#41
|
|||
|
I distinctly remember shaman dots not stacking until later in the game. Not only this, but the patch notes from Sept 4, 2002 pretty clearly state that only one instance of a certain spell could afflict a target at a time up until that patch. This includes inferior level spells.
Your spell did not take hold | ||
|
#42
|
|||
|
My mommy told me that dots did not stack in 1999 (This is about as valid as most posts in here)
| ||
|
#43
|
|||
|
people saying the inferior shaman dots did not stack with the higher lvl version never played a shaman in classic
http://ralloszek.stephans.org/rz/pla...yer_name=Jotok Lets see when you other non believing shamans played "classic". Put up or shut up. | ||
|
#44
|
|||||||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(2) You provide no patch for when "wore off" messages were added, only when it was patched and fixed because it was broke at some point (3) Whether or not the "wore off" messages were in doesn't negate my findings. It only makes it more obvious people wouldn't miss it if it was in. (4) All you've done is put up a bunch of irrelevant or ultimately non-decisive patches followed by your original patch quote which you misinterpret. In other words. Next. "Inferior and superior DoTs." The Devs never mention a "line" of spells anyway. They do mention heat blood and boil blood. So what makes a line? Let me ask you some questions if you're so smart pal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Do these spells stack?
Quote:
Lastly, the issue isn't if Blart could tell exactly how much each tic was doing, but if he could discern the difference between 1 DoT versus 2 DoTs. Obviously he would notice a difference of 1 DoT versus 2 DoTs actively on someone. To say otherwise is (1) stupidity or (2) bias. Sure he doesn't get DoT dmg messages, we haven't seen when "wore off" messages were put in exactly so maybe he didn't get a "wore off" message, but he could see the difference between Plague versus Plague + Scourge. His guide archived over various ears remains unchanged in regards to him claiming DoTs stacked. No one reported it to him, but MORE importantly in his years and years of PvP he continued to stack DoTs. In years of PvP he isn't going to notice 1 DoT versus 2 DoTs on a toon and he is one of the best Shamans at the time? *throws a handful of straws at DarthPeon* keep grasping, brah. You're arguing pointless minutia and missing the major issue here. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Your logic makes no fucking sense. The most common sense read is he tagged with scourge, VoS, ebreath, rooted, then waited for VoS to wear off to cast again, and kept it rooted til it died. Pretty simple. Matches what he says. Recap of this Legit Source If he wasn't trying to stack ebreath and VoS (1)He either (a)let it beat on him between VoS (1) and Ebreath for 42 seconds, or (b)ran (even though he says to root so you don't lose dmg) or (c)put in 2 specific root steps, but decided to leave that one out AND (2)He says to wait 42 seconds from Ebreath to VoS(2), but not from VoS(1) to Ebreath??? No. Sense. Quote:
Quote:
Real Summary
Conclusion (thus far) It's still my wave of ever vindicated various sources with clear statements of DoTs stacking versus one vague patch message that does not clearly address shaman DoTs stacking. If you have no real new evidence to add, I think the verdict is clear: all shaman DoTs stacked in classic. | ||||||||||||
Last edited by Castle; 11-17-2011 at 12:51 PM..
|
|
#45
|
|||
|
FFS. This is project 1999, not project 2001. The classic dot system is pretty well documented as only allowing 1 dot per line to be cast on any one mob.
This was considered a flaw and was subsequently fixed I can see why people would be upset with its current state, because that's exactly why it was patched in. | ||
|
#46
|
||||
|
Quote:
It wasn't patched in. It said that for necros (and druid sources confirm for druids) they could only cast 1 dot from each line. 2002 just affirmed this and sources say necros/druids couldn't stack like shamans. They changed it so you could stack 2 of the exact same DoT from 2 different classes in 2002. BTW though the posts say 2001 they all say Jan of 2001 because that's when CR reformated DB and the dates got reset, all the other info stayed. This means every post at the latest was Jan 28 2001. Bam. | |||
|
#47
|
||||
|
Quote:
Scourge - 170 Mana (21 Ticks) VoS - 160 Mana (7 Ticks) Envenomed Breath - 100 Mana (7 Ticks) Root - 30 Mana VoS - 160 Mana (7 Ticks) | |||
|
#48
|
|||
|
shrug maybe i was wrong in my last post...lol it has been over 10 years....easy to forget. Anyways I just found this on Shaman's Crucibile (the best site for shaman info). This is straight from a Mod there too (his response is in bold):
Ravenwing wrote: Quote: You are correct that DoTs from the same line don't stack, but this didn't apply to shaman DoTs in EQClassic. I played a shaman in classic and you can ask any other shaman who played: all of our DoTs stacked except you can't double up on the exact same DoT. That was one of the things that made them so amazing was the fact that all their DoTs stacked. That was apparently changed later at some point for "balance." I remember stacking Ebolt with VoS AND Envenomed Breath. Apparently you can't do that these days. Probably got tossed in with the 2002 patch that allowed the same DoT from different classes to stack, and they did this to balance things out. It seems to fit into that update since they changed how stuff stacks and had just made DoTs much more powerful, especially in raid situations. I think you have it reversed. As of the dot stacking patch, multiple dots from the same line still didn't stack: Quote: 2002/09/04: After today the same DoT spell cast by different casters can affect the same target at the same time. Also, if you cast a DoT spell on a target and you already have that spell active on it, the spell will refresh. (Note: It will not be possible to stack Lifeburn). This does not allow for inferior spells to stack along with superior spells. (Example: Two Necromancers can both land Boil Blood on the same target. However, Heat Blood, being an inferior spell, will still not stack.) Currently on live, you *can* stack multiple dots of the same type, including the shaman/necro poison line. Originally, it wasn't possible. The ability to stack Bane with EB wasn't nerfed; it was added in post-classic. I played from a shaman 1999-2001 and could stack my all low level and high level poison/disease dots. FYI Source: http://www.eqclassic.org/forums/view...t=312&start=25 MORE RESEARCH BELOW: Quote: Currently on live, you *can* stack multiple dots of the same type, including the shaman/necro poison line. Originally, it wasn't possible. The ability to stack Bane with EB wasn't nerfed; it was added in post-classic. Actually, the opposite is true. Originally shamans could stack all of the following DoTs on one mob: Sicken, Affliction, Scourge, Plague, Pox of Bertoxxulous, Tainted Breath, Envenomed Breath, Venom of the Snake, Envenomed Bolt, and Bane of Nife. Source: http://lucy.allakhazam.com/stacking.htm ... ource=Live Spell: Envenomed Breath (shaman - 24) Does not currently stack with... Tainted Breath - Shaman - 9 Venom of the Snake - Shaman 39 Evenombed Bolt - Shaman 49 Bane of Nife - Shaman 56 Spell: Pox of Bertoxxulous Does not currently stack with... Sicken - Shaman - 5 Affliction - Shaman - 19 Scourge- Shaman - 34 Plague - Shaman 49 It was nerfed somewhere along the line after Velious. I think the facts I have given in my previous post and my interpretation of where the nerf came from is the most probable story. They allowed the same DoT to be stacked by any number of characters, and they had focus effects of burning/extended affliction, so they made Shamans like other classes with "lines" of spells and only one spell "per line" stacks. | ||
Last edited by skorge; 11-17-2011 at 03:34 PM..
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
And the evidence continues to pour in for Shamans... Are you haters still hanging on to one vaguely written patch note that doesn't even mention Shaman?
| ||
|
#50
|
|||||
|
I think I forgot one
http://web.archive.org/web/200107240...ll.asp?Id=1141 Speaking on Scourge - 34 dis Quote:
http://web.archive.org/web/200107240...ll.asp?Id=1141 Quote:
| ||||
Last edited by Castle; 11-17-2011 at 03:59 PM..
|
|
|
|