#1
|
|||
|
are warriors really worth playing?
I really see no advantage to playing the warrior class other than an exp bonus over sk and paladin.
The 6 hp per stamina vs 5.2 seems trivial. AC seems to be more important than HP, because healing spells are for a set amount and not % based. Also, SK has lifetap line and Paladins have heals and LOH, among other things. I guess what I am trying to get at is the warrior class doesnt seem to be more tanky than an sk or Pal. Warriors dont do more damage either. So whats the point of playing one? I'm a newb to the game but these are my thoughts so far. | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Evasive and Defensive
http://wiki.project1999.com/Sakuragi...de#Disciplines Quote:
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
| |||
|
#3
|
|||
|
warriors do more damage than sk and pally. they have higher offense and defense ratings (for now)
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
lol. are paladins worth playing?
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Warriors tank better and do more damage.
SK/Pal have better snap aggro. SK/Paladins are better for raid trash or groups because of their easymode aggro. Warriors are better for tanking raid bosses. | ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
| |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Paladins are the shit
| ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
If you plan on being THE raid tank or among a collection of potential raid tanks in a guild, be a warrior. Just want to tank and level to 60, paladin/shadow knight is just great.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|