PvP Range

[Djanis]

I think 5-6 range is a good compromise.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by God-King Abacab [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm in favor of +4/-4 with high contest zones being labeled as FFA

There way no formal 8 lvl or unlimited range ffa pvp server for a reason. 4 levels makes sense.

[Softcore PK]

VZ and TZ were both 8 levels, and with four teams and rampant crossteaming it was pretty much FFA.

[Kraz]

The problem is not range... Its fucking resists, its like fucking wow. if they are 1 level above you, you cant land spells thats not classic, thats not even eq its wow....

[Drytan]

Range of +/-4 levels, just like the original RZ.

I ask that a new poll be created, one with specific level range choices (4,6, and 8 should suffice).

[MrSparkle001]

+/-4 like RZ gets my vote, since I'm assuming this server won't have a Sullon Zek ruleset?

Has anyone addressed the issue of deleveling? RZ for a long time had a problem with high levels deleveling to make themselves practically gods. I distinctly remember a trio of deleveled trolls - Moe, Larry, and Curly - who'd terrorize Nektulos.

[Tamiah2011]

needs to be 4 lvl difference.

[lethdar]

The only problem is pre 30 really, everything else is fine.

[Morninx]

Straight +/-6 is enough. more fair fights. Dynamic pvp, though a good idea looks to be more headaches then necessary and leaves ability for people to find ways to exploit it. Also players should only con 3 colors. Green/Red if OOR of pvp depending on which end of the spectrum and anyone in range of PvP should con White.. no blues or yellows.

[Clownface]

Just make sure that high level zones have no level range to prevent OOR healing/Ressing/shit-talking spys that sit next to your raid immune to death.