Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 07-23-2014, 09:39 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

I like that there already filibusters against this
  #72  
Old 07-23-2014, 09:51 PM
Gaffin 7.0 Gaffin 7.0 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,147
Default

you got the neckbeards already sweatin mayo nirgon settle down, this could cause suicide
  #73  
Old 07-23-2014, 10:30 PM
fastboy21 fastboy21 is offline
Planar Protector

fastboy21's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,179
Default

Item recharging abuse has the potential to ruin raiding.

Boxing abuse has the potential to ruin the entire server.

The decision to include some "classic" elements and to exclude others isn't primarily about consistency:

if it were then i would agree entirely that the OP is 100% right to point out that the devs have intentionally been inconsistent (i.e. there are some non-classic features that have been implemented and some classic features that have been intentionally not implemented.)

What is more important than consistency in all decisions regarding classic and non-classic features, regarding what to include or not, is to look at the over all effect on the server when implementing a particular feature.

In my opinion the impact from allowing boxing would far exceed the impact from allowing recharging. The server is better without boxing.

Now, that doesn't mean that the devs should allow item recharging. In fact, I happen to agree with the OP that item recharging has been abused in a way that far exceeds what it was on live. Maybe it should be removed...because it has an overall negative non-classic impact on the server, despite being a classic feature.
  #74  
Old 07-23-2014, 10:54 PM
Kika Maslyaka Kika Maslyaka is offline
Planar Protector

Kika Maslyaka's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,055
Default

/agree with fastboy21
__________________
Quote:
[Rogean;750468]
Aren't you suppose to be banned?

[Zuranthium;1453395]
The people who invented the first space ships were brilliant. That doesn't mean anybody should actually want to use them 200 years later. Ideas are limited by means of execution. Everquest has amazing ideas that need to be completely reworked in their execution, in order for classic Everquest as it was envisioned to actually exist and continue to be relevant as things have evolved.
  #75  
Old 07-23-2014, 11:16 PM
Zaela Zaela is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 319
Default

blabber post, click to skip

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teako [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I.e. - Monk epic not showing. An entire class's epic is broken atm by not showing it's particle
---> http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...0080&page=8#78

A "true" classic experience is obviously not deliverable, for the reasons that people bring up every time and many more. Saying (or letting people think) "classic above all" is kind of inevitably gonna be shooting yourself in the foot. At some point you have to draw a line between having a broken/exploitable/trivial game and a technically non-classic one.

I think it's worth considering that EQ was a massive low-budget game. Of course it was bursting with bugs, poor design decisions, unintuitive mechanics, etc etc. The world was too big and there were too many players to really have a good sense of all the things people were doing. And it's not like they had a lot of time to hunt bugs once things got off the ground and they were cranking out expansions every year (and back then, it actually meant putting effort into them).

Taking the buggy mess that the game was on this date and calling it gospel is kinda silly. Yeah, you can dig up all the bugs they fixed and nerfs they made to that date, but it's not like they ever got more than the tip of the iceberg back then. In its own way, hewing close to classic on bug fixes and nerfs would be pretty arbitrary -- we know a lot more about where the bugs and overpowered things are now than they did at the time.

I don't have any particular opinion about recharging (or much of anything) since I'm new here and more interested in design than play. But I will say that given how it works, recharging sounds pretty obviously like a bug brought about by a poor design decision (didja know older clients used the same item field for current charges as they did for stack amount? yeah, their servers probably did too)

tl;dr no one's going to agree whether nostalgia down to the tiniest detail is more important than the feels of having no resources and no information and no 5 years of farming time or not, so don't bother.
  #76  
Old 07-23-2014, 11:20 PM
Zalaerian Zalaerian is offline
Planar Protector

Zalaerian's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teako [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How is group exp buff, loot and scoot, global OOC, and no item loot classic for red again?

I think before we start campaigning for minor things to be changed because "ZOMG CLASSIK!" we *need* to consider the realistic changes that need to happen because it's classic.

I.e. - Monk epic not showing. An entire class's epic is broken atm by not showing it's particle

Rogue epic particle isn't implemented, though proven hundreds fold over to have existed in classic.

Pet exp penalty should be removed by now on the timeline

Sneak/Hide has been posted through the nose to not be working as intended.. unchanged..

Classic resists capped at 255

Atrocious EXP bonuses given to players of red.. global OOC.. "loot and scoot" rules..

Current mob pathing speed is borked all to hell since last patch, mobs that have been confirmed not to move "very fast" are faster than jboots (Raptors, anyone?)

No item loot from your precious twink on red?

Can't pickpocket *most* humanoid mobs?

The Ivandyr's hoop click effect nerf? Not classic

Chickens in OT aren't considered "animal" anymore? Somehow? Even though other "animal" spells work on them, charm doesn't?

Or maybe we could remove Red99 all together, because by "classic" standards most characters there are leveled with a tremendous exp bonus from grouping.. which isn't classic at all.

But you're right, Nerdgon, we need to stop and remove item recharging.. because *that's* what's breaking YOUR classic experience, even though it's 100000000% classic.

Make sure we don't fix the important non-classic stuff, we need to get to work on this game breaking classic mechanic.
God its good to be us (red). No crutch recharging or duck casting. We're so good at this game. Better at the PVE than the PVErs
__________________
Ksah <Empire>
  #77  
Old 07-30-2014, 03:51 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Pls no more item recharge, classic experience killer like boxing... see OP
  #78  
Old 07-30-2014, 04:06 PM
Aveenia Aveenia is offline
Aviak

Aveenia's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Arctis Tor
Posts: 90
Default

I boxed during Kunark, had a good job & worked at home a lot. My guess is that prohibition has more to do with server resources than anything. Could be wrong.

Also, WIKIs no... alakazham YES!
  #79  
Old 07-30-2014, 04:12 PM
talian21 talian21 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 141
Default

Item recharging, and MQ'ing are exploits of an NPC inventory bug/oversight, get rid of.
  #80  
Old 07-30-2014, 06:25 PM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,955
Default

Just let me box when I want to play.

And I will be happy.

H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.