#152
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Lambthroat
Level 30 Troll Shammy | |||
|
#153
|
|||
|
Hahahah. That's so bad! Looks like a really buffed out Patrick Stewart. Old model gnomes look bad. But still way better than that.
| ||
|
#154
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#155
|
|||
|
Apparently someone needs to make a ST:NG video using the Luclin gnome models. Get on it! I'd watch it!
| ||
|
#157
|
|||
|
both gnome graphics look a bit mentally challenged. derbe derrrrrb
| ||
|
#158
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Bhear Ghrillz - Level 51 Druid - Dial A Port | Oggre - Level 44 Warrior | Revenance Vampirus - Level 40 Necromancer | Mottley Crue - Level 30 Rogue | Renovatio - Level 3 Cleric | Abradolf Lincler - Level 40 Cleric | Drowning - Level 35 Enchanter | Oradan Omnipotent - Level 57 Magician | Chubbz Zilla - Level 40 Monk - Scaled Brotherhood
| ||||
|
#159
|
|||
|
I personally love the old classic models.
| ||
|
#160
|
|||
|
So is this actually a thing? Will Luclin models actually be blocked? How would you even enforce that? Considering we must go around the 'patcher' as it is, and do it ourselves. Banning for luclin models? Laughable honestly.
Your 60 epic monk got banned? MQ or what bro? Nah, i had my luclin lizards turned on so it didnt look like i was playing a pokemon named Polygon. If the devs even got behind the idea of enforcing classic models, i would also expect them to crack down on UI's, spell gem icons, textures, shadows, any improved graphics options, all dedicated graphics cards(or at least ones made in the last 10 years), internet connections above 50kbps, and the ability to tab to wiki for a map without crashing. Thats what classic is, not some character models that only I see ffs. | ||
|
|
|