Now that we have confirmed the competitive mechanics on p99 can be cheated...

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by hotkarlmarxbros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What makes you think there was some secret discussion between Riot and GMs and the GMs didn't just decide to do this after the influx of complaints that finally tipped the scales with Stunningly having tutorials on how to exploit the p99 engages?

Because there's a Riot officer that is a GM now... Somebody noticed him twitch streaming and he accidentally logged into his GM client on stream instead of his player account.

[Naethyn]

And there we have it. We have unlocked the final ree. Accusing the admins of favoritism. Natural evolution I suppose. We’ve all been there.

[starkind]

Riots r bad guys. Stop glorifying the murder of innocent children. And the burning of their futures and parents livelihood.

[eladrimar]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because there's a Riot officer that is a GM now... Somebody noticed him twitch streaming and he accidentally logged into his GM client on stream instead of his player account.

Fraps?

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because there's a Riot officer that is a GM now... Somebody noticed him twitch streaming and he accidentally logged into his GM client on stream instead of his player account.

how do you come in here and say that without at the very least, naming names or otherwise prove it?

I believe it, but you're gonna have to do alot better if you want results.

otherwise you wasted your breathe.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Got it. Riot idiots have their own language that looks like English, but has a whole other meaning that only Riot idiots understand.

Lol can’t accept that other rational people could realize what a shitty guild he is in and what a shitty person he is. Nah they must just be a riot neckbeard!

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

how do you come in here and say that without at the very least, naming names or otherwise prove it?

I believe it, but you're gonna have to do alot better if you want results.

otherwise you wasted your breathe.

Because he’d have to name a staff member and will then get banned (because he’d be lying and making it up about said staff member)

[nyclin]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because there's a Riot officer that is a GM now... Somebody noticed him twitch streaming and he accidentally logged into his GM client on stream instead of his player account.

got a link for this?

[SantagarBrax]

Originally Posted by hotkarlmarxbros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So anything short of submitting video evidence of the individuals themselves actively cheating means that no cheating is occurring? Despite the fact that the engagements have been proven to be exploitable? And that nobody actively looking to benefit from said cheating would ever submit proof of themselves cheating unless they were doing it to show the engagement is exploitable so it gets fixed?

I mean, I get it. You're being deliberately obtuse to continue running the distraction in an attempt to get the engagements to remain as-is so that your team who has been actively cheating the engagements can continue being able to do so. I'm more putting this out there for the other people reading to understand how hypocritical you are being when you are saying you don't want /random to kill competition when the alternative is just as anti-competitive, only strictly benefitting any team that cheats. And that the bar for it to be proved that anybody is cheating is to submit a video of yourself doing it, otherwise anything goes.

So let's move the discussion phase onto a better path forward that renders the ability to script moot. I envision making the FTE's more difficult, not less. Add in elements that require great sophistication and a little more panache. The problem with this scenario will be more petitions for mistakes, thus countering Staff's seeming goal of "as much hands off as possible". I could be wrong about this assumption.

Feedback from staff would be critical moving forward, which would provide us with a base of operations to freely brainstorm within.

[SantagarBrax]

"greater sophistication" *edit