Resists, Null's custom versus Classic.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by CrystalBlue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have not logged on since they nerfed your Ice Comet to do 66% pvp damage from the previous 80 percent.

Considering I was, nice troll [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.], it rustled my jimmies a little.

2001 change that was a smart addition:

- Resist-debuffs will do 1.5 times their normal value for PvP
encounters. In other words, if the spell did -60MR in PvP before, it
does -90MR in PvP now. PvE (combat versus NPCs) remains unaffected.

But I wouldn't put it in here until other things are fixed.

[Vayder]

Originally Posted by CrystalBlue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dont trust any of that spell data on Lucy in regards to what was "classic" spell resists.

I don't think you understand what I'm making the case for. I'm saying I believe the best solution is to use current Lucy data for all classic spells.

[CrystalBlue]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's 70 without me even looking, go dig through patch notes. I'm done with that for a while until my existing stuff's bumped off the pile.

like I said, 50 percent, not 70.

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Considering I was, nice troll [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.], it rustled my jimmies a little.

2001 change that was a smart addition:

But I wouldn't put it in here until other things are fixed.

CrystalBlue is a classic pvp Enchantress.

[Nirgon]

But I did log in after the spells nerfs, for quite some time.

It wasn't until rule flipping to screw us by a certain other ruinous element was removed.

[lethdar]

Originally Posted by Vayder [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I still can't fathom that classic resists worked the way you folks have described. Not saying they didn't cause I wasn't playing pvp then but using the explanation and Lucy data the following would be true:

Immune to Ice Comet at 117cr
Immune to Lava Bolt at 107fr
Immune to Venom of the Snake at 96pr
Immune to Anarchy at 71mr

Was that classic? If not, then your appeal to Lucy is wrong.

Unsure of where people started citing lucy for resist % rate, but just looking at this anyone who played classic knows this is hillariously wrong. 107/117 did not ever make you immune to non stun linked nukes. Unless you were a bard rolling around with resist songs you would rarely ever full resist a nuke (unless it was an enchanter/cleric nuke above level 20, furor and chaotic feedback (as well as shock of lightning with its knockback) seemed to be included in the normal resist nuke resist code).

just a quick FYI, not reading whole thread need to go out and hit up the bars pals.

And to morons who believe enchanters are bad in pvp if they can't land nukes... I'm too busy to type out an adequate insult to capture your extreme stupidity.

[SearyxTZ]

FREE NIRGON

[heartbrand]

Why was nirgon banned? Not seeing the post?

[Amuk]

Cant imagine why people arnt playing here, I have only been raging about this since beta - here we are in kunark and its still custom bullshit.

Fuck the blueb zerg shitty fake low pop wanna be pvp server - you can keep it, and fuck loz also.

[bamzal]

so when does this classic pvp server come out? red99 not classic

[Tecmos Deception]

Originally Posted by gloinz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

plus old way meant u could reliably face 6 people and get away, new way means you had better not let them get the chance to cast a root on u

You're supposed to be able to reliably escape a 6v1?

No wonder so many people think EQ PvP is retarded.