Quote:
Originally Posted by Baler
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
heh it all depends on the language.. so I said != which means not equal.. I know of one language that ~= means not equal too.
So when I used != it just meant Does Not Equal.
C#, C, C++: !=
Lua is the language I know uses: ~=
/shrug
---
It's funny because == and = are totally different also. @_@
---
So in regards to EQ,..
Enchanter pet code is 100% NOT the same as Mage pet code which is 100% NOT the same as shaman pet code.
That clear enough for you?
Thus making statements that resist gear affects mage pets 100% certainly based on enchanter code is NOT true, Unless proven.
And frankly I think we both have better things to do than gather statistics on resist based attacks/spells onto magician pets.
SOOOO to cover all bases,. buff ur mage pets with resist if you think they'll be getting hit with spells resistable by said resists.
.
|
Sorry I didn't have altcode for
≈ (apprx.=) available
Edit: Shaman pet code is certainly different from mages, because it was nerfed ages ago to be different (no more root sword dogdog)
Enc charm pet and mage pets, as far as buff effects and gear are concerned, are ≈.