Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Does a controlled detonation or not change reality? You're like HBB caroling Israeli foreign policy.
|
Huh? Where in this thread at all did I blame "Teh Guvernment"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulgiamatti
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm not interested in those questions, it's just such a waste of time. Two airliner jets careened into the buildings, and they collapsed. Building 7 collapsed from damage. It didn't look like a controlled demolition to me.
This is where everyone posts a bunch of conspiracy videos and articles explaining why the buildings couldn't have collapsed on their own - I'm just not interested in it anymore. The United States government is not going to murder 3,000 civilians or conspiratorially demolish buildings.
If you want to indict the government for crimes against humanity or the violation of civil liberty, look at Henry Kissinger's record or the NSA wiretapping. Look at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay and the practice of waterboarding. For fuck's sake indict them on things they're actually doing and abandon this wasteful scrutiny of the fallen twin towers and building 7.
|
Actually I'm more concerned with the possibility of the people behind the construction of the towers lying about the materials/quality control. I'm not sure where the government conspiracy tangent came from though.
I honestly want to know how steel that takes ~2750 degrees F would lose structural integrity in temperatures barely half of that 1517 degrees F is the boiling point of jet fuel in atmospheric conditions.
As for tower 7, while you're entitled to your opinion, I'm still going to give more weight to the plethora of engineers who have a different one.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]