Quote:
Originally Posted by Bockscar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What's with this ridiculous "I disagree with you, therefore you didn't play EQ in the old days!" pathetic excuse for an argument? That's probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard. I played from 99 (some months after the game launched) to 02 and then from late 03 to 04. So because you don't personally know me and/or I didn't play on your server, I... didn't play at all? Can anybody in this entire community participate in a discussion without vomiting retardation like a complete imbecile? Unholy fucker of mothers, there's no hope for these people if they ever have to rely on intellect for anything in their lives.
|
Because you change your mind in every other fucking thread you participate in, is why people dont listen to anything you say...
E.G.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bockscar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
anyway you don't need an effective 100 in a resist in order to resist spells pretty regularly. 50 or 60 will make you resist a plain spell easily a fifth of the time. Considering a warrior can get 170 unbuffed MR pre-Kunark, you're the one who's full of shit when you claim that these spells were virtually unresistable at the time.
|
Please Reread what you wrote about 1-2 pages back, then read your own quote here... Then take a huge deep breath..... Now reply with a straight face how utterly unintelligent you are...
You sir, clearly NEVER played Classic to any extent...
Your arguements are null and void..
Again we get it, you want to playa pure melee/hybrid.... and make casters null and void when you achieve "your" 50-60 in resists, so you can "easily" resist spells 1/5 of the time. While all along focusing on getting over that 100 mark so you can strut around as a walking juggernaut... We get it...
Coincidently this is nothing towards favortism to casters, its quite the opposite as I will not be maining a caster when Red99 comes out. (will be using one to farm thats for sure!)