Log in

View Full Version : /who [class] all


fischsemmel
02-07-2011, 06:29 PM
I'm 99% positive that until today, I could do a /who [class] all command and the results would display roleplaying and anonymous players also. But today I'm just getting people who are neither.

While it IS possible that there are 0 roleplaying or anon paladins, rogues, monks, shadowknights, or rangers online right now... I find it more likely that something has changed.

What gives?


Not really a big deal, of course. Just curious.

Boomlaor
02-07-2011, 06:40 PM
you could do that early on in the server, but it hasn't worked that way for months now.

Droodler
02-07-2011, 06:50 PM
I've been playing since December. I don't think I've ever had anon/RP players returned in a class specific search.

Occasionally, a guild search will yield anon players that I know to be in the guild.

Uthgaard
02-07-2011, 07:36 PM
It only happens if you have an ip exemption. Low priority but known issue.

fischsemmel
02-08-2011, 09:09 AM
It only happens if you have an ip exemption. Low priority but known issue.

Huh. Well thanks for tickling my curiosity :)

Versus
02-08-2011, 11:05 AM
We can just solve this problem by people not being vag's and not being anon or /role. :)

fischsemmel
02-08-2011, 11:08 AM
We can just solve this problem by people not being vag's and not being anon or /role. :)

^

You'll never catch any of my characters anon or RP. I stay visible on principle (because I'm always annoyed when people are anon or RP, heh).

Versus
02-08-2011, 11:20 AM
Same, until the inevitable day where I'm on a raid on told to /role. The minute that raid is over I will be back to normal.

burkemi5
02-08-2011, 11:30 AM
have you ever played a druid/shaman/enchanter? you will want to use anon

Versus
02-08-2011, 12:29 PM
have you ever played a druid/shaman/enchanter? you will want to use anon

Nope ;)

But if I was, I'd say "no, sorry" if at any time it was inconvenient for me to help someone out.

Benebric
02-08-2011, 01:17 PM
That's about every 30 seconds

soup
02-08-2011, 02:26 PM
have you ever played a druid/shaman/enchanter? you will want to use anon

I leveled a druid 1-50 without ever once using /role or /anon, and once at 50 I continued to never use either, with the exception of a SINGLE time I was in Plane of Hate for about an hour. Turned it off immediately upon leaving.

If I could push a button and completely remove anon and role from the game I'd push it in a heartbeat, lack of classic be damned :)

Knuckle
02-08-2011, 02:40 PM
Your a bunch of internet hardasses for not using anon/roleplay as a buffslut class.

Rasah
02-08-2011, 03:03 PM
If I could push a button and completely remove anon and role from the game I'd push it in a heartbeat, lack of classic be damned :)That might put an end to civility on the server.

toddfx
02-08-2011, 03:26 PM
I thought that at one point in time you could do even more elaborate stuff along the lines of "/who all cleric 30 35 LFG" but recently it seems it does not take all the variables into consideration. A class and level range works fine, but if I remember correctly, the LFG variable does not seem to be considered when combined with a level range.

Is it true a longer string of variables was once classic?

Note: I do not have an IP exemption.

fischsemmel
02-08-2011, 03:44 PM
have you ever played a druid/shaman/enchanter? you will want to use anon

Main was a chanter on live for years, and I never used, or even wanted to use, anon or roleplay.

Actually I take that back. I may have wanted to and actually used roleplay in the first year or so of playing. But that was only because I thought when you wanted to roleplay, you were supposed to /roleplay. Good times!

fischsemmel
02-08-2011, 03:47 PM
I thought that at one point in time you could do even more elaborate stuff along the lines of "/who all cleric 30 35 LFG" but recently it seems it does not take all the variables into consideration. A class and level range works fine, but if I remember correctly, the LFG variable does not seem to be considered when combined with a level range.

Is it true a longer string of variables was once classic?

Note: I do not have an IP exemption.

I don't know anything about this, but I wish /who count all was around. Haha.

I'm pretty sure I'm the reason that command was removed way back in the day. I used that thing nonstop to see how many different X class Y race Z level range characters were online.

Guess if you are specific enough with your queries, it isn't really needed though. And EQEmu doesn't hide the overall server pop. Oh well.

Mcbard
02-08-2011, 03:50 PM
I thought that at one point in time you could do even more elaborate stuff along the lines of "/who all cleric 30 35 LFG" but recently it seems it does not take all the variables into consideration. A class and level range works fine, but if I remember correctly, the LFG variable does not seem to be considered when combined with a level range.

Is it true a longer string of variables was once classic?

Note: I do not have an IP exemption.

The lfg tag works just fine combined with a level range for me.

Versus
02-08-2011, 04:17 PM
The lfg tag works just fine combined with a level range for me.

Same. I do "/ all 30 40 LFG" all the time and it works perfectly.

toddfx
02-09-2011, 12:43 AM
Sorry guys, you're right. Not sure what I was smoking

Harrison
02-09-2011, 12:58 AM
I played a cleric for 8 years on live.

I didn't /role unless we were required to for raiding.

No sympathy from me.