec]

Lol @ how f*cked faction will be in velious. Ally all 3 factions no problemo at all when yelinak and tormax only give 1 hit.

[Shiftin]

I think there may be bigger problems than the dwarf. I con differently to VP trash than I do to skyfire wurms, and they should both be on RingofScale faction. On dravingar I con threateningly outside and scowls inside, even after around 500 individual faction hits between mistmoore, Kazon and Vhalen (the bard in SK which should give +10 ROS).

[Rusl]

I believe that is working as intended. Only the named dragons in VP are on ring of scale faction and the trash mobs are always KoS.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With regards to the dwarf king giving more faction, we have posts showing he was known to give larger faction hits and was used to gain RoS faction rather easily, we have first hand accounts of people doing this back on live. What else can we give you to show this should be?

[Awwalike]

bro, quoting random peoples posts on alla for truth is like using wikipedia to complete a research paper.

[Uthgaard]

Originally Posted by Rusl [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

we have posts showing he was known to give larger faction hits and was used to gain RoS faction rather easily

...in Luclin.

Originally Posted by Rusl [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

we have first hand accounts of people doing this back on live.

From someone who couldn't keep his own story straight and retroactively edited the expansion when called on it.

Tell it like it is; don't give a slanted recap to try to lend imaginary credibility to an argument with no supporting evidence.

[Heebee]

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

From someone who couldn't keep his own story straight and retroactively edited the expansion when called on it.

Wrong.

First off, I didn't alter the expansion when I edited my post, I simply made a grammatical change a couple of hours after I posted.

And second, you might want to check the timestamps to see exactly when I edited my post.

Oh wait, here - I'll do it for you:

Here is my post:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is where you believe I was "called on it":
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a pretty piss poor attempt to discredit me, by claiming that I retroactively edited my post in response to you "calling me" on a mistake, when your post was actually made the following day.

Troll better please.

[Heebee]

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The part most people fail is keeping your mouth shut when you're wrong.

You could probably learn something from this yourself.