Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-05-2011, 05:47 PM
Ravhin Ravhin is offline
Sarnak

Ravhin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 307
Default

Trucidation should be 5.9 sec cast time during the era it does 1100 damage.

http://web.archive.org/web/200106111...ell.asp?Id=518

If it is really only 3.2 then it should be bug reported.
__________________
Ravhin - 56 Gnome Necro (Project 1999, Retired) <Divinity>
Contributor: Project 1999 Wiki
Ravhin incedo'Marduk - 60 Human Paladin (Live on E'ci, 1999-2001) <Destinati Conquerers>
  #42  
Old 09-05-2011, 05:53 PM
OngorDrakan OngorDrakan is offline
Sarnak

OngorDrakan's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 336
Thumbs up

Fuckin' A Bob. You got it right!
__________________
Drunke

OUT OF THE WAY PECK!

Quote:
12:53 <Littlegyno> nilberg
12:53 <Littlegyno> i was
12:53 <Littlegyno> gonna have pix
  #43  
Old 09-05-2011, 06:07 PM
YendorLootmonkey YendorLootmonkey is offline
Planar Protector

YendorLootmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Surefall Glade
Posts: 2,198
Default

I refuse to believe that in "a perfect world", I would have to be in a guild of anti-social, training douchebags and endorse griefing others to get a chance at any raid target.

Such a server would end up being two guilds that train the shit out of each other, because the other guilds that didn't want to stoop to that level stopped bothering with the server, and those players that remained got recruited by the remaining two guilds to increase their mob train offense/defense.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:

"You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles
  #44  
Old 09-05-2011, 06:20 PM
Gwence Gwence is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 561
Default ..

Sorry this isn't a new idea, IB tried to get this idea accepted over a year ago. GM's weren't having it then, doubt they'll consider it now.

Way to be thinking though!
  #45  
Old 09-05-2011, 06:21 PM
Motec Motec is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 684
Default

Raid scene is fine. Fuck off.
  #46  
Old 09-05-2011, 07:11 PM
Phallax Phallax is offline
Fire Giant

Phallax's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sorry this isn't a new idea, IB tried to get this idea accepted over a year ago. GM's weren't having it then, doubt they'll consider it now.

Way to be thinking though!
With the way the sever is taking a shit lately they may.

And to all you reds claiming PvP its not gonna happen so just gtfo...seriously.
__________________
Phallax [55 Luminary]
Phallax [51 Mystic]
Jeebs [40 Ranger]
  #47  
Old 09-05-2011, 07:14 PM
Foxx Foxx is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobby [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Bob...my perfect would is: You, Me, 500mil plat, a private isle, and a private airline to ship out goods people buy over the forums.


I miss thee!


Inventory: xxxxxxxxx Plat, 192 Gold, 54 Silver, 0 Copper
[Mon Mar 28 01:46:39 2011] You say, '#summon irbob'
[Mon Mar 28 01:46:40 2011] Summoning irbob to ecommons 741.7, -1356.0, 2.5
[Mon Mar 28 01:47:19 2011] Meccus says, 'GM ?''
[Mon Mar 28 01:47:34 2011] You say, 'NO....'
[Mon Mar 28 01:47:37 2011] You say, '#name Bob'
[Mon Mar 28 01:47:38 2011] Successfully renamed Irbob to Bob
[Mon Mar 28 01:47:38 2011] Sending player to char select.
[1 Monk] Bob (Iksar) <The Syndicate> ZONE: ecommons


Thus created Bob the Iksar, summoned to ec, and renamed.


<3 forever documented!

GM favoritism ruining this server, which is why so many people hacking on this box... ppl like hobby ruin the box and make unfair rules so their friends can do what they want
  #48  
Old 09-05-2011, 07:18 PM
Arrisard Arrisard is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 303
Default

Everquest is, without a doubt, a community driven game. If you take a look at the actual PNP from this era, 95% of it was addressed to cursing, various PC chat rules, impersonating people, 3rd party programs, etc. Very little was actually dedicated to things like KSing and ninja-looting. Infact, that's about covers the rest of it in a nutshell - don't ninja-loot or KS and that all GM decisions are final.

This had 2 primary effects. It actually kept the power in the players' court, where it should be, and gave the GMs a bit of a wide lane in which to arbitrate disputes (This is where a lot of "what exactly constitutes GM involvement in a classic sense" comes from).

Infact, the latter contributed to the fact that one wanted GM intervention because of it's fairly whimsical nature. GM controlled raid calendars might have happened, but they were without a doubt a very small minority across most of the servers. Calling it a "classic experience" for most would be a large stretch. Most of the time, solutions were found in either "work it out or you're going to /ran 100 for the mob". If it was after the fact, simple FTE normally ruled the day. There wasn't any huge investigation beyond that most times because FRAPs wasn't considered evidence, and GMs only watched raids if they REALLY had nothing else to do or had been previously called.

That's, imo, what made it work. It was simple for the GMs to enforce and the players got to decide if they wanted to work it out or act like children and make their own lives miserable. And not a lot of people wanted GM intervention unless they genuinely thought they had been a legit KSing beef.

I firmly believe that competition is just as important as cooperation in this game. Keeping as much of both those intact is of vital importance and a balance must be struck. GM controlled raid calendars and complete FFA are extreme solutions that are not in the best interest of the server. Instancing is so far removed from being "classic" I have absolutely no worries about it ever being implemented here, I'm not even going to get into it (read even just one or two of the "why you left Live threads", LDoN and instancing are pretty popular reasons in those threads).

Because, that's ultimately what community based game is about. Player control, competition, cooperation, with as little GM enforcement as possible to ensure some basic rules are enforced in the most simple way possible.

If the community wants to act like children or waste their lives spawn camping, then that's up to them. Or they can grow up or work something out. But it shouldn't be the GM's responsibility to dictate how the community interacts with each other beyond some very, very simple anti-griefing rules because well - it's the easiest, most effective, and most classic solution.
  #49  
Old 09-05-2011, 07:30 PM
jimthayner jimthayner is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Well, this could go either way. But removing all GM intervention would be like getting rid of all the cops in town, thinking that "well, with people killing each other and stealing shit, they'll eventually just realize how stupid it is to murder each other/steal from each other and they'll all agree to stop."

One of the best inventions to MMOs was instanced raid zones for each raid group.

Bring on the flame posts.
  #50  
Old 09-05-2011, 07:33 PM
Daldaen Daldaen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 9,062
Default

If you're concerned about DPS groups ksing, then enable the raid tool. Let guilds form a raid have their DPS work as a single entity. If two guilds get to the mob at the same time whichever raid does more DPS wins the loot. Don't retort with bs of "no more cleric or tanks recruited". Because that is simply untrue guilds still have uncontested raids very often when they need those mobs.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.