View Full Version : ******Official politics thread ******
AzzarTheGod
12-13-2017, 08:42 PM
the team is all here. lets kick some gigga butt
Ahldagor
12-13-2017, 09:55 PM
Xaanka, what'd you get banned for last time?
hyejin
12-13-2017, 10:04 PM
too much fun too fast. yo check the 7s
Nilstoniakrath
12-13-2017, 11:39 PM
i'm sure a lot of lefties are just rolling with it to countersignal but its pretty funny that some of them genuinely believe the allegations and think moore should have stepped down. when the democratic party has run multiple child rapists in elections this year. ed murray anyone? he raped something like 8 crack addicted teenage boys in the 80's while working as a social worker, and his own cousin, and they ran him until his own cousin went on tv. the democratic party had no issue running with that guy. there was another one like that too. weird there hasn't been a lot of moral panic about those allegations, which have actually been proven true, from the left.
hell i don't believe in taking unfounded allegations as truth myself, but if we're going to say allegations against people like moore should be taken at face value to be "on the safe side" why aren't leftists alarmed that over 75% of the people being named in metoo allegations are jewish democrats? and the rest male feminist democrats? that's not bullshit either, if you look at the list of people accused its totally true.
some of these #metoo's are really dope though. i know a few random celeb accusers and as far as i'm aware they're all telling the truth. the #metoo thing is definitely a more grassroots, genuine thing. the moore+allred thing has more been the democratic party's way of capitalizing on it.
Humanity is pretty sad actually. It either dismisses stuff as the fault of the victim, and allows women to be gang raped and murdered and blames them for wearing skimpy clothes, or goes to the other extreme and believes every claim without any analysis whatsoever. Or just plays politics as sport and each case is judged by how it helps their own side. Pathetic.
mickmoranis
12-14-2017, 12:04 AM
the team is all here. lets kick some gigga butt
Daps soul
Pokesan
12-14-2017, 12:24 AM
its amazing how quickly the accelerationists were proven right. the energy from the constant outrage a reality tv celebrity fat cat can churn is really turning our country around in the most unexpected ways
maskedmelon
12-14-2017, 11:11 AM
Humanity is pretty sad actually. It either dismisses stuff as the fault of the victim, and allows women to be gang raped and murdered and blames them for wearing skimpy clothes, or goes to the other extreme and believes every claim without any analysis whatsoever. Or just plays politics as sport and each case is judged by how it helps their own side. Pathetic.
many people are incapable of evaluating individual issues on their own merits, so they instead consult the schedule of principles furnished by their ideology, that mode of belief which demands the least of them. those who are capable still generally consult ideology, because they have neither the time nor energy to invest in uncovering truths which in the context of their lives as governed by petrified intellect is meaningless.
JurisDictum
12-14-2017, 02:52 PM
Aparently the speakership is cursed:
Despite several landmark legislative wins this year, and a better-than-expected relationship with President Donald Trump, Ryan has made it known to some of his closest confidants that this will be his final term as speaker. He consults a small crew of family, friends and staff for career advice, and is always cautious not to telegraph his political maneuvers. But the expectation of his impending departure has escaped the hushed confines of Ryan’s inner circle and permeated the upper-most echelons of the GOP. In recent interviews with three dozen people who know the speaker—fellow lawmakers, congressional and administration aides, conservative intellectuals and Republican lobbyists—not a single person believed Ryan will stay in Congress past 2018.
...
The speaker can't afford to admit he’s a lame duck—his fundraising capacity and deal-making leverage would be vastly diminished, making the House all the more difficult to govern. When asked at the end of a Thursday morning press conference if he was leaving soon, Ryan shot a quick “no” over his shoulder as he walked out of the room.
Farewell jackass. I'll always remember you as the biggest sell out in D.C. The kid that grew up with welfare that wants to cut everyone else's.
Edit: Paul Ryan Sees His Wild Washington Journey Coming to An End (Paul Ryan Sees His Wild Washington Journey Coming to An End)
Xaanka
12-14-2017, 04:02 PM
Xaanka, what'd you get banned for last time?
staying woke
gucci gang gucci gang gucci gang gucci gang
hyejin
12-14-2017, 04:04 PM
Bitcoin is accelerating global warming (http://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-is-ruining-the-planet-2017-12?nr_email_referer=1&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_content=10ThingsSAI&pt=385758&ct=Sailthru_BI_Newsletters&mt=8&utm_campaign=Post%20Blast%20%28sai%29:%2010%20thin gs%20in%20tech%20you%20need%20to%20know%20today&utm_term=10%20Things%20In%20Tech%20You%20Need%20To %20Know%20-%20Engaged%2C%20Active%2C%20Passive%2C%20Disengage d&r=UK&IR=T) yall
mickmoranis
12-14-2017, 04:17 PM
Bitcoin is accelerating global warming (http://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-is-ruining-the-planet-2017-12?nr_email_referer=1&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_content=10ThingsSAI&pt=385758&ct=Sailthru_BI_Newsletters&mt=8&utm_campaign=Post%20Blast%20%28sai%29:%2010%20thin gs%20in%20tech%20you%20need%20to%20know%20today&utm_term=10%20Things%20In%20Tech%20You%20Need%20To %20Know%20-%20Engaged%2C%20Active%2C%20Passive%2C%20Disengage d&r=UK&IR=T) yall
lol
I love how like
if one thing goes up AT ALL
its like
THIS IS KILLING THE PLANET
but its like
comparitivly the use of minerals mined to make batteries to post on social media #metoo is about a thousand pounds per square inch more of a footprint than nvidia cards.
Libs love to fly too, thats about 10thousand pounds per square inch more.
Oh yea and the prius, manufactured all over the globe, shiped to LA, may make the coastline there more blue, but it also makes the world more blue thanks to rising ocean levels.
You name it, libs eat up climate change causes.
meanwhile conservs till the land locally and use a flip phone their cuck hipster kid who moved to the coast sent them 13 years ago.
JurisDictum
12-14-2017, 04:18 PM
It kind of goes without saying but just to be diligent:
Paul Ryan is going to go work in private sector lobbying soon.
mickmoranis
12-14-2017, 04:21 PM
b-b-b-ut i thought libertariasm was baaaad?
https://i.imgur.com/EM55F91.png
The best thing about this is libs are like, "HAH look what WE can do to FIGHT this!"
meanwhile people who were pro striking down Net Nutrality are like....
you moran, thats exactly what we WANTED you to do and the entire REASON we struck down federal managment of the internet.
Xaanka
12-14-2017, 04:28 PM
literally the only reason anyone cares about net neutrality is because reddit's frontpage got spammed with 60k upvote posts in subs with 13 subscribers by some chinese botnet paid for by probably soros because he owns a lot of netflix right now, or google, or one of the other.. 3 companies set to lose money from the law being changed.
its funny how much spamming reddit can influence the public hivemind right now. i predict a move away from reddit, twitter, world wide web and other establishment-manipulatable communication mediums soon. fresh takes on old tech cumming soon.
Patriam1066
12-14-2017, 04:54 PM
$183 for one tire
Fucking run flats. I couldn't even Persian Jew haggle my way out of this one
mickmoranis
12-14-2017, 05:21 PM
$183 for one tire
Fucking run flats. I couldn't even Persian Jew haggle my way out of this one
stop buying white bmw's and you wont spend so much on repairs
maskedmelon
12-14-2017, 05:39 PM
b-b-b-ut i thought libertariasm was baaaad?
https://i.imgur.com/EM55F91.png
The best thing about this is libs are like, "HAH look what WE can do to FIGHT this!"
meanwhile people who were pro striking down Net Nutrality are like....
you moran, thats exactly what we WANTED you to do and the entire REASON we struck down federal managment of the internet.
the last line of the tweet made me smile, "the remedy to authoritarianism is expansion of governmental control!" ^o^
whether what he is doing is right or wrong, the supreme idiocy of the above implication is almost as encouraging as the millions of heads that will nod emptily in agreement.
when we fail to understand the reasons to act, our action is surrendered to exploitaton.
You can trust Scott Wiener, goy.
Just as he wants to expand the government to remedy authoritarianism, he also wrote and passed laws to decriminalize intentionally infecting others with HIV for purely altruistic reasons.
https://i.imgur.com/Xko86v0.png
mickmoranis
12-14-2017, 06:35 PM
the last line of the tweet made me smile, "the remedy to authoritarianism is expansion of governmental control!" ^o^
lmao pras and dap the fuckn warhmammer for that one
Ahldagor
12-15-2017, 12:06 AM
literally the only reason anyone cares about net neutrality is because reddit's frontpage got spammed with 60k upvote posts in subs with 13 subscribers by some chinese botnet paid for by probably soros because he owns a lot of netflix right now, or google, or one of the other.. 3 companies set to lose money from the law being changed.
its funny how much spamming reddit can influence the public hivemind right now. i predict a move away from reddit, twitter, world wide web and other establishment-manipulatable communication mediums soon. fresh takes on old tech cumming soon.
It's already happening. Early millenials are deleting social media and going outside. Hell, flip phones are coming back. How this stalls humanity's virtual existence (the only way our species can truly survive) is yet to be seen.
Ahldagor
12-15-2017, 12:08 AM
Why none of y'all talking about Iran attempting to be taken through the UN's Iraq-Gauntlet that culminates in cruise missiles hitting your capital?
Patriam1066
12-15-2017, 12:49 AM
Why none of y'all talking about Iran attempting to be taken through the UN's Iraq-Gauntlet that culminates in cruise missiles hitting your capital?
Because it's all that I talk about over dinner and I'm not discussing it here. A pretty serious and infuriating topic
AzzarTheGod
12-15-2017, 12:51 AM
lmao pras and dap the fuckn warhmammer for that one
pras
Xaanka
12-15-2017, 01:17 AM
It's already happening. Early millenials are deleting social media and going outside. Hell, flip phones are coming back. How this stalls humanity's virtual existence (the only way our species can truly survive) is yet to be seen.
i think a lot of social media will move from the www to usenet soon, really the only thing stopping it from happening today is client side
AzzarTheGod
12-15-2017, 01:41 AM
Whale down. Damage report off the starboard bow.
Xaanka
12-15-2017, 04:34 AM
You can trust Scott Wiener, goy.
Just as he wants to expand the government to remedy authoritarianism, he also wrote and passed laws to decriminalize intentionally infecting others with HIV for purely altruistic reasons.
https://i.imgur.com/Xko86v0.png
(((altruistic reasons)))
Scott Weiner is a small-souled bugman
AzzarTheGod
12-15-2017, 05:00 AM
(((altruistic reasons)))
Scott Weiner is a small-souled bugman
you might say he's not an ombudsman, hes an obugsman
AzzarTheGod
12-15-2017, 05:01 AM
self admirin PFP wittiest forum poster with gr8est vocabulary. i'll be here all week hittin licks
Ahldagor
12-15-2017, 10:15 AM
Because it's all that I talk about over dinner and I'm not discussing it here. A pretty serious and infuriating topic
Agreed. Trump seems hell bent on a war, and I've no idea why.
Ahldagor
12-15-2017, 10:16 AM
i think a lot of social media will move from the www to usenet soon, really the only thing stopping it from happening today is client side
I don't know what usenet is. What's the difference?
JurisDictum
12-15-2017, 11:10 AM
Agreed. Trump seems hell bent on a war, and I've no idea why.
Because it might get him re-elected and possibly let him get more accomplishments under his belt. Trump wants to claim an impressive legacy more than anything. He wants to be a good war-time president if he gets the chance. I do think he is going out of his way itching for a fight -- but is smart enough not to do it too obviously.
Xaanka
12-15-2017, 02:06 PM
I don't know what usenet is. What's the difference?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet
its massive, you could drop the entirety of twitter onto it today and it wouldn't even make a dent.
the only reason it's not viable right now, today as a replacement for the WWW is its organisational structure. with usenet you would search by topics, so say, you would search and see every post from every person in the world about "soccer"
all you'd really have to do is make a modern client/frontend for usenet, and it could replace imageboards today. make it search by user instead of topic and it could replace facebook/twitter. it's much much much more resilient to censorship.
JurisDictum
12-15-2017, 03:23 PM
Democrat Andrea Ramsey gets the distinction of being the first female to be ousted for sexual harassment (yep it was a male...I'm going to guess some young married cute guy).
I would like this guy's identity. Those laws aren't for people like him. They are for fragile women. Not little pussies like this that use laws designed to protect women for a settlement. He deserves to be humiliated for it -- and sure hope the police were condensing and rude as well.
Xaanka
12-15-2017, 04:23 PM
unless we're limiting it to just politics, i think the lesbian #metoo with that girl from the voice was first
mickmoranis
12-15-2017, 05:12 PM
I cant wait till 2030+ when the psychological stress women put on men is the big to do on social media and women lose their jobs for putting unfair expectations on males to perform and be successful while simultaneously manipulating them for sex whenever the female wants it from whomever they chose at the time while still expecting all men to cater to them at every turn, in case they may be interested but not so much that it can be used it against the male to harass or disempower them.
#mentoo
AzzarTheGod
12-15-2017, 05:47 PM
i feel like i post a good amount but xaanks is at 2.5k and im at 6.7k or whatever which made me realized...
i realized it feels like ill never get 10k within a reasonable time frame (will take years??)
pretty disappointed. i have no idea how nirgon did it or what timeframe nirgon did it in.
maskedmelon
12-15-2017, 06:12 PM
i feel like i post a good amount but xaanks is at 2.5k and im at 6.7k or whatever which made me realized...
i realized it feels like ill never get 10k within a reasonable time frame (will take years??)
pretty disappointed. i have no idea how nirgon did it or what timeframe nirgon did it in.
Have you considered posting images? liek one at a time?
Pokesan
12-15-2017, 06:15 PM
Have you considered posting images? liek one at a time?
https://i.imgur.com/0PAb4kW.png
AzzarTheGod
12-15-2017, 06:17 PM
Have you considered posting images? liek one at a time?
You're right a handful of low effort troll posts/day aren't gonna hack it. I feel like my post count took a huge amount of damage from the delete era and like I still haven't gotten ahead of those deletions. Its like a reverse-treadmill effect and its been pretty depressing.
Even if I dropped maximum bands there's literally not enough bands to deliver to achieve 10k within a reasonable time frame. Like how many bands can there possibly be?
Ur right I need expanding industry to achieve this impossible dream of FIVE DIGIT post count. *tosses bands aside, disenchanted with the lack of quantity*
AzzarTheGod
12-15-2017, 06:20 PM
Gotta be honest I'm pretty angry right now. I SWEAR I had 6.7k the other day.
*throws homemade dagger into freshly plastered and repaired wall from last week*
maskedmelon
12-15-2017, 06:20 PM
https://i.imgur.com/0PAb4kW.png
sometimes i feel close to certain that you post these things just to drain my brain trying to grasp the association when there ain't one ;n;
maskedmelon
12-15-2017, 06:24 PM
Gotta be honest I'm pretty angry right now. I SWEAR I had 6.7k the other day.
*throws homemade dagger into freshly plastered and repaired wall from last week*
itll be okay, you'll get there ^^
*rubs ATG's shoulders*
you can do it ^^
Pokesan
12-15-2017, 06:27 PM
sometimes i feel close to certain that you post these things just to drain my brain trying to grasp the association when there ain't one ;n;
i was about to post it anyway but thought it amusing to include your quote in context since i do that alot :)
mickmoranis
12-15-2017, 06:29 PM
You're right a handful of low effort troll posts/day aren't gonna hack it. I feel like my post count took a huge amount of damage from the delete era and like I still haven't gotten ahead of those deletions. Its like a reverse-treadmill effect and its been pretty depressing.
Even if I dropped maximum bands there's literally not enough bands to deliver to achieve 10k within a reasonable time frame. Like how many bands can there possibly be?
Ur right I need expanding industry to achieve this impossible dream of FIVE DIGIT post count. *tosses bands aside, disenchanted with the lack of quantity*
youre in the 10k club as far as im concerned
maskedmelon
12-15-2017, 06:32 PM
i was about to post it anyway but thought it amusing to include your quote in context since i do that alot :)
well,
ty for thinking of me (o^^o)
mickmoranis
12-17-2017, 07:39 PM
politics or science fiction?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/634733/Do-demon-skulls-and-Nazi-briefcase-discoveries-prove-Third-Reich-contacted-ALIENS
(hillary is a reptilian)
Pokesan
12-17-2017, 09:04 PM
https://www.si.com/jerry-richardson-carolina-panthers-settlements-workplace-misconduct-sexual-harassment-racial-slur
But multiple former female employees recount that Richardson's behavior began to feel like a violation when he spoke of their bodies. He had a special interest in female grooming, they say. He would notice when their nails were not up to his standards, and pay for them to get manicures. Multiple female employees recalled to SI that Richardson asked them if he could personally shave their legs.
Richardson was also known for what multiple women call the “seatbelt maneuver.” He would invite female employees out to lunch, and in keeping with his reputation as a self-styled gentleman, he would open the car door for his guests. Once they were seated, however, he would insist on fastening their seatbelt for them, reaching across their lap and brushing his hand across their breasts before putting the belt in the clasp.
mickmoranis
12-17-2017, 10:15 PM
how is this bullshit considered politics now?
why does the left hate the constitution?
how can you take yourself seriously when you say you are not a communist when all you care about is punishing people for social behavior via making new laws or changing old ones?
Pokesan
12-17-2017, 10:50 PM
how is this bullshit considered politics now?
why does the left hate the constitution?
how can you take yourself seriously when you say you are not a communist when all you care about is punishing people for social behavior via making new laws or changing old ones?
it's politics because the taxpayers say it is
Hope this helps!
Patriam1066
12-17-2017, 11:28 PM
When did the cowboys get so bad
Holy shit
Patriam1066
12-17-2017, 11:33 PM
Hahahahaha fake punt
Patriam1066
12-17-2017, 11:40 PM
DAK
Pokesan
12-17-2017, 11:44 PM
zeke back next week?
seahawks may get beat worse than 40
fuck
Patriam1066
12-18-2017, 12:24 AM
FIRST DOWN
fuck you oakland
Patriam1066
12-18-2017, 12:25 AM
zeke back next week?
seahawks may get beat worse than 40
fuck
Dallas couldn't put up 40 even with zeke. The play calls are horrible
Patriam1066
12-18-2017, 12:44 AM
LOL wow Carr
Pokesan
12-18-2017, 12:53 AM
retarded ending. grats cowboys
Ahldagor
12-18-2017, 09:34 AM
Y'all watched all that? Lotta bad football this week.
Ahldagor
12-18-2017, 09:35 AM
I think Richardon is having to sell the Panthers because of his behavior.
Lhancelot
12-18-2017, 09:37 AM
retarded ending. grats cowboys
Hey. As many times as the Cowboys lost due to some stupid reason or ref call, it's about time they got one that bounced their way.
JurisDictum
12-18-2017, 10:44 AM
Very interesting read on The Age of Outrage (https://www.city-journal.org/html/age-outrage-15608.html). Its a written lecture by a Manhattan Institute fellow -- which is a left-leaning think tank.
It's essentially a moderately conservative argument. The problem is Gen X fucked up how they were running colleges (because of over-the-top Boomer professors). We need to fix this by affirming our free-speech values and telling BLM kids to stop interrupting classes and events now and again. Also SJW Degrees are BS (he implies they don't teach as well compared to traditional subjects).
It's amazing how much escapes the author -- a Yale graduate specializing in social and moral psychology. He identifies the problem with identity politics dividing people. Similiar to Lormin. But like Lormin -- he naively believes this is all some mistake we are going to fix.
No. The money and credibility given to divisive groups will continue to pour in. Because the elites don't want us all to come together and have a big koom-by-ya moment so we tax the rich. That's exactly their fear. And those of us who are not conservatives at heart understand this.
Change must earth shattering and fundamental. Society must be turned on its head (at least temporarily). The people need a sense of justice again.
Raavak
12-18-2017, 11:54 AM
Society always seems to have "come to Jesus" moments caused by some strife where everything gets "real". Great Depression, massive war, plagues. Then in the generations that follow life gets easier and things get "out of wack" with lots of illogical beliefs and the kids believe fairy tales are real. Then "boom" something again happens to slam reality in everyone's face.
There's a lot of lunacy going on right now. We've been here before. History says there will be a correction.
mickmoranis
12-18-2017, 12:01 PM
Society always seems to have "come to Jesus" moments caused by some strife where everything gets "real". Great Depression, massive war, plagues. Then in the generations that follow life gets easier and things get "out of wack" with lots of illogical beliefs and the kids believe fairy tales are real. Then "boom" something again happens to slam reality in everyone's face.
There's a lot of lunacy going on right now. We've been here before. History says there will be a correction.
its funny how the left constantly brought up "fall of rome! fall of rome! its happening here!" but then they go and smoke weed and do coke at night clubs all night and now are into pegging and transgendreism but dont see the connections between progressive social behavior and caligula.
Raavak
12-18-2017, 12:38 PM
Fascists (i.e. progressives) always come around in times like this. Joe Blow hard worker lets his guard down and the left builds political power. It happened with the Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans. It happened more recently in and after the "roaring 20's". Seems to be happening again right now.
Scary honest truth. When shit does hit the fan and the going gets rough... snowflakes toughen up or die.
Right now they are loud, annoying, and preachy. Complaining how evil companies wrested the power of the government to censor internet data. About how we need to let guys with dresses carry rifles in war. They are armchair warriors throwing out words on the Internet. But when the "correction" happens self-righteous ideals and safe spaces make way for the people just trying to survive in a hard world. Pajama Boy vanishes because he is weak physically, mentally, and knows nothing useful for a society rebuilding itself. A society that doesn't have the spare resources to feed and cloth a useless person.
skarlorn
12-18-2017, 01:07 PM
Lol how do u figure the 1920s was fascist leaning. Volstedt act maybe? If anything you should argue that the New Deal was fascism (it worked great for our country).
skarlorn
12-18-2017, 01:09 PM
Woops for a sec i thought I was trying to speak to well balanced individuals and then I remembered. Please don't respond
maskedmelon
12-18-2017, 01:21 PM
i just want everyone to know that i have no rational basis for any of my arguments. i just post whatever feels right in the moment since my paltry investment in dead thought is insufficient to license any creeibility on relevant subject matter.
i stil love you all though *hugs* (o^^o)
mickmoranis
12-18-2017, 01:24 PM
Lol how do u figure the 1920s was fascist leaning. Volstedt act maybe? If anything you should argue that the New Deal was fascism (it worked great for our country).
TYL www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/rise_of_american_fascism.htm
Patriam1066
12-18-2017, 01:27 PM
Woops for a sec i thought I was trying to speak to well balanced individuals and then I remembered. Please don't respond
You don't see the connection between transgender people having rights and Caligula ruling the Roman Empire? What gives dude read a book or something
Pokesan
12-18-2017, 01:43 PM
i just want everyone to know that i have no rational basis for any of my arguments. i just post whatever feels right in the moment since my paltry investment in dead thought is insufficient to license any creeibility on relevant subject matter.
i stil love you all though *hugs* (o^^o)
same
Pokesan
12-18-2017, 01:43 PM
Caligula
*in very xaanka falsetto*
that's a weird way to spell podesta dude
JurisDictum
12-18-2017, 01:58 PM
You don't see the connection between transgender people having rights and Caligula ruling the Roman Empire? What gives dude read a book or something
The real connection I see here is the one between Mick and Richard Nixon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMfVnBmpMm8 (1:28 min clip)
You know what caused the Romain Empire to fall? They didn't change anything. They got lazy, conservative, and the rich completely fleeced the lower orders instead of meeting the challenges of the day. What happened to Rome, Japan, the fucking Mayans. This is what happened to China before Mao came along and saved their damn country. The elites had no personal motivation to change anything despite that the society was decaying.
Patriam1066
12-18-2017, 02:42 PM
The real connection I see here is the one between Mick and Richard Nixon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMfVnBmpMm8 (1:28 min clip)
You know what caused the Romain Empire to fall? They didn't change anything. They got lazy, conservative, and the rich completely fleeced the lower orders instead of meeting the challenges of the day. What happened to Rome, Japan, the fucking Mayans. This is what happened to China before Mao came along and saved their damn country. The elites had no personal motivation to change anything despite that the society was decaying.
If you're interested in Roman history, read empires of faith by Peter sarris I believe. By the way, the eastern Roman Empire fell after basil II because of the same thing. The urban wealthy class of Constantinople took all the money from the citizen farmers in Anatolia who had been, for 400 years, fighting Muslims to a fucking standstill. For probably a 2-5% gain in profits, the major senatorial families destroyed the means by which the people on the border sustained themselves and thus the empire. Also, Basil II conquering Armenia, the major source of crack imperial soldiers for the past 1000 years, didn't help
I know too much about the fall of Rome and the sassanians. God help us if I ever get a time machine. I'll be taking an Abrams tank first to crush Muhammad and his camel, then to the Alamo
Pokesan
12-18-2017, 08:52 PM
A New Report Reveals The Pentagon’s Secret Alien Hunters (http://uproxx.com/life/pentagon-aliens/)
Indeed, more than once it sounds a lot more like the military is convinced it’s got some sort of weapons system stored in a shed somewhere, with statements in the article like “the United States was incapable of defending itself against some of the technologies discovered” and “unusual aerial systems interfering with military weapon platforms and displaying beyond-next-generation capabilities.”
:confused:
mickmoranis
12-18-2017, 10:13 PM
reptoids
mickmoranis
12-18-2017, 11:00 PM
Trump fixes obumers mistake lol
1. trump is going to end the defense sequester from 2011 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hnyl3pE6l1g
2. the defense sequester was an obama ara restriction on military spending that the navy has had some concerns about https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/694480/sequestration-poses-biggest-threat-to-readiness-military-leaders-say/
3. since 2011 there have been 3 major accidents in the navy and people be like, " why are all these ships crashin into each other" ever since they started poppin up
I think its interesting that trump hasnt tried to play this up
Pokesan
12-18-2017, 11:10 PM
the NFL is intentionally scheduling crummy games in primetime because they know retards like me will watch regardless
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 01:00 AM
how bout those not fake news websites like CNN breaking the banned CDC word list, amiright?
JurisDictum
12-19-2017, 01:12 AM
Disney is going to rival Netflix as a streaming site (I trust the power of the mouse to pull it off). The only question is if Netflix will be able to keep up in the environment of rampant Republican corruption that has permeated the Trump presidency.
On NPR they are still pretending their is no man behind the curtain. "Let's hope the authorities stay vigilant over these potentially problematic mergers."
Jesus Fucking Christ
They hold no punches when it came to pointing out how fucked up the conservative parties in Europe are. Some guy assured us all they were mostly ugly racists that have "improved their marketing" to seem like they only care about immigration.
Or maybe they just only care about immigration jackass. Obviously if your racist...and you need a political party... But some people just don't like how immigration seems to squeeze wages.
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 01:15 AM
how bout those not fake news websites like CNN breaking the banned CDC word list, amiright?
Enjoying your fascism?
Pokesan
12-19-2017, 01:22 AM
how bout those not fake news websites like CNN breaking the banned CDC word list, amiright?
hot dog forums say its a banned word list in the sense that it's language directives for submitting official documentation for congressional review
e: oh, budgetary
Patriam1066
12-19-2017, 01:26 AM
Trump fixes obumers mistake lol
1. trump is going to end the defense sequester from 2011 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hnyl3pE6l1g
2. the defense sequester was an obama ara restriction on military spending that the navy has had some concerns about https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/694480/sequestration-poses-biggest-threat-to-readiness-military-leaders-say/
3. since 2011 there have been 3 major accidents in the navy and people be like, " why are all these ships crashin into each other" ever since they started poppin up
I think its interesting that trump hasnt tried to play this up
1. The defense budget is going from $580 billion to $693ish billion
2. We don't spend money on basic infrastructure, like a one time $400 million pump system recommended by the army corps of engineers that would've saved the western half of Houston from flooding
3. You don't pay taxes
4. Hope this helps!
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 01:36 AM
1. The defense budget is going from $580 billion to $693ish billion
2. We don't spend money on basic infrastructure, like a one time $400 million pump system recommended by the army corps of engineers that would've saved the western half of Houston from flooding
3. You don't pay taxes
4. Hope this helps!
Thank u for this
jakerees
12-19-2017, 11:10 AM
https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-drug-trafficking-investigation/
In its determination to secure a nuclear deal with Iran, the Obama administration derailed an ambitious law enforcement campaign targeting drug trafficking by the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah, even as it was funneling cocaine into the United States, according to a POLITICO investigation.
The campaign, dubbed Project Cassandra, was launched in 2008 after the Drug Enforcement Administration amassed evidence that Hezbollah had transformed itself from a Middle East-focused military and political organization into an international crime syndicate that some investigators believed was collecting $1 billion a year from drug and weapons trafficking, money laundering and other criminal activities.
Over the next eight years, agents working out of a top-secret DEA facility in Chantilly, Virginia, used wiretaps, undercover operations and informants to map Hezbollah’s illicit networks, with the help of 30 U.S. and foreign security agencies.
They followed cocaine shipments, some from Latin America to West Africa and on to Europe and the Middle East, and others through Venezuela and Mexico to the United States. They tracked the river of dirty cash as it was laundered by, among other tactics, buying American used cars and shipping them to Africa. And with the help of some key cooperating witnesses, the agents traced the conspiracy, they believed, to the innermost circle of Hezbollah and its state sponsors in Iran.
But as Project Cassandra reached higher into the hierarchy of the conspiracy, Obama administration officials threw an increasingly insurmountable series of roadblocks in its way, according to interviews with dozens of participants who in many cases spoke for the first time about events shrouded in secrecy, and a review of government documents and court records. When Project Cassandra leaders sought approval for some significant investigations, prosecutions, arrests and financial sanctions, officials at the Justice and Treasury departments delayed, hindered or rejected their requests.
The Justice Department declined requests by Project Cassandra and other authorities to file criminal charges against major players such as Hezbollah’s high-profile envoy to Iran, a Lebanese bank that allegedly laundered billions in alleged drug profits, and a central player in a U.S.-based cell of the Iranian paramilitary Quds force. And the State Department rejected requests to lure high-value targets to countries where they could be arrested.
JurisDictum
12-19-2017, 11:25 AM
I read that yesterday and thought "Why would the DEA be spearheading a investigation into a group that politically sensitive?" This is a bit out of their jurisdiction IMO.
The DEA is an annoying bureaucracy we will someday have to retool to do something useful. Probably just managing drugs in international conflicts would be the best use for them.
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 11:30 AM
hot dog forums say its a banned word list in the sense that it's language directives for submitting official documentation for congressional review
e: oh, budgetary
so fake news
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 11:43 AM
lol appropriate? idk you tell me.
https://i.imgur.com/ONpp89b.png
Lhancelot
12-19-2017, 12:16 PM
so fake news
Reporters with various forms of "fake news" from an 1894 illustration by Frederick Burr Opper
https://i.imgur.com/NRK0QIc.jpg
JurisDictum
12-19-2017, 12:57 PM
Looks like the Humbug News went out of business, but we still got plenty of Cheap Sensation and Fake News.
Lhancelot
12-19-2017, 01:06 PM
Looks like the Humbug News went out of business, but we still got plenty of Cheap Sensation and Fake News.
I just thought it was interesting the term "fake news" has been used and in existence since at least 1894.
I should have known ventriloquism was at work when Trump the muppet spoke such a phrase. He could never come up with something original.
***Hey you never know, perhaps the phrase "humbug news" will be resurrected too.
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 01:07 PM
who's more of a muppet? The guy saying that there is fake news or the entire liberal party saying that it's a myth?
Lhancelot
12-19-2017, 01:32 PM
who's more of a muppet? The guy saying that there is fake news or the entire liberal party saying that it's a myth?
Even liberals understand fake news exists.
Newsflash: Trump also uses fake news. Conservatives also use fake news.
Fake news isn't something liberals created. As you can see by that cartoon, fake news actually has been recognized and even called as such since 1894.
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 02:34 PM
am I trump? no
did I say it was somethign libs created?
no
did I post an example of how CNN prints fake news?
yes
are you and other libtards (which you sound like are you libtarded now?) trying to defend CNN by having petty arguments about trump instead of acknowledging that CNN Is fake news?
yes
does me saying CNN is fake news, mean I am saying fox news is not fake news?
nope
please be woke lancelot not sheepcuck
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 04:07 PM
CNN is a piece of shit right now. It's actually pathetic.
NY Times and WaPo are also historically Fake News.
big surprise: media magnates have deep ties to govt and are actively used as propaganda mills.
Ultimately, this is why I think NN's end is going to be worse than when it was in the hands of govt. It's easier to obfuscate backroom dealings to suppress info and free speech than if the government was doing it publicly.
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 04:48 PM
CNN is a piece of shit right now. It's actually pathetic.
NY Times and WaPo are also historically Fake News.
big surprise: media magnates have deep ties to govt and are actively used as propaganda mills.
Ultimately, this is why I think NN's end is going to be worse than when it was in the hands of govt. It's easier to obfuscate backroom dealings to suppress info and free speech than if the government was doing it publicly.
net nutrality did not protect websites or internet service providers from limiting free speech. twitter bans people based on speech all the time. its totally within all of their rights to ban any type of speech.
the reason they dont, mostly, is because we have capitalism and if they did people would just outright stop using the service, specifically if they went all "authoritarian" with their choices of what to ban or throttle or whatever.
However the goverment, if they do that, as the FCC demonstrated... if the majority public opinion is contrary to theirs, it means nothing to them and they will just ban/throttle whatever the feel like at the time.
All it takes is a libcuck al frankin to be in the white house that thinks somethign stupid like, "you know what piracy should be illegal and the best way to prevent it is to block all access to websites that are suspected of supporting piracy"
then no matter what you want, you aint getting access to that.
The (appointed) government employees did have the power to do this under title II
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 04:50 PM
Is there any record of what the appointed govt employees banned under Title II?
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 05:06 PM
Is there any record of what the appointed govt employees banned under Title II?
what are you asking me?
Does america have a history of newlib fembot cuck liberals who support anti free speech at record levels not only in the base but by the current party elite?
no.
Is the modern democrat party actively trying to limit free speech? yes
are these laws meant to last generations and to be changed and evolve with elected (appointed) officials? yes
and to get specific "has there EVER been a goverement that didnt take its rights away from its citizens in the history of mankind?"
no there has never, ever, EVER been an example of a goverement that didnt take away its citizens rights... and as we progress into a world where both the base and the party elete agree on limiting our freedom, giving the goverment the power to do so is a fools errand that will ultimately end with the rights of your children, or even you, taken from you.
COULD you solve all the problems you have with the NN change simply by enacting state regulation?
YEP
so quit your fuckin cryin and get out there and call your representative.
Or are you just an ID political monkey that does whatever reddit mob tells you to do?
PS sorry for the edgy alt right speech but when you ask questions like that, you got it comin.
Lulz~Sect
12-19-2017, 05:07 PM
[Post only available for Project 1999® Gold™ account holders]
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 05:19 PM
what are you asking me?
Does america have a history of newlib fembot cuck liberals who support anti free speech at record levels not only in the base but by the current party elite?
no.
Is the modern democrat party actively trying to limit free speech? yes
are these laws meant to last generations and to be changed and evolve with elected (appointed) officials? yes
and to get specific "has there EVER been a goverement that didnt take its rights away from its citizens in the history of mankind?"
no there has never, ever, EVER been an example of a goverement that didnt take away its citizens rights... and as we progress into a world where both the base and the party elete agree on limiting our freedom, giving the goverment the power to do so is a fools errand that will ultimately end with the rights of your children, or even you, taken from you.
COULD you solve all the problems you have with the NN change simply by enacting state regulation?
YEP
so quit your fuckin cryin and get out there and call your representative.
Or are you just an ID political monkey that does whatever reddit mob tells you to do?
PS sorry for the edgy alt right speech but when you ask questions like that, you got it comin.
1) i don't browse reddit
2) asking for a little evidence to better understand your views has triggered you? Seek help dude.
3) I still don't understand why you think NN on a state wide basis will be better. On the whole, I'm pro-state govt over los federales and I am honestly hoping to hear an alternative opinion on the matter since so much of pro NN stinks of emotional reactionary propaganda.
4) please take a breath and work on writing more coherently. It's hard to do anything more than ignore your posts when they are literally streams of wrong-assumptions and vilifications against the government party you do not agree with. You're being just as a bad as a retarded SJW, and that makes me sad.
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 05:25 PM
2) well the gov did put peopel in concentration camps just 60 years ago if they were japanese. Also they try to take away rights all the time because theyre afraid of guns etc. There are many examples of the freedom of americans being limited by goverment overreech.. taking your shoes off at the airport for the TSA is another example etc (one proven to not help anyone mind you) There's a lot of examples. And even if there werent, the point is protecting future generations from an over reaching goverment is the entire modus of the states right/libertarian constatitionalists. Just like it was for the folks the penned the constitution.
3) On a stat level they do not have the power to control the entire country, a state can be supper fucked up (take south carolina for example) and one state over it can be an beutiful place with a booming economy (north)
The country was built on the premice that states would manage shit like this, not the feds. Because states are smaller and easier to manage, rather than the entire country.
Hell NN isnt even goign to be a problem for most libcucks because you live in cities with lots of options for isp's... while the states with smaller pop's are the ones that will suffer the most. Ironically they dont realy care though... and that is just an anecdotal thought.
4. I will never work on writing coherently, writing incoherently is what gets me off and my right.
I am not vilifying a goverment party, Im simply stating a fact: the left is activly trying to change and limit free speech laws, even bernie sanders tried to pass legislation to limit it last year, and hes the smartest guy they got.
I am simply stating a fact. The left wants to limit free speech and the "evil demigog authoritarian nazi trump" happened to be the guy who appointed the guy who ensured that no government apparatus would have the ability to do that. That should make you think.
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 06:02 PM
The Left definitely has done some nasty things. I think their entire rhetoric against Trump is some of the worst sensationalism I've seen out of the American people.
But let's not forget the entire McCarthy era government impingement on freedoms (Republican led). You had people losing jobs and going to jail because they had different political views than the administration. Surely you know this? Red Scare and Lavender Scare set the precedent for us losing a lot of our rights, even to this day. It was a precursor to the Patriot Act (woops another right-wing liberties rape-fest)
It's irresponsible to only blame the Left for reducing personal liberty and free speech. Under the guise of "protecting ur freedum", the Republican party repeatedly implemented strategies that discourage free speech and foster paranoia. Right-wing paradigm also loves to reduce civil-liberties and marginalize people under the guise of "my freedom means u cain't do freedom how u want it."
Yes, Left-Wing is guilty, too, but here's the problem with your stance:
Ur basically just saying you prefer the way the GoP limits your freedom of speech and civil liberties. Which is fine. That's the entire purpose of contemporary government, to shape and limit freedom for the good of the people it serves (theoretically). But your argument that it's only the Left does this is equally sensationalist and occluded as left-wingers out there who read a CNN article and then scream about how evil the new tax bill is. Basically what I'm saying is you're the equivalent to a SJW girl in san francisco who has never had to work a day in her life and practices yoga and then goes home to smoke weed and bitch about how evil the republican party is, but for the right. Get better.
PS u are constantly vilifying the left and casting aspersions on liberals with the way you write. Obviously you know that the sector of the left who smokes weed and does coke is only a fraction of the party at large. And obviously you know that people on the right smoke weed and do coke... right? Or are you just an alt-right shill who screeches about the degeneration of society b/c filthy liberals are doing ass-fucking and would support measures to limit their freedom to choose sexual partners while having a melt-down that the left wants to limit ur ability to do hate speech?
:)
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 06:22 PM
dont get hung up on me hating on the left. The same way I shouldnt get triggered by you asking for more detail, so were both in teh wrong here.
But seriously, I hate the left, i hate the modern left so much, the republicans are just as bad BUT I dont hate them as much, because theyre bad in the way that someones old mean racist grandpa is bad..
the left however is supposed to be the YIN to this yang... its the light vs dark, day vs night, right vs wrong.
Its the balance that makes the world spin. But right now the left has lost control, and we have TWO bad sides in a TWO party system.
I hate the left because they used to fight for the good, but now they fight for the "other bad"
and we need someone to fight for the good.
Now, here we have libertarian constatutionalists... they are not the right OR the left. They simply do not believe in sharing their wealth with others, and so people on the left think they are conservative.
They do not believe in corperate control, they believe states should sort it out. They do not believe in no taxes, they believe states should work it out.
There is a lack of "belief" in that party, there is only one thing. That states should work out like 90% of what the feds are controlling.
If you had libertarian ideology driving one half of the political spectrum, something like 75% of the country would probubly have state funded healthcare. But instead the left (a globliast jihad party) has provided 0 people with healthcare and refuses to while digging its heels in the sand about it until they get their way.. just like the right does about its bullshit.
But again, dont mistake me vilifying the left with me glorifying the right.
However I love trump and if he asked me to kill people I would.
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 06:25 PM
Ur basically just saying you prefer the way the GoP limits your freedom of speech and civil liberties. Which is fine. That's the entire purpose of contemporary government, to shape and limit freedom for the good of the people it serves (theoretically). But your argument that it's only the Left does this is equally sensationalist and occluded as left-wingers out there who read a CNN article and then scream about how evil the new tax bill is. Basically what I'm saying is you're the equivalent to a SJW girl in san francisco who has never had to work a day in her life and practices yoga and then goes home to smoke weed and bitch about how evil the republican party is, but for the right. Get better.
PS u are constantly vilifying the left and casting aspersions on liberals with the way you write. Obviously you know that the sector of the left who smokes weed and does coke is only a fraction of the party at large. And obviously you know that people on the right smoke weed and do coke... right? Or are you just an alt-right shill who screeches about the degeneration of society b/c filthy liberals are doing ass-fucking and would support measures to limit their freedom to choose sexual partners while having a melt-down that the left wants to limit ur ability to do hate speech?
:)
and hey I vilify the left, you make adhominem attacks and act like you're not a leftist monkey tho so wake up or "seek help"
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 06:50 PM
the left however is supposed to be the YIN to this yang... its the light vs dark, day vs night, right vs wrong.
Its the balance that makes the world spin. But right now the left has lost control, and we have TWO bad sides in a TWO party system.
I hate the left because they used to fight for the good, but now they fight for the "other bad"
and we need someone to fight for the good.
This is great. And that's why I think the alt-right is valuable, because they call the left out on the shit the left die-hards have been blinded to. The trick has simply been cajoling you into communicating this message in a coherent way without hyper-aggressive phraseology that only serves to upset the selfsame people who desperately need a history lesson and fact-check.
And you almost did it, too :-)
Finally, you can't pitch into rhetoric plagued by verbal abuse and name-calling and then just be like "oh don't mind that LOL."
Here's an adhominem attack: if you can't see why that communication style is destructive rather than constructive, and merely a reactionary fall-back to pique the ire of your enemy so you can point and say "Hah youre just as bad as I am so you're WORSE," then you are worse than an idiot. You are a blind LOSER.
Good thing I'm not a liberal, so it's okay for me to personally insult you, you fucking moron.
PS - i got you to write coherently so congratulations, u lost and I won.
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 07:01 PM
Good thing I'm not a liberal, so it's okay for me to personally insult you, you fucking moron.
you may not e a liberal but you're definitely a soy boy libcuck pajama baby, spouting off all this "things would be better if ya just spoke to me like a big boy" nonsense.
and I aint tryin to convince anyone. Im tryin to call people dumbasses.
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 07:05 PM
1) mick can't stand rational discussion
2) he's just here to bully
3) i enjoy bullying too
this has been a lot of fun. smell ya l8r u mongoloid right shill
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 07:05 PM
1) mick can't stand rational discussion
2) he's just here to bully
3) i enjoy bullying too
this has been a lot of fun. smell ya l8r u mongoloid right shill
enjoy your spiced rum by the fireplace while your girlfriend texts black dudes.
JurisDictum
12-19-2017, 09:22 PM
enjoy your spiced rum by the fireplace while your girlfriend texts black dudes.
What is it with all the blacked.com plugs today?
Ahldagor
12-19-2017, 09:33 PM
What is it with all the blacked.com plugs today?
Penis envy?
mickmoranis
12-19-2017, 09:41 PM
skarlon please quote all the bad words I posted in the last 5 pages and then quote all the bad words all the libcucks post and i think youll see that your group is shittier than my group
hail trump
skarlorn
12-19-2017, 11:00 PM
That sounds like a great use of my time.
NOT!
AzzarTheGod
12-20-2017, 12:18 AM
Only right winger I supports Cam Neely.
Ahldagor
12-20-2017, 02:05 AM
Only right winger I supports Cam Neely.
Jack Cagle got my vote. He's big on road repair and efficient lane structures.
AzzarTheGod
12-20-2017, 04:21 AM
Jack Cagle got my vote. He's big on road repair and efficient lane structures.
my car is getting fucked up pretty bad every year by poorly done road work and half ass projects that aren't repaired correctly or other non road related work.
so roads are definitely an election issue. its really bad in every state pretty much. no tax money spent the last several years on any roads, state or fed.
texas has a lot of private highways i heard so its a little different?
AzzarTheGod
12-20-2017, 04:23 AM
Only right winger I supports Cam Neely.
get woke dumb cucks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cam_Neely
Born June 6, 1965 (age 52)
Comox, BC, CAN
Height 6 ft 1 in (185 cm)
Weight 218 lb (99 kg; 15 st 8 lb)
Position Right Wing
Shot Right
Played for Vancouver Canucks
Boston Bruins
NHL Draft 9th overall, 1983
Vancouver Canucks
Playing career 1983–1996
zodium
12-20-2017, 06:03 AM
But seriously, I hate the left, i hate the modern left so much, the republicans are just as bad BUT I dont hate them as much, because theyre bad in the way that someones old mean racist grandpa is bad..
the left however is supposed to be the YIN to this yang... its the light vs dark, day vs night, right vs wrong.
Its the balance that makes the world spin. But right now the left has lost control, and we have TWO bad sides in a TWO party system.
I hate the left because they used to fight for the good, but now they fight for the "other bad"
and we need someone to fight for the good.
There he sits: he talks awkwardly rather than glibly; he is courteous. He commands a distant and cold respect. But he is a very dangerous man. Were he primitive and brutal he would be a criminal—a murderer. But he is subtle and cruel. He would rise high in a Nazi regime. It would need men just like him—intellectual and ruthless. But Mr. C is not a born Nazi. He is the product of a democracy hypocritically preaching social equality and practicing a carelessly brutal snobbery. He is a sensitive, gifted man who has been humiliated into nihilism. He would laugh to see heads roll.
Ahldagor
12-20-2017, 09:59 AM
my car is getting fucked up pretty bad every year by poorly done road work and half ass projects that aren't repaired correctly or other non road related work.
so roads are definitely an election issue. its really bad in every state pretty much. no tax money spent the last several years on any roads, state or fed.
texas has a lot of private highways i heard so its a little different?
Private roads are usually drive ways for the rural homes. Lots of county roads are neglected because there is no money from the tax base due to low population. Cagle takes care of the basics which is all a government really should do.
Patriam1066
12-20-2017, 11:35 AM
my car is getting fucked up pretty bad every year by poorly done road work and half ass projects that aren't repaired correctly or other non road related work.
so roads are definitely an election issue. its really bad in every state pretty much. no tax money spent the last several years on any roads, state or fed.
texas has a lot of private highways i heard so its a little different?
The highways in Texas, even public ones, are fairly well maintained. However, roads in Houston are garbage. Total trash
Also, San Antonio has the worst roads / drivers I've ever seen in my life
skarlorn
12-20-2017, 12:12 PM
oh boy do i love driving westheimer NOT
mickmoranis
12-20-2017, 12:39 PM
I have no comment skarlorn deep dicked me so hard i am sore
skarlorn
12-20-2017, 12:43 PM
I admire your honorable acknowledgement. Welcome back to the forums dear pal :-)
mickmoranis
12-20-2017, 01:10 PM
thanks buddy poke gave me this awesome christmas presnet too and its my sig now but I have to crop it or maybe ill change my avatar but i love my avatar :(
https://i.imgur.com/Lgx0bt5.png
CyricTheMad420
12-20-2017, 01:24 PM
whole thread is fucking gold ha
mickmoranis
12-20-2017, 01:26 PM
whole thread is fucking gold ha
Pokesan
12-20-2017, 01:35 PM
fix it to be less shit pls. i know you can do better than me!
mickmoranis
12-20-2017, 01:47 PM
fix it to be less shit pls. i know you can do better than me!
dude the meme quality cut out, the fresh prince twist... it cant be better than this.
skarlorn
12-20-2017, 04:07 PM
that image is BIG if TRUE
Pokesan
12-20-2017, 09:34 PM
lots of libertarians suddenly.
mickmoranis
12-21-2017, 10:17 AM
Right wingers 2008 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/14/AR2010061405423.html
Left wingers 2017 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2017/8/18/16151924/radicalization-white-supremacists-nazis
Raavak
12-21-2017, 12:00 PM
In a span of a week 2 of Obama's largest fascist power grabs were overturned. The ringing of the Liberty Bell should be drowning out the wailing of the commie-crats.
mickmoranis
12-21-2017, 02:42 PM
today in politics:
https://i.imgur.com/4a9bPfz.png
AzzarTheGod
12-21-2017, 04:26 PM
Bye bye mandate
mickmoranis
12-21-2017, 05:33 PM
Bye bye mandate
irs totally underbudget as is.
losing 20% of its budget.
if we have trump for 8 yeras we might be able to bankrupt IRS and close it down.
pray with me bros.
AzzarTheGod
12-22-2017, 12:34 AM
irs totally underbudget as is.
losing 20% of its budget.
if we have trump for 8 yeras we might be able to bankrupt IRS and close it down.
pray with me bros.
pras n prayers
*closes circle with Mick holding hands*
Ahldagor
12-22-2017, 01:32 AM
Y'all are cute.
JurisDictum
12-22-2017, 02:20 AM
The President’s Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin, maintained that his department had run the numbers and had shown that the tax bill would pay for itself. It appears that he lied, not so much about the result of the Treasury’s study but about the existence of the study itself: the Times reported last month that the analysis had not been done.
But yea... Trump is a real champion for the middle class.
mickmoranis
12-22-2017, 06:40 PM
https://i.imgur.com/tepMoj6.png
AzzarTheGod
12-22-2017, 06:44 PM
https://i.imgur.com/tepMoj6.png
This is only 50% satire. Its a tax cut and it does benefit the middle class.
Of course smaller sized middle class businesses (5-10 million in profits/year) will see the largest relief. This is because businesses between 2-10 million were getting absolutely murdered by taxes, with no incentive to hire. That is the problem. You had this HUGE tax burden on smaller businesses for no reason, while the big dogs are over in Ireland and Holland paying a flat 15% while technically being an American founded company.
Businesses over 25 million in revenue, well they didn't really need a tax cut but are getting one anyway. That is one of the missteps of the bill.
Anyway, the bill does what Trump said he was going to do. There is no sense for the left to hate on it. The only thing they should be voicing strong dissent for is not taxing passive income over 100 million dollars, and not raising the capital gains tax and/or changing the definition of capital gains. P.S. draft federal regulations on hedge funds please. stop giving these overnight billionaires a place to make money disappear and we'll be a lot richer as a whole.
mickmoranis
12-22-2017, 06:47 PM
stop giving these overnight billionaires a place to make money disappear and we'll be a lot richer as a whole.
no, im pretty sure its the middle class's appetite for netflix and chrome wheels thats the bigger problem, but i feel you.
AzzarTheGod
12-22-2017, 06:48 PM
no, im pretty sure its the middle class's appetite for netflix and chrome wheels thats the bigger problem, but i feel you.
Ah no.
They literally make money disappear.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/13/an-industry-in-crisis-hedge-funds-bleed-100-billion-in-2016.html
The fact that every successful business magnate and Sillicon Valley innovator rushes out to a secret hedge fund (hedge funds are not allowed to advertise, and do not report statistics to the public) is cannibalizing this country.
AzzarTheGod
12-22-2017, 06:52 PM
chrome wheels and netflix and cell phone bills are nowhere near a 100 billion thrown in the trash in just 2016 alone. definition of treason: americans burning money to foreign nationals.
Its a major problem its been a major problem since the early 1990s and its intensifying. get woke
mickmoranis
12-22-2017, 06:52 PM
Ah no.
They literally make money disappear.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/13/an-industry-in-crisis-hedge-funds-bleed-100-billion-in-2016.html
The fact that every successful business magnate and Sillicon Valley innovator rushes out to a secret hedge fund (hedge funds are not allowed to advertise, and do not report statistics to the public) is cannibalizing this country.
but this link says Despite all the outflows, hedge funds actually ended the year with more money than they had going in, thanks to $119.9 billion in performance gains
AzzarTheGod
12-22-2017, 06:55 PM
but this link says Despite all the outflows, hedge funds actually ended the year with more money than they had going in, thanks to $119.9 billion in performance gains
and how many of those are foreign nationals or those with foreign interests, I.E. the soros of the world.
The winners of hedge funds play basketball on our court, and walk off the court with our money. They are not American citizens.
you're literally aiding and abetting people who hate the US and encouraging our successful businessmen and entrepreneurs to throw all their money away at a Saudi Arabian craps table.
AzzarTheGod
12-22-2017, 07:00 PM
they shouldn't be allowed to play on our court. they can go make their own court in Malaysia.
this globalist hole in the boat needs to be plugged up and the pirate raiders need to be knocked off the decks.
mickmoranis
12-22-2017, 07:14 PM
ok well, if oyu want to talk to naci palosi about how its the end of the world here's her number (seriously u can talk to her directly I call it almost every day and call them cucks): (415) 556-4862
Azzar, I hate to break it to you but the matters of the problem you speak of are above our pay grade. :( How to fix?
In the meantime I wont goostep to liberal goy trying to get me to rebell against giving money to the working class via tax breaks that happen to also give the rich money.
Besides I get A LOT more money now so, works out for me big time.
AzzarTheGod
12-22-2017, 07:17 PM
hedge funds also aren't even lawful to begin with. If you have access this article sums it up.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2007-01-01/hands-hedge-funds
mickmoranis
12-22-2017, 07:32 PM
i feel you but thats a fight for another timeline in a different multiverse, we already proved that both the left and the right are hard pass on this type of wokeness.
our timeline is going to be a little more ruff if you know what I mean, ie bitcoin is nice but canned goods are nicer.
skarlorn
12-22-2017, 07:48 PM
yo real talk who can point me to a global economic breakdown which reveals how much the american middle class is propped up by our military-industrial bully status or how much that's just empowering our oligarchy real talk five words or less would be great
Pokesan
12-22-2017, 08:02 PM
yo real talk who can point me to a global economic breakdown which reveals how much the american middle class is propped up by our military-industrial bully status or how much that's just empowering our oligarchy real talk five words or less would be great
gas prices
skarlorn
12-22-2017, 08:34 PM
frak
Patriam1066
12-23-2017, 04:09 PM
yo real talk who can point me to a global economic breakdown which reveals how much the american middle class is propped up by our military-industrial bully status or how much that's just empowering our oligarchy real talk five words or less would be great
Tail wags the dog
JurisDictum
12-23-2017, 08:02 PM
yo real talk who can point me to a global economic breakdown which reveals how much the american middle class is propped up by our military-industrial bully status or how much that's just empowering our oligarchy real talk five words or less would be great
Took me awhile but I got it!
9241
Pokesan
12-27-2017, 01:15 PM
having given it 2 minutes of thought, I've decided to be racist against austrians. they are troublemakers.
zodium
12-27-2017, 01:33 PM
gas prices
:eek:
JurisDictum
12-28-2017, 12:11 PM
I just learned from CNN that women are feeling empowered (http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/27/health/sexual-harassment-women-empowerment/index.html) now. As I tried to read the article some video came on with a woman loudly saying something along the lines of "you can't touch her butt" in scolding tone.
Lulz~Sect
12-28-2017, 01:42 PM
the hell i can’t
nilzark
12-28-2017, 06:59 PM
This thread is going nowhere.
AzzarTheGod
12-28-2017, 07:13 PM
thread dead in water. zeitgeist collapse
hyejin
12-28-2017, 11:08 PM
rubs gel on paddles
JurisDictum
12-28-2017, 11:34 PM
thread dead in water. zeitgeist collapse
I never actually voted on this thread.
Ahldagor
12-29-2017, 02:44 AM
thread dead in water. zeitgeist collapse
Happened months ago. How's your swimming skill?
hyejin
12-29-2017, 02:59 AM
wipes off paddles and sets them down with expression like "nah"
AzzarTheGod
12-29-2017, 03:41 AM
Happened months ago. How's your swimming skill?
Oh I've just been riding in this neat submarine this whole time.
https://i.imgur.com/34ioQsu.jpg
*looks out viewport wistfully, catches glimpse of a very large shadow passing overhead*
Captain, 3 o'clock turn on the double
*vessel shifts 90 degrees in pursuit*
Ahldagor
12-29-2017, 09:53 AM
Sounds like hippie drug talk "submarine"
Patriam1066
12-29-2017, 05:34 PM
This thread is going nowhere.
It's because TRUMP is doing too well
Checked my stock portfolio and I can't even be mad about the president being a dumb ass anymore
AzzarTheGod
12-29-2017, 08:16 PM
one headlight off, driving through the streets,
80mph when its red,
only one reason,
cuz im on a whales head,
and if he aint in these streets,
then im going to his bed,
catch him, put a carpal through his threads,
then its back to the block,
and u know how I do man,
I got that ROCK
***ULTRA MIC DROP***
mickmoranis
12-30-2017, 12:53 AM
It's because TRUMP is doing too well
Checked my stock portfolio and I can't even be mad about the president being a dumb ass anymore
welcome back
Ahldagor
12-30-2017, 03:05 AM
That was expected due to trend. Blame the last guy and take the credit motif? Grab a beer and float this river.
AzzarTheGod
12-30-2017, 03:15 AM
That was expected due to trend. Blame the last guy and take the credit motif? Grab a beer and float this river.
Disney heiress to personally pocket 30 million in cash from the tax cut, admits none of it is going anywhere except her pocket.
mickmoranis
12-30-2017, 04:27 AM
That was expected due to trend. Blame the last guy and take the credit motif? Grab a beer and float this river.
its funny when libtards quote bush supporters
Ahldagor
12-30-2017, 03:07 PM
its funny when libtards quote bush supporters
Context, bruh.
Pokesan
12-30-2017, 03:37 PM
Context, bruh.
he's right though. the 2008 crash happened before obama was even elected.
JurisDictum
12-30-2017, 03:38 PM
Context:
It used to be that Bernie Sanders was an ideological lone ranger in the Senate. Now, a whole host of potential presidential hopefuls are racing to represent the liberal grass roots on their issues of the day — and pulling the Democratic Party’s center of gravity further to the left.
The trend was apparent throughout the fall among the half-dozen Democratic senators drawing the loudest buzz for 2020 — aside from Sanders (I-Vt.), the group includes Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.).
New left rising.
Pokesan
12-30-2017, 03:39 PM
booker leftist? lol no
skarlorn
12-30-2017, 03:41 PM
he's right though. the 2008 crash happened before obama was even elected.
Exactly. Thanks Bush.
JurisDictum
12-30-2017, 03:58 PM
booker leftist? lol no
I don't know much about him. But they couldn't just list 6 people without 1 black guy could they? Sounds like whatever else Booker did, he wants to get on board with Bernie.
mickmoranis
12-30-2017, 05:27 PM
Exactly. Thanks Bush.
gotta love those bail outs that I think my hipster president did to save the economy
Pokesan
12-30-2017, 07:12 PM
https://i.imgur.com/3rCOiTq.jpg
Patriam1066
12-30-2017, 07:20 PM
https://i.imgur.com/3rCOiTq.jpg
Lol
skarlorn
12-30-2017, 07:49 PM
https://i.imgur.com/3rCOiTq.jpg
Love getting called goyim
hyejin
12-30-2017, 08:09 PM
hypothetical question here: what if aesthetically pleasing, functional vagina nipples have to be installed into genes before birth? does you're little boy get them or nah? doesn't denying your little boy vagina nipples constitute overriding his consent anyway and so you should just decide based on what you think is most aesthetically sound?
followup for the no's: what if they come discounted in a modification package that reduces incidence of cancer and MS by 99% and it would save U a year salary on those health packages?
tertiary for holdouts: what if the don of the zaibatsu requires u submit you're baby boy to nipple mod and circumcision to get the health mods installed at all? could vanilla boys with 100 yr lifespans win in the marketplace vs semi-immortal, sexually unfrustrated cyborgs or would U merely be damning your natty child to poverty and loneliness?
please answer question by question as they apply.
skarlorn
12-30-2017, 08:19 PM
Just to get clear. The vaginal nipple mods are activate on demand, but impossible to activate if I don't put them into my boy?
hyejin
12-30-2017, 08:21 PM
the functionality of the vagina nipples is up to U. Consider it you're "dream" vagina nipple. I'm not the vagina nipple engineer. but be realistic: 1 thing it can't do is seal shut and be invisible -- visible vaginas all the time. However, the vagina nipple cannot be implanted after birth it can only be installed into the gametes before fertilization.
Pokesan
12-30-2017, 08:23 PM
gotta replay ff7 this winter
thanks for reminder
skarlorn
12-30-2017, 08:58 PM
Without fathoming the shape of my ideal vagina nipple I can instinctively say I would install it as an option if it were a cultural norm and would increase potential appeal of my spawn.
Otherwise I'd only opt for it if there were other benefits like free health care like in your third and second options to an extent.
It seems like an unnecessary burden to put on a baby child and if they really want a vagina nipple they should genetically engineer a solution and I'll give myself one in solidarity.
hyejin
12-30-2017, 09:17 PM
i gave u something to run with and u woudlnt even answer point by point like i asked. ill have to write a whole nother post if i want to tease you into the intellectual juicy bits of the vagina nipple question.
do u have any idea how long it takes to punctuate a post this way by blowing into a tube? sad behavior.
Nilstoniakrath
12-30-2017, 11:45 PM
hypothetical question here: what if aesthetically pleasing, functional vagina nipples have to be installed into genes before birth? does you're little boy get them or nah? doesn't denying your little boy vagina nipples constitute overriding his consent anyway and so you should just decide based on what you think is most aesthetically sound?
followup for the no's: what if they come discounted in a modification package that reduces incidence of cancer and MS by 99% and it would save U a year salary on those health packages?
tertiary for holdouts: what if the don of the zaibatsu requires u submit you're baby boy to nipple mod and circumcision to get the health mods installed at all? could vanilla boys with 100 yr lifespans win in the marketplace vs semi-immortal, sexually unfrustrated cyborgs or would U merely be damning your natty child to poverty and loneliness?
please answer question by question as they apply.
This entire discussion will soon be moot, once brain transplants are perfected.
mickmoranis
12-30-2017, 11:51 PM
Guns don’t kill people, Iranian police do.
JurisDictum
12-31-2017, 02:33 PM
We got a more credible list of progressives from the one progressive newspaper left, The Nation:
https://www.thenation.com/article/the-2017-progressive-honor-roll/
But they are still talking softly to the bourgeois wing of the party IMO. They even mentioned Joe Kennedy III...GTFO of here with that BS. Calling his gun control speech "Most Valuable House Speech," says a lot about the value of House speeches.
Patriam1066
12-31-2017, 08:16 PM
Guns don’t kill people, Iranian police do.
That's not new. Using it as a pretext for war would be a huge mistake
AzzarTheGod
01-01-2018, 04:18 AM
That's not new. Using it as a pretext for war would be a huge mistake
I dont think its about going to war so much as its about social and economic pressure on the regime (I.E. getting more support for additional sanctions).
Any talk like pretext to war is just coming from Israel and their prop pieces, no one else. More specifically, the political party of Benj4min N3t@nyahu who just stole an election in order to further the deep state agenda of Israel. Yes they have a deep state too.
AzzarTheGod
01-01-2018, 04:20 AM
That's not new. Using it as a pretext for war would be a huge mistake
But let's keep in mind we have opened fire on sovereign governments for far less. I.E. Qaddafi was not guilty of any crime, and guilty of no crime against his people.
We wouldn't hit Iran until it turns into a Libyan situation. The people must revolt first, then the US would begin covert operations. There will not be a frontal assault on Iran. just arming rebels, sabotaging computer systems, stoking the fire, steering the agenda (through social media) etc much in the same vein as Egypt and other Arab Spring countries.
We've been down this road before. We know the playbook.
JurisDictum
01-01-2018, 02:56 PM
If we invade Iran -- we're marrying that bitch and we aren't leaving. I hope people understand this. We're talking huge expense at minimum. And we would still probably look like monsters to the Muslim world.
Big increase in terrorism likely. Almost certainly we will try to legitimize a totally corrupt regime that agrees to brutally suppress terrorism/anyone who challenges them.
its bad bad bad. It's so bad I don't think were actually going to do it. But I've been wrong about Trump before.
Patriam1066
01-01-2018, 03:48 PM
If we invade Iran -- we're marrying that bitch and we aren't leaving. I hope people understand this. We're talking huge expense at minimum. And we would still probably look like monsters to the Muslim world.
Big increase in terrorism likely. Almost certainly we will try to legitimize a totally corrupt regime that agrees to brutally suppress terrorism/anyone who challenges them.
its bad bad bad. It's so bad I don't think were actually going to do it. But I've been wrong about Trump before.
No way- a unified, successful, democratic Iran would be even more anti-Saudi than the current nation. The playbook for Iran would be to carve it up into smaller ethnic states to weaken any potential resistance to Israel and Saudi Arabia
I don't think an invasion or "regime change" happens though. We have generals and intelligence analysts who know Iran can mobilize literally millions of Shia devotees who will happily die for the state. In addition, some of the protesters are calling for a parliamentary democracy, some are calling for the last descendant of the Shah to be restored as monarch, but most are calling for cheaper eggs
The point is, Persians arent brain dead Arabs who say "Allahu Akbar" whilst taking up AKs to shoot up streets in a murderous orgy to topple the regime. These are protests representing discontent, not an organized revolution. The sad truth is the Iranian regime has staying power. Oh, and the second a Saudi jet flies over Iran, all of those protestors will be falling in line behind the regime, just like during the Iran-Iraq war, to defend the homeland
For my part, I'll be taking a huge dump on the entrance to a local Sunni mosque after eating nothing but pork for a week
mickmoranis
01-01-2018, 04:03 PM
Its almost as if we need total global destabilization for any of these countries to change... hmmmm
hows that old saying about making omelets go?
skarlorn
01-01-2018, 05:18 PM
In addition, some of the protesters are calling for a parliamentary democracy, some are calling for the last descendant of the Shah to be restored as monarch, but most are calling for cheaper eggs
This post jumped off the screen and benched 300 lb then slapped my ass and hopped back inside the comp
Ahldagor
01-02-2018, 09:40 AM
Is Iran using the US dollar to trade their oil with? That's an important factor.
AzzarTheGod
01-02-2018, 06:10 PM
The playbook for Iran would be to carve it up into smaller ethnic states to weaken any potential resistance to Israel and Saudi Arabia
I don't think an invasion or "regime change" happens though.
Disagree with you saying it can't happen. But the hurdles are huge. Iran is essentially a first-world country that has been held back by not participating in Western banking. Its very far from a hell hole like Libya despite what the West wants people to think. Its a great nation, under any regime.
It would be like saying we are going to invade Turkey to fix the problems in Turkey. The fact N3t@nyahu is pushing for war is definitely a factor. I think what this will amount to is some air strikes on nuclear sites. The Israel far right definitely wants to make use of this presidency while it still can. The Israeli far right is under heavy fire from that last election fraud. It amounted to a Vladimir Putin style election with the results predetermined. So this is their last chance to make an impact against Iran. They can't risk another election theft again or Israel will lose legitimacy. They have to get Iran done within the next 2-4 years. There is a finite amount of time for Neo-Con Trump and fascist n3t@nyahu to make this happen.
Partitioning ethnic states made sense in Iraq and we didn't partition Iraq either. So thats definitely not a possibility.
AzzarTheGod
01-02-2018, 07:48 PM
lmao fuck that bitch cuz im still in the zone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oZpTzTL9cU
AzzarTheGod
01-02-2018, 07:52 PM
auxillary licks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe52Tpjo3AE
skarlorn
01-02-2018, 09:48 PM
Sorry I underdelivered for u pages back big j, I did my best and I can appreciate the effort you put shit posting for me
hyejin
01-03-2018, 04:13 PM
Worry not my love. Still learning to dictate in placitude. I think no more correction stream of consciousness for y'all, since you love me so much and the default aesthetics tracking me all my life are 99th percentile anyway.
JurisDictum
01-03-2018, 05:00 PM
So apparently the Silicon Valley elite are now notorious for big sex parties. The problem with that is women are a bit disadvantaged by the dynamic.
See, rich entrepreneurs have a lot of different ways to make money. So to keep it interesting, they just let their dicks decide what to invest in. All kinds of business is decided at these sex parties.
The party scene is now so pervasive that women entrepreneurs say turning down invitations relegates them to the uncool-kids’ table. “It’s very hard to create a personal connection with a male investor, and if you succeed, they become attracted to you,” one told me. “They think you’re part of their inner circle, [and] in San Francisco that means you’re invited to some kind of orgy. I couldn’t escape it here. Not doing it was a thing.” Rather than finding it odd that she would attend a sex party, says this entrepreneur, people would be confused about her not attending. “The fact that you don’t go is weird,” the entrepreneur said, and it means being left out of important conversations. “They talk business at these parties. They do business,” she said. “They decide things.” Ultimately, this entrepreneur got so fed up that she moved herself and her start-up to New York and left Silicon Valley for good.
The rich are literally making us suck their dick for money.
These guys are the top. They are determining what the pinnacle of success is in America. They should be aware they are being watched. They should be watched. By everyone.
Article was from Vanity Fair: “Oh My God, This Is So F---ed Up”: Inside Silicon Valley’s Secretive, Orgiastic Dark Side (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/brotopia-silicon-valley-secretive-orgiastic-inner-sanctum)"
AzzarTheGod
01-03-2018, 05:41 PM
So apparently the Silicon Valley elite are now notorious for big sex parties. The problem with that is women are a bit disadvantaged by the dynamic.
See, rich entrepreneurs have a lot of different ways to make money. So to keep it interesting, they just let their dicks decide what to invest in. All kinds of business is decided at these sex parties.
The rich are literally making us suck their dick for money.
These guys are the top. They are determining what the pinnacle of success is in America. They should be aware they are being watched. They should be watched. By everyone.
Article was from Vanity Fair: “Oh My God, This Is So F---ed Up”: Inside Silicon Valley’s Secretive, Orgiastic Dark Side (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/brotopia-silicon-valley-secretive-orgiastic-inner-sanctum)"
Makes sense. They specifically talked about this culture on True Detective season 2.
He specifically referenced that "Deals get done" at these parties.
Just goes to show you Pizzolotto did his homework and the show had some basis in reality.
Xaanka
01-03-2018, 08:48 PM
So apparently the Silicon Valley elite are now notorious for big sex parties. The problem with that is women are a bit disadvantaged by the dynamic.
See, rich entrepreneurs have a lot of different ways to make money. So to keep it interesting, they just let their dicks decide what to invest in. All kinds of business is decided at these sex parties.
The rich are literally making us suck their dick for money.
These guys are the top. They are determining what the pinnacle of success is in America. They should be aware they are being watched. They should be watched. By everyone.
Article was from Vanity Fair: “Oh My God, This Is So F---ed Up”: Inside Silicon Valley’s Secretive, Orgiastic Dark Side (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/brotopia-silicon-valley-secretive-orgiastic-inner-sanctum)"
haha i got fired from a major online video game retailer and studio that will never release the third release of their flagship title (wink wink) because i wouldn't have weird poly-amorous sex with a bunch of gross tech dudes and their blue hair rotten crotch female companions (whores)
i gave up on the whole industry, it instantly became HYPER creepy the second i was trans.
another one that happens to be a foreign console company who's primary market is children (hint) harassed me until i quit because i went to HR about sexual harassment because i walked in on a 19 year old latino boy throwing up on a 85+ year old chinese exec's cock in the bathroom.
i could be possibly talking about some of the biggest companies in the entire industry. who knows. you'll just have to guess.
Ahldagor
01-03-2018, 09:06 PM
The wealthy have orgies, oh no! Business is done in the backroom, oh no! Hasn't it always been that way?
Xaanka
01-03-2018, 10:29 PM
The wealthy have orgies, oh no! Business is done in the backroom, oh no! Hasn't it always been that way?
no its legitimately disgusting if you're female or trans you HAVE to participate in this weird poly-amorous drug-fueled sex orgy shit or else you get blacklisted or harassed out of your job. these are the same people loudly screeching about how our society doesn't respect women. much as it was hilarious when the entire world found out that hollywood was a cesspool of sex-addicted creeps who all happen to share the same religion, exposure of the hypocrisy of liberal policy-funding technocrats is awesome.
all the women are whores and deserve to be shamed as well though, lol @ the author trying to paint these women who just couldn't stop going to gross nerd sex orgies as victims. the only "victims" of that are people like me who chose to walk away from, got fired from, or harassed at a well paying job over it. personally i was done with dealing with gay nerd losers to begin with and i never went to school for anything i was doing but lol at some poor girl who goes to school to get into IT and gets faced with this shit.
skarlorn
01-04-2018, 02:36 AM
https://i.imgur.com/gN7LIqG.jpg
tbh
skarlorn
01-04-2018, 02:38 AM
no its legitimately disgusting if you're female or trans you HAVE to participate in this weird poly-amorous drug-fueled sex orgy shit or else you get blacklisted or harassed out of your job.
also interesting. sry 2 hear it. It's great to hear that you are mentally healthy enough to not be deep in that stuff. :)
JurisDictum
01-05-2018, 03:57 PM
You know Kink.com stuff was pretty hot from the Bay Area. Now they closed down...Its like the professionals have been moved out so some nerdy tech want-to-be can try to take their place....
Being a dom that can suduce kinky sub people is a cool kids club your more or less born into. And IDK who the fuck these guys think they are to pull it off so seamlessly. It just happens to be subordinates at work all the time eh?
Just hire a hooker and get over yourself.
I blame the way the BDSM community talks about consent. Like you get them to sign a forum in a office setting and then all bets are off. Its not supposed to be a mechanical business agreement -- unless you are hiring a hooker.
I'm assuming a lot of good will on behalf of these dominator wannabe nerds. Maybe they totally get it -- but get off on the power trip of coercing those that work under them to do stuff they don't want to. This is actually more likely.
And that's why I can't agree with the Anti-Feminist article published by the NYT today (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/opinion/golden-globes-metoo.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fo pinion):
What happened to women’s agency? That’s what I find myself wondering as I hear story after story of adult women who helplessly acquiesce to sexual demands. I find it especially curious given that a majority of women I know have been in situations in which men have come on to them — at work or otherwise. They have routinely said, “I’m not interested” or “Get your hands off me right now.” And they’ve taken the risk that comes with it.
Or maybe -- and this is just a maybe...the guy grabbing her ass should take the risk. Not her for choosing to work there.
Maybe if the author was born into a fuck up family where her step dad molested her or something -- should have a better understanding of why standing up to certain kinds of guys is extremely difficult for certain kinds of women. Even if that is not ALL women.
But I do agree with the due process point she made....I just found this quote very left field.
Raavak
01-05-2018, 04:18 PM
I blame the way the BDSM community talks about consent. Like you get them to sign a forum in a office setting and then all bets are off. Its not supposed to be a mechanical business agreement -- unless you are hiring a hooker.
That's a "50 Shades of Grey"'s f'd up understanding of BDSM, not real BDSM.
Ahldagor
01-05-2018, 04:40 PM
Porn actors and actresses sign a contract that puts them in that black and white position because it's a staged performance to sell a fantasy. Private bdsm stuff is consentual and requires a lot of trust between those engaging in the behavior.
Kink proly left Cali because of the mandatory condom usage for porn filming in Cali. Most consumers want to see unprotected sex, so the market dictates unprotected sex since it's a business.
hyejin
01-05-2018, 05:01 PM
Currently monitoring this thread!
Also, this whole aversion to sex and sexual dynamic in the workplace categorically is severely misguided. I'd never swap fluids for safety, but I'm far far more valuable when I have all other options open for managing the psychology of my fellow-samurai. Particularly now that everything I do is accomplished with voice and legs. ^^
Working was very depressing when I had to charcoal-filter my personality. My coworkers are way happier now too and we definitely make more money with me pulling all levers available. My employees get prettier and healthier and they dress better and smile when they come to work and I don't hurt them. :o No less legitimate than the 'family business' model; it gets gross only when gross people are involved.
JurisDictum
01-08-2018, 03:39 PM
So one place the Democratic elite have been getting their dumb fucking ideas (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/08/tom-steyer-2018-midterms-327574?lo=ap_e1) on how to resist Trump -- is a billionaire hedge fund manager Tom Steyer.
The billionaire has been the biggest donor to Democrats in recent election cycles, to the tune of nearly $200 million. His national stature has grown recently with a series of straight-to-camera ads, calling for the impeachment of President Donald Trump. That campaign will continue, Steyer said, adding that he will be delivering copies of “Fire and Fury,” the Michael Wolff book infuriating Trump’s White House, to all congressional offices.
I just hope he is stupid enough to run for president himself. Which it sounds like he may be. Whenever I see some crap billionaire candidate that fancies himself a man of the people -- I'll call him Steyer.
Steyer has been playing heavily in races across the country in recent years, largely through his NextGen political group that initially was focused on climate issues. The group relaunched in 2016 with a broader mandate, not zeroing in on any one issue.
“We have taken a disastrous turn, and now we need to get back to a path to a just and prosperous future,” he said.
In other words he is full of shit and doesn't care about anything except being in power and maybe the environment. Fucking gross.
skarlorn
01-08-2018, 03:41 PM
Currently monitoring this thread!
Also, this whole aversion to sex and sexual dynamic in the workplace categorically is severely misguided. I'd never swap fluids for safety, but I'm far far more valuable when I have all other options open for managing the psychology of my fellow-samurai. Particularly now that everything I do is accomplished with voice and legs. ^^
Working was very depressing when I had to charcoal-filter my personality. My coworkers are way happier now too and we definitely make more money with me pulling all levers available. My employees get prettier and healthier and they dress better and smile when they come to work and I don't hurt them. :o No less legitimate than the 'family business' model; it gets gross only when gross people are involved.
;-)
JurisDictum
01-08-2018, 05:25 PM
Oprah might run for president apparently...
Here is a list (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/08/oprah-winfrey-political-issues-328242?lo=ap_a1)of what we know about Oprah's politics:
Winfrey favors increased background checks on guns
Winfrey supportive of paths to citizenship for undocumented immigrants
Winfrey a staunch advocate of LGBT rights
Winfrey stressed importance of press freedom at Golden Globes
‘60 Minutes’ approach signals wish to lessen political polarization
Winfrey questioned the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq
What's missing here?.....hmmmmm....what important issue that everyone cares about is mysteriously missing from the to-do list of the most benevolent woman on daytime T.V.?
hmmmm
Patriam1066
01-08-2018, 06:05 PM
Not voting for Oprah
Patriam1066
01-08-2018, 06:07 PM
https://i.imgur.com/gN7LIqG.jpg
tbh
LOL
maskedmelon
01-08-2018, 07:03 PM
Oprah might run for president apparently...
Here is a list (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/08/oprah-winfrey-political-issues-328242?lo=ap_a1)of what we know about Oprah's politics:
Winfrey favors increased background checks on guns
Winfrey supportive of paths to citizenship for undocumented immigrants
Winfrey a staunch advocate of LGBT rights
Winfrey stressed importance of press freedom at Golden Globes
‘60 Minutes’ approach signals wish to lessen political polarization
Winfrey questioned the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq
What's missing here?.....hmmmmm....what important issue that everyone cares about is mysteriously missing from the to-do list of the most benevolent woman on daytime T.V.?
hmmmm
climate change
JurisDictum
01-08-2018, 07:25 PM
Ahh shit I didn't even realize she missed out on climate change posturing.
But as MM knows -- I was referring to wealth inequality. The party elite is desperate. They need some plutocrat-friendly nominee and soon. How else are they going to crowd out all the legitimate populist candidates?
Oprah would lose us the election likely...she would turn it into a white vs everyone else kind of deal. Her advisers probably couldn't wait to get hysterical about any criticism directed her way being racist. This would pretty much instantly turn off the non-SJW population.
Ahldagor
01-08-2018, 10:30 PM
Lol, Oprah, celebrity candidate, lololol. No, she wouldn't win and would be a cynical nominee by the DNC. Seriously, wtf. Whichever party gets their shit together and takes care of the basics will have the country for the next 30 years.
hyejin
01-08-2018, 10:59 PM
you've already given a lot but if you please please let me experience Oprah v Trump I'll experience about a 8 month orgasm, require IV fluids and be very grateful
maskedmelon
01-09-2018, 11:36 AM
a bashful little smile still wriggles onto my face every time I consider that POTUS is Donald J Trump. dont think i'd experience orgasm getting to see Oprah vs. Trump, butt there sure would be something super liberating about it. i can't imagine any worries finding purchase in my mind forever thereafter ^^;
JurisDictum
01-09-2018, 01:51 PM
There's like 5 more Oprah articles today.
David Brooks writes an article about how "Anti-Trumpism" is in decline
I think the bar has been lowered again on us.
skarlorn
01-09-2018, 02:13 PM
i bet oprah would be ruthless as a commander in chief tbh
JurisDictum
01-09-2018, 02:22 PM
Well its hard to argue shes not qualified with Trump sitting in office. She would be a strong candidate....but I have a strange feeling she would be more of a foreign policy president that doesn't do much for the economy...how much you want a bet she would just recruit the Clinton empire?
But I do think she would be a total peace dove on FP and be famous for that.
skarlorn
01-09-2018, 02:27 PM
oprah is an extremely strong candidate in the zeitgeist. She WILL run and WILL be a strong contender in the Democratic primaries. Her win or loss will ultimately ride on her willingness to fuck over the people voting for her and give up her authority for the people who put her into power.
She'll definitely out-PR and out-muscle all the other female candidates, of whom there will be more than men right now, because the DNC is wrongfully thinking that they need a woman to get Trump out of office. But she WILL lose to Trump who will absolutely destroy her with his master-level bullying tactics and psychological assault.
I really hope the Democrats manage to put a more legit person up for election. I would still vote for Sanders. I'm not seeing many better options now that Kid Rock is running for Senate and the entire entertainment industry suddenly has a boner because they realize the dystopian future of Idiocracy is Now.
mickmoranis
01-09-2018, 06:05 PM
heh sanders is out there actually trying to change policy and meanwhile democrats are like, *chortle that fool, the onlyl way to do that is pink hats and marching* meanwhile he reminds them he raised more money and gathered more crowds during the primary than any candidate in any of our lifetimes and that didnt help so.... lol
maskedmelon
01-09-2018, 06:25 PM
oprah is an extremely strong candidate in the zeitgeist. She WILL run and WILL be a strong contender in the Democratic primaries. Her win or loss will ultimately ride on her willingness to fuck over the people voting for her and give up her authority for the people who put her into power.
She'll definitely out-PR and out-muscle all the other female candidates, of whom there will be more than men right now, because the DNC is wrongfully thinking that they need a woman to get Trump out of office. But she WILL lose to Trump who will absolutely destroy her with his master-level bullying tactics and psychological assault.
I really hope the Democrats manage to put a more legit person up for election. I would still vote for Sanders. I'm not seeing many better options now that Kid Rock is running for Senate and the entire entertainment industry suddenly has a boner because they realize the dystopian future of Idiocracy is Now.
lotta truth in that last line. recently learned the unsurprising fact that parents who have children outside of marriage have an a stage IQ 10 points lower than their married counterparts. when 40% of births within a democracy are to parents in the 25th percentile of intellectual prowess, we can expect big things in the future, BIG things.
Patriam1066
01-09-2018, 06:43 PM
heh sanders is out there actually trying to change policy and meanwhile democrats are like, *chortle that fool, the onlyl way to do that is pink hats and marching* meanwhile he reminds them he raised more money and gathered more crowds during the primary than any candidate in any of our lifetimes and that didnt help so.... lol
And lost decisively to Clinton
Patriam1066
01-09-2018, 06:44 PM
oprah is an extremely strong candidate in the zeitgeist. She WILL run and WILL be a strong contender in the Democratic primaries. Her win or loss will ultimately ride on her willingness to fuck over the people voting for her and give up her authority for the people who put her into power.
She'll definitely out-PR and out-muscle all the other female candidates, of whom there will be more than men right now, because the DNC is wrongfully thinking that they need a woman to get Trump out of office. But she WILL lose to Trump who will absolutely destroy her with his master-level bullying tactics and psychological assault.
I really hope the Democrats manage to put a more legit person up for election. I would still vote for Sanders. I'm not seeing many better options now that Kid Rock is running for Senate and the entire entertainment industry suddenly has a boner because they realize the dystopian future of Idiocracy is Now.
Oprah could win bud. Honestly, how much worse could she be than trump? I was serious when I said all television should be 24/7 airings of Patton and the Passion of the Christ. We would've avoided this collective fate as a nation
skarlorn
01-09-2018, 07:03 PM
And lost decisively to Clinton
Didn't he lose because DNC corruption and conspiracy to make him lose?
JurisDictum
01-09-2018, 07:20 PM
Didn't he lose because DNC corruption and conspiracy to make him lose?
TBH it wasn't all corruption though. Part of it was simply people assuming Clinton would win and wanting to identify with the winner....good ol' inevitability. Elite liberals liked Clinton more than Bernie...but they still had issues with her Foreign Policy. Hence why some Neo-cons went Clinton
But more dems voted for Bernie....that's a fact.
mickmoranis
01-09-2018, 07:37 PM
And lost decisively to Clinton
thanks to voter disenfranchisement and corrupt party fixing inside the DNC tho so dont be a basic bitch and forget that.
TBH it wasn't all corruption though. Part of it was simply people assuming Clinton would win and wanting to identify with the winner....good ol' inevitability. Elite liberals liked Clinton more than Bernie...but they still had issues with her Foreign Policy. Hence why some Neo-cons went Clinton
But more dems voted for Bernie....that's a fact.
when the super delegates and the party elite say that they have chosen their candidate, that is what put that idea into the minds of the average demacuck. So, it was manipulation. it was all a manipulation.
Also serious corruption, like in nevada, had a MAJOR affect on americas ability to see that sanders was the clear winner.
I mean obviously hillary was not a clear winner hence god emp got the win.
CyricTheMad420
01-09-2018, 07:52 PM
well lets see, Bernie had the lets make a change momentum and had all the little libs and hippies if i remember correctly they absolutely screwed him out of the primary seems like they killed some people over keeping it hush and then after taking his licks bernie went and bought a third home so hmm. then the dnc "leaks" were blamed on russia trying to get trump into office if you ask me the ellectoral college saved us from a clinton fixed election.
Patriam1066
01-09-2018, 07:54 PM
Didn't he lose because DNC corruption and conspiracy to make him lose?
Idk, that played into it. But even without superdelegates Bernie got wrecked in the Hispanic vote. He did shockingly bad here in Texas, and he lost Cali too. That doesn't bode well for his prospects...
You can't only win places like New Hampshire and vermont
mickmoranis
01-09-2018, 08:06 PM
Idk, that played into it. But even without superdelegates Bernie got wrecked in the Hispanic vote. He did shockingly bad here in Texas, and he lost Cali too. That doesn't bode well for his prospects...
You can't only win places like New Hampshire and vermont
what mattered were the white votes in the primary in NY and Cali... both manipulated basic bitches by the authority that they want telling them how to live their lives.
the Hispanics didn't go out and vote in the primary. Get real.
Mistle
01-09-2018, 08:14 PM
And now Fusion's testimony was released. Money laundering charges anyone?
The Trumpian brigade is so fucked.
skarlorn
01-09-2018, 08:42 PM
what mattered were the white votes in the primary in NY and Cali... both manipulated basic bitches by the authority that they want telling them how to live their lives.
the Hispanics didn't go out and vote in the primary. Get real.
i would rather disagree with a room full of white southern males at a MAGA rally than i would disagree with a room full of white hipster females at any place in san francisco
worst comes to worse, the guys beat you physically
the women will ostracize u on the spot and use social sabotage to try and stop you from spreading your seed anywhere in that geographic locale
mickmoranis
01-09-2018, 11:05 PM
https://www.dhs.gov/archive/current-status-states-territories
Department of Homeland Security
Current Status of States/Territories
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on December 20, 2013 a phased enforcement plan for the REAL ID Act (the Act), as passed by Congress, that will implement the Act in a measured, fair, and responsible way. The following is a list of the current status of each state/territory.
would you like to know more?: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/08/starting-jan-22-some-may-need-a-passport-for-domestic-air-travel.html
thanks cuckbama.
mickmoranis
01-09-2018, 11:06 PM
And now Fusion's testimony was released. Money laundering charges anyone?
The Trumpian brigade is so fucked.
classic democrat, cares nothing about whats going on in america, only cares about reality tv politics.
zodium
01-10-2018, 02:17 AM
worst comes to worse, the guys beat you physically
the women will ostracize u on the spot and use social sabotage to try and stop you from spreading your seed anywhere in that geographic locale
tfw your culture treats women so bad they unionize and lockout your dong. :o
Pokesan
01-10-2018, 12:07 PM
Not voting for Oprah
https://i.imgur.com/r8LjJ6V.png
mickmoranis
01-10-2018, 01:43 PM
wb
skarlorn
01-10-2018, 01:57 PM
https://i.imgur.com/r8LjJ6V.png
yes Yah YEAH my nurga however there is still a thin edge of meritocratic advancement to our increasingly feudal oligarchy.
my life goal is to establish an estate and become a feudal lord
hyejin
01-10-2018, 02:24 PM
yes Yah YEAH my nurga however there is still a thin edge of meritocratic advancement to our increasingly feudal oligarchy.
my life goal is to establish an estate and become a feudal lord
cynicism bout america is rly pre-trump
it's actually pretty ez to make it and u get a stable fief for it. your peers have been completely destroyed by alcohol, marijuana, social media which doesnt include my wisdom, and dietary missteps because they and their progenitors are inherently inferior. the system works good and the path is clear if u don't leap headlong into any obvious spike traps like marriage / drugs /etc
skarlorn
01-10-2018, 02:30 PM
cynicism bout america is rly pre-trump
it's actually pretty ez to make it and u get a stable fief for it. your peers have been completely destroyed by alcohol, marijuana, social media which doesnt include my wisdom, and dietary missteps because they and their progenitors are inherently inferior. the system works good and the path is clear if u don't leap headlong into any obvious spike traps like marriage / drugs /etc
Agreed I am on Track for Lordship by age 30 np. Sure I work some weekends while my peers snort mdma and drink but I'm good wid dat
Lhancelot
01-10-2018, 03:30 PM
the system works good and the path is clear if u don't leap headlong into any obvious spike traps like marriage / drugs /etc
What if you just slowly creep into the spike traps, is the effect the same in the end? I know some pretty happy drug addicts/married folk.
skarlorn
01-10-2018, 03:35 PM
What if you just slowly creep into the spike traps, is the effect the same in the end? I know some pretty happy drug addicts/married folk.
happiness does not equate to becoming a member of the Lordship. I would argue that seeking happiness is a spike trap.
hyejin
01-10-2018, 03:37 PM
What if you just slowly creep into the spike traps, is the effect the same in the end? I know some pretty happy drug addicts/married folk.
I hear what you're saying and have noticed this creep correlates with nonsentient pet ownership, symptomatic of fundamental moral/spiritual collapse. I won't rule out a pig experiencing pig's happiness but this sort of ugliness can only exist happily in stupefaction. I don't think that could equal real sublime human joy.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.