#71
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#72
|
|||
|
Naikon known pal and hero, legendary point guard @ the JCC in flordia, should take his advice
| ||
|
#73
|
|||
|
personally do not like boxing myself but agree that it's better for the health of the sever to allow it
| ||
|
#74
|
|||
|
Would 1 box be so bad? I boxed my warrior on TZ 51-60 in the hole with a shaman.
It makes the annoying buff classes available for raids that no one wants to play - how many shaman hate their lives buffing 40 man raids by themselves etc. I like the idea of having buff classes as boxes - they're gay as shit to main, which usually results in a lack of them and a bunch of the fun classes standing around with their dicks in their hands. | ||
|
#75
|
|||
|
If you're going to have such a stern stance on 2 boxing, you shouldn't issue out ip exceptions for any reason.
| ||
|
#76
|
|||
|
Why not have like a certain population rule - under 200 you get 1 box etc.
If we're at a high population it won't be an issue - but if it drops low it keeps things moving, and allows people stuff to do within a low population server. People doing things and having fun = attract more people. | ||
|
#77
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#78
|
|||
|
| ||
|
#79
|
|||
|
I'm indifferent about 2 boxing. Would prefer it on though. Because it enables people without large networks of friends to play at off peak hours etc... with the classes they like. With the double edge sword of making sure powergamers have port bots and everything they could ever need without playing with anyone else.
It would be more acceptable if they could fix the /q issues with boxing. Otherwise I totally respect Nilbogs stance on never allowing it. | ||
|
#80
|
|||
|
Amazed this made 10 pages.
| ||
|
|
|