Freedom From Atheism Foundation

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Iksandar Peregrinus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TLDR

But to the OP and similar dick-minds: check out Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens on the Utube.

If they make NO sense to you then you are a confirmed moron and should kill yourself immediately, for the good of us all.

Yup! Definitely not a religion! Learn our ways or you will/should/deserve to die. Very progressive indeed.

[Glenzig]

Definitely Atheists.^^^

[Shamalam]

Originally Posted by Pico [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

thanks, ive thought about my privlege and luck a lot during my time on this world. now im being congratulated for it which really seals the deal for my belief strucure, thank you for this time written

You're most welcome! I wish I could live in blissful ignorance like you fine people, but unfortunately my brain works. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[r00t]

Dawkins and Hitchens are both incorrigible fools.

Dawkin's PhD thesis is about fucking bird beaks, something Darwin beat him only by over 100 years with, yet somehow he's the world's expert on evolution? Fucking Bill Nye is more qualified, and yes I'm being facetious.

At least he's not as stupid as Hitchens and doesn't outright deny the hypothesis that God could exist.

Real scientists recognize natural patterns, appreciate the math behind them, come to terms that it's not happenchance, and eventually become deists. Things like DNA being a database with checksums and fantastical properties that we can't even imitate or understand the combinations of 4 little base pairs; it simply doesn't just poop itself out.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dawkins and Hitchens are both incorrigible fools.

Dawkin's PhD thesis is about fucking bird beaks, something Darwin beat him only by over 100 years with, yet somehow he's the world's expert on evolution? Fucking Bill Nye is more qualified, and yes I'm being facetious.

At least he's not as stupid as Hitchens and doesn't outright deny the hypothesis that God could exist.

Real scientists recognize natural patterns, appreciate the math behind them, come to terms that it's not happenchance, and eventually become deists. Things like DNA being a database with checksums and fantastical properties that we can't even imitate or understand the combinations of 4 little base pairs; it simply doesn't just poop itself out.

Be prepared to be told how little your brain is able to comprehend. Most Atheists really honestly believe that people who believe in creation reject all forms of scientific knowledge. Well, I don't think they actually believe that, but its always the go to response for sure. Easy straw man to build so you don't have to talk about anything actually relevant to the discussion.

[Orruar]

There are halfway reasonable reasons to believe in a deity/deities. Checksums in DNA sounds like you're really stretching. It's like you want to believe but you don't want to sound like a moron, so you come up with something that sounds halfway scientific. In the end, you come out sounding like a moron anyway. Do you really think that the process of evolution wouldn't discover similar algorithms to ones we use, when we are both attempting to do similar tasks in a universe with the same physics/mathematical properties? The regulatory processes of the immune system often exhibit similar properties to regulatory systems in various manufacturing processes. Does that indicate to you that our immune system must have had a designer? Or is it just the case that when solving similar problems, a trial and error approach (evolution) can come up with similar solutions to what we humans design?

And the fact that humans can't yet understand fully our DNA does not make for a good argument for a designer. Or are we back to believing in Zeus because we don't understand electrical charge in the atmosphere and how that leads to lightning/thunder?

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are halfway reasonable reasons to believe in a deity/deities. Checksums in DNA sounds like you're really stretching. It's like you want to believe but you don't want to sound like a moron, so you come up with something that sounds halfway scientific. In the end, you come out sounding like a moron anyway. Do you really think that the process of evolution wouldn't discover similar algorithms to ones we use, when we are both attempting to do similar tasks in a universe with the same physics/mathematical properties? The regulatory processes of the immune system often exhibit similar properties to regulatory systems in various manufacturing processes. Does that indicate to you that our immune system must have had a designer? Or is it just the case that when solving similar problems, a trial and error approach (evolution) can come up with similar solutions to what we humans design?

And the fact that humans can't yet understand fully our DNA does not make for a good argument for a designer. Or are we back to believing in Zeus because we don't understand electrical charge in the atmosphere and how that leads to lightning/thunder?

You're assigning an intelligence to a abstract idea. Evolution isn't an entity. It can't guide or manipulate or assign anything to anyone anywhere.

[Shamalam]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Real scientists recognize natural patterns, appreciate the math behind them, come to terms that it's not happenchance, and eventually become deists.

You're suggesting that real scientists, when faced with something they can't immediately explain, simply give up and start believing in god? As in, if they don't reach the same conclusions as you, they aren't a real scientist?

Man, I wish I could be 14 again. Freakin' adorable.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're assigning an intelligence to a abstract idea. Evolution isn't an entity. It can't guide or manipulate or assign anything to anyone anywhere.

You are so fucking retarded. Every one of your posts is a nonstop train of idiocy. Please stop.

[Shamalam]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are halfway reasonable reasons to believe in a deity/deities. Checksums in DNA sounds like you're really stretching. It's like you want to believe but you don't want to sound like a moron, so you come up with something that sounds halfway scientific. In the end, you come out sounding like a moron anyway. Do you really think that the process of evolution wouldn't discover similar algorithms to ones we use, when we are both attempting to do similar tasks in a universe with the same physics/mathematical properties? The regulatory processes of the immune system often exhibit similar properties to regulatory systems in various manufacturing processes. Does that indicate to you that our immune system must have had a designer? Or is it just the case that when solving similar problems, a trial and error approach (evolution) can come up with similar solutions to what we humans design?

And the fact that humans can't yet understand fully our DNA does not make for a good argument for a designer. Or are we back to believing in Zeus because we don't understand electrical charge in the atmosphere and how that leads to lightning/thunder?

Logic has no place within this thread, good sir.