TMO raid suspension secretly lifted

[Jimes]

Originally Posted by Banditfist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How do you know it wasn't increased? Fuckstick!

This game of "what if" is pretty retarded. The GM's made a public announcement on this stuff. IB confirmed ninja looted CT. 2 week suspension was handed out. 1 week was taken off, and you peasants on the forums were pretty much silent about it.

[Hitchens]

Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, but I bet it would have happened in either case. /shrug

I agree.

[Craigmandu]

From Amelinda's post here it would seem there is some sort of non disclosure rule about stuff the GMs follow.

Since the punishment was documented as such, regardless of the last paragraph about "non-disclosure of account information policy" that post should have been replied to or edited and the reduction of 2 days explained in the same fashion as the original reduction of 1 week was explained.

[Banditfist]

Originally Posted by Jimes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This game of "what if" is pretty retarded. The GM's made a public announcement on this stuff. IB confirmed ninja looted CT. 2 week suspension was handed out. 1 week was taken off, and you peasants on the forums were pretty much silent about it.

You missed the secret GM decision to shorten TMOs suspension. How do you know Amelinda didnt lengthen IB's?

Mem blurr, TMO.

[Flunklesnarkin]

I think public humiliation / punishment thread with a list of offenses and punishments would make half this drama go away.


Less bickering over who got punished for what etc etc.


and anybody saying there is some sort of non-disclosure policy as a reason they can't... I call shenanigans on that.

[Jimes]

Originally Posted by Banditfist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You missed the secret GM decision to shorten TMOs suspension. How do you know Amelinda didnt lengthen IB's?

Mem blurr, TMO.

That wasn't exactly secret either.

[Thana8088]

I am sure Amelinda is doing the best that she can, and it must be incredibly frustrating to deal with the "oh-we-are-so-entitled" p99 community.

Could the lifting of TMO's raid suspension been handled differently? Sure.

Should it have been? Maybe.

Does it really matter now? Not so much.

People will work together towards a better community or they won't. If we do, perhaps the original spirit of p99 will return someday.

[Writ3r]

She is too busy banning people like PureLo who point out her mistakes and contradictions that hold her accountable for her own actions rather than taking the time to legitimately go through your petitions and handle them with intent to fix. Seems she would also much rather hide her little pinky promises with the intent to be stealthy but rather as we all know should be made public knowledge so they don't erupt into stuff like this causing further dissension. I mean after all wasn't it her own words saying she wanted there to be a "clean slate" where both/all guilds could work together better?

Good job botching that ideal.

[Silentone]

Just curious what difference would it have made if she posted it or we raided a target and revealed it?

[Writ3r]

If she posted it... there doesn't look like there is any favoritism going on for one.

Second, people who are going to engage targets and see TMO roll up actually would have to be prepared to be leapfrogged or trained instead of not...considering they thought they were suspended.

Besides as is shown without the knowledge of knowing think of how many petitions could have been avoided on top of the amount they already complain about getting had it been made public... it is quite obvious people would rather trust a professional public statement by someone who is suppose to be in charge rather than players who have provided problems in the past for others.