Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:26 PM
Gwence Gwence is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 561
Default

they didn't initially
  #22  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:28 PM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,381
Default

Here's something to talk about.. I have also heard that CS would not involve themselves in any matters whatsoever within veeshan's peak on eqlive back in the day. I think even nilbog confirmed this. That would make for some interesting situations in VP if the guilds were to start training / kill stealing eachother. I'm not against that if that's how the players want it to be.

Disclaimer: This will not be the case unless/until I officially state it is. Discuss it though, I'm interested to hear your opinions.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #23  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:32 PM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's something to talk about.. I have also heard that CS would not involve themselves in any matters whatsoever within veeshan's peak on eqlive back in the day. I think even nilbog confirmed this. That would make for some interesting situations in VP if the guilds were to start training / kill stealing eachother. I'm not against that if that's how the players want it to be.

Disclaimer: This will not be the case unless/until I officially state it is. Discuss it though, I'm interested to hear your opinions.
100 percent feel VP should have the "corpse rot" potential and CS should not involved themselves in it. Its one of the things that gamers across the globe reference as the ultimate in "hard core".

p99 needs this

edit: it may be the final thing that gets the squabbling guilds to settle down and make deals among themselves, if VP is turned into a CS-less deathtrap
  #24  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:33 PM
Kawai Kawai is offline
Orc


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 35
Default

thank you for the update. i got a few questions :

if each dragon being rolled by the potential 2 (as you said) guilds showing with a (maybe) 24h timer to kill what's gonna happen in the case that follow :

# guild A got SW and Xygoz and nexona, guild B the others 3 . Guild A wipe on sw (can happen) and the way vp is , you have to kill Silverwings to go further in. SO does it mean guildB need to wait guild A to kill SW or wipe 24h on it to be able to attemps others dwagons ? and so have vp fte because one guild can't kill the dragon #1 in the kill order ?

# nother concern: first VP clear is done, how do we handle repop ? ffa ?

Kawi
ps: this is personnal question , am not representing my guild here
  #25  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:34 PM
Dr4z3r Dr4z3r is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 565
Default

No raid rules in VP?

I have to say, I think the total lack of ambiguity would really be helpful.
  #26  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:36 PM
Gwence Gwence is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 561
Default

well I dont speak for anyone but myself really, but I think logging everything and fraps'ing and reporting everything is about as fucking gay as you can possibly get in a game.

I'm all about adapting to the situation and fighting fire with fire! There's quite a bit of strategy involved in raid setup when you going into it expecting some craziness to go down.
  #27  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:36 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's something to talk about.. I have also heard that CS would not involve themselves in any matters whatsoever within veeshan's peak on eqlive back in the day. I think even nilbog confirmed this. That would make for some interesting situations in VP if the guilds were to start training / kill stealing eachother. I'm not against that if that's how the players want it to be.

Disclaimer: This will not be the case unless/until I officially state it is. Discuss it though, I'm interested to hear your opinions.
do it
  #28  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:38 PM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

once more, get off to the right foot and dispense with the whole /random for VP targets on the first night,etc.

Let the guilds zerg into VP willy nilly first night..let them wipe and they leap frog over each other and let them spend the rest of the night doing nightmare CRs and begging the last few keyed people and alts to drag/rez them from the other guild.
  #29  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:39 PM
Slathar Slathar is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,651
Default

Make it FFA. I'll buy a VP keyed character for 200k solely to train anyone who tries raiding there. Since it would be a no rules zone.
  #30  
Old 10-21-2011, 03:43 PM
Jomar Jomar is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Discuss it though, I'm interested to hear your opinions.
I say if you go with a full-on hands off approach, you need to unflag VP keys as soul bound as well, as part of the support staff's original intent with that approach was to make the zone as difficult as possible (I'm assuming VP keys are soul bound here).

The entertainment that you, nilbog, and the other developers could get out of this would be a small reward for all of the hard work you guys have put in on this server.
__________________
[60 Druid] Jomar (Halfling) <The Black Hand>
[60 Wizard] Astizen (Erudite) <The Black Hand>
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.