#21
|
||||
|
I watched all 30 seconds of the video! Twice! Not sure how good your german is, but u simply dont get what hes saying. Like I sad before: respect is what he asks for.
Quote:
| |||
|
#22
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| |||
|
#23
|
||||
|
Quote:
1) Gain back Christian territory 2) Defend Christians 3) Purify Christian lands A lot of: "Oh no! Christians are under attack!" medieval arguments were used to justify war. Then the knights would come in and take over large swaths of land to "protect Christians." These days -- the argument goes -- Western Democracy ideals have replaced Christian theology. But the same general practice is taking place in the Muslim and Eastern Orthodox world. Edit: an important thing is understand is that religions used to be in charge of matters of state or shared power with military leaders (kings). So religion used to be the primary cohesion. Rather than Nationalism or Democratic Idealism. | |||
Last edited by JurisDictum; 04-28-2017 at 05:13 PM..
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
Quote:
But even so, you say "Christian" when that is not correct. These were European Catholics, which in fact don't nor ever did represent the whole of Christianity. In fact more Christians have probably been killed by Catholicism than any other peoples. In fact, the crusades were led by a Viking nation formed in the north of france. Though now embraced Catholicism, but still doing as Vikings do ... since Catholicism had always merged beliefs to a degree. You think you have history down, but that's just too much MTV for ya. And even since then, Islam has never had a reformation, never an enlightening or any such movement, it just can't. It's not even a real religion at it's core, but purely an ideology. In Catholocism, it came from simply reading the bible again, because they had abandoned it for stuff they just made up. The bible, the NT specifically for the Church, never teaches conquest by the sword, in fact teaches against it. Islam does. So allah axbur mofo!
__________________
| |||
|
#25
|
||||
|
Quote:
Most people would consider Catholics "Christians" Daywolf. This is especially true before Martin Luther nailed a sheet of paper with 95 theses on the university's chapel door in October 31, 1517 (the first crusades started by like 1200 A.D.). But I guess you were probably brought up to believe only Protestants are Christians. | |||
Last edited by JurisDictum; 04-28-2017 at 08:37 PM..
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#27
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#28
|
|||
|
Hah! Pokes jumping onto someone else's losing battle now. WTG!
Juri, do you know anything about any religions, anything at all for real? Christianity? Islam? Buddhism? Judaism? Hinduism? Something other than just globalist one world propaganda? Personally it's been fascinated me all my life, well apart from globalism :P Even before the first crusade, Catholicism was it's own thing, a denomination, while other denominations were in existence. The primary other denomination at the time was in the East out of the Byzantine empire. These were all established hundreds of years before the crusades of the pope hat. There has never been a centralized ruling church since the first century where there were many independent Churches of the day. It's just easiest to use the RCC to blanket attack everyone to make some deluded point and promote a brand of cultural Marxism or whatever. Yet while ignoring actual history. Did you know that before the pope hats first crusades led by Vikings, that Muslims, Christians and Jews lived together in relative peace in the East? But not a utopian peace, that's for sure, no place where Islam had full control. Islam started their Crusade 100's of years before the West stuck back, around 700 A.D. Here is a vid that will show the progression that you'd never ever see on MTV in 1 million years https://youtu.be/c7y2LRcf4kc Yeah, just look at that battle map, and clearly shows you have no idea what you're talking about, other than shame on the West shame shame shame, as you've been told and accepted. And Islam never went through a reformation. All of the Church denominations did in some respects, even the RCC (though that's going south now as it joins with your globalism which loves Islam). But only some of Islam ... which each time they all eventually get slaughtered because that is what their ideological book instructs them to do. While Christianity teaches: As Jesus said "My kingdom is not of this world", Islam is instructed to put the entire world under submission - which is what their book is named, Submission. It's a political ideology, as it teaches, while the religion part is only second seat. So you can never have a reformation with your Islamic ideology, only be in submission to it. This seems why the Left and Islam get together so well, for now anyway. They are both ideologies. And they will use each other at least while it is expedient, and then comes the head choppings.
__________________
| ||
|
#29
|
|||
|
This is what the map looked like in 1200 AD:
http://www.euratlas.net/history/europe/1200/index.html Shit changes. That's how the world was back then. Warlords would invade territory because of religious reasons (Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu whatever) or because they could. Muslims often invaded areas to "protect Muslims" in the same manner as Christians. Muslim bigshots were rich from shipping trade around the Indian Ocean -- they used the money to build Mosques and promote Islam (to promote more trade). Then when Islam converts were inevitably attacked in some city by the pagans (less often Christians), the bigshot sends in his army to "protect Muslims" and take a city. Muslims and Christians are very similar is all I'm saying. They did the same kind of stuff. Your big point is Muslims did it first...whatever. That was in 700 fucking AD wasn't it? Now a days. Christians and Muslims continue to be very similar IMO. They just can't see it. | ||
Last edited by JurisDictum; 04-29-2017 at 09:22 AM..
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|