******Official politics thread ******

[ScaringChildren]

Oh no! Whatever will they do?? (https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/422545-dems-worry-top-three-candidates-in-polls-are-all-white-men)

[Irulan]

Oh no! Whatever will they do?? (https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/422545-dems-worry-top-three-candidates-in-polls-are-all-white-men)

It doesn't look like democrats are interested in governing.

[Wonkie]

It doesn't look like democrats are interested in governing.

they haven't even been seated yet.

u skinny dingus

[ScaringChildren]

they haven't even been seated yet.

u skinny dingus

what does the House have to do with anything?

u dingus

[maskedmelon]

on a happier note, I thought this was funny:

https://nypost.com/2018/12/17/radio-station-plays-baby-its-cold-outside-nonstop-amid-controversy/

[ScaringChildren]

on a happier note, I thought this was funny:

https://nypost.com/2018/12/17/radio-station-plays-baby-its-cold-outside-nonstop-amid-controversy/

Hell yeah, stickin' it to the Man---er, woman with guerrilla radio

[Wonkie]

on a happier note, I thought this was funny:

https://nypost.com/2018/12/17/radio-station-plays-baby-its-cold-outside-nonstop-amid-controversy/

ok google what is patriarchy

[Wonkie]

if u were out at a bar and your friend girl(no gf hehe) said she thought someone put something in her drink, what would your reaction be?

[maskedmelon]

id try to make sure she was okay (how's she feeling, etc.), seek to ascertain the source of the concern, inspect the druink, did she leave it unattended,who has been around her, etc. and then if i acquire the same concern maybe take a sample of it with us when we leave and in any case suggest that we leave or at a minimum stick together because she is obviously out of sorts whether something was put in her drink or not. either way, wouldn't let her out of my sight and would alert our friends.

hbu?

[maskedmelon]

ok google what is patriarchy

I did this, but didn't dig past the dictionary definitions which just sound like the origin and backbone of civilization. must be alternative bastardizations of the word out there that conform to whatever deluded narratives we'd care to saddle it with, butt im too lazy to dig hen up :c I'd be happy to consider any you liek to share though :3

[Irulan]

if u were out at a bar and your friend girl(no gf hehe) said she thought someone put something in her drink, what would your reaction be?

Wouldn't leave their side n be like lets go. Even if she became out of it. I'd like get arrested from fireman carrying her out to a uber or lyft for the ER if absolutely necessary.

[Wonkie]

id try to make sure she was okay (how's she feeling, etc.), seek to ascertain the source of the concern, inspect the druink, did she leave it unattended,who has been around her, etc. and then if i acquire the same concern maybe take a sample of it with us when we leave and in any case suggest that we leave or at a minimum stick together because she is obviously out of sorts whether something was put in her drink or not. either way, wouldn't let her out of my sight and would alert our friends.

hbu?

Wouldn't leave their side n be like lets go. Even if she became out of it. I'd like get arrested from fireman carrying her out to a uber or lyft for the ER if absolutely necessary.

that's good. you understand it means date rape.

qed the song should not be played.

[Wonkie]

otoh if it was off topic crew and k8 said dino did it, I'd understand she's falsely accusing him for fun and then we'd laugh and highfive.

[maskedmelon]

that's good. you understand it means date rape.

qed the song should not be played.


https://i.imgur.com/j7DGdci.gif

[Mblake81]

I always thought the song was about getting warm on liquor during a holiday snow and having sex.

"say, what's in this drink?"

Con be interpreted different ways. Might mean strong liquor .. "wow, what did you put in this?" or it could mean date rape "what's in this? some kind of date rape drug?" but that isn't in the song. Like many artistic things its left up to the listeners imagination.

Wonkie hears it as rape.

"Say what's in this drink? (no cabs to be had out there)"

Too drunk to drive. It's not "Say what's in this drink? (I gotta check the windows so no one sees me rape this chic)"

They were both getting liquored up, in a romantic setting, the woman knows whats up and so does the man. Errrr body in dis clubb gettin Tipsy *bass beats*. The lyrics are from her point of view, at least the controversial ones perhaps, during a more conservative time in America.

"Fuck deez hoes Fuck deez hoes woop woop"

[Wonkie]

I always thought the song was about getting warm on liquor during a holiday snow and having sex.

"say, what's in this drink?"

Con be interpreted different ways. Might mean strong liquor .. "wow, what did you put in this?" or it could mean date rape "what's in this? some kind of date rape drug?" but that isn't in the song. Like many artistic things its left up to the listeners imagination.

Wonkie hears it as rape.

"Say what's in this drink? (no cabs to be had out there)"

Too drunk to drive. It's not "Say what's in this drink? (I gotta check the windows so no one sees me rape this chic)"

They were both getting liquored up, in a romantic setting, the woman knows whats up and so does the man. Errrr body in dis clubb gettin Tipsy *bass beats*

if you have a different answer to the bar query I'll engage. right now it appears everyone understands it culturally as meaning date rape.

and that aint festive.

[maskedmelon]

if you have a different answer to the bar query I'll engage. right now it appears everyone understands it culturally as meaning date rape.


that's a false equivalency though, pokes. if you don't see that then you are either deluded (no offense, we all find ourselves this way at times in one regard or another), dishonest or insincere.

assuming you are sincere, set aside the visceral and engage the rational. you could experience a lot of growth if you found a way to do that and it'd probably lead to greater happiness ^^ otoh if rigid adherence to this schedule of broken thought (most pre-established worldviews are!) is necessary for you to maintain a respectable level of civility in your life then I'll shut up ^^ i understand and respect that. most us lean on delusion to remain upright. perhaps all.

[Wonkie]

that's a false equivalency though, pokes. if you don't see that then you are either deluded (no offense, we all find ourselves this way at times in one regard or another), dishonest or insincere.

assuming you are sincere, set aside the visceral and engage the rational. you could experience a lot of growth if you found a way to do that and it'd probably lead to greater happiness ^^ otoh if rigid adherence to this schedule of broken thought (most pre-established worldviews are!) is necessary for you to maintain a respectable level of civility in your life then I'll shut up ^^ i understand and respect that. most us lean on delusion to remain upright. perhaps all.

bud you already said thing in drink = date rape. the dissonance is your own, but thank you for not being *****rdly with your words.

[Irulan]

I wouldn't play that song or turn it up without expecting a negative, possibly hostile reaction from a liberal sjw "in the know".

Now I personally prefer manipulation, espionage, subterfuge, I mean diplomatic channels versus drugs.

Granted you could probably have sex with me if you brushed your teeth and bought me fancy patisserie.

So I find date rape really pathetic.

Then again being told to kill myself by people online is typically the highlight of my days.

[maskedmelon]

bud you already said thing in drink = date rape. the dissonance is your own, but thank you for not being *****rdly with your words.

thats the false equivalency :o you are supremely talented at debate and from how you go about it I gather it's entirely intuitive. whether it is or is not though it is a marvel.

to be clear, I did not say that, but I do not disagree with it either, conditionally. i don't recognize the scenario that you outlined to be anywhere in the realm of the scenario in the song though. context is relevant. and thank you for not considering my words dastardly. they weren't meant that way ^^

[Wonkie]

thats the false equivalency :o you are supremely talented at debate and from how you go about it I gather it's entirely intuitive. whether it is or is not though it is a marvel.

to be clear, I did not say that, but I do not disagree with it either, conditionally. i don't recognize the scenario that you outlined to be anywhere in the realm of the scenario in the song though. context is relevant. and thank you for not considering my words dastardly. they weren't meant that way ^^

if thing in drink means date rape
and
song say thing in drink
then
what does song mean?

not dastardly it refers to a previous word culture controversy where yall dictionary humpers annoyed me :o

[maskedmelon]

if thing in drink means date rape
and
song say thing in drink
then
what does song mean?

not dastardly it refers to a previous word culture controversy where yall dictionary humpers annoyed me :o

in the bad scenario, the implication of a friend saying she suspected someone put something in her drink would be that the thing in the drink was a date rape drug, which is something we have had to deal with for the last 20-30 years. as far as i know, this was not a thing in the 40s/50s and if it was, it was not as prevalent as it is today.

In the song, the girl is enjoying herself, implies she wants to stay, but does not want to suffer the slutshaming of the era. When she says "what's in this drink?" she most certainly is not suggesting it's been tainted with date rape drug. She's either suggesting it is strong, or more likely presenting it as an excuse to stay, which conforms to the silly nature of the song and the habit of blaming socially unacceptable behavior on alcohol in that era.

and now I feel I have been duped into typing far more than any sane person should on this topic and in a way feel like this is somehow an indictment on my usual attempts to argue first principles in a vacuum.

you are a goober.

[ScaringChildren]

if you have a different answer to the bar query I'll engage. right now it appears everyone understands it culturally as meaning date rape.

and that aint festive.

This is called "Confirmation Bias".

You hear "What's in this drink?" and think date rape drug.

That's your fault for misunderstanding the lyrics due to your psychotic preconceptions of the world.

[Wonkie]

in the bad scenario, the implication of a friend saying she suspected someone put something in her drink would be that the thing in the drink was a date rape drug, which is something we have had to deal with for the last 20-30 years. as far as i know, this was not a thing in the 40s/50s and if it was, it was not as prevalent as it is today.

In the song, the girl is enjoying herself, implies she wants to stay, but does not want to suffer the slutshaming of the era. When she says "what's in this drink?" she most certainly is not suggesting it's been tainted with date rape drug. She's either suggesting it is strong, or more likely presenting it as an excuse to stay, which conforms to the silly nature of the song and the habit of blaming socially unacceptable behavior on alcohol in that era.

and now I feel I have been duped into typing far more than any sane person should on this topic and in a way feel like this is somehow an indictment on my usual attempts to argue first principles in a vacuum.

you are a goober.

i can think of a better use for a time machine (https://youtu.be/Nmsek2FGFG4)

[Wonkie]

This is called "Confirmation Bias".

You hear "What's in this drink?" and think date rape drug.

That's your fault for misunderstanding the lyrics due to your psychotic preconceptions of the world.

you wouldn't save your friend girl?

[ScaringChildren]

you wouldn't save your friend girl?

I don't have friends who are girls.

They have cooties.

[Irulan]

What's in this drink?

Sugar?
Saccharine?
Corn Syrup?
Stevia?
Equal?
Red&Bleu#5
Caramel Coloring?
Cancer?
Neutrinos?
Quarks?
HEVs?
Drugs?

It could be anything.

Most likely to be drugs though :p

[Irulan]

I don't have friends who are girls.

They have cooties.

Coonties.

[ScaringChildren]

It's a pretty classic way of flirting with someone to say "What's in this drink?"

It's a way of admitting to feeling something...

[Irulan]

i can think of a better use for a time machine (https://youtu.be/Nmsek2FGFG4)

I actually held a piece of trinitite at ground zero babes.

Doesn't this make me hot?

My saliva is probably radioactive.

[Irulan]

It's a pretty classic way of flirting with someone to say "What's in this drink?"

It's a way of admitting to feeling something...

True thats the way my grandmother explained it to me. She was disappointed in hippie liberals tho.

[Wonkie]

anachronisms are only fun when the lady wears a chainmail bikini

[ScaringChildren]

The outrage over Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer is one I don't understand (https://twitter.com/HuffPost/status/1067972666622189568)

Uh, of course there's bullying in it. It's the entire point of the show, ya reeeetards.

[Irulan]

Retard is one of my favorite words. I describe myself this way constantly. It's a valid label. Property. Description. Variable. Affect.

Prove me wrong.

[Mblake1981]

What's in this drink?

Sugar?
Saccharine?
Corn Syrup?
Stevia?
Equal?
Red&Bleu#5
Caramel Coloring?
Cancer?
Neutrinos?
Quarks?
HEVs?
Drugs?

It could be anything.

Most likely to be drugs though :p

Strong liquor goes to your head, lowers inhibitions.

/bonk

[Irulan]

Strong liquor goes to your head, lowers inhibitions.

/bonk

Just to be clear I agree with and respect that after drowning in absinthe in my youth.

[misterbonkers]

decided to write an article about my experiences with the project1999 forums (https://thehardtimes.net/hardstyle/what-joining-a-hate-group-while-cheating-on-my-husband-and-abusing-pills-taught-me-about-writing-clickbait/)

[Irulan]

decided to write an article about my experiences with the project1999 forums (https://thehardtimes.net/hardstyle/what-joining-a-hate-group-while-cheating-on-my-husband-and-abusing-pills-taught-me-about-writing-clickbait/)
So. You're coming out as an opiate addicted junkie who likes to bottom for men?

Hi, welcome to the forums.

[tsuchang]

And then he signed a cap!!!! Impeach him!!!

[feniin]

And then he signed a cap!!!! Impeach him!!!

Does policy and law not apply to Republicans just because they're in power?

[Throndor]

Im getting drunk in reno tonight, with sledding with the kiddos on the agenda for tomorrow. Wish me luck on the drive by hard 8 craps bet, folks. And fuck you fen-dog! ;)

[ScaringChildren]

Does policy and law not apply to Republicans just because they're in power?

Obama signed military stuff all the time (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/12/27/oh-noes-obama-signed-stuff-for-troops-too-n2538116)

Soooooooo stfu :)

[Wonkie]

Obama signed military stuff all the time (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/12/27/oh-noes-obama-signed-stuff-for-troops-too-n2538116)

Soooooooo stfu :)

huh. stormfront really has an answer for everything dontcha know

[Irulan]

https://i.imgur.com/cARocuC.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Mxef2TI.jpg

1965, men, lets #maga

Lol :p 🤪

[ScaringChildren]

I'm pretty sure my dad has said that exact quote.

[Irulan]

ArR u reAdY Furr t3h dIKkoseXUal uPrizinG?! (https://i.imgur.com/Mxef2TI.jpg)

[Ahldagor]

https://i.imgur.com/cARocuC.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Mxef2TI.jpg

1965, men, lets #maga

Lol :p 🤪

The Johnson years were strange.

[ScaringChildren]

Leftist, Feminist, hate-porn, snuff film.

I tried to fit more adjectives in there.

[ScaringChildren]

Xhale City Vape Shop employee has epic meltdown over Trump Shirt (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK-mnbH4s74)

for wonkie

Hahahahhahahahahahaha

Total sperg out

[Ahldagor]

So an asshole and sperglord interact in a vape shop....lol, wut?

Like so what, take the guy's money, or exercise your right of private business to refuse service and stay steadfast in that decision. Weak clerk and weak customer. Yikes Georgia, but Georgia was a penal colony, so proly par.

[Irulan]

Looks gay. Haven't met a str8 v8pe yet

[Wonkie]

Xhale City Vape Shop employee has epic meltdown over Trump Shirt (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK-mnbH4s74)

for wonkie

its just a prank bro

owning the libs to hit a youtube lick

[ScaringChildren]

Why do all Leftists shriek like women?

[Wonkie]

Why do all Leftists shriek like women?

leprechauns arent leftists

[Wonkie]

anyway am i being made fun of when you call me intuitive?

cogito ergo karma chameleon

[Nibblewitz]

so much racism coming from the left

[ScaringChildren]

so much racism coming from the left

[Wonkie]

this is incomprehensible to everyone

hope this helps

i guess you just aren't smart enough, lobotololi :o

[Ahldagor]

this is incomprehensible to everyone

hope this helps

This is less intuitively ironic than Robert Blake being on To Tell the Truth, why?

[ScaringChildren]

https://i.imgur.com/O6ddejE_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
:confused:

[Ahldagor]

Karma Chameleon is before my time and I don't get what it is or means at all (as is To Tell the Truth)

olds

Culture Club was before my time too, but we can both insert Steve Rogers pointing because we understood that reference. One of us! One of us! One of us! /hug /lick

[ScaringChildren]

https://youtu.be/UABn0lSJJ40

[Nibblewitz]

woman's rally cancelled (https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2018/12/30/california-womens-march-rally-canceled-over-concerns-that-it-would-be-overwhelmingly-white/?utm_term=.a244d186062e)

[ScaringChildren]

woman's rally cancelled (https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2018/12/30/california-womens-march-rally-canceled-over-concerns-that-it-would-be-overwhelmingly-white/?utm_term=.a244d186062e)

"IT'S TOO WHITE! SHUT IT DOWN!"

lol leftists are so fuckin weird and racist

[Wonkie]

https://youtu.be/UABn0lSJJ40

what's this guys deal? cop? i saw him dunk a moneybeggar on the tweeter a couple weeks ago and it was funny

[ScaringChildren]

what's this guys deal? cop? i saw him dunk a moneybeggar on the tweeter a couple weeks ago and it was funny

Yeah, he's a cop that does crime/shooting reviews.

Has an Anthony Fantano vibe to him.

[Wonkie]

woman's rally cancelled (https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2018/12/30/california-womens-march-rally-canceled-over-concerns-that-it-would-be-overwhelmingly-white/?utm_term=.a244d186062e)

The Eureka group, which does not appear to be an official California chapter of the Women’s March

k

[ScaringChildren]

k

No True Scotsman™

[Wonkie]

No True Scotsman™

its a dubious claim, like your sobriety

[ScaringChildren]

its a dubious claim, like your sobriety

Well it's not the first time this has happened.

Here's the OFFICIAL™ Woman's March doing the same exact thing (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/09/us/womens-march-on-washington-opens-contentious-dialogues-about-race.html)

[ScaringChildren]

https://i.imgur.com/Kap50e9_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

[Wonkie]

Well it's not the first time this has happened.

Here's the OFFICIAL™ Woman's March doing the same exact thing (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/09/us/womens-march-on-washington-opens-contentious-dialogues-about-race.html)

not really

[Irulan]

https://i.imgur.com/Kap50e9_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
Fucking lol. And ya. I would swipe left on both. I'm down for them to get in the ring tho.

Probably would just wind up sucking each other's dicks.

[ScaringChildren]

not really

Yes really (https://youtu.be/g-a7UCyynDo)

[Wonkie]

Yes really (https://youtu.be/g-a7UCyynDo)

im real sorry but hes too fat to watch

[ScaringChildren]

im real sorry but hes too fat to watch

i win i win i win

[Wonkie]

i win i win i win

https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/1079105735441690625

[mickmoranis]

https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/1079105735441690625

nazis had such powerful computers (thanks IBM) that it was possible for someone in 2018 to dox someone in 1942

[Wonkie]

nazis had such powerful computers (thanks IBM) that it was possible for someone in 2018 to dox someone in 1942

very wise mickold. clothing is the only way we have to express ideas.

libs btfo

[ScaringChildren]

https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/1079105735441690625

This would be like me linking to a Pillow Salesman Twitter account, because it would also make no sense.

I have nothing in common with gay ass nazi larpers.

Try harder.

[ScaringChildren]

Oh no, another Women's March is canceled (https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-new-orleans-women-s-march-canceled-amid-anti-semitism-controversy-1.6790373) :(

[JurisDictum]

Got back in town from the holidays. The news is starting to get a bit more interesting. Over Christmas it was mostly about this on going wall drama. I'll just say now -- Trump just has to play it stubborn to win. Just another example of the (planned and paid for) stupidity of Democratic Establishment political strategy.

I can only to so much fake news, postering and bullshit. So I've been mostly looking at this research site this morning:

https://concentrationcrisis.openmarketsinstitute.org/

Nice little write up about how monopolies control everything and your idiot for thinking the "free market" is at all intact. All the little buttons give you details about who owns everything in certain sectors.

[ScaringChildren]

Nice little write up about how monopolies control everything and your idiot for thinking the "free market" is at all intact. All the little buttons give you details about who owns everything in certain sectors.

I used to be pretty Libertarian when it came to free markets, however, even Libertarians believe monopolies and cartels must be dealt with and they're clearly not. When you have companies like Google who are just as powerful as governments, with the ability to oppress much in the same way, something has to be done.

If fascism comes to the US, it'll be a corporate version of it. Some say we're already there.

[Ahldagor]

Teddy Roosevelt knew what was up.

[JurisDictum]

How is Google oppressing you? By allowing someone to block or ignore you for calling them insane faggits?

(you may even be right btw, this isn't a relevant point of contention.)

But exactly how are we being oppressed.

If we aren't honest about that. Google will continue to dominate the ISP and advertising and social media world. And one day completely own all of your faggy pix.

BTW there are worse oppressors than Google. "Spectrum" comes to mind and all of the DMCA and net neutrality shenanigans...

Btw I read the package details of the store bought phyllo dough my mother swears by. It's not fucking phyllo. Because I know how to make real phyllo.

TLDR: humans are stupid unaware creatures who can't even ask for search out and demand what they want. They need to be carefully controlled. Less they just kill themselves and everyone around them ignorantly.

Meaning at some point. Oppression is an absolute necessity. It should be illegal to mislable "crusty overly dry sheets of wheet gluten and hydrogenated oil and corn flower" as phyllo.

It's about what's legitimate.

If we wen't to war so that a Nationally-owned Standard Gas company can provide affordable gas to America -- I think most would be on board. But if we go to war so that big gas company number 4 can give their shareholders a big chunk of money -- America losses its legitimacy with it's population in the long run.

We are either all in it together or not. Corporate America wants to play this game where they talk out of both sides of their mouth. On one hand, we are all in this together, support our troops and the international order. On the other, keep your hands off of "my money" you welfare bums!

It can't be both. These people are going to have to fuck off and stop using our government to make money (never going to happen)

or

They are going to have to make sure that what they are doing is best for the entire country not themselves (could happen eventually).

[JurisDictum]

Teddy Roosevelt knew what was up.

I like Teddy too. But all that trust busting was tempory and not good enough in the first place. Its like they handicapped those who were winning and left the system the same.

Time for us to learn from mistakes on trust-busting. We need a systemic solution not another band-aid.

[JurisDictum]

If we wanted a free market we need to get rid of "intellectual property."

That's not a real thing. That's just an invention to create monopolies. No one ever had a patent on growing corn and used the warchief to block other farmers from copying him.

Retarded.

IP rights are for books. We should have kept it that way. We should simply have laws against plagiarism and not this IP abomination we have created.

[Irulan]

If we wanted a free market we need to get rid of "intellectual property."

That's not a real thing. That's just an invention to create monopolies. No one ever had a patent on growing corn and used the warchief to block other farmers from copying him.

Retarded.

IP rights are for books. We should have kept it that way. We should simply have laws against plagiarism and not this IP abomination we have created.

I'm in favor of placing like a max 5 year limit on intellectual 'property' and then shooting everyone else who's abused the game for 50 odd years, but that would result in mass graves and a very very unhappy altrightleft.

we'd also have to nuke disneyland --- admittedly even their broken down old US museum rides are fun

also china tried this, i think they are getting on board with the way things are now with eternal IP but still trying to play the counterfiet game hard.

Also bartering just don't work on a globaluberlyfty amazonian scale, so someones got to own the moneyIP

[Irulan]

^drugs

[mickmoranis]

If we wanted a free market we need to get rid of "intellectual property."

That's not a real thing. That's just an invention to create monopolies. No one ever had a patent on growing corn and used the warchief to block other farmers from copying him.

Retarded.

IP rights are for books. We should have kept it that way. We should simply have laws against plagiarism and not this IP abomination we have created.

Aaaaaaaaand the communist reveals his hand

[Wonkie]

Aaaaaaaaand the communist reveals his hand

https://i.imgur.com/H1lJg_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

[Irulan]

I would clone hoards of velociraptors.

[ScaringChildren]

Louis C.K. is Alt-Right now lol (https://www.thedailybeast.com/louis-cks-leaked-comedy-set-panders-to-the-alt-right)

[mickmoranis]

lol

[Wonkie]

he didn't put that set out. if he wanted that to be his reentry, he would have. comedians try a lot of shit in clubs, just let him find his new voice. if that means making fun of shooting survivors i think that sucks, but it's not yet time to crucify the bald ginger.

[mickmoranis]

"the world is a better place without lck"

*Comments on 1000 articles a day about how upset they are

[Nibblewitz]

he didn't put that set out. if he wanted that to be his reentry, he would have. comedians try a lot of shit in clubs, just let him find his new voice. if that means making fun of shooting survivors i think that sucks, but it's not yet time to crucify the bald ginger.

Could have called him a white man for maximum effect.

[Irulan]

Gingger

[ScaringChildren]

Potato N***er.

[ScaringChildren]

Nagger.

The word was Nagger.

[ScaringChildren]

I like his new set.

He doesn't give a shit anymore and it shows.

In a good way though.

[Wonkie]

hey. hey can i jack off in front of u

*jacks off in front of u before u can reply*

i know you know the answer is yes

unless ur secretly a bald ginger?

[ScaringChildren]

https://i.imgur.com/vA5owaN_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

[ScaringChildren]

https://youtu.be/VlWCnA7TbNU

[JurisDictum]

https://youtu.be/VlWCnA7TbNU

No one is going to watch an 1 1/2 hour long alt-right propaganda video.

[misterbonkers]

No one is going to watch an 1 1/2 hour long alt-right propaganda video.

"it's not a ponzi scheme, those are dumb, it's actually a [explains a ponzi scheme to the T]"

[Wonkie]

No one is going to watch an 1 1/2 hour long alt-right propaganda video.

why won't lefty brainlets debate us? BTFO cucks

[mickmoranis]

https://youtu.be/VlWCnA7TbNU

its funny how liberals are like:

"fox news is fake news because they mix opinion with news"

then they watch stephen colbert or john oliver and when those commentators make wild allegations that are blatant lies the liberals are like:

"this is comedy, not news, so you cant say its fake!"

then they use phrases like "trickle down economics" in actual political arguments.

Yet they don't know the fact that that phrase came from a COMEDIAN in 1917 talking about Herbert Hoover. (https://wiredpen.com/2015/01/30/will-rogers-trickle-economics/)

So they literally obtain their entire legislative political ideology from the comedians, they excuse for making up wild allegations, because its just comedy.

--ATTENTION-- everything I just said is actually HARD FACTS and should be read and chortled about while you realize how much of a rube you've been.

Ask a lib where trickle down economics comes from, and they'll say it was Ragen. :cool::rolleyes:

[Mead]

its funny how liberals are like:

"fox news is fake news because they mix opinion with news"

then they watch stephen colbert or john oliver and when those commentators make wild allegations that are blatant lies the liberals are like:

"this is comedy, not news, so you cant say its fake!"

then they use phrases like "trickle down economics" in actual political arguments.

Yet they don't know the fact that that phrase came from a COMEDIAN in 1917 talking about Herbert Hoover. (https://wiredpen.com/2015/01/30/will-rogers-trickle-economics/)

So they literally obtain their entire legislative political ideology from the comedians, they excuse for making up wild allegations, because its just comedy.

--ATTENTION-- everything I just said is actually HARD FACTS and should be read and chortled about while you realize how much of a rube you've been.

Ask a lib where trickle down economics comes from, and they'll say it was Ragen. :cool::rolleyes:

you've said this before

[feniin]

its funny how liberals are like:

"fox news is fake news because they mix opinion with news"

then they watch stephen colbert or john oliver and when those commentators make wild allegations that are blatant lies the liberals are like:

"this is comedy, not news, so you cant say its fake!"

then they use phrases like "trickle down economics" in actual political arguments.

Yet they don't know the fact that that phrase came from a COMEDIAN in 1917 talking about Herbert Hoover. (https://wiredpen.com/2015/01/30/will-rogers-trickle-economics/)

So they literally obtain their entire legislative political ideology from the comedians, they excuse for making up wild allegations, because its just comedy.

--ATTENTION-- everything I just said is actually HARD FACTS and should be read and chortled about while you realize how much of a rube you've been.

Ask a lib where trickle down economics comes from, and they'll say it was Ragen. :cool::rolleyes:
How does if feel to be so dumb all the time? I bet it's nice :o

[Mead]

mick-reader detected :o

you're a pictures kind of guy aren't you

I like that

[Wonkie]

https://i.imgur.com/dWWMVkM.jpg

[Irulan]

radical fanatics on the on the... right call people left of of them... radical fanatics.

News at 9/11.

I told my mom about u pokesan.

[Irulan]

trickle down economics is pee tapes

[Irulan]

https://i.imgur.com/vA5owaN_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

This may be tru, but the jews payyyy america better mercmoney$$ an it's way funner than working for the muslims or ruskies

also israelibabes with combat experience aare hawt

[Wonkie]

radical fanatics on the on the... right call people left of of them... radical fanatics.

News at 9/11.

I told my mom about u pokesan.

what'd you tell her!

[ScaringChildren]

No one is going to watch an 1 1/2 hour long alt-right propaganda video.

An educational video on Supply Side Economics is 'alt-right propaganda'?

Lol k

[ScaringChildren]

https://i.imgur.com/dWWMVkM.jpg

Cool.

Pew Research has discovered that Leftists (not Conservatives) have moved more further radically to the left since the 80s (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/05/takeaways-on-americans-growing-partisan-divide-over-political-values/)

Neat random guy talking out of his ass though.

[ScaringChildren]

Ask a lib where trickle down economics comes from, and they'll say it was Ragen. :cool::rolleyes:

He brings this up in the video, even showing TYT claiming the Reagan administration 'invented' it, not knowing it has been debated since the 1920s.

[Wonkie]

Cool.

Pew Research has discovered that Leftists (not Conservatives) have moved more further radically to the left since the 80s (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/05/takeaways-on-americans-growing-partisan-divide-over-political-values/)

Neat random guy talking out of his ass though.

that's an opinion article, you freakin dingus :D

[ScaringChildren]

that's an opinion article, you freakin dingus :D

No it's not.

It's Pew Research.

Are you retarded?

[ScaringChildren]

Kanye sees it (https://twitter.com/kanyewest/status/1080200391906578433?s=20)

[JurisDictum]

Warren will be president in 2020.

Calling it now.

[Wonkie]

No it's not.

It's Pew Research.

Are you retarded?

it's an opinion column on the internet website "pew research dot org"

learn stuff pls

[ScaringChildren]

Warren will be president in 2020.

Calling it now.

LOL

Not even fans of Warren believe this.

[ScaringChildren]

it's an opinion column on the internet website "pew research dot org"

learn stuff pls

No it isn't.

It's referring to a factual study.

It's the furthest thing from an opinion piece.

I know you're not this stupid, so stop trolling. That's my job.

[mickmoranis]

Warren/Dolezal 2020

[Wonkie]

Warren will be president in 2020.

Calling it now.

akshually, 2021

BTFO lib

[ScaringChildren]

Hillary will gain most of the super delegates because she owns the DNC and they haven't paid their debt to her yet.
(https://youtu.be/-aF1GBNO6Dw)
Sorry Democrats.

[Asteria]

Warren/Dolezal 2020

Winfrey/Trump 2020!

[Mblake1981]

Winfrey/Trump 2020!

I like my socks right where they are, thanks. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkCUMJAf0us)

[JurisDictum]

LOL

Not even fans of Warren believe this.

Give me one reason why she couldn't win the presidency.

I have noticed a pattern of Fox news watchers* all have been steadily drilled that Warren is hopless, unpopular, nutty, and Native Americans enjoy those stupid articles calling her Pocahontas.

None of those things are true. She is a god damn popular senator that was already courted to run last cycle. She has very little dirt on her (the Indian on the application is literally they best they could come up with). A long track record of working with the DNC and also being more populist than normal corporate democrats.

Hilary is DoA. No one remotely wants Clinton it would be a mistake for her to try to run.

*So if you don't watch Fox...be aware your opinions sound very similar to someone who gets their news from fox.

[ScaringChildren]

Give me one reason why she couldn't win the presidency.

I have noticed a pattern of Fox news watchers* all have been steadily drilled that Warren is hopless, unpopular, nutty, and Native Americans enjoy those stupid articles calling her Pocahontas.

None of those things are true. She is a god damn popular senator that was already courted to run last cycle. She has very little dirt on her (the Indian on the application is literally they best they could come up with). A long track record of working with the DNC and also being more populist than normal corporate democrats.

Hilary is DoA. No one remotely wants Clinton it would be a mistake for her to try to run.

*So if you don't watch Fox...be aware your opinions sound very similar to someone who gets their news from fox.

In a poll with her vs Trump, they tie, with the plurality answering "Don't Know" (Page 239) (https://morningconsult.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/180824_crosstabs_Politico_v1_.pdf) That same study shows Sanders and Biden both doing much better.

Even her own state doesn't support her. (https://www.newsweek.com/warren-own-state-doesnt-want-president-1131621)

Last week's poll results (from Suffolk):

Warren is one of the largest in the "Shouldn't Run" category. And one of the lowest "Excited".

https://i.imgur.com/0rQo3VY.png

Here's another study showing her poor performance among constituents (https://www.suffolk.edu/academics/10732.php)

None of this information comes from FAUX News™. :)

[JurisDictum]

Sanders might be able to push her out.

Biden no fucking way. The guy is Obama 2.0 and we are done with Obama.

Polls often favor those who are already better known. Clinton would have smoked sanders in a 2012 poll. She did smoke sanders in 2016 in the deep south in general -- in the areas where sanders had trouble getting his image out.

Hilary Clinton was the highest "shouldn't run" not Liz Warren (ironic given your first comment). In fact, Sanders even seems higher.

I'm not going to base everything off 1 standford poll anyway. "You shouldn't run" can mean a lot of things besides "I won't vote for you."

[ScaringChildren]

Biden no fucking way. The guy is Obama 2.0 and we are done with Obama.

YOU are done with Obama.

You know that you're in a slim minority, right? You may like Warren, but most people don't.

Hilary Clinton was the highest "shouldn't run" not Liz Warren (ironic given your first comment). In fact, Sanders even seems higher

Did you even read my comment? I said she has one of the lowest in that category.

My first comment was about Hillary Clinton owning the DNC. It doesn't matter what the public thinks of Hillary, that won't stop her.

[ScaringChildren]

I'm not going to base everything off 1 standford poll anyway. "You shouldn't run" can mean a lot of things besides "I won't vote for you."

I linked 3 separate studies...

[Throndor]

Give me one reason why she couldn't win the presidency.

I have noticed a pattern of Fox news watchers* all have been steadily drilled that Warren is hopless, unpopular, nutty, and Native Americans enjoy those stupid articles calling her Pocahontas.

None of those things are true. She is a god damn popular senator that was already courted to run last cycle. She has very little dirt on her (the Indian on the application is literally they best they could come up with). A long track record of working with the DNC and also being more populist than normal corporate democrats.

Hilary is DoA. No one remotely wants Clinton it would be a mistake for her to try to run.

*So if you don't watch Fox...be aware your opinions sound very similar to someone who gets their news from fox.


Warren is pretty much the only politician that has called out stock buybacks as being ponzi-esque.

[Irulan]

branded herself a "dog mom" in her announcement PC

literally had the dog there with her; when asked how her family would cope pointed to dog and said dog seemed to be doing ok.

im not saying she couldnt win, but i am saying if she could we not just deserve but NEED donald trump

DJT is the bigmac mom.

Annuit coeptis. Novus ordo seclorum.

Get over urzelfs

[Irulan]

That being said, I think (((Warren))) is exactly what (((They))) want lol. And ur boy DJT (((may))) help get her (((elected))).

Peace out nurggerassi.

[Irulan]

Warren is a cooler name for the nukes to drop from in the history books anyway.

Trump is eppically gay sounding and that boy has a lissssppppp.

https://i.imgur.com/2G0YgBX.jpg

lol sorry for the old meme pic


NOT

[Irulan]

Imagine president Pocahontas signing assassination orders. Might even play nicely into a 2024 bid for the republicantbuildawalls.

[JurisDictum]

I linked 3 separate studies...

None of them are that convincing. The establishment spits out dumb fucking studies like its their job...because it literally is their job in some cases.

I'm just saying this now when everyone is still surprised by the concept. I expected some reaction. I wanted to see if there some big dirt on Warren someone knew I didn't that would prevent her from consolidating a lot of support.

None so far. Dumb shit just as expected that's not going to change a single voter's mind. The alt right can keep making Indian jokes and see where that gets them.

And why were on the subject about how stupid alt right is (we forget sometimes), how is that wall coming along? Kind of funny that Trump waiting until the democrats won to try to get it right? Almost he thinks its better to be against Dems than to actually build a wall right?

Trump never cared about a wall. He just uses it as a wedge issue. It's painfully obvious.

Hating immigrants is never going to get you a good job. It's not an immigrants fault that American companies ran by rich white dudes are outsourcing all our jobs, hiring illegals, and fucking bankrupting our nation.

[Mblake1981]

Warren is a cooler name for the nukes to drop from in the history books anyway.

Trump is eppically gay sounding and that boy has a lissssppppp.

Warren is a more cutting name but we don't call it a Warren Card.

Her presidency would be more akin to what some have voiced wanting, I think. Fairly quiet, more professional and out of the spotlight. Doubt we would see her flying a rainbow flag, talking about "big tiddy is now running the show", no LGBTQ issues or social justice baloney.

Maybe something about education. I doubt she would be on twitter calling the Nkorean leader "Little Rocket Man", which freaked a good many people out (while others were cheering)

Nancy Reagan. Reminds me of my esther aunt.

[Irulan]

If the Republicans ran a polite Terf (female, Trad) who (((respects))) the little sisters of the poor and the bakertographers rights to not work for a potential client. (which I totally respect, non facetiously).

They'd probably have it in the bag. It would be political suicide to sling mud at and attack such a figure if they did the quiet voice big stick schick.

That being said Trump wants campaign donations for himself and friends (((not the party))) so he is going to attempt to be uncle Nizzar the 3rd. There is indeed lots of $$$ in politics, including internationally as well apparently lol.

I can't predict the future. I think Warren would be a shit status quo president. But. It might be entertaining to see pocahontas rustle jimmies with her own weird political footballs, aka executive orders.

She probably doesn't give a rats ass about "us".

Pretty sure Republicans will hold on to the senate the next 5yrs.

I think the U. S. was sublimated by multinationals in the 80s and this is all "normal" now.

[ScaringChildren]

None of them are that convincing. The establishment spits out dumb fucking studies like its their job...because it literally is their job in some cases.

I'm just saying this now when everyone is still surprised by the concept. I expected some reaction. I wanted to see if there some big dirt on Warren someone knew I didn't that would prevent her from consolidating a lot of support.

None so far. Dumb shit just as expected that's not going to change a single voter's mind. The alt right can keep making Indian jokes and see where that gets them.

And why were on the subject about how stupid alt right is (we forget sometimes), how is that wall coming along? Kind of funny that Trump waiting until the democrats won to try to get it right? Almost he thinks its better to be against Dems than to actually build a wall right?

Trump never cared about a wall. He just uses it as a wedge issue. It's painfully obvious.

Hating immigrants is never going to get you a good job. It's not an immigrants fault that American companies ran by rich white dudes are outsourcing all our jobs, hiring illegals, and fucking bankrupting our nation.

Warren is not likable.

You cannot win an election without being popular.

Why can't leftists ever learn this simple fact?

[Throndor]

That's the thing though. Any meaningful presidency, at this point, is doomed to be 1-term.

We have a lot of very unpopular corrections that need to be made, on top of the issues being impossible to platform on to begin with.

How do you platform on the reality that Stock Buybacks need to be prohibited again because they've caused stock equities to balloon 200% higher than they should be. (i.e. we need to crash the market by 65%)

How do you platform on the reality that labor unions need to be dismantled, or restructured in such a way that people who should've left the workforce 10 years ago are no longer raking in salaries and pensions over 400% more lucrative than the pay structures and long-term incentives of new hires?


How do you platform on the reality that the remnants of the "Greatest Generation" and the baby boomers' party is over, and it's time to stop robbing their children's and grandchildren's futures?




I mean, I've seen Warren's position at least one of these matters (stock buybacks) but when she voiced her concern and it was met with scorn and derision on both sides of the political aisle (because of her colleagues obvious self-serving reasons), but how the hell can anyone get elected on a platform of incredibly unpopular, but absolutely necessary issues?

[Irulan]

That's the thing though. Any meaningful presidency, at this point, is doomed to be 1-term.

We have a lot of very unpopular corrections that need to be made, on top of the issues being impossible to platform on to begin with.

How do you platform on the reality that Stock Buybacks need to be prohibited again because they've caused stock equities to balloon 200% higher than they should be. (i.e. we need to crash the market by 65%)

How do you platform on the reality that labor unions need to be dismantled, or restructured in such a way that people who should've left the workforce 10 years ago are no longer raking in salaries and pensions over 400% more lucrative than the pay structures and long-term incentives of new hires?


How do you platform on the reality that the remnants of the "Greatest Generation" and the baby boomers' party is over, and it's time to stop robbing their children's and grandchildren's futures?

You don't lol. :o

I agree though.

[Throndor]

ran by rich white dudes

Leftists need to seriously drop the "white" out of this description. While it may happen to be true that most major corporations are ran by rich dudes, who are also predominantly white, you're completely pissing off all the "white" people that are not RICH in the process, and THAT is why you lost the last election.

It's uncanny how the party of "not ALL ______ are like that" completely fails to see how their own racist generalizations are working against their own aims.

[Mblake1981]

republicantbuildawalls

Hey I hear ya, I am one of those that think something has to be done about illegal immigration but I thought it was a silly idea when it was proposed. The border is way to large, the costs way too high. It wasn't reasonable something like that could be done. The people that call the shots have pretty much insulated themselves from any harm, like when you talk about job automation.

"If you were any good you would be doing something better and it wouldn't be a worry.. sucks to be you. I am glad I am not you. Should have had better parents, teachers, society and listened to them, I did."

..it's true though.

Add X amount of years to that pot of poop stew.. you have a country half heartedly trying to build walls. Like a gated community, to keep the riff raff out.

Castles have walls, its human history. Those occupying this country have a history of war with them, ran them out and settled. They lived and so did those building a life here. So the blood has been stirred.

If I was a historian and seen them take over areas as time passed, I would point in laugh just on principle.

[Mblake1981]

Warren is not likable.

You cannot win an election without being popular.

Why can't leftists ever learn this simple fact?

Video killed the radio star. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwuy4hHO3YQ)

I heard you on the wireless back in '52
Lying awake, intent at tuning in on you
If I was young it didn't stop you coming through

They took the credit for your second symphony
Rewritten by machine on new technology
And now I understand the problems you can see

[ScaringChildren]

Leftists need to seriously drop the "white" out of this description. While it may happen to be true that most major corporations are ran by rich dudes, who are also predominantly white, you're completely pissing off all the "white" people that are not RICH in the process, and THAT is why you lost the last election.

It's uncanny how the party of "not ALL ______ are like that" completely fails to see how their own racist generalizations are working against their own aims.

Take a far-right Nazi's beliefs and replace "Jewish" with "White" and it fits perfectly with mainstream leftist ideology.

It's like a politician running on an antisemitic platform in Israel. It's just as absurd.

[ScaringChildren]

Nice chair,
https://imgur.com/3HxwSCg.gif

[Irulan]

Pretty much @blake, SC, & Throndor.

That bit about machines writing (scripting) the narrative is highly accurate.

[JurisDictum]

I was simply drawing attention to the fact that many of these men (almost all men) are white. Therefore, the fact that they are white obviously doesn't mean they support the interest of all white men.

They say they aren't racist and they mean it. They are not looking out for white men at all. If your an unconnected white man, they don't give a shit about you or anyone like you necessarily and brown Muslims are just as good for all they care.

Your a just white n***** to them.

[Irulan]

I was simply drawing attention to the fact that many of these men (almost all men) are white. Therefore, the fact that they are white obviously doesn't mean they support the interest of all white men.

They say they aren't racist and they mean it. They are not looking out for white men at all. If your an unconnected white man, they don't give a shit about you or anyone like you necessarily and brown Muslims are just as good for all they care.

Your a just white n***** to them.

Then this BS transcends race (and IMO sex) and we shouldn't bring those issues into it. Because it detracts from the truth and empowers those people to control the narrative.

[Irulan]

the force of change is more on their side tho. Harder working, worse conditions, can't speak well enough to complain, has no leverage to complain.

It's our nature to take that over what the current population offers.

Automation will not scare a lawyer, politician, general or doctor until a machine can do their job better. Have you guys read the words of people employed to automate jobs? its fascinating, you can practically hear the edge of excitement in the words.

"I get to pick up a sword and kill? yeeeeeee!"

Now is it real change (sword swings freely and everywhere a neck is exposed) or is it fake.. a guided edge "chop this, chop that but not this.. never this"

Blades for Utopia

^^^^ and I'm no luddite but totally agree.

[Throndor]

I was simply drawing attention to the fact that many of these men (almost all men) are white. Therefore, the fact that they are white obviously doesn't mean they support the interest of all white men.

They say they aren't racist and they mean it. They are not looking out for white men at all. If your an unconnected white man, they don't give a shit about you or anyone like you necessarily and brown Muslims are just as good for all they care.

Your a just white n***** to them.


That may well be true, but you have to take into account that the average person is a moron, and does not have the mental capacity to delineate between the "generalization" and the "intent" of the generalization.

The average person sees a rhetorical sleight towards "white men" and regardless of the fact that the statement is directed at "rich white men" they associate with the term regardless because they see it as an attack on RICH people, WHITE People, and MEN (and rightly so with all of the vitriolic racist, and sexist shit being spewwed by the left in addition to their root qualms with the economic system).

As such, because they associate with 1 out of 3, or 2 out of 3, they are simply too stupid to delineate between all three adjectives, 2 out of 3 adjectives, and 1 out of 3 adjectives.

Considering the left is the party of "Hijacking and redefining language", you would assume them smart enough to rebrand it as an attack on ULTRA RICH "PEOPLE" and stop throwing sexist and racist qualifiers in with that description, but then we devolve the conflict back to its marxist roots, so i think the argument really needs to be depersonalized altogether and called for what it truly is: an argument against CORPORATOCRACY. (But then you wouldn't be a leftist, because leftists, by and large, refuse to address the root issue and insist on merely replacing some of the Hydra's heads, with browner more feminine heads).

The reason I say this is simple: If we replaced all of the executive staff of corporations throughout the country to Brown women tomorrow, the self-serving nature of corporate culture would remain the same. Stop being a fucking sexist racist and address the root issue: Citizen's United, and Corporo-fascism.

[Cecily]

Leftists need to seriously drop the "white" out of this description. While it may happen to be true that most major corporations are ran by rich dudes, who are also predominantly white, you're completely pissing off all the "white" people that are not RICH in the process, and THAT is why you lost the last election.

It's uncanny how the party of "not ALL ______ are like that" completely fails to see how their own racist generalizations are working against their own aims.

I’d like to go on record as never having used racial qualifiers in my proposed mass executions of rich people.

[Mblake1981]

^^^^ and I'm no luddite but totally agree.

I'm talking shit, Irulan

passing time..

/shrug

This message is hidden because Throndor is on your ignore list.

[ScaringChildren]

https://i.imgur.com/yfEHHFS.jpg

[mickmoranis]

Take a far-right Nazi's beliefs and replace "Jewish" with "White" and it fits perfectly with mainstream leftist ideology.

It's like a politician running on an antisemitic platform in Israel. It's just as absurd.

https://i.imgur.com/6FZyBqf.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/rppDYGn.jpg

[ScaringChildren]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI4LMWI5o8k

[Throndor]

i missed Throndor. altho i don't read his posts, I think he's attractive ^^

very insistent!



Love me while I'm here, baby, because when i'm gone, I aint ever comin' back!

[Irulan]

No way does Hillary drink. it'd interfere like crazy w/ her drug regimen.

Tru

[Irulan]

If u can put a Muslim in a headhold and control them ur doing pretty good regardless of ur politics

[Irulan]

I'm talking shit, Irulan

passing time..

/shrug

Story of my life.

Presently running through all of bg-tob with an assassin with no stat bonuses other than maxing cha with tomes. This is my reality. A reality rich ppl have kindly provided for me.

[ScaringChildren]

https://i.imgur.com/nK38wAY.jpg

[Irulan]

this argument is wut won me and wonkie both over to neoconservatism

U sure wonkie isn't a liberal?

[Ahldagor]

That may well be true, but you have to take into account that the average person is a moron, and does not have the mental capacity to delineate between the "generalization" and the "intent" of the generalization.

The average person sees a rhetorical sleight towards "white men" and regardless of the fact that the statement is directed at "rich white men" they associate with the term regardless because they see it as an attack on RICH people, WHITE People, and MEN (and rightly so with all of the vitriolic racist, and sexist shit being spewwed by the left in addition to their root qualms with the economic system).

As such, because they associate with 1 out of 3, or 2 out of 3, they are simply too stupid to delineate between all three adjectives, 2 out of 3 adjectives, and 1 out of 3 adjectives.

Considering the left is the party of "Hijacking and redefining language", you would assume them smart enough to rebrand it as an attack on ULTRA RICH "PEOPLE" and stop throwing sexist and racist qualifiers in with that description, but then we devolve the conflict back to its marxist roots, so i think the argument really needs to be depersonalized altogether and called for what it truly is: an argument against CORPORATOCRACY. (But then you wouldn't be a leftist, because leftists, by and large, refuse to address the root issue and insist on merely replacing some of the Hydra's heads, with browner more feminine heads).

The reason I say this is simple: If we replaced all of the executive staff of corporations throughout the country to Brown women tomorrow, the self-serving nature of corporate culture would remain the same. Stop being a fucking sexist racist and address the root issue: Citizen's United, and Corporo-fascism.

Trouble is that Citizen's United is virtually cemented in now due to the court dynamics. I don't know if you've read the assenting opinion on that case, but the logic is laughable. Can an LLC commit murder?

[ScaringChildren]

U sure wonkie isn't a liberal?

Wonkie is a normie neoliberal.

He doesn't have convictions, just a tribe who blurts words into his psyche.

Which leads him to nonchalantly accept whatever way the wild blows, even if it contradicts what his tribe believed 5 minutes earlier.

Also when the tough gets going, he gives up and watches football instead.

He's an elitist corporatist's wet dream.

[ScaringChildren]

mad

FURIOUS

[Throndor]

Trouble is that Citizen's United is virtually cemented in now due to the court dynamics. I don't know if you've read the assenting opinion on that case, but the logic is laughable. Can an LLC commit murder?

Familial owned/Nepotic upper echelon hiring practices within a corporation is how one skirt's the Estate Tax laws.

Of course it's built that way on purpose, and you can thank Obama for robustly expanding the Estate Tax Laws to extremely hamper the middle and upper-middle class without addressing how an Immortal Corporation is capable of holding the upper class' Nepotic wealth indefinitely.

Just another example of how the left does not intend to eliminate the "wealth inequality" that they purportedly oppose, while simultaneously cementing us "Ni66ers" (race independent class-ist slur) in the poor house indefinitely.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estate_tax_in_the_United_States#Federal_estate_tax

With taxation beginning at 18% for inheritences over $10,000, and ramping up to 39% for inheritences of 1/4million (a value equivalent to the average price of a 3-bedroom single family home throughout the US) the government is essentially taxing the middle class homeowner at 40% when they die and bequeath their home to a single heir. How is this battling "wealth disparity" whilst simultaneously allowing a corporation to hold all the rights of an individual without that pesky thing called "death" getting in the way?

[Wonkie]

got em

[ScaringChildren]

Wonkie, what are your feelings towards the bad press about Kevin Spacey, given that you're a fellow self-admitted pedophile?

[Wonkie]

Wonkie, what are your feelings towards the bad press about Kevin Spacey, given that you're a fellow self-admitted pedophile?

i like to make em go mad its very funny to me

[Irulan]

Do u think an aktual female in her late 50s who likes Kevin Spacey is a pedro?

[Throndor]

he was warhawkin very sensibly a few pages back in a imperial way, while being a social/domestic lib. my implicationjoke is that this is equivalent 2 neoconservatism.

only thjing tween him and full on ethnofascism now is the development of taste.

You can't buy class (as evidenced by the plebians flocking to the high dollar cotton sportswear store in the Great Mall just before Christmas)

If you give them more money, they just compulsively spend it on buying even more cheap china-made shit.

[ScaringChildren]

Trump supporters denied housing over political beliefs (https://youtu.be/MPfnygNQ54I)

Red (hat) Lining?

[Irulan]

You can't buy class (as evidenced by the plebians flocking to the high dollar cotton sportswear store in the Great Mall just before Christmas)

If you give them more money, they just compulsively spend it on buying even more cheap china-made shit.
+1

[Wonkie]

Trump supporters denied housing over political beliefs (https://youtu.be/MPfnygNQ54I)

Red (hat) Lining?

if libs arent forced to be my friends they are naxis

[ScaringChildren]

if libs arent forced to be my friends they are naxis

Would you say the same thing to black people in the 1950s?

[Wonkie]

Would you say the same thing to black people in the 1950s?

would you ask this question if you weren't embarrassingly stupid?

[ScaringChildren]

would you ask this question if you weren't embarrassingly stupid?

Wonkie in 1950: "Maybe if you weren't black you could get a house. Try harder, noob."

[Throndor]

if libs arent forced to be my friends they are naxis

I wouldn't want to live with a bunch of nazis digging through my room sifting for paraphernalia that opposes their dogmatic artificially reconstructed mindset anyways.

[Irulan]

Trump supporters denied housing over political beliefs (https://youtu.be/MPfnygNQ54I)

Red (hat) Lining?

Lol. Y did she advertise she worked for fox?

My sister lived literally across the hall in an apartment from a big name republican in DC BTW. She was like "dooiint talk to her... But she's not that bad"...

I think it's dumb to protect ppl from discrimination on the basis of their "behavior and beliefs".... Y does anyone have to provide service or housing to anyone? Y can't u be like "i won't take the client because I don't want to".

I don't even want my hairdresser to be forced to interact with me. That's how u get a terrible hairdresser and a really bad do.

[Wonkie]

Wonkie in 1950: "Maybe if you weren't black you could get a house. Try harder, noob."

politics is choice. its ok to discriminate for choices.

[ScaringChildren]

Political discrimination is now the largest form of discrimination, beating out racial, sexual, and religious (https://m.phys.org/news/2017-10-discrimination-grounds-political-ideas-prevails.html)

[Irulan]

if libs arent forced to be my friends they are naxis

I'm your fan, n very potential lover.

[ScaringChildren]

politics is choice. its ok to discriminate for choices.

Not in Washington DC.

It's considered a human right.

When Antifa stormed Tucker Carlson's house, they treated it as if it was a Hate Crime

[Wonkie]

Not in Washington DC.

It's considered a human right.

in the land of rand mcnally hamburgers eat people

[Irulan]

Political discrimination is now the largest form of discrimination, beating out racial, sexual, and religious (https://m.phys.org/news/2017-10-discrimination-grounds-political-ideas-prevails.html)

Im used to the unspoken closeted religious discrimination that goes on. I bet if they outlaw political discrimination it will just be something else next. Like musicband discrimination. U must listen 2 and enjoy Katy Perry 2 be my pal in crime.

[ScaringChildren]

politics is choice. its ok to discriminate for choices.

Transitioning into another gender is a choice too.

[Wonkie]

sorry ill be nice

its impossible to enforce that particular right. its a fine but useless feely goody thing.

[misterbonkers]

Transitioning into another gender is a choice too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdf5n-zI14

[Irulan]

politics is choice. its ok to discriminate for choices.

Everything can subjectively be made a choice. I discriminate against ppl for choosing to live, and eat food, and poop.

All choices IMO.

[Wonkie]

Transitioning into another gender is a choice too.

i think its genetic, like down's syndrome

[ScaringChildren]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdf5n-zI14

Political opinions are hardcoded into you as much as sexuality is.

So just like it isn't appropriate to discriminate based on sexuality, you shouldn't for political views.

[Wonkie]

Political opinions are hardcoded into you as much as sexuality is.

So just like it isn't appropriate to discriminate based on sexuality, you shouldn't for political views.

https://youtu.be/gvdf5n-zI14

[Irulan]

Transitioning into another gender is a choice too.

Lol. So is being a retarded primate constrained by limited concepts and traditional ideologies. Also

[ScaringChildren]

https://youtu.be/gvdf5n-zI14

https://youtu.be/FJ_gW6NobSo

[Irulan]

I chose my cutie patootie avatar for very specific evil reasons.

[ScaringChildren]

The Left: "Curing disabled people of diseases is genocide" (https://www.pluralist.com/posts/2244-activist-slams-curing-genetic-diseases-as-threat-to-disabled-identity-it-s-actually-genocide)

[Wonkie]

Everything can subjectively be made a choice. I discriminate against ppl for choosing to live, and eat food, and poop.

All choices IMO.

3edgy5me

[Irulan]

I want to cure disabled ppl. Best cure would be copying their brains into robot slaves and making them build me pleasure pyramids all over the known universe, as far as can be.

[ScaringChildren]

I want to cure disabled ppl. Best cure would be copying their brains into robot slaves and making them build me pleasure pyramids all over the known universe, as far as can be.

Sounds like a genocidal nazi to me :rolleyes:

[ScaringChildren]

havent clicked any of the links on last few pages. and their content is sad. except maerilith's contribs

GIVE ME UR DICK

[Throndor]

politics is choice. its ok to discriminate for choices.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2015/08/05/political-beliefs-genetic/#.XC1MPFVKiUk

It's been said a million times, today's "liberalism" is a mental disease, well grounded in retarded genetics.

(Trolling aside, my criticism of Jonathan Haidt's complete failure to include Prudence/Temperance into his axes of morality is a more salient point that has yet to be addressed in any of our discussions on political philosophy/morality)

[Wonkie]

havent clicked any of the links on last few pages. and their content is sad. except maerilith's contribs

im just glad im not in trouble

[JurisDictum]

Fox is coming out hard against Warren.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/elizabeth-warren-leads-democrats-2020-contenders-in-bad-timing

They just spin it every negative way possible. It really is like watching the art of political spin.

Edit: "young guns in the democratic party" aren't threatening. Its the old man that can make her look a poser if he gets down in the mud with her.

Warren is the halfway point for Democrats. She is half progressive and non-neoliberal, but also half establishment. She is acceptable to the DNC crowd*, Bernie is not. That's why I say Warren is looking good for 2020.

*These guys fear a purge basically. Once the Democrats start going more socialist and less corporate.

[Irulan]

Fox is coming out hard against Warren.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/elizabeth-warren-leads-democrats-2020-contenders-in-bad-timing

They just spin it every negative way possible. It really is like watching the art of political spin.

Edit: "young guns in the democratic party" aren't threatening. Its the old man that can make her look a poser if he gets down in the mud with her.

Warren is the halfway point for Democrats. She is half progressive and non-neoliberal, but also half establishment. She is acceptable to the DNC crowd*, Bernie is not. That's why I say Warren is looking good for 2020.

*These guys fear a purge basically. Once the Democrats start going more socialist and less corporate.

More constructive criticism than "lol lubruls" in fox News comments sextion would be helpful.

BTW u guys tend to provide that, some.

I don't think lizzy has it in the bag against Trump. But lol. I want to know who would actually be a viable Democratic candidate. I think the base on both sides is pretty locked into party line voting. So picking a candidate who will actually energize independents is a safe bet.

I can't speak to Warren on this.

[Ahldagor]

So what the hell is Romney's deal?

[rollin5k]

warren strikes me as a puppet and a liar. people dont want puppets anymore, thats why bernie was so popular because he LIED and said he was going to be a kewl dood then promptly sold the fuck out. she doesnt stand a chance in an election unless its fixed.

[mickmoranis]

So what the hell is Romney's deal?

He's a washed up nobody that the left is trying desperately to convince Republicans is better than Trump because they are deranged from orange man bad sydrom and they're trying every hail mary in the book to try to stop Trump's godlike momentum

[mickmoranis]

Jeez you make a post on this thread in the morning and you come back in the afternoon and it's 10 pages old

[ScaringChildren]

Fox is coming out hard against Warren.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/elizabeth-warren-leads-democrats-2020-contenders-in-bad-timing

They just spin it every negative way possible. It really is like watching the art of political spin.

Edit: "young guns in the democratic party" aren't threatening. Its the old man that can make her look a poser if he gets down in the mud with her.

Warren is the halfway point for Democrats. She is half progressive and non-neoliberal, but also half establishment. She is acceptable to the DNC crowd*, Bernie is not. That's why I say Warren is looking good for 2020.

*These guys fear a purge basically. Once the Democrats start going more socialist and less corporate.

Fox News is bashing her because she's the first one running. That's it. It's not because she's a threat, she's just a target.

I'm actually disappointed that you see her as some grassroots leftwing populist.

She's just another neo-liberal shill who pretends to act that way. She even mimicked AOC's live streaming. So transparent.

Her opponents will thump her over the head with the native american claim because she used it to take advantage of affirmative action programs. Even her supposed tribe called her out on her bullshit.

She won't even make it past the primaries.

I thought you could sniff out bullshit better, JD.

[ScaringChildren]

So what the hell is Romney's deal?

Just another out of touch Republican doing something retarded.

[rollin5k]

even liberals just need to accept trump at this point. all other options are worse for them they just cant see it. tds

[Wonkie]

Just another out of touch Republican doing something retarded.

the white horse is gonna perforate u

[ScaringChildren]

Trump responded perfectly too.

Romney expected to provoke him into an angry response, proving his point, but he was level-headed. He made Romney look like an idiot.

No one is even supporting Romney in this.

The guy is stupid. Wtf was he trying to do?

[ScaringChildren]

the white horse is gonna perforate u

I'm gonna perforate your butthole if you keep it up

[ScaringChildren]

New York Times executive admits to having an anti-Trump bias. (https://youtu.be/PZ_ie2A_Yu4)

[Irulan]

So?

Like do people have to like and associate with one another...? Support people they don't like or think are dumb?

Bias is = dislike or preference.

If the NYT guy had a bias for him. Ud probably not even care or notice.

ITT we learned ppl have biases. Especially around particularly radical or polarizing issues / ppl...

This is normal and not entirely upsetting for most of us.

[Irulan]

mad

Biased bro. Lol.

[Wonkie]

I'm gonna perforate your butthole if you keep it up

that's what i said dingus.

idaho falls lds temple man its gorgeous

[Wonkie]

New York Times executive admits to having an anti-Trump bias. (https://youtu.be/PZ_ie2A_Yu4)

please stop linking long videos. im actually offended you watch such garbage

[Irulan]

please stop linking long videos. im actually offended you watch such garbage

I just watched 2 hrs of makeup vids. This is the only thread with any action tho.

[Wonkie]

I just watched 2 hrs of makeup vids. This is the only thread with any action tho.

that's a far sight better than tim pool. i think dino is intentionally wasting our time.

[misterbonkers]

I just watched 2 hrs of makeup vids. This is the only thread with any action tho.

pretty much my problem. im actually super apolitical but this thread is the only active one so i gotta drum up content somehow

[mickmoranis]

Wonkie doesn't have time to watch these videos because he's behind on his Jimmy Kimmel clips right now

[Wonkie]

Wonkie doesn't have time to watch these videos because he's behind on his Jimmy Kimmel clips right now

no talk shows since jon stewart left.

[Asteria]

I think it's dumb to protect ppl from discrimination on the basis of their "behavior and beliefs".... Y does anyone have to provide service or housing to anyone? Y can't u be like "i won't take the client because I don't want to".

I don't even want my hairdresser to be forced to interact with me. That's how u get a terrible hairdresser and a really bad do.

Yeah! The offended holier than you hairdresser shouldn't have to choose between butchering your mane for a good price or apologizing to leave at short notice because "Just got a call - My mother is in the hospital, so sorry!" The latter choice might not be too incovenient for her actually if they return fairly quickly and are pretty sure you won't be around to see her car return in 15 minutes. But that 15 minutes or more is still time lost for her to work.

[Asteria]

please stop linking long videos. im actually offended you watch such garbage

[ScaringChildren]

no talk shows since jon stewart left.

Don't like Trevor Noah?

...racist.

[ScaringChildren]

Wonkie, I found an article that's supportive of your behavior (https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html)

[ScaringChildren]

https://i.imgur.com/KZFiVoq.jpg

[ScaringChildren]

https://i.imgur.com/ZrIFMZD_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

[Patriam1066]

Dino seek Christ dude you’re a sycophant

[ScaringChildren]

Dino seek Christ dude you’re a sycophant

Do you even know what a sycophant is?

Sounds like you don't, brev...not making sense right now. Too much hookah?

[Wonkie]

Wonkie, I found an article that's supportive of your behavior (https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html)

pedo accusations are a common avenue for seizing leadership among white supremacist gangs

[tsuchang]

Warren for prez
1/2020th

[JurisDictum]

pedo accusations are a common avenue for seizing leadership among white supremacist gangs

Is this how you got ousted?

[ScaringChildren]

pedo accusations are a common avenue for seizing leadership among white supremacist gangs

Dude, you admitted that you were a pedophile.

[JurisDictum]

Warren for prez
1/2020th

I called it first

[Wonkie]

Dude, you admitted that you were a pedophile.

? show me the brainworms you have on this one

[ScaringChildren]

? show me the brainworms you have on this one

You regretted admitting it on the forums, so you deleted your original comment

[Wonkie]

You regretted admitting it on the forums, so you deleted your original comment

really disappointing man. i thought you were gonna say something funny.

what a letdown

[ScaringChildren]

really disappointing man. i thought you were gonna say something funny.

what a letdown

I'm not joking around.

You admitted liking younger children and even told us about the subreddits you creep around on.

You even listen to a pod cast called..."Chapo Trap House", which is dedicated to finding ways to trap children in a dungeon house filled with web cams.

Sick shit, dude.

You really need help.

[Wonkie]

this could be a fun game if someone smarter did the gaslighting

[tsuchang]

I called it first
Well crud. I hurried to get it posted but am age related slow.

[ScaringChildren]

I'm not gaslighting.

You actually said this.