Titanium DL

[Haynar]

I have 3 copies of Titanium.

neener neener

[nectarprime]

Originally Posted by Haynar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have 3 copies of Titanium.

neener neener

Actually we all have infinite copies.

[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by fastboy21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure what you mean. If it's victimless then there is no theft. There has to be some damages, or it isn't anything.

I never said it's theft, just that it's a crime according to the stipulations of copyright law. Copyright law is agnostic about whether intellectual property is still available through retail, meaning if it came to a lawsuit that wouldn't be a discriminating factor. Simplicity would apply: was copyrighted material acquired or redistributed illegally? If yes, a crime was committed.

I don't agree with that law, and I also suggest others ignore it because there are no real repercussions for breaking it. I'm merely suggesting that we probably don't want to turn the forums into a hotbed for torrenting the client, but apparently the owners of P99 are less concerned about that than I am.

[nyclin]

Originally Posted by Haynar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have 3 copies of Titanium.

neener neener

i've got an iso file and a cd burner

checkmate

[Swish]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never said it's theft, just that it's a crime according to the stipulations of copyright law. Copyright law is agnostic about whether intellectual property is still available through retail, meaning if it came to a lawsuit that wouldn't be a discriminating factor. Simplicity would apply: was copyrighted material acquired or redistributed illegally? If yes, a crime was committed.

I don't agree with that law, and I also suggest others ignore it because there are no real repercussions for breaking it. I'm merely suggesting that we probably don't want to turn the forums into a hotbed for torrenting the client, but apparently the owners of P99 are less concerned about that than I am.

How do you legally prove 1000s of people here have an illegal copy? Case by case?

[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How do you legally prove 1000s of people here have an illegal copy? Case by case?

Daybreak wouldn't need to prove that if they wanted to shut down P99.

[NegaStoat]

Originally Posted by Thulack [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you bought EQ at any time you have the right to get digital copies of your purchase. So torrenting EQ if you have bought it in the past is not illegal.

The thread should have died here, as the above is correct. You don't have to be in possession of your CD case or CD's (broken or not). A bank statement showing that you paid for a subscription during the time Titanium was being sold is sufficient. Also, my placing my legally protected digital copy in a manner that allows others to torrent it is not breaking the law - the responsibility falls squarely on those seeking to obtain their own legal digital copies of a previous purchase.

[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by NegaStoat [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

my placing my legally protected digital copy in a manner that allows others to torrent it is not breaking the law

Yes it is, that's the definition of unauthorized redistribution. Granted, you'll never actually be prosecuted for uploading & seeding torrents unless you're running a large-scale operation and costing some hawkish corporation a large amount of money, but even if you have a legally purchased copy of Titanium (or anything, for that matter), and you go and download a torrent of it, that would still constitute copyright infringement because when you torrent something you are by definition also sharing it. If you own a bunch of movies and you decide to go download them off the bay without hiding your IP address, sooner or later your ISP is going to get a C&D letter from a big movie company because while you were downloading those movies you were also redistributing them without authorization.

[fastboy21]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never said it's theft, just that it's a crime according to the stipulations of copyright law. Copyright law is agnostic about whether intellectual property is still available through retail, meaning if it came to a lawsuit that wouldn't be a discriminating factor. Simplicity would apply: was copyrighted material acquired or redistributed illegally? If yes, a crime was committed.

I don't agree with that law, and I also suggest others ignore it because there are no real repercussions for breaking it. I'm merely suggesting that we probably don't want to turn the forums into a hotbed for torrenting the client, but apparently the owners of P99 are less concerned about that than I am.

Then it isn't victimless. You can't have it both ways in copyright law: either there is a victim or there is no crime. Wrapping pseudo-legal jargon around it doesn't change the essence of the issue at point.

Again, no clue what you mean when you say both of those things together. You seem to be arguing clearly on a particular side of the issue.

In any case, of more interest, why the sudden interest in illuminated the law on a server you've been playing on for years now...

[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by fastboy21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Then it isn't victimless.

That's correct, but when I said it's a victimless crime I was being more aphoristic than literal. It's victimless in the sense that there is no direct immediate harm being done to the owner of that intellectual property, but one could argue that there is an indirect effect on the overall security of that company's copyright power.

Originally Posted by fastboy21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can't have it both ways in copyright law: either there is a victim or there is no crime.

Says who? That's like saying it's only illegal if you don't get caught. If you illegally possess and vape weed in your basement and there are literally zero victims, it's still illegal. Copyright law is no different - there is no absolute requirement for someone to be victimized in order for a crime to be committed.

Originally Posted by fastboy21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wrapping pseudo-legal jargon around it doesn't change the essence of the issue at point.

What are you talking about? Pseudo-legal jargon? You've completely lost me here.

Originally Posted by fastboy21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again, no clue what you mean when you say both of those things together. You seem to be arguing clearly on a particular side of the issue.

"Victimless crime" is pretty self-explanatory - it's a crime in which there are no victims. Crime does not require victimization. You seem to be conflating "crime" with "wrongdoing" - crime is contingent upon a man-made, flawed legal system. In some instances there are crimes you'd have to be a monster not to commit. Copyright laws only exist to protect the interests of companies and their intellectual property, not to prevent wrongdoing or victimization.

Originally Posted by fastboy21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In any case, of more interest, why the sudden interest in illuminated the law on a server you've been playing on for years now...

You've answered your own question - for illumination and clarity's sake. It's not sudden, I've been clarifying this point about piracy for awhile. I realize now that there's probably some kind of contractual arrangement between Daybreak and P99, but a contract is just a band-aid to prevent the bleed-out of liability that normally exists otherwise. Time erodes that band-aid's adhesiveness and eventually it falls off, so there's still value in understanding the technicalities of the laws themselves even when there's a contract in place.