Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Are you in favor of the proposed resist system changes
Yes 13 46.43%
No 15 53.57%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2012, 05:35 PM
Vayder Vayder is offline
Sarnak

Vayder's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 306
Default Proposed Resist System Changes - Lucy

Proposed Resist System Changes:
  • Use current Lucy data for pvpresistbase, pvpresistmax, and pvpresistcalc to determine pvp resists for all classic spells
  • Add +50% debuff bonus to all resist debuffs

With our powers combined we can be the hope and change this server needs!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #2  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:21 PM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

You would think a melee would have to sacrifice some dps in order to become immune to cc. Not with these changes.
  #3  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:24 PM
Zereh Zereh is offline
Fire Giant

Zereh's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Erudin
Posts: 713
Default

Lucy does not contain "original" spell data.

Root: 2002-03-07 11:32 Initial Entry
__________________
❤ Z A R A H ❤
  #4  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:25 PM
Vayder Vayder is offline
Sarnak

Vayder's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamwiseBanned [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You would think a melee would have to sacrifice some dps in order to become immune to cc. Not with these changes.
Only immune to root assuming no debuffs. Changes make debuffs matter. Changes make FR/CR/PR/DR matter.

Also melee are going to need some serious gear to avoid other forms of CC like Largarn's Lamentation which requires 197mr to be immune and assuming the Enchanter tashes you first you'll be needing 257mr.
__________________
  #5  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:27 PM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

You can't argue facts with Nirgon because how he remembers EQ is the way it was despite being shown classic pvp posts from 2000-2001 that say otherwise
  #6  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:27 PM
Vayder Vayder is offline
Sarnak

Vayder's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zereh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lucy does not contain "original" spell data.

Root: 2002-03-07 11:32 Initial Entry
Agreed, but neither does the current system.
__________________
  #7  
Old 09-11-2012, 06:33 PM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

I guess Nirgons not classic argument doesn't apply when it's in his interest.
  #8  
Old 09-11-2012, 07:14 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

What exactly do those 3 numbers mean?
  #9  
Old 09-11-2012, 07:17 PM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

who said anything about his wizard?
  #10  
Old 09-11-2012, 07:41 PM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

how the hell is this possible? a warrior tashed was not rooted with 125 mr on this server. clearly HB is exploiting because Destin gets first casted at 171 MR consistantly.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.