#91
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#92
|
|||
|
I am not sure how hard it would be to code, but a rested experience bonus for the old folks with limited playtime would be quite nice.
(and let people melees bind wound up to 100%) | ||
|
#93
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Example, pumice isn't instant cast. Meditate doesn't force you to sit in the book. Recharging isn't working anymore. I mean the list goes on, to isolate yourself in the "classic" argument only ends up in no one playing, with some good changes, people will eventually crawl back. The changes suggested will not make the game "ezmode" it will merely make it a little less hostile for new players. Everquest is ONLY hard, when you're in an underdog guild, remember that.
__________________
Quote:
Wipe it clean. | ||||
|
#94
|
|||
|
Smedy, you're wasting your breath with the trolls. I made a two page post about everything that's not classic, many of them imbalanced things which I HAVE posted in the bug forum as well. I don't see nihilum complaining about their class specific fear armor which shouldn't be in and their mistwalkers which are past due on progression for a nerf, or their cleric masks that shouldn't be in game, or the mage swords they exploited to 50, or fire giant charm which works 1000x better than it ever worked on live. Whatever, CLASSIC TILL 30 PEOPLE LEFT ON SERVER NOTHING WRONG HERE FOLKS SERVER WORKING FINE.
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
#96
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#97
|
||||
|
Quote:
And you ran the biggest zerg of the servers first two months, Imaginary Friends, and still could not level past 40 right? In that time, I was in a far smaller guild and played a weaker race/class combo then you and I did just fine. Maybe classic EQ is just not for you. Please help vile develop the next VZ/TZ. Have fun there. | |||
|
#98
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#99
|
||||
|
Quote:
See, your excuse is that you don't see how you could bind rush with no mana so you should be able to bind in the zone. When the real issue you're trying to avoid is that you don't have a reason for being there after you died. Give me ONE legitimate reason for being bound and staying in a zone you died in because to me... You're still causing problems and not conceding the zone to the active battle or victors! Now, its about wasting peoples time, and that my friend is where you'll get the bad rep. The whole point is: What's your purpose of being in the zone? None! You died! You shouldn't be in the zone. You have no legitimate reason. Wait until the victors have established zone control and allow you to LnS or wait for a rez and keep raiding if your team wins. Otherwise, guess what happens - you'll eventually bind rush, train, and buff or support your allies in battle after you've already been defeated. That's the reason why you shouldn't be allowed to bind in raid zones. I'd like to stress again, because it doesn't seem the norm here, that the LnS rule was player community enforced with GM support for a reason. It actually worked to promote competitive PvP on VZ! | |||
Last edited by STRAY; 04-20-2012 at 08:10 PM..
|
|
#100
|
||||
|
Rydar, what you posted probably does apply to the total malcontents who actually are too lazy and will only play on 100x exp servers. I still think you're being ignorant and are very much vocal minority on this particular issue though.
Let's talk about "classic". How many people were usually in the most common zones during classic? How easy was it to get groups? Was it feasible to actually *stop leveling to PvP* and pick one zone with 80+ players in it to set up shop in? (answer: it was) Now.... how much of the above exists here? None of it. You can keep throwing around the word "classic", but what you're actually defending is a really poor not-classic experience. I summed this up here: Quote:
The casual RED player starting up on this server is who you need to be considering. Not your hardcore raid gamer who has ten alts and just wants MOAR CONTENT to meatgrind through. | |||
|
|
|