|
View Poll Results: Are you happy with an 8 level pvp range | |||
Yes | 75 | 41.44% | |
No (Post your suggested level difference) | 106 | 58.56% | |
Voters: 181. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
PvP Range
Are you guys happy with the 8 level PvP Range? Considering a 6 or 5 level difference instead. 8 Levels is a lot when people are in the lower levels.
__________________
| ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
8+/- is fine
e/ <3 | ||
Last edited by Combobreaker; 10-11-2011 at 11:10 PM..
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
Depends if there will be EXP loss. If no loss, then leave it in. If lost, then the range should be narrowed a bit. I think 5 or 6 sounds right.
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Edited: +/- 4 or 5 please. 8 is too large and the dynamic seems like more of a pain to implement than it is worth.
| ||
Last edited by Shwingler; 10-11-2011 at 10:49 PM..
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
The current level range is good, any level range can be successful.
The level range modifier should be taken out. | ||
Last edited by Naikon; 10-11-2011 at 10:49 PM..
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
Item loot is not happening, nor is this the place to discuss it.
__________________
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
I'm in favor of +4/-4 with high contest zones being labeled as FFA
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Level range is fine - just do away with the dynamic PvP system. It creates a whole mess of problems and is a ton of work for you guys.
| ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
maybe make it 4 levels until 35 or something, then bump it up.
dynamic pvp deal doesnt make sense. i attack someone 4 levels above me now i can get axe murdered by someone 12 levels above me then when i protect myself i get murdered by someone 20 levels above me??? just make raid zones no pvp range. problem solved. [hate,fear,sky,sol b, permafrost, kedge] possibly give like a 20% boost to xp for the 'added difficulty' aka ur ass getting griefed trying to slay polar bears. | ||
Last edited by pojab; 10-11-2011 at 10:57 PM..
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
dont really care about sub 30, after that it should be 8 or no limit.
| ||
|
|
|