#101
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#102
|
||||
|
Quote:
There were three things that were even up for negotiation. Loot system, guild name, and guild leadership. You guys wouldn't budge on the first two. We just wanted you to meet us halfway on something. If our leaders were unacceptable. Why couldn't we compromise on a guild name? | |||
|
#103
|
||||
|
So why did Sloan leave FE?
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
| |||
|
#105
|
|||
|
Sloan moved halfway across the country for a job and as such has been online for about 15 mins total since the beginning of February or so.
__________________
Corova Moloko, Crusader and Guild Leader of The Mystical Order
| ||
|
#106
|
|||
|
sloan was on all day yesterday.
| ||
|
#107
|
|||
|
How can anyone talk shit after merging with dolj?
| ||
|
#108
|
||||
|
Quote:
Couple clarifications for the delusional... FE did consider going on our own. Structural leadership was never a problem, raid leadership was once Sloan left (He moved across the country and took a full-time job, Splorf). Actually, Getsome was willing to compromise on co-leader during our last negotiation, but by that time I had little interest in merging with IB, so I made the last clause of changing the name a non-negotiable deal breaker and I walked from the deal, not the other way around. Getsome and I get along fine, we just don't see eye to eye on certain issues like guild mergers or training juggs over water. I think an example of poor leadership would have been to accept any deal without knowing what all your options are. I would have been remiss to have not sought TMO as an option. You ask why I'm not co-leader, or any other FE officer for that matter in TMO - I didn't ask. I didn't think it was necessary. In fact, TMO didn't make any terms. I told them exactly what I wanted for our members and they agreed with no amendments. Originally, I thought that our members would be happiest with IB, however there was a lot more discontent than I thought when that merger was on the horizon. TMO had an overwhelming amount of support over IB, which guided our decision. Yes, it is about pixels because that's why most of our members play. Pixels don't really interest me personally. I didn't train my own guild to make them think it was TMO, derp. I trained TMO and FE happened to be down there as well. All in all, I died either way and we still got the VS - I'd call it a win/win. Also, Goodies down-leveled in the ordeal which was early restitution for her later stealing a Hand of the Maestro from FE and refusing to return it. Apparently, she did the exact same thing when she was leader of Acryd. IB - be wary letting her hold onto no-drops, she has a reputation as a repeat offender at this point. | |||
|
#109
|
|||
|
The terms offered to FE by IB never changed. They were posted in writing to their guild, what you see in http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=145720 were my words and never changed.
I put forth the best terms IB was willing to offer. I viewed the leadership of FE as dysfunctional at times and the feedback from all the ex FE who were in IB supported this sentiment. You call my unwillingness to negotiate a lack of respect, I feel I was looking out for the best interests of everyone involved. Unbrella has been involved in the RMT side of P99 for quite some time and I felt making him a co leader of any entity I was involved in would be a bad decision. If the folks from TMO want a to keep a clean whistle you may want to look more closely at who you just made an officer in your guild. | ||
|
#110
|
|||
|
obv Tmo does not care about their whistle look at the ban wave a couple times ago. LULZ
IB kept their integrity FE never had any Tmo still wipes with 70 people to 32k hp mobs | ||
|
|
|