Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-27-2016, 10:34 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,176
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tairne Bloodhoof
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #32  
Old 12-27-2016, 11:41 PM
Goobles Goobles is offline
Planar Protector

Goobles's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: A shoe
Posts: 1,518
Default

im going to roll alli on the new server <3
__________________

it's like you make the atomic bomb (server) and you don't want to let other countries (guilds) have nuclear secrets (under the radar information). it's gm's business and no one else's or else everyone gets nuked. letting Iran or North Korea beta test and keep the successful nukes, makes other countries uncomfortable.
  #33  
Old 12-28-2016, 12:01 AM
katrik katrik is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ATL
Posts: 542
Default

Having a blast! Holla @ Tikiri on PVE alli.
  #34  
Old 12-28-2016, 01:36 PM
Squabbles123 Squabbles123 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by notColgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
having extensively played several vanilla WoW emus over the past several years i can safely say what i thought was a good game was simply nostalgia

vanilla WoW is actually very bad in many regards

old school alterac valley is really the only decent thing, however it varies from server to server and most of the time the metagame is just to just avoid pvp altogether and race to kill the other team's boss

TBC had the good parts of vanilla WoW except it wasn't completely horribly designed in most ways

unfortunately, there has never been and probably never will be a decent TBC emu server
Vanilla WoW is a good game, better than the current game IMO. Its biggest issue was the lack of viable talent specs at end-game, those were pretty bad, putting all the hybrids into healing, giving DPS 1 maybe 2 good specs, making EVERY Warrior tank, etc.

Classic EQ is vastly better balanced at launch.
Last edited by Squabbles123; 12-28-2016 at 01:38 PM..
  #35  
Old 12-28-2016, 02:04 PM
katrik katrik is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ATL
Posts: 542
Default

Actually love the dnd approach to talents. 'Sort of' viable, but not the best and shouldn't be. Also, warriors are some of the best dps if geared and played properly. Same with ferals & pally tanks.
  #36  
Old 12-28-2016, 04:51 PM
Squabbles123 Squabbles123 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by katrik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually love the dnd approach to talents. 'Sort of' viable, but not the best and shouldn't be. Also, warriors are some of the best dps if geared and played properly. Same with ferals & pally tanks.
Depends on where you are at end-game.

MC-BWL = Warriors could really only tank, Fury/Arms dps was well below the primary DPS classes and having off-tanks was more important.

Post AQ-40 into Naxx, yes, Fury warriors could finally do good damage.

Same is true with Ferals and Pally tanks. Early on? No way. Post AQ-40? Sure whatever.
  #37  
Old 12-28-2016, 06:29 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squabbles123 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Depends on where you are at end-game.

MC-BWL = Warriors could really only tank, Fury/Arms dps was well below the primary DPS classes and having off-tanks was more important.

Post AQ-40 into Naxx, yes, Fury warriors could finally do good damage.

Same is true with Ferals and Pally tanks. Early on? No way. Post AQ-40? Sure whatever.
I was tanking MC with a feral druid on the last Nostalrius server with little problem. Hail my brothers in Massivus Backhandeth still on p99.

The non-vanilla™ issue with druids on these emulators is that the talents are not actually the way the game played originally. Druids, for example, had a bottom balance talent of hurricane. Innervate wasn't a spell, but the bottom talent for resto. Feral was trash. There are lots of changes because of the 1.12 content which make it easier.
  #38  
Old 12-28-2016, 07:19 PM
katrik katrik is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ATL
Posts: 542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squabbles123 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Depends on where you are at end-game.

MC-BWL = Warriors could really only tank, Fury/Arms dps was well below the primary DPS classes and having off-tanks was more important.

Post AQ-40 into Naxx, yes, Fury warriors could finally do good damage.

Same is true with Ferals and Pally tanks. Early on? No way. Post AQ-40? Sure whatever.
No way. Fury wars can do amazing dps now. It just needs to be itemized and played well. But yes, pallys/bears are mostly fine for 5 mans.
  #39  
Old 12-28-2016, 07:47 PM
pasi pasi is offline
Planar Protector

pasi's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,077
Default

Fury warriors and rogues are the top damage class on raids at the current stage as well. Emulated servers have yet to properly address glancing blows, but the gap between fury/rogue and anyone else is gigantic. Even with proper glancing blows, the gap would still be large.

Warriors scale better than any class and people try hard enough so that the top guilds have all r14 weapons. I don't know of any guild that does BWL without starting with onyxia and ZG buff. This is in addition to fill consumables.

As nilbog mentioned, these servers all have 1.12 talents. The biggest change from live is warriors having a strong protection tree. Shield slam wasn't added until BWL and it didn't get an aggro modifier until a patch after that. Thus, specs like DPS warriors sucked on live due to threat capping until protection revamp. Hunters who ignored threat were much better.

I'm standard bliz fashion, the first guilds to tackle content faced a far more difficult and/or "bugged" version of it. They did include original onyxia in nostalrius, but that was the extent of it.

Lastly, there was a massive change to the 5 second rule that was patched in after MC was cleared. When MC launched, you went into the 5 second rule when you started a cast as opposed to finishing one. Very large change for healers.

Overall, the game would still be a breeze if you took emulator level players and put them in an appropriate server, but yeah, it was a little harder
__________________
  #40  
Old 02-23-2017, 02:53 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

some real good nerd drama recently on elysium

i'm pretty shocked to find out the staff of a free server was making rl dollars from it
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.