Roses are Red, Violets are Blue

[quido]

thx 4 shaere

[Reguiy]

So the options are:
A) Call myself casual/carebear/bluebie/<some effeminate name>
or
B) Play shitty eq pvp

Hmm, tough one....

[h0tr0d (shaere)]

Originally Posted by Reguiy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So the options are:
A) Call myself casual/carebear/bluebie/<some effeminate name>
or
B) Play shitty eq pvp

Hmm, tough one....

You would have the chance to beat other players and crush the competition, with consequences!


And I didn't know you were Tasslehoff, Jeremy. Perhaps we should duel in KC.

[Reguiy]

Originally Posted by h0tr0d (shaere) [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You would have the chance to beat other players and crush the competition, with consequences!


And I didn't know you were Tasslehoff, Jeremy. Perhaps we should duel in KC.

When you have level headed responses to my extremely sarcastic posts, it makes me feel like I just wasted my precious time typing it up.

[h0tr0d (shaere)]

Originally Posted by Reguiy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When you have level headed responses to my extremely sarcastic posts, it makes me feel like I just wasted my precious time typing it up.

Apologies! I don't think red is bad, just full scale PvP is not for me. I tried Rallos Zek and couldn't play there, killed upon entering the game and then corpse camped for the first 2 days trying to make new characters, just entirely too much of that or griefing. The deity-based pvp on Sullon Zek I enjoyed thoroughly.

Personally I would like a red server to be completely open to whatever players wanted to do in game, be it training or what have you with corpse camping being the exception. Then if people think they're hardcore by beating players on a blue server who can't fight back, let them go there.

[Tecmos Deception]

Originally Posted by whitebandit [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty real argument here..

He basically said that calling myself hardcore is totally arbitrary, and then went on to say that I should not be able to call myself hardcore because HE is hardcore.

That's not a good argument.

[radditsu]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Brandon_Vedas

[Mezzmur]

Originally Posted by oldschooltrader [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

thanks 4 Shaere

Because I miss that.

[h0tr0d (shaere)]

Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He basically said that calling myself hardcore is totally arbitrary, and then went on to say that I should not be able to call myself hardcore because HE is hardcore.

That's not a good argument.

Not calling myself hardcore due to the fact I once played a little pvp, rather it would speak to the fact I wasn't as hardcore (as you allude to how I defined it) because I didn't cut it on RZ.

My point was actually that if someone thinks they're so badass in relation to other players because they beat them at this or that, then play on a server where you actually fight them.

[SirAlvarex]

I used to find it annoying when the Red players crapped on blue players for "not being hardcore enough".

But now that the non-T1 guilds keep calling everyone else not hardcore enough for their game, I'm coo wit it.

If you want to call yourself hardcore when there's a *harder* mode out there, then I'm not sure you can call yourself hardcore anymore. Maybe Mediumcore? SemiCore? Timesinkers?