Log in

View Full Version : Righteous protestor assaulted for using word Jew at Rubio townhall


Big_Japan
01-21-2016, 09:45 PM
Marco Rubio owned by Jews, Jews and freemasons! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SX7NOGL-BA)

https://i.imgur.com/l23wAv8.png

Look how fast the illusion of civility disappears when you say the magic word. TRUMP's security and/or crowd would be crucified by media if they karate chopped a shrieking baboon in the shoulders like that when he was not threatening any kind of violence to anyone.

Funny thing is, Rubio literally uttered the words "Edward Snowden is a traitor" at the last debate. That he serves as a prostitute for greater men is beyond question, even if you think "Jews and freemasons" is a bit of scapegoating. There is no insult, heckle, or indeed physical injury that is beyond what this traitorous piece of filth deserves.

Check out the schnoz on the guy doing the shoulder slapping. He looks like young James Lipton.

https://i.imgur.com/pXfnJUV.png

Tonight on Inside the Actors Studio, top actor Marco Rubio discusses the exceptional method acting talents required to betray his country and his conscience live on national television while limiting the quavering in his voice that comes from choking out the agonizing words of submission to a bare minimum.

Pokesan
01-21-2016, 09:56 PM
paging @AzzartheGod - educate me here, is there a legal basis for law enforcement punishing free speech like this?

voted 5

KagatobLuvsAnimu
01-22-2016, 12:00 AM
Public disruption is one of those lines... He was removed from the premises its not like he was arrested.

Big_Japan
01-22-2016, 12:20 AM
actually he was violently forced back into his chair by a jackbooted judaic thug. THEN removed from premises.

Pokesan
01-22-2016, 12:46 AM
Public disruption is one of those lines... He was removed from the premises its not like he was arrested.

what part of the constitution forbids me from calling marco rubio a jew-lover?

Big_Japan
01-22-2016, 12:50 AM
what part of the constitution forbids me from calling marco rubio a jew-lover?

marco JEWbio

Pokesan
01-22-2016, 01:00 AM
removal from the premises is still a free speech violation

do you support free speech zones?

Lune
01-22-2016, 01:20 AM
ITT:

http://i.imgur.com/dXFVDtM.jpg

Pokesan
01-22-2016, 01:23 AM
ITT:

Lune makes bad posts

KagatobLuvsAnimu
01-22-2016, 04:12 AM
actually he was violently forced back into his chair by a jackbooted judaic thug. THEN removed from premises.
I'm not contesting this.
what part of the constitution forbids me from calling marco rubio a jew-lover?
It wasn't that person's platform in which to speak, it wasn't a Q and A, he wasn't called on, he disrupted someone else's rally and unlike...
http://2static4.fjcdn.com/comments/When+he+said+that+the+hillary+security+breach+was+ sexist+_0724e5f0e7ada047a9aa1ec135aee5ce.jpg For some reason images aren't showing up in my posts.
Rubio's fans/security defended that platform.
removal from the premises is still a free speech violation
No it is not.

am0n
01-22-2016, 07:51 AM
For some reason images aren't showing up in my posts.


Reading is hard, I know.

http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=225633

Kyff
01-22-2016, 08:44 AM
[...]Rubio literally uttered the words "Edward Snowden is a traitor" at the last debate. That he serves as a prostitute for greater men is beyond question, even if you think "Jews and freemasons" is a bit of scapegoating. There is no insult, heckle, or indeed physical injury that is beyond what this traitorous piece of filth deserves.
[...]

I can't always follow you.

Do you mean to say that a hypothetical Wehrmacht soldier who defected in 1939 to alert the world that the holocaust is happening would have been a "traitorous piece of filth" who deserves every insult, heckle or physical injury?

Big_Japan
01-22-2016, 09:08 AM
I can't always follow you.

Do you mean to say that a hypothetical Wehrmacht soldier who defected in 1939 to alert the world that the holocaust is happening would have been a "traitorous piece of filth" who deserves every insult, heckle or physical injury?

analogy doesn't hold up so well. NSA mass surveillance activity as it exists now runs contrary to the American people's interests, whereas the holocaust was at least to the benefit of the country under whose flag the act was committed.

Jarnauga
01-22-2016, 09:31 AM
blacks
muslims
women
gays
mexicans
jews
asians
lizard people

http://11410-presscdn-0-32.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/tumblr_me0lljUNnx1rqs8ry_zps1eefa797.gif

Kyff
01-22-2016, 09:46 AM
analogy doesn't hold up so well. NSA mass surveillance activity as it exists now runs contrary to the American people's interests, whereas the holocaust was at least to the benefit of the country under whose flag the act was committed.

One could argue that quite contrary NSA mass surveillance ist not only contrary to the interests of the Amrican people but also breaks several American Laws whereas the Holocaust was in line with the legal system of the place it happened in.

Also I most seriously doubt that Germany benefitted from the holocaust. Apart from the moral standpoint and the inhumanity of the system it required machines and men to run which would have been more useful at the frontlines.

With the extreme comparison I simply wanted to point out that a whistleblower alerting to a grave mistake most likely is a more honorable person than the lawbreakers who feel betrayed by the discovery. The American people should be mad at the scumbags spying on them, not at the person bold enough to leave that filth behind.

maskedmelon
01-25-2016, 01:21 PM
I can't always follow you.

Do you mean to say that a hypothetical Wehrmacht soldier who defected in 1939 to alert the world that the holocaust is happening would have been a "traitorous piece of filth" who deserves every insult, heckle or physical injury?

analogy doesn't hold up so well. NSA mass surveillance activity as it exists now runs contrary to the American people's interests, whereas the holocaust was at least to the benefit of the country under whose flag the act was committed.



One could argue that quite contrary NSA mass surveillance ist not only contrary to the interests of the Amrican people but also breaks several American Laws whereas the Holocaust was in line with the legal system of the place it happened in.

Also I most seriously doubt that Germany benefitted from the holocaust. Apart from the moral standpoint and the inhumanity of the system it required machines and men to run which would have been more useful at the frontlines.

With the extreme comparison I simply wanted to point out that a whistleblower alerting to a grave mistake most likely is a more honorable person than the lawbreakers who feel betrayed by the discovery. The American people should be mad at the scumbags spying on them, not at the person bold enough to leave that filth behind.



In honor of ushering unto this otherwise delightful thread, an untimely end at the tender age of 2, with premature indulgence in the Law of our Lord Godwin and for enviable ambition in the refutation of one argument with the same argument, it is my profound honor to present Kyff with this Retarded Poster Award!

Let's all share in a round of applause for Kyff!!!

Spyder73
01-25-2016, 05:49 PM
Man throws a shoe at president Bush - "falls" down 2 flights of stairs while being apprehended, is sentenced 3 years in Iraqi prison. Free speech for all