Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: If pvp exp was increased, by what %?
5 2 0.73%
10 1 0.37%
15 7 2.56%
20 36 13.19%
25 21 7.69%
30 8 2.93%
35 3 1.10%
40 5 1.83%
45 0 0%
50 38 13.92%
55 0 0%
60 0 0%
65 0 0%
70 0 0%
75 4 1.47%
80 0 0%
85 0 0%
90 0 0%
95 0 0%
100 77 28.21%
0. I am happy with the current experience rate. 71 26.01%
Voters: 273. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-2012, 02:52 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,460
Default If pvp exp was increased, what % and why?

If the experience rate of the pvp server was increased, by what % should it be increased, and why?

This is a poll designed to gauge opinion.
  #2  
Old 02-12-2012, 02:52 PM
Truth Truth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: h00t
Posts: 842
Send a message via ICQ to Truth Send a message via AIM to Truth Send a message via MSN to Truth Send a message via Yahoo to Truth
Default

20% was what SZ had, as only server lost xp on pvpdeath (even cons not greenie griefing) (like here)
  #3  
Old 02-12-2012, 02:53 PM
Ssleeve Ssleeve is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
20% was what SZ had
Sounds fair, it really is a bit more difficult to level due to the disruption of pvp and the pvp exp loss (which isn't a big deal imo)
  #4  
Old 02-12-2012, 02:56 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
20% was what SZ had
Agreed, if there's any increase to the exp rate it should be no more than 20%. No other Live pvp servers around the era had increased experience as far as I know. 20% is enough to offset the increased risk of pvp while not trivializing the difficulty of the game. I'm okay with keeping exp as it is though.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #5  
Old 02-12-2012, 02:58 PM
Rykk Rykk is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 87
Default

10-20% I don't wanna level too fast but it will help with soloing especially if you're a melee that can't port or find groups (+ people might actually make rangers)
  #6  
Old 02-12-2012, 02:59 PM
Amelinda Amelinda is offline
VIP / Contributor

Amelinda's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Plane of Fear
Posts: 3,672
Send a message via AIM to Amelinda Send a message via Yahoo to Amelinda
Default

i think searyx had a really good idea as far as increasing xp for players level 25 and below then spreading that xp required among the higher levels. so you could get to level 25 faster and retain players better. i think a slight xp bump would help also.
  #7  
Old 02-12-2012, 03:00 PM
nabsev nabsev is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 165
Default

As someone who plays more than a casual but way less than a poopsocker I vote 50%
  #8  
Old 02-12-2012, 03:01 PM
snaz snaz is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amelinda [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i think searyx had a really good idea as far as increasing xp for players level 25 and below then spreading that xp required among the higher levels. so you could get to level 25 faster and retain players better. i think a slight xp bump would help also.
This makes a lot of sense. I voted 0 on the poll, but the idea quoted by Amelinda has my support.
  #9  
Old 02-12-2012, 03:02 PM
Amuk Amuk is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 821
Default

I think people need to accept that red99 won't have 600+ for awhile at least, making low/mid lvl pvp rather shitty. Getting ppl through levels quicker and into the fight would be better - as well as countering the exp loss from pvp death/time loss. I'd probably say around 30 - SZ had teams/more population.
  #10  
Old 02-12-2012, 03:20 PM
Supreme Supreme is offline
Planar Protector

Supreme's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rivervale,Texas
Posts: 1,077
Default

Nilbog there is nothing wrong with the server.

What you have is a bunch of whining ungratefuls that think because things are not the way THEY want it that it should be changed.

You give us a FREE EQ emu and the overwhelming majority enjoy what you have done.

Please do not let the few "dictate" the server direction to the many.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.