#51
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
E.G. Quote:
You sir, clearly NEVER played Classic to any extent... Your arguements are null and void.. Again we get it, you want to playa pure melee/hybrid.... and make casters null and void when you achieve "your" 50-60 in resists, so you can "easily" resist spells 1/5 of the time. While all along focusing on getting over that 100 mark so you can strut around as a walking juggernaut... We get it... Coincidently this is nothing towards favortism to casters, its quite the opposite as I will not be maining a caster when Red99 comes out. (will be using one to farm thats for sure!)
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||||
Last edited by Kringe; 10-14-2011 at 06:04 PM..
|
|
#52
|
|||
|
I am not sure what all the bitcheness is about in this discussion. Kringe thanks for your point of view. Your reasoning looks pretty solid and logical. I didnt play classic EQ pvp. To all the haters, one suggestion if your going to attack someones post it's best you actually have counter point and not just some waaah about whether the person is well known or not.
Its interesting how some people are so terribly concerned about their character sucking at the end game. As you said Kringe the majority of the server is not going to be end game geared for at least 4 months provided nothing gets changed concerning xp rate. I rather play a class that is better sooner then one that shines at the very very end because quit frankly we dont know whats going to happen in 4 months in terms of population. Even then if your so concerned about being resisted I would suggest that person plan on becoming friends with a class or classes that can debuff that resist for them. | ||
Last edited by tbox; 10-14-2011 at 06:06 PM..
|
|
#53
|
||||
|
Quote:
My complaint is 99% of your forum posts pertain to the video game like a nerd. | |||
Last edited by God-King Abacab; 10-14-2011 at 06:47 PM..
|
|
#54
|
|||
|
The complaints are in response to decisions for the server based off the input of people who don't know what they're talking about. Or even worse, the ignorant majority listening to said people and cannonizing it as fact.
| ||
|
#55
|
||||
|
Quote:
You started off by failing miserably at an appeal to authority, proceeded to make a series of completely unqualified statements and nonsensical logical leaps before finally resorting hair-splitting semantics to revise all the silly things you said before turning into a blubbering, angry mess at the end there. | |||
|
#56
|
|||
|
Man, posting about eq pvp in the pvp forum. What a dick head. You're right.
| ||
|
#57
|
|||
|
pre kunark i ran around with 100ish fire and 120ish cold resist and while nukes did less damage it was not some huge amount, might shave on average 60 - 80 damage off of a 400 damage spell. 150+ was when resists started to be real noticeable and even then you would take near full a lot and when a partial kicked in you would still usually take 60 - 70 percent of the damage you would have otherwise taken, the gap between 100 and 150 was noticeable but not huge.
most nukes with a secondary component such as a debuff or stun resisted much more, my wind series was essentially worthless as soon as people started getting resist gear/buffs | ||
Last edited by Darwoth; 10-14-2011 at 08:34 PM..
|
|
#58
|
|||
|
My recollection is in line with Darwoth's... even @ 170 CR I seriously doubt you were sitting there taking Ice Comets to the face until a wizard was oom with nary a care in the world. In fairness I don't recall having ever had 170 CR back then, but how many did?
| ||
|
#60
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
|