My Theory About Why Feminism is Currently Irrelevent to Millenials

[this user was banned]

can we agree that as far as professional presentation goes, perhaps too much is not expected of women but rather too little is expected of men.

go into a law office and try to find me a man wearing a properly tailored suit. you can't. it just won't happen. men dress like absolute trash from mcmanagers all the way up to ceo's. it's even been a trend/meme among west coast tech types trying to parrot steve jobs and bill gates. slovenliness on purpose to signal how down to earth you are.

maybe men should start trying again

[citation needed]

[JurisDictum]

Are redheads attractive? I'm disgusted by all minorities and generally only liked brunettes, by now I'm into blondes. Trying to figure out these redheads currently plz halp

Well the guy holding the sign is fugly as fuck IMO.

But there are attractive redheads out there.

9658

[AzzarTheGod]

I knew this JD fella had some juice lol.

[AzzarTheGod]

Are redheads attractive? I'm disgusted by all minorities and generally only liked brunettes, by now I'm into blondes. Trying to figure out these redheads currently plz halp

redhead women are typically hypersexual and/or at least identify as sexual beings according to most research. They have a heightened sensitivity (confirmed via science) that is a part of their DNA. This is part of the reason for that.

from what i have observed true redheads are racist (but this is more to do with the low number of redheads and a tendency to stick within ethnic group by all races. For example you like brunettes you come from an area with all different types of exotic brunettes)

if u get your Saltbae on though, they do not discriminate. You might need a full head of hair though. Ya'll got that?

[w0k]

Well the guy holding the sign is fugly as fuck IMO.

But there are attractive redheads out there.

9658
Nice post!

Are redheads attractive?

they are ^^

redhead women are typically hypersexual and/or at least identify as sexual beings according to most research. They have a heightened sensitivity (confirmed via science) that is a part of their DNA. This is part of the reason for that.

The quoted text actually is supported by research and is not broscience, dailymail as it sounds. Redheaded women literally are the humans best-adapted to modern society.

[w0k]

on further review i need a lither neck than that boy. it's a flattering photo but idk if he cuts it on video (or bathroom scale tbh).

[Patriam1066]

Well the guy holding the sign is fugly as fuck IMO.

But there are attractive redheads out there.

9658

on further review i need a lither neck than that boy. it's a flattering photo but idk if he cuts it on video (or bathroom scale tbh).

https://youtu.be/zhexf94LjTw

[mickmoranis]

... Mick when was the last time you (really) knew a woman?

I know women are brainwashed into thinking feminism is moral and are unaware they are soldiers manipulated on a battlefield by self identifying amazonian cultists made up of the weakest people in the gene pool in an effort to destroy all life on the planet earth.

So.. I'd say I think I know them pretty well.

[Jimjam]

I know women are brainwashed into thinking feminism is moral and are unaware they are soldiers manipulated on a battlefield by self identifying amazonian cultists made up of the weakest people in the gene pool in an effort to destroy all life on the planet earth.

So.. I'd say I think I know them pretty well.

Mate that episode of Futurama was just a satire.

[mickmoranis]

Mate that episode of Futurama was just a satire.

man it is so sad that the libtard education system has been so fatal to these peoples brains that if you say amazonian the only thing they can think of is an adult cartoon

how much deeper does your knowledge go? Are you about to wow me with your awareness of the new wonder woman films? Maybe your cuck mother was a fan of xena?

[Jimjam]

It's not the word Amazonian that triggered my response, but everything else you said.

[Patriam1066]

I know women are brainwashed into thinking feminism is moral and are unaware they are soldiers manipulated on a battlefield by self identifying amazonian cultists made up of the weakest people in the gene pool in an effort to destroy all life on the planet earth.

So.. I'd say I think I know them pretty well.

How do you make yourself this mad. Serious question, I want to enrage myself like this to work even harder at the gym

[JurisDictum]

How do you make yourself this mad. Serious question, I want to enrage myself like this to work even harder at the gym

Not to doxx Mick as almost certainly sedentary and overweight. But speaking from experience, that's probably whats going on.

How do you think Rush Limbah keeps his head all red and puffed up like that despite all the money he makes for basically talking shit about democrats on the radio.

Ahhh shit man how depressing...now I need to drown my sarrow in this bottle of oxycotin...

And then that basically helps him...turns out he was way ahead of the game on getting busted for oxytocin -- most of his listeners were right behind him.

Rush Limbah is the luckyest fuck alive. But since he's a spoiled little brat that is never satisfied like mick, and he because he never exercises and lets any positive natural chemicals flow through him also like mick, it's never going to occur to him how happy he should be.

[w0k]

happy JD is copping the lobotostream of consciousness-fu technique. i look forward to the day this whole board is lobotostream

[Patriam1066]

happy JD is copping the lobotostream of consciousness-fu technique. i look forward to the day this whole board is lobotostream

Drugs actually are bad though

[JurisDictum]

Joe Montana disagrees. More pot in this society is probably what we need. You guys realize like all athletes are doing it now right?

[w0k]

u will not reach peak lobotostream on pot alone my friend

[mickmoranis]

I am enjoying life emensly and have never been mad on this website, also I am giving you information that is true, the women are secretly trying to take over the world and have organizations simmilar to the illuminati and they are all sex addicts and are all having sex with eachother.

[JurisDictum]

Spirits have more alcohol in them than beer and wine....that doesn't mean people that drink spirits are all alcoholics, or that beer and wine means your getting any less drunk.

Pot is basically the same. Sure if you smoking a ton of dab you might be a total addict -- but its not different than smoking a ton flower (which is at least 20% THC most the time these days).

[Patriam1066]

More pot is not good, supercharged pot products are more readily available now then they ever have been.

Pot is stronger and has almost no benefits at all to anyone, and out of all the smokers .01% have some type of medical need for it.

Pot makes you suck at life

Weed is preferable to pretty much every other vice out there. It should def be legal if opioids Xanax and alcohol remain legal

hope this helps

[Patriam1066]

Joe Montana disagrees. More pot in this society is probably what we need. You guys realize like all athletes are doing it now right?

When I said drugs I mainly meant pills. People in our society trust doctors and never consider that they're highly paid employees most of the time. Employees, unfortunately, of pharmaceutical and insurance companies when you get right down to it. Docs write scripts and people trust that they're being taken care of and voila, 70,000 people die a year to opioids and half of them are trannies posting on this forum

God bless

[AzzarTheGod]

Weed is preferable to pretty much every other vice out there. It should def be legal if opioids Xanax and alcohol remain legal

hope this helps


720

[mickmoranis]

More pot is not good, supercharged pot products are more readily available now then they ever have been.

Pot is stronger and has almost no benefits at all to anyone, and out of all the smokers .01% have some type of medical need for it.

Pot makes you suck at life

Thats not true, almost every person could benefit from the indica strain allowing them to sleep through the night. almost 90% of Americans are diagnosed with sleep deprivation due to the stress of living such an adult child themed life full of leisure and entertainment.

[Ella`Ella]

55 pages of men and men pretending to be women discussing the relevance of feminism...

[Irulan]

55 pages of men and men pretending to be women discussing the relevance of feminism...

Sorry like the top posters in this thread definately do not even have crossdressing AGP drag queer credibility... they are all chadbros at best.

Kinda want to revoke Xaanka's tranny privilage 2.

I'm not claiming female privilege, but yaw women do get treated diff in this world by 'others' (different being the keyword, by others). And it's not as easy as the angry manlets would like to think it is despite the fact that their dead outnumbers the female dead statistically, which is like all they have a candle to hold to, and it's their own dumb fault for being violent craknugs fighting wars and being mad for not getting laid.

Anyway statistically we are all 100% dead in the end, it just is a matter of our own dumbass decisions pretty much as to "how". Kinda hard for that to sink into a "mans" skull. I blame white luxury. Reckless drivers w/ nice cars who expect insurance to take care of them + their manslaughter being like the #1 thing that comes 2 mind. Although this is something they also share in common with saudi princes and the children of rich pakistani doctors (some of which, but rarely, are some of the nicer people i've had the pleasure of knowing).

But men be throwing themselves on their swords of absolutes.

[mickmoranis]

https://youtu.be/7pN6ZgGRfQU

[Kaight]

55 pages of men and men pretending to be women discussing the relevance of feminism...

Men and trans people can (and should) be feminists ya know

[aMindAmok]

Men and trans people can (and should) be feminists ya know

When feminist figure out how to be feminist I might consider it.

[mickmoranis]

Men and trans people can (and should) be feminists ya know

they can and are, but they cannot and arenot allowed to be NEW feminists... you clap and woman-splane it everytime one opens their mouths about maybe new feminism going a little too far.

[Kaight]

they can and are, but they cannot and arenot allowed to be NEW feminists... you clap and woman-splane it everytime one opens their mouths about maybe new feminism going a little too far.

I'm sorry Mick, have you considered joining us and some mean ladies yelled at you? :(

[Irulan]

I use to troll @ him all the time. I'm not even gonna claim success.

But ya mick has a good excuse in my previous behavior to fear new wave terfism. Feminism. Which is pretty elitist garbage.

Yep, incinerate me!

Also politics on this forum .. omg ...

[Jimjam]

And the most important thing is learning to sleep properly without the aid of drugs ( any kind )

Usually through relaxation techniques, meditation or exercise, whichever you prefer. If you cant sleep you either are not managing your stress or are not doing enough physical work, so again you are stupid and probably fat.

Banging one out helps.

[skarlorn]

Banging one out helps.

[AzzarTheGod]

And the most important thing is learning to sleep properly without the aid of drugs ( any kind )

Usually through relaxation techniques, meditation or exercise, whichever you prefer. If you cant sleep you either are not managing your stress or are not doing enough physical work, so again you are stupid and probably fat.


https://i.imgur.com/nZfrmYS.gif

[Wonkie]

terfs are good and we should be nicer to them

[maskedmelon]

thread's a parody of sanity a stone's throw from the deluded reality our society's chasing. it's no longer funny. it's depressing.

[Patriam1066]

I'm sorry Mick, have you considered joining us and some mean ladies yelled at you? :(

I hope you're not actually sorry

Mick is one angry fuck

[mickmoranis]

Ben Shapiro: Black Culture is to blame for income inequality for African Americans
liberals: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEE

Ben Shaprio: Bullying is to blame for school shootings
liberals: If bullying was to blame then transgenderDs would be shooting up schools, no: White male culture is to blame for school shootings.

Me: Wait, so the google guy saying that there are differences between a man and a woman is, true?
Liberals: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Irulan]

You have a minor point. (about dems head spins)

P.S. I never shot up a school.

But I also, wasn't always a low T low risk individual either.

[mickmoranis]

can a newfem please explain to me how this logic works:

1. It is not ok to tell a black male to stop dressing like a thug or embracing gang/rap music culture

2. It is EXTREMELY ok for you to tell a white person to stop being masculine and embracing all the things that the conservative right's culture believe in?


seriously, HOW... HOW is it ok to have that double standard? How is it ok for you to shame someone for hating on a culture, and then for you to turn it around and do the exact same thing?

Why cant you just accept that different people embrace different aspects of different cultures and to just fucking DEAL WITH IT?

Please, how does the newfem logic make any sense? What exactly do each of you tell yourself when you say biggoted ass shit that is completely specious and made up and attacks the way of life of literally millions of people when you say its wrong to do the same to ANY OTHER culture???!!!!??!?!?>!?!?!

Oh meanwhile the cultures that WE hated on, are WAY MORE MASCULINE AND SEXIST THAN CONSERVATIVE RIGHT WING CULTURE... so why the hell are you defending them!?!?!

This is a serious question.

[mickmoranis]

explain to me. you are lost.

[mickmoranis]

Libtards: Masculinity in media is why there are mass shootings

Libtards: also we love sci-fi and horror genres

https://i.imgur.com/5suef1z.gif

[Irulan]

It's not rely bigoted to say don't rape and beat ur cousinsister childwife of 13 without abortions (way 2 keep the race pure btw).

That is a really fracking weird and disturbing picture. Really weird and disturbing dumbasses exist across all spectra of human life and are produced under all ideologies more or less. I haven't figured out how to make people smart or nice, sorry.

It doesn't invalidate everything everyone says? Including ur good o'l pastors saying to not be an hpv riddled dank whore for fat obese's pumping out children with genetic horrific death sentences (like chronic liver disease and a top lifespan of 20 yrs maybe)???

I really honestly wish abstinence and vows of celibacy worked and sterilization and feminization wasn't necessary. Besides 99% of all of u make bad women are gross no matter what anyway so it's kind of pointless to try to chemically castrate humanity through cowmilk and soyprotienbars.

P.S. this is a 1000% hyperbolic trollpost.

Were just not likely to make progress until borigification as a species. and It will probably be some other species doing that to us, and not ourselves rly.

[mickmoranis]

It's not rely bigoted to say don't rape and beat ur cousinsister childwife of 13 without abortions (way 2 keep the race pure btw).

That is a really fracking weird and disturbing picture. Really weird and disturbing dumbasses exist across all spectra of human life and are produced under all ideologies more or less. I haven't figured out how to make people smart or nice, sorry.

It doesn't invalidate everything everyone says? Including ur good o'l pastors saying to not be an hpv riddled dank whore for fat obese's pumping out children with genetic horrific death sentences (like chronic liver disease and a top lifespan of 20 yrs maybe)???

I really honestly wish abstinence worked and sterilization and feminization wasn't necessary. Besides 99% of all of u make bad women are gross no matter what anyway.

whoah whoah whoah, are you saying masculine men ALL support rape?! Is that what the libtards believe? That going to church and liking stoicism, self reliance, and being a strong independent male = rape!

You sneeky editor... No posts are troll posts all posts are true.

[Irulan]

whoah whoah whoah, are you saying masculine men ALL support rape?! Is that what the libtards believe? That going to church and liking stoicism, self reliance, and being a strong independent male = rape!

You sneeky editor... No posts are troll posts all posts are true.

lol not rly they don't exactly, but some behavior does sort of go there? probably from both sides of the divide... i mean girls hypersexualize themselves on instagram pretty bad 2, but that begs the 'she's asking for it' line of reasoning.

(btw I'm not advocating either way)

I'm just pointing out where the logic flows.

There's a lack of nobility and discipline and integrity that people seem to be unable to grasp in general, and we haven't been able to develop that core integral set of features that eliminates both sets of problems in a near universal way, and laws won't really help, but to 'seek justice' which, I have never had justice ever in my life, so whatever. Anarchy!

My biggest beef with the current idea of feminism is that there is a belief more and more "special case" laws will bring equality. (or justice, LOL)

Perhaps a specially crafted honor code might empower women and cuck men, but I don't see it ever happening.

That being said, people are naturally trying to seek whatever recourse and succor they can through whatever means they can, and lawyers are powerful tools in the coming communist world. Many groups are actually doing this / or attempting too, and trying to make many special rules for their special little snowflakey hearts of hearts (even the super christian alt right luvs 2 do this now).

And for whatever reason, the rapists never get killed, efficiently, and without mess, and media attention. Nor does it seem like killing off everyone is going to eliminate the problem either, it seems to be profoundly outside the bounds of physiology and eugenics.

Which leaves us with OMG men and women are inequal. In many ways they are. The solution is to understand these inequalities and stop using them as cruches or excuses for bad behavior or tyranny. More and more bureaucracy does seem to obfuscate and make it harder for someone to at least get vengeance for wrongs done to them.

It's also clearly obvious what works for men, does not exactly all the time work for women.

From my perspective, if my co-worker is an annoying git, I can't just get up on them and threaten to rip their spleen out. IDK why this worked so well as a man, but it did seem to on a lot of occasions and seemed to be the expected norm, from my anecdotal experiences.

As a women, it's much more effective to publicly shame and discuss the problems openly, or bring higher ups in, so that everyone tends to balance the equation rather than creating a 1v1, however, omg when a clique of mean girls forms it's just fucking ugly 2. Liberals kind of are working this way.

I think in short in a final epic way, proper men, could indeed use their super awesome masculinity properly to defend women and bring equality without subjugating them ya, and this would be a great boon to us all.

[loramin]

i pray for you on an almost daily basis. it brings me great shame that my virtue is so little that i cannot muster the fortitude 2 assess how to manipulate you back to health by reading into your posts.

I'm 90% certain Mick is a paranoid schizophrenic. If I'm correct, that means that (like my brother) the only thing that could help him get healthy is therapy and drugs ... which are exactly the sort of things Mick will probably (also like my brother) never try.

TLDR: Mick's a lost cause.

[mickmoranis]

I'm 90% certain Mick is a paranoid schizophrenic. If I'm correct, that means that (like my brother) the only thing that could help him get healthy is therapy and drugs ... which are exactly the sort of things Mick will probably (also like my brother) never try.

TLDR: Mick's a lost cause.

notice you cannot explain to me how its ok to say white people have a culture problem but its racist to say black people do.

oh and since you can only resort to ad hominem, please, i urge you to watch the interview between the two sets of people in this youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pN6ZgGRfQU

Youll see libs screaming, crying and yelling and attacking every conversion topic that is brought up, then you see two people who lean a little bit more to the right (reality in this case) about male/race privlage and they have a REALLY good discussion about different cultures, what its like to live in them, actually LISTENING to the people the left (women) clap and interrupt while they womansplaine the "struiggle" of being them.

[Wonkie]

I'm 90% certain Mick is a paranoid schizophrenic. If I'm correct, that means that (like my brother) the only thing that could help him get healthy is therapy and drugs ... which are exactly the sort of things Mick will probably (also like my brother) never try.

TLDR: Mick's a lost cause.

it's worse than you think. he's a libertarian.

[mickmoranis]

say what you will about libertarianism but libertarianism has historically killed and abused less than ALL other forms of government, by the billions... so go ahead and tell me how THIS time you socialists are on the moral high ground and aren't going to turn into the Rajneesh or jones town or every single other socialist movement in the history of man kind.

[Wonkie]

got em

[Patriam1066]

got em

[mickmoranis]

i aint wrong sorry you toga wearing cultists (that goes for both socialists and Persians)

[skarlorn]

oo oo call me something mick

[mickmoranis]

libs should watch this series on netflix: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBLS_OM6Puk

it really is a great example of what happens when libs try to live in their idiology

1. it requires intense funding (libs have champaign taste even the ones that want to give up everything and live off the land, they just want the finer things in life, leasure)
2. it requires censoring people and a class system, its a popularity contest, jus tlike high school (maybe that's why they look to highschool students for leadership these days eh? #marchforwhateverthosekidsaredoingtoday)
3. they will go just as dark as the conservitives, they will kill their enemies, they will do anything any other human would do, so they are not morally superior in anyway at all.
4. they want to help everyone, but when they realize that you cant just WANT that to happen, they go right on down the same path that HIMLER went, poison the poor people, get rid of them, do what ever it takes for a final solution.
5. liberalism. is. a. pyramid. scheme. make no mistake.

NOW libertarianism, has created more freedom than any form of organized goverment in the history of man kind, and the entire world feeds off the moment libertarianism(anti federalists) created penning the first 10 amendments to the united states constitution. Anti federalists made the world free place for ALL nations.

period.

[Wonkie]

no

[Patriam1066]

no

Howdy pokesan welcome back

[skarlorn]

i'd like point out wonkie has a post on page 1 of bda to phinny thread.

impressive sleeper acct.

what am i doing with my life

[Patriam1066]

i'd like point out wonkie has a post on page 1 of bda to phinny thread.

impressive sleeper acct.

what am i doing with my life

I'm telling you, no way he's Irish. Italian or Jewish. He's had some Semitic blood, that's how you become that clever

[mickmoranis]

https://i.imgur.com/bVrTILD.png

[Wonkie]

rad fems!

https://i.imgur.com/WqYRUN6.jpg

[AzzarTheGod]

im runnin touchdowns

im on the west side of chicago

im looking for some bus-downs

[maskedmelon]

im digging the idea that libertarianism is at odds federalism. wtg mick ^^

[mickmoranis]

https://i.imgur.com/4TMP8Kh.png

[Patriam1066]

I think I'm the only person here who legitimately respects women and feels that they are equal

If y'all ever have a daughter your perspective will change

[mickmoranis]

I think I'm the only person here who legitimately respects women and feels that they are equal

If y'all ever have a daughter your perspective will change

youre a fuckng retard women have wonderful standing in america.

sorry you cover them up with sheets in your family but that's unique to you.

seriously this is the dumbest post you have ever posted.

you seriously think woman are legitimately disrespected in this country?

please leave this continent.

[Patriam1066]

youre a fuckng retard women have wonderful standing in america.

sorry you cover them up with sheets in your family but that's unique to you.

seriously this is the dumbest post you have ever posted.

you seriously think woman are legitimately disrespected in this country?

please leave this continent.

Persians aren't big on the lady covering. Also, I don't see feminism as harmful. Who gives a shit. It's an issue like weed or gay marriage. How anyone gets worked up over this is beyond me

[mickmoranis]

Persians aren't big on the lady covering. Also, I don't see feminism as harmful. Who gives a shit. It's an issue like weed or gay marriage. How anyone gets worked up over this is beyond me

Feminism isn’t harmful new feminism is rewriting history and is definitely harmful when literally companies will:

1. Hire more of one sex cus they believe a lie that woman need help
2. Change the content they produce to be more inclusive
3. Attack good people who have minor disagreements about the state of social order today
4. Is revisionist history

[loramin]

Feminism isn’t harmful new feminism is rewriting history and is definitely harmful when literally companies will:

1. Hire more of one sex cus they believe a lie that woman need help
2. Change the content they produce to be more inclusive
3. Attack good people who have minor disagreements about the state of social order today
4. Is revisionist history

Translation: there's actual feminism, which no sane person would ever be against, and then there's "Mick's imaginary Fox-news based definition of feminism" which is just as nuts as Mick is ... but gives him something to post about.

[mickmoranis]

no there was actual feminism but you idiot children were raised in americas worst period for public education so you were not taught what feminism achieved over the last 100 years and you learn everything from TV and you hear mindless dribble that women are treated unfairly today when you have no idea what being treated unfairly actually means.

[Wonkie]

Translation: there's actual feminism, which no sane person would ever be against, and then there's "Mick's imaginary Fox-news based definition of feminism" which is just as nuts as Mick is ... but gives him something to post about.

please argue with me about terfs :(

[loramin]

please argue with me about terfs :(

I think the "t", "e", and "r" in that acronym make it pretty clear that they're not normal/mainstream feminism.

[Wonkie]

I think the "t", "e", and "r" in that acronym make it pretty clear that they're not normal/mainstream feminism.

how did you, a man, come to be in charge of which feminism is valid?

[maskedmelon]

doesn't matter whether terfs are true feminists or not. They are going to lose. The left does not tolerate intolerance except when directed at outsiders.

[JurisDictum]

None of these god damn people are popular with the newer generations. That's just a story conservatives news papers tell you because they know "kids these days" sells. Boomers still think they actually were a meaningful generation that contributed to this country....lol...they. did. nothing. It was all their parents.

I can't blame gen X for how anti-social they are..they were a tiny generation surrounded by the most selfish generation in American history.

Rad fem is some stupid little campus group that increasingly, not even the professors think is worth a shit. And same with all the rest of the useless identity majors.

They are lionized by media outlets like infowars and fox to scare old people into thinking the country is doomed.

I mean this entire little protest movement....its like their doing it because mommy and daddy said that's what they did....Boomer's ego is like a black hole sucking all the air out of anything new socially...

[Wonkie]

doesn't matter whether terfs are true feminists or not. They are going to lose. The left does not tolerate intolerance except when directed at outsiders.

well duh.

but the point is that the women's rights movement has been compromised and redirected by the inclusion of male voices.

which is of course, "terf hatespeech"

[maskedmelon]

well duh.

but the point is that the women's rights movement has been compromised and redirected by the inclusion of male voices.

which is of course, "terf hatespeech"

^。^ im not disagreeing with you, butt hating those with whom you do not agree is commendable as a matter of self preservation. terfs are hateful. if you are not hateful, you are right to hate them. This sort of sanctioned intolerance on the left is liek a safety valve, allowing a peaceful society to vent pent up frustrations with their oppressors on more assailable targets. We can't defeat the white male patriarchy, but we can rather handily stamp out a bunch of unhappy, lonely women suffering the delusions of a grand ideology.

[mickmoranis]

If only defeating the male patriarchy meant building yourself up instead of ripping someone else down. #liberals #newfem

[Wonkie]

^。^ im not disagreeing with you, butt hating those with whom you do not agree is commendable as a matter of self preservation. terfs are hateful. if you are not hateful, you are right to hate them. This sort of sanctioned intolerance on the left is liek a safety valve, allowing a peaceful society to vent pent up frustrations with their oppressors on more assailable targets. We can't defeat the white male patriarchy, but we can rather handily stamp out a bunch of unhappy, lonely women suffering the delusions of a grand ideology.

an otherwise perfect post ruined by including the low-born intolerant left meme. disappointing.

still 9.5/10 in you lap ^^

[AzzarTheGod]

None of these god damn people are popular with the newer generations. That's just a story conservatives news papers tell you because they know "kids these days" sells. Boomers still think they actually were a meaningful generation that contributed to this country....lol...they. did. nothing. It was all their parents.

I can't blame gen X for how anti-social they are..they were a tiny generation surrounded by the most selfish generation in American history.

Rad fem is some stupid little campus group that increasingly, not even the professors think is worth a shit. And same with all the rest of the useless identity majors.

They are lionized by media outlets like infowars and fox to scare old people into thinking the country is doomed.

I mean this entire little protest movement....its like their doing it because mommy and daddy said that's what they did....Boomer's ego is like a black hole sucking all the air out of anything new socially...

You have a lot of commonality with Xaanks and I.

Boomers the plague of progress

[AzzarTheGod]

I'm interested in more posts speculating on the cause of the boomer Ego.

What were it's influences? Which television programs or world events/traditions helped shape what we know as the Baby Boomer?

If you can bring the woke JD then prove it.

[AzzarTheGod]

You can either make yourself bigger by standing taller, or you can lop the heads off everyone around you

I'm well over 6 feet and still own 2 inch heel lifts. Makes game a lot easier every inch of height is one less shit test you have to go through.


For a guy like you I'd say you'd need about 5-6 inches in lifts. Good luck w that.

[maskedmelon]

an otherwise perfect post ruined by including the low-born intolerant left meme. disappointing.

still 9.5/10 in you lap ^^

i do better (o^^o)

[AzzarTheGod]

If you can bring the woke on Boomers JD then prove it.

Will not happen. diff between J, xaanks, ATG is the opposition posters are incapable of rational speculation and interpretative facts.

ur just a meme JD trying to pass urself off as the authentic article

[loramin]

how did you, a man, come to be in charge of which feminism is valid?

I'm not in charge of anything, nor did I say what was or wasn't valid. I simply stated a basic fact, that "terfs" are, by their very definition, not simple feminists.

But it's also true that they don't represent "mainstream" feminism. There are a whole lot more people who would define themselves with the dictionary definition of a feminist:

adjective
1. advocating social, political, legal, and economic rights for women equal to those of men.
noun
2. an advocate of such rights.


than there are people would define themselves as "terfs":

Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist. That group of feminists that claims that trans women aren't really women, as biological determinism is only a fallacy when it used against them, not when they use it against others.

[JurisDictum]

I'm interested in more posts speculating on the cause of the boomer Ego.

What were it's influences? Which television programs or world events/traditions helped shape what we know as the Baby Boomer?

If you can bring the woke JD then prove it.

There was a lot going on there. First of all, it was simply easy to buy a house and support yourself in the post war economy...and it continued to be so until the 70s...this when boomers already had their jobs and houses...and even if they didn't the god damn gen-xers were too much of a mess right out of high school and college to compete for any of the better jobs.

This combined with a big backlash against conformity...They were still killing homosexuals for being a communist threat and black leaders etc...a lot different than the current situation on identity politics.

Boomers are the TV generation. They grew up watching TV...expecting commercials..having money to buy whats on the commercials (and not needing to spend it on future savings or housing). They never grew out of this.

Boomers bought there own BS...that the hippie generation was a defining moment for all of the generation...despite that the kids didn't do a lot (Johnson and his red-neck mentality did -- and to a lesser degree Kennedy by working with MLK). They looked at this is like "yea that's us" without releasing it was a small subset of rich white stoners that everyone else in there generation hated (and voted against come Nixon).

Boomers don't really think anyone has it hard because they never did. Is a common underline theme. What comes to mind is this grey haired boomer professor I had...she actually the question to this small 400 writing class "why do some kids seem to do so well with school and be involved with extra caricular activities (referring to some frat girl as a positive example) and others not?"

She genuinely never considered that wealthier kids might have an easy time on this front...while poor kids would be too trying to catch up to the private school kids to go out drinking partying every night. Just clueless -- life long educator -- no clue why some might have an easier time on work than others...

She was working 2 jobs...scarce university professorships at both the community college and the university -- thereby taking 2 different jobs someone worth a shit could have had instead. Sometimes I get the impression she didn't understand the text we were reading.

Boomers treated the government like it was there for them and only them. They show little regard for any other generation besides themselves...they made more cash so now they want tax cuts, they start retiring now they want better drug prices and benefits.

I went to buy some CBD oil yesterday...the cashier apologize that --by law-- dispensaries have to make you leave with it in a child save bag...that costs $1.50...I was bitching about this to a boomer, the response was favorable for the law, the bureaucracy making these pointless laws, and me paying $1.50 to protect the environment better than if the store paid for it...

you know what also helps the environment? not making stupid laws that everyone needs a fucking plastic bag every visit, and not pumping out so many kids if you can't make sure their not getting in your drugs! My generation gets it...its just WOOOOSH to a boomer...

Money has just been there for them..that's the impression i get. We all pay a little for a stupid law to make those bureaucrats feel important.

Boomers are by far the worst offenders when it comes to raising kids to make themselves feel better....no one told them that's immoral I guess.* It should be fucking obvious...no other generation did this en masse. That's what this protest shit is like in the media...the media like filming their own elite kids to reflect positively on them. Because identity politics was the issue of their day, and not our day, this is perverted and desperate. We don't need a big mass protest movement for identity politics....that was them. Again, boomer ego just couldn't accept this until finally they started to suffer...now their bitching more.

* this goes for all the bullshit cheering on single motherhood, praising parents pulling their kids out of school and way they raised Millennials to be happy in the short term (self-esteem movement). All the digital neglect....it was because they didn't want to admit they were shit parents. Or admit that shit parents have a negative impact on their kids life. That was just too hard for generation mid-life crisis to handle. They had shit to do, and it surely wasn't parenting.

[Wonkie]

I'm not in charge of anything, nor did I say what was or wasn't valid. I simply stated a basic fact, that "terfs" are, by their very definition, not simple feminists.

But it's also true that they don't represent "mainstream" feminism. There are a whole lot more people who would define themselves with the dictionary definition of a feminist:



than there are people would define themselves as "terfs":

you did an excellent job pasting from the dictionary and i applaud you for it.

however, mainstream or not is irrelevant to your initial claim to mick that no actual feminists believe as he thinks they do.

like, do brooke baldwins views on feminism represent feminist philosophy better than those found on /r/gendercritical because she generates advertising revenue?

[loramin]

you did an excellent job pasting from the dictionary and i applaud you for it.

however, mainstream or not is irrelevant to your initial claim to mick that no actual feminists believe as he thinks they do.

like, do brooke baldwins views on feminism represent feminist philosophy better than those found on /r/gendercritical because she generates advertising revenue?

And again you failed at basic reading comprehension. What I said to Mick was in response to:

Feminism isn’t harmful new feminism is rewriting history and is definitely harmful when literally companies will:

1. Hire more of one sex cus they believe a lie that woman need help
2. Change the content they produce to be more inclusive
3. Attack good people who have minor disagreements about the state of social order today
4. Is revisionist history


... not terfs. You're the one who wanted to talk about them:
please argue with me about terfs :(

[Wonkie]

And again you failed at basic reading comprehension. What I said to Mick was in response to:



... not terfs. You're the one who wanted to talk about them:

we'll have to ask mick.

mick did you mean radfems or the nonexistent feminists loramin describes?

[maskedmelon]

Feminism isn’t harmful

Translation: there's actual feminism, which no sane person would ever be against, and then there's "Mick's imaginary Fox-news based definition of feminism" which is just as nuts as Mick is ... but gives him something to post about.

you failed at basic reading comprehension.

[AzzarTheGod]

we'll have to ask mick.

mick did you mean radfems or the nonexistent feminists loramin describes?



Busted up laughing

[AzzarTheGod]

There was a lot going on there. First of all, it was simply easy to buy a house and support yourself in the post war economy...and it continued to be so until the 70s...this when boomers already had their jobs and houses...and even if they didn't the god damn gen-xers were too much of a mess right out of high school and college to compete for any of the better jobs.

This combined with a big backlash against conformity...They were still killing homosexuals for being a communist threat and black leaders etc...a lot different than the current situation on identity politics.

Boomers are the TV generation. They grew up watching TV...expecting commercials..having money to buy whats on the commercials (and not needing to spend it on future savings or housing). They never grew out of this.

Boomers bought there own BS...that the hippie generation was a defining moment for all of the generation...despite that the kids didn't do a lot (Johnson and his red-neck mentality did -- and to a lesser degree Kennedy by working with MLK). They looked at this is like "yea that's us" without releasing it was a small subset of rich white stoners that everyone else in there generation hated (and voted against come Nixon).

Boomers don't really think anyone has it hard because they never did. Is a common underline theme. What comes to mind is this grey haired boomer professor I had...she actually the question to this small 400 writing class "why do some kids seem to do so well with school and be involved with extra caricular activities (referring to some frat girl as a positive example) and others not?"

She genuinely never considered that wealthier kids might have an easy time on this front...while poor kids would be too trying to catch up to the private school kids to go out drinking partying every night. Just clueless -- life long educator -- no clue why some might have an easier time on work than others...

She was working 2 jobs...scarce university professorships at both the community college and the university -- thereby taking 2 different jobs someone worth a shit could have had instead. Sometimes I get the impression she didn't understand the text we were reading.

Boomers treated the government like it was there for them and only them. They show little regard for any other generation besides themselves...they made more cash so now they want tax cuts, they start retiring now they want better drug prices and benefits.

I went to buy some CBD oil yesterday...the cashier apologize that --by law-- dispensaries have to make you leave with it in a child save bag...that costs $1.50...I was bitching about this to a boomer, the response was favorable for the law, the bureaucracy making these pointless laws, and me paying $1.50 to protect the environment better than if the store paid for it...

you know what also helps the environment? not making stupid laws that everyone needs a fucking plastic bag every visit, and not pumping out so many kids if you can't make sure their not getting in your drugs! My generation gets it...its just WOOOOSH to a boomer...

Money has just been there for them..that's the impression i get. We all pay a little for a stupid law to make those bureaucrats feel important.

Boomers are by far the worst offenders when it comes to raising kids to make themselves feel better....no one told them that's immoral I guess.* It should be fucking obvious...no other generation did this en masse. That's what this protest shit is like in the media...the media like filming their own elite kids to reflect positively on them. Because identity politics was the issue of their day, and not our day, this is perverted and desperate. We don't need a big mass protest movement for identity politics....that was them. Again, boomer ego just couldn't accept this until finally they started to suffer...now their bitching more.

* this goes for all the bullshit cheering on single motherhood, praising parents pulling their kids out of school and way they raised Millennials to be happy in the short term (self-esteem movement). All the digital neglect....it was because they didn't want to admit they were shit parents. Or admit that shit parents have a negative impact on their kids life. That was just too hard for generation mid-life crisis to handle. They had shit to do, and it surely wasn't parenting.


Tabbed for later

[Kaight]

*drinks $7.50 glass of Pinot grigio tells attractive New Yorker c-suite feminist friends about p99 sexist community laugh heartily about how much less money they’re making than US GIRLS clicks submit*

[JurisDictum]

*drinks $7.50 glass of Pinot grigio tells attractive New Yorker c-suite feminist friends about p99 sexist community laugh heartily about how much less money they’re making than US GIRLS clicks submit*

That's what there all like.

Some real advice I'd like to give liberal women as a socialist guy...don't start a war your not going to win.

[Wonkie]

*drinks $7.50 glass of Pinot grigio tells attractive New Yorker c-suite feminist friends about p99 sexist community laugh heartily about how much less money they’re making than US GIRLS clicks submit*

eat your pheasant
drink your wine

[mickmoranis]

*drinks $7.50 glass of Pinot grigio tells attractive New Yorker c-suite feminist friends about p99 sexist community laugh heartily about how much less money they’re making than US GIRLS clicks submit*

i commend this fembot for sticking with the big dogs long enough to sound like lulz :cool:

[Kaight]

That's what there all like.

Some real advice I'd like to give liberal women as a socialist guy...don't start a war your not going to win.

Yet you can’t even use basic grammar correctly.

[mickmoranis]

Yet you can’t even use basic grammar correctly.

This is what is known as “nagging” the practice is one of the many reasons women make less money than men.

[JurisDictum]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNwaZ_sy6M8

Most women never wrap there head around this. They just assume they career stall around 40 because of sexism.

[skarlorn]

ford and gribb

[Kaight]

This is what is known as “nagging” the practice is one of the many reasons women make less money than men.

mick i GUARANTEE you I make more money than you, and this isn't a gender thing. you are such a fucking maniac i can't imagine a company actually wanting to keep you around. your coworkers do not want to hear about chem trails anymore, k? i've never spoken to them, i've never met them but I know this to be true.

[mickmoranis]

I own a company made up of 680 male emploees

[JurisDictum]

Crazy women have a harder time holding down jobs than crazy men. We have better compartmentalization.

I mean think about it. Whenever they catch a male killer its like "he seemed like such a nice and quiet guy." When they catch some women killing...its all "that bitch was crazy and I'm not at all surprised."

People actually think I have a positive attitude about women in the real world...and maybe I do in that moment. Sometimes I fool myself by being so relentlessly PC and appropriate.

But deep down I know I'm just flaming sexist that agrees with Buddha...women are less evolved and will probably have to be reincarnated as men before they achieve enlightenment.

Or pick any spiritual leader...because they all agree on this.

[AzzarTheGod]

mick i GUARANTEE you I make more money than you, and this isn't a gender thing. you are such a fucking maniac i can't imagine a company actually wanting to keep you around. your coworkers do not want to hear about chem trails anymore, k? i've never spoken to them, i've never met them but I know this to be true.

*pans lens to Kayyte*

[mickmoranis]

Crazy women have a harder time holding down jobs than crazy men. We have better compartmentalization.

I mean think about it. Whenever they catch a male killer its like "he seemed like such a nice and quiet guy." When they catch some women killing...its all "that bitch was crazy and I'm not at all surprised."

People actually think I have a positive attitude about women in the real world...and maybe I do in that moment. Sometimes I fool myself by being so relentlessly PC and appropriate.

But deep down I know I'm just flaming sexist that agrees with Buddha...women are less evolved and will probably have to be reincarnated as men before they achieve enlightenment.

Or pick any spiritual leader...because they all agree on this.

pseudo science what vaccines cause autism too?

[skarlorn]

i like gurls for intimacy and sex and snuggles

i like boys for shit posting and teabagging the corpses of my Elf Victims

I like money to buy G U C C I and L O U I S

god bless Amoricang

[JurisDictum]

Skarlorn is going to make that million by 30. And then some uppity bitch is going to take half of it.

3/4 marriage ends in divorce.

[AzzarTheGod]

Crazy women have a harder time holding down jobs than crazy men. We have better compartmentalization.

I mean think about it. Whenever they catch a male killer its like "he seemed like such a nice and quiet guy." When they catch some women killing...its all "that bitch was crazy and I'm not at all surprised."

People actually think I have a positive attitude about women in the real world...and maybe I do in that moment. Sometimes I fool myself by being so relentlessly PC and appropriate.

But deep down I know I'm just flaming sexist that agrees with Buddha...women are less evolved and will probably have to be reincarnated as men before they achieve enlightenment.

Or pick any spiritual leader...because they all agree on this.

Its because many women chose to be slaves to emotions that may not even be relevant to the surrounding circumstances but rather a part of their biological reproductive moods. They have a wild horse thing going. Its not just "mood swings" or whatever elementary basic bitch explanation you've heard growing up. Its a survival based programming with a certain set of triggers hardwired into their DNA.

U might say but don't men also seek to reproduce and have a set of predictable behaviors one can expect in any courtship? AHA! There is the difference. Men don't treat life as one big courtship or relationship with the world. Men treat the workplace as the workplace. Its an abstract concept.

Similar to how women struggle with honor. Simply because honor is an abstract concept. Women have the SAME struggle with not treating life as one big relationship week in and week out. Women have a public relationship with life.

[skarlorn]

Skarlorn is going to make that million by 30. And then some uppity bitch is going to take half of it.

3/4 marriage ends in divorce.

THanks dude I am worried about this too, coming from a divorced family. Really hoping i can either get a pre-nup or marry a woman who comes from a wealthy family so that I could go after her equally hard in case of a divorce

[AzzarTheGod]

THanks dude I am worried about this too, coming from a divorced family. Really hoping i can either get a pre-nup or marry a woman who comes from a wealthy family so that I could go after her equally hard in case of a divorce

The higher the education level of the woman, the less likely she is to struggle with abstract concepts.

Shoot for a girl with a Masters or higher and I don't see a problem with a "surprise divorce". You might have a regular divorce, but that is a horse of a different color from what you are most concerned about.


The crazy horse divorce.


AYYYYYYY fuuuuuukkkkkkkkkk

thats bars...

[AzzarTheGod]

and im not talking about a Masters from Phoenix University online or some State school. stick to private institutions or institutions with religious leanings. Fordham, Notre Dame, Duke n such

[JurisDictum]

Well if you have kids it doesn't matter as much -- because that becomes what matters in the end. Unless you have fucked up values.

This pre-supposes she/you sticks around until they're older teenagers though.

[AzzarTheGod]

ugh mic check

reppin set woke 920

[AzzarTheGod]

Well if you have kids it doesn't matter as much -- because that becomes what matters in the end. Unless you have fucked up values.

Bachelors degree.

Fucked up values.


Checks out . Dear Diary, today I brought the woke to the Feminist thread.

[skarlorn]

Fair point. I currently have a Harvard PhD qt in my back pocket in case I hit procreation time and need to call in the bench marriage candidate. Low chance of suprrise marriage issues with her cause she's also from a Ukranian immigrant family.

But i'm shootin UP gettin GAINS hoping to form a harmonious marriage with a wonderful human with tits n brains

[Wonkie]

you only lend credence to media feminism by bashing the gynocracy(XXOG)

have some subtlety gents

[skarlorn]

i'm shit posting p99 forum boards

not charming people in public

have some relativity, Einstein

[AzzarTheGod]

knew some nuts girls from harvards graduate schools. this 1 girl who graduated from harvards masters program deleted her entire social media presence after posting she was dating a black man. former 3rd string NBA player

im talking 1,000 pics going back to 2011. yeughhhhhh

religious leaning it aint

[Wonkie]

i'm shit posting p99 forum boards

not charming people in public

have some relativity, Einstein


i mostly just wanted to post XXOG

[skarlorn]

i respek dat

[AzzarTheGod]

you only lend credence to media feminism by bashing the gynocracy(XXOG)

have some subtlety gents

mirror mirror who's the farest?

trickk a buck 50 on that horse n carriage

down to the watches, alligator straps

feminists holler back, just like they parrots

six different time zones, i don't set er back

As I heat it it turns blueish,

JD European custom, the politic is Italian

it seems i get foolish, the post is Jewish

we aint browsing, pull up so mean with the angel bowing

or with the emblem bearing the Stallion

yeughhh

[maskedmelon]

fem·i·nism
ˈfeməˌnizəm

noun

advocacy for social restructuring on the basis of the delusion that women enjoy similar variability and perforamance thresholds in the absence of several hundred thousand years of selection pressures and chronic exposure to biotoxins responsible for them.

synonyms: the women's movement, the feminist movement, women's liberation, female emancipation, women's rights; informalwomen's lib
"a longtime advocate of feminism"

[AzzarTheGod]

fem·i·nism
ˈfeməˌnizəm

noun

advocacy for social restructuring on the basis of the delusion that women enjoy similar variability and perforamance thresholds in the absence of several hundred thousand years of selection pressures and chronic exposure to biotoxins responsible for them.

synonyms: the women's movement, the feminist movement, women's liberation, female emancipation, women's rights; informalwomen's lib
"a longtime advocate of feminism"


*squeezes off Super 8*

my gat heavy.

its how every rhyme has begun lately

im not somebody who stops and makes a 180

im not somebody who has a job and a young lady

with me its twice bitten once shy

Its eye for an eye

i need a half second to be packed n ready

then im out the door, putting in time and labor

so if my Super 8 overweight, then im its enabler

'Gean chasing me i cant escape my violent past,

so I gotta post n run, or DINE AND DASH

but im always outside, I restrain flight

because the best place to hide is in PLAIN SIGHT

I heard [redacted] coming, i left the post on the floor

with no traces of DNA or databytes

wish i was there, they were probably in an UPROAR

but we all square, allsfair in love n war

[JurisDictum]

*drinks $7.50 glass of Pinot grigio tells attractive New Yorker c-suite feminist friends about p99 sexist community laugh heartily about how much less money they’re making than US GIRLS clicks submit*

This was still a sick burn. You just shouldn't have solo'd out Mick. I'm sure you make more money than me, for example.

But that's what this is about. Pitting poor white dudes against middling professional women. This makes both groups helpless against wealthy white men....because both groups as a collective are too stupid to see the man behind the curtain on this one.

[AzzarTheGod]

This was still a sick burn. You just shouldn't have solo'd out Mick. I'm sure you make more money than me, for example.

But that's what this is about. Pitting poor white dudes against middling professional women. This makes both groups helpless against wealthy white men....because both groups as a collective are too stupid to see the man behind the curtain on this one.

No one is against them. If I acknowledge my flaws I expect others to do the same.

3rd wave Feminism is building a cult of contrived narcissism. Its toxic.

[maskedmelon]

No one is against them. If I acknowledge my flaws I expect others to do the same.

3rd wave Feminism is building a cult of contrived narcissism. Its toxic.

[mickmoranis]

No one is against them. If I acknowledge my flaws I expect others to do the same.

3rd wave Feminism is building a cult of contrived narcissism. Its toxic.

[Ahldagor]

No one is against them. If I acknowledge my flaws I expect others to do the same.

3rd wave Feminism is building a cult of contrived narcissism. Its toxic.

That narcissism is a cultural facet now, sadly. Vanity is a mortal sin.....

[NachtMystium]

History doesn't lie. Yeah it has changed somewhat, but it will always remain the same as long as universal truths remain. People can go against the grain as much as they want but you can't fit a circle into a square.

Just think about the very beginning, which noone knows for sure, why would Man be the long-lasting, dominant constant throughout all of history? Genders are not equal. I know that's a hard pill to swallow. Yes, they should be treated equally, but they are not equals.

Men and Women must recognize their differences and capitalize on their strengths lest they end up wasting time trying to pretend they are the same, ultimately resulting into what we currently have now - which is just a waste of time that will result into whatever wasted time produces.

[Ahldagor]

History doesn't lie. Yeah it has changed somewhat, but it will always remain the same as long as universal truths remain. People can go against the grain as much as they want but you can't fit a circle into a square.

Just think about the very beginning, which noone knows for sure, why would Man be the long-lasting, dominant constant throughout all of history? Genders are not equal. I know that's a hard pill to swallow. Yes, they should be treated equally, but they are not equals.

Men and Women must recognize their differences and capitalize on their strengths lest they end up wasting time trying to pretend they are the same, ultimately resulting into what we currently have now - which is just a waste of time that will result into whatever wasted time produces.

With the right proportions, a round peg will fit into a square hole.

[NachtMystium]

With the right proportions, a round peg will fit into a square hole.

Okay, let's go with that. Let's even agree that this is already true today, that we have met the right proportions for some circles to just happen to fit through the squares, for some reason, they want to fit through.

2+2 always equals 4 though. There are no proportions to change this.

[Patriam1066]

History doesn't lie. Yeah it has changed somewhat, but it will always remain the same as long as universal truths remain. People can go against the grain as much as they want but you can't fit a circle into a square.

Just think about the very beginning, which noone knows for sure, why would Man be the long-lasting, dominant constant throughout all of history? Genders are not equal. I know that's a hard pill to swallow. Yes, they should be treated equally, but they are not equals.

Men and Women must recognize their differences and capitalize on their strengths lest they end up wasting time trying to pretend they are the same, ultimately resulting into what we currently have now - which is just a waste of time that will result into whatever wasted time produces.

Think about how unstable a past society would've been where vast majorities of poor men didn't have access to women. You're talking about social instability at an unsustainable scale. I think that, rather than superiority, accounts for misogyny during the past

Regardless, while we have different characteristics and traits, I think it's highly speculative to assume men's qualities are "better." Different definitely, but probably not better

[NachtMystium]

Think about how unstable a past society would've been where vast majorities of poor men didn't have access to women. You're talking about social instability at an unsustainable scale. I think that, rather than superiority, accounts for misogyny during the past

Regardless, while we have different characteristics and traits, I think it's highly speculative to assume men's qualities are "better." Different definitely, but probably not better

That's exactly my point, though. We are no better than one another and it's so fruitless to try and prove otherwise. It is foolish, though, to try and pretend that men and women are the same.

Men and women are better and worse, are strong and weak, they are the constant variable and for some reason people are hellbent on proving otherwise despite history spoon-feeding you the statistics.

Men are better at X, Women are better at Y. Why is this such a hard concept for the general public to grasp? Why do women feel the need to constantly meet some kind of equal statistic rather than being content with their own strengths?

[AzzarTheGod]

Regardless, while we have different characteristics and traits, I think it's highly speculative to assume men's qualities are "better." Different definitely, but probably not better

well if u dont play to ur strengths how could u be better?


720

[mickmoranis]

this page is just a tldr of the google guy memo, which imo was not off the mark.

[Wonkie]

^。^ im not disagreeing with you, butt hating those with whom you do not agree is commendable as a matter of self preservation. terfs are hateful. if you are not hateful, you are right to hate them. This sort of sanctioned intolerance on the left is liek a safety valve, allowing a peaceful society to vent pent up frustrations with their oppressors on more assailable targets. We can't defeat the white male patriarchy, but we can rather handily stamp out a bunch of unhappy, lonely women suffering the delusions of a grand ideology.

just realized the same applies to incels/Redpill-kin

...

i should be nicer to mick :(

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon
^。^ im not disagreeing with you, butt hating those with whom you do not agree is commendable as a matter of self preservation. terfs are hateful. if you are not hateful, you are right to hate them. This sort of sanctioned intolerance on the left is liek a safety valve, allowing a peaceful society to vent pent up frustrations with their oppressors on more assailable targets. We can't defeat the white male patriarchy, but we can rather handily stamp out a bunch of unhappy, lonely women suffering the delusions of a grand ideology.

There is a certain level of financial security people need before it statistically has little impact on their happiness...lets just everyone to that point and I swear I'll drop the issue.

I think this is the primary source of anger and the reason a safety valve is needed.

[AzzarTheGod]

There is a certain level of financial security people need before it statistically has little impact on their happiness...lets just everyone to that point and I swear I'll drop the issue.

I think this is the primary source of anger and the reason a safety valve is needed.

woke 920

[loramin]

Men are better at X, Women are better at Y. Why is this such a hard concept for the general public to grasp? Why do women feel the need to constantly meet some kind of equal statistic rather than being content with their own strengths?

Because the reasons men and women are better/worse at X/Y aren't just genetic, or even just biological.

Of course, biological differences do exist. For example, women have a higher pain tolerance than men because they have to give birth, but they can't hold as much in their bladder (compared to men) because their bladder is surrounded by baby-making organs and a man's bladder isn't.

But biological differences make up only a small part of the many differences between men and women in our society. All the rest come from environment, mainly social conditioning. Studies have shown that babies as young as 10 months old have already learned some gender roles (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fa28/416e4d859727cc22c7d48be612dbd22f9c20.pdf). In other words all of us, before we were even a year old, had already started building our internal template for what it means to be male or female, based on the templates of people around us ... templates which came from a long history of inequality.

No one (sane) cares about "equality statistics" when they're about basic biological differences. But the problem is that throughout history people have blamed socially-caused traits on biology, not just for women but also other groups. For instance, so-called "scientists"
blamed the shape of African-Americans' heads for their inherent biological mental inferiority (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craniometry) ... even though there was no such "inherent biological inferiority" at all (as real scientists would later prove). What was perceived as a biological issue was in fact entirely a product of environment.

Likewise, women today are prevented or discouraged from doing things, even if they can do them as well as men. The only way they can show that they're being prevented is to use facts and information, eg. "equality statistics".

[Wonkie]

Because the reasons men and women are better/worse at X/Y aren't just genetic, or even just biological.

Of course, biological differences do exist. For example, women have a higher pain tolerance than men because they have to give birth, but they can't hold as much in their bladder (compared to men) because their bladder is surrounded by baby-making organs and a man's bladder isn't.

But biological differences make up only a small part of the many differences between men and women in our society. All the rest come from environment, mainly social conditioning. Studies have shown that babies as young as 10 months old have already learned some gender roles (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fa28/416e4d859727cc22c7d48be612dbd22f9c20.pdf). In other words all of us, before we were even a year old, had already started building our internal template for what it means to be male or female, based on the templates of people around us ... templates which came from a long history of inequality.

No one (sane) cares about "equality statistics" when they're about basic biological differences. But the problem is that throughout history people have blamed socially-caused traits on biology, not just for women but also other groups. For instance, so-called "scientists"
blamed the shape of African-Americans' heads for their inherent biological mental inferiority (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craniometry) ... even though there was no such "inherent biological inferiority" at all (as real scientists would later prove). What was perceived as a biological issue was in fact entirely a product of environment.

Likewise, women today are prevented or discouraged from doing things, even if they can do them as well as men. The only way they can show that they're being prevented is to use facts and information, eg. "equality statistics".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL0MuT0v6ds

[mickmoranis]

Loramin you ever seen a black baby dance? You ever seen a horse give birth to a little baby horse? This is called genetic inheritance and it has to do with evolution. It’s how animals pass on survival instincts.

Humans pass on their gender rolls the same way, kids have natural interests in things based on their sex.

So it’s a genetic mutation that we’ve evolved into.

If you want to play Himmler and try and breed it out of society then by all means, become the tyrannical liberal authoritarian we all told you you’d evolve into and why we need the second amendment.

[Mblake81]

There is a certain level of financial security people need before it statistically has little impact on their happiness...lets just everyone to that point and I swear I'll drop the issue.

I think this is the primary source of anger and the reason a safety valve is needed.

Great, the primary source of anger has been identified. What is the secondary and the next and the next and the next?

There will always be something to complain about because of fundamental unhappiness at the core. There is little that will fill that hole inside the chest. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Joi2F60Veqo)

"Man why do you smile, don't you understand how you are being fucked over by the man? I don't get it?? what makes you happy you damn idiot? for fucks sake you are a moron that just lays there. Why don't you base your happiness on things me and others value... looks at all these blah blah blahs... don't you get it, don't you understand the blah blah blahs and how important they are? Education, you see education is the key and you are happy only because your feeble mind cannot grasp the complicated issues that would make you sad."

[Wonkie]

Great, the primary source of anger has been identified. What is the secondary and the next and the next and the next?

There will always be something to complain about because of fundamental unhappiness at the core. There is little that will fill that hole inside the chest. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Joi2F60Veqo)

you're describing stockholm syndrome

[JurisDictum]

Great, the primary source of anger has been identified. What is the secondary and the next and the next and the next?

There will always be something to complain about because of fundamental unhappiness at the core. There is little that will fill that hole inside the chest. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Joi2F60Veqo)

Why fix any problems when more problems will just come along? We all need to accept things exactly like they are..now...in this arbitrary moment.

[Mblake81]

Why fix any problems when more problems will just come along? We all need to accept things exactly like they are..now...in this arbitrary moment.

"So you're saying"

https://i.imgur.com/1hQzJhF.jpg

[Wonkie]

imagine being retarded enough to buy petersons crap

[Mblake81]

imagine being retarded enough to buy petersons crap

So you're saying you are a Peterson fan and own all his books?

[Wonkie]

So you're saying you are a Peterson fan and own all his books?

i'm saying i googled the pic you posted and took a guess at your mental ailment

was i right? :o

[Mblake81]

i'm saying i googled the pic you posted and took a guess at your mental ailment

was i right? :o

So you are saying we should bully kids

I mostly wanted to post "so you're saying" ;)

[Wonkie]

So you are saying we should bully kids

I mostly wanted to post "so you're saying" ;)

well, i'm bullying you. if that is how you see it, I can't be held responsible.

[Mblake81]

well, i'm bullying you. if that is how you see it, I can't be held responsible.

You're doing the right thing. I am mostly wanting to post to post and play switch ups to see who will catch it before I dig into them spine deep.

Leave me be, grey phantom.

[JurisDictum]

Pearson was doing damn good in that Cathy Newman interview...until it got the part where he had to admit that he was comparing trans protestors to Mao Zedong...and then obviously had to lie that this wasn't done to stir up controversy.

You can even see him fire up a bit when he starts talking about the THE LEFT TRYING TO DICTATE LANGUAGE!!

An acorn isn't an oak tree. And these bitches are no Mao Zedong. The segue from his lobster comments was masterful too.

Mao would never put up with any of this modern identity politics shit in his country*...and there is no parallel. If 1 women out of 100 men score the same on the tests...then there is 3 women and 297 men in that Chinese classroom.

That's how Mao rolled...that's how it still works.

He's also wrong that power doesn't make you happy...just because you have to cycle through partners doesn't mean you aren't happy as a clam. Serotonin make you happy, exerting power gives creates serotonin.

*He supported 2nd wave feminists concepts like everyone with half a brain in the 60s. The modern identity politics movement is a bastardization of identity politics as they existed in leftwing thought in 1800's-early 1900's.

[Mblake81]

So confucius say

https://i.imgur.com/UqfIAXh.jpg

[JurisDictum]

I've completely replaced getting high with working out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izBKzh1Ni6A

[Mblake81]

I've completely replaced getting high with working out (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovzqV7jzGAQ)

https://i.imgur.com/FAtB1qT.jpg

[NachtMystium]

Women do not need the approval of men to get involved in STEM fields. I will even argue, even if they were "discouraged" into applying to STEM fields(since when have you heard a modern man discourage a woman into going into this field? in fact it's the opposite).

On another note, gender roles have done nothing but good for society. Scientifically speaking, gender roles as they are now, are paramount to happiness and social functionality.

Luxury as it creeps into the "Strong men make good times, good times create weak men" I feel we're going into this phase and we will repeat it.

[mickmoranis]

Women do not need the approval of men to get involved in STEM fields. I will even argue, even if they were "discouraged" into applying to STEM fields(since when have you heard a modern man discourage a woman into going into this field? in fact it's the opposite).

On another note, gender roles have done nothing but good for society. Scientifically speaking, gender roles as they are now, are paramount to happiness and social functionality.

Luxury as it creeps into the "Strong men make good times, good times create weak men" I feel we're going into this phase and we will repeat it.

You go do labor, I’ll stay home and clean and play with the kids and be my own boss!


Fast forward 40 years and invent the desk job:woman gets on internet “ARG THE PATRIARCHY ARG MEN ARG WOMAN RUN THE WORLD!”

[loramin]

Loramin you ever seen a black baby dance? You ever seen a horse give birth to a little baby horse? This is called genetic inheritance and it has to do with evolution. It’s how animals pass on survival instincts.

Wow Mick, that's a new low even for you. There is absolutely no science whatsoever behind your "genetic black baby dance" theory: it's pure and simple ignorant racism (just like craniometry).

Women do not need the approval of men to get involved in STEM fields. I will even argue, even if they were "discouraged" into applying to STEM fields(since when have you heard a modern man discourage a woman into going into this field? in fact it's the opposite).

On another note, gender roles have done nothing but good for society. Scientifically speaking, gender roles as they are now, are paramount to happiness and social functionality.

Luxury as it creeps into the "Strong men make good times, good times create weak men" I feel we're going into this phase and we will repeat it.

"Nothing but good" huh? So the women in Arab countries who can't leave the house without a male guardian ... that's good? Or the fact that women have been male property for most of human history ... that's good? Maybe if you're the gender that gets to do the owning, but not so much for the people being owned.

As for men discouraging women from STEM ... obviously it's not the way it was back in (say) the 20's, when men actually told women "you can't do _____." Back then it was explicit; nowadays it's (usually) far more subtle

Try to imagine if you went into a classroom and it was 95% female: would you feel out of place? What if every class in your major was like that?

Or what about long before you go to college: think about all the female scientists and engineers in movies. Studies have shown that only around 20% of scientists in movies are female, and even when women scientists are shown they're more often foils to male protagonists. And then there's:

Flicker has written about the cliché of the male scientist, who comes in various guises. He can be a hard and diligent worker, sometimes obsessively enthusiastic ... he tends not to be particularly attractive, typically resplendent in glasses, a lab coat, and tangled hair .... But it's with looks that the discrepancy becomes really obvious. The female film scientist tends to be gorgeous. In Flicker's words, she is "remarkably beautiful and, compared with her qualifications, unbelievably young. She has a model's body -- thin, athletic, perfect -- is dressed provocatively and is sometimes 'distorted' by wearing glasses."

In other words, there are no men saying "you can't be a scientist", there's just a whole society teaching us lessons through the movies we watch, lessons like "women don't belong in science, they belong looking pretty".

Thankfully, society is complex and we've evolved to the point where we also teach conflicting lessons like "grrrl power", which is why we have the women we do have in STEM (vs. almost none back in the 20's). We've made progress, but women are also still far under-represented, and it's not because "the man" is literally keeping women out of STEM, it's because of our society and the lessons it teaches us.

[Wonkie]

we need strong men like nacht in the fight for the right to say slurs online

[JurisDictum]

Men have dominated women historically because men are stronger and scary to women on a physical level. Even really tough women are scared of men when it comes to the prospect of getting a fist fight.

Until it was considered socially unacceptable to hit women under the vast majority of circumstances...women were just too damn scared. Even after that, high status men are scary on a social level (men experience this too).

So you don't need to know anything about the particular social circumstances to determine why women were not as accomplished historically as men. They weren't allowed to be.

Women are wired to appreciate protectors in the way men are wired to seek out young hot-bodied women. This is where some of the 3rd wave breaks down...because they don't want to admit this..and they want to say its all society.

None of that shit has anything to do with whether women want to be a doctor or not though...incidently they make great doctors.

But capitalism has created a problem...the problem is that men can't play protector for their dr. girlfriend/wife because they don't make half her money. The few guys that do are overloaded with options....not to mention fucking busy and have a tendency to prefer a more home-bound partner making sure the domestic scene doesn't go to hell.

That's kind of on women too...they interpret money as protection. That's their choice not their male counterparts.

The aside to all this that's confusing...a red herring IMO. Is that women generally don't seem to want to:

1) work with things (they tend to rather work with people)

2) devote themselves 100% to career...while only a small % of men do this...its like millions more then women in a planet with as many people as we have.

IDK if this is or is not social tbh. It is still just a tendency...lots of women work with things and can't stand people.

Another thing to confuse everyone is that some men have brains more like women and some women have brains more like men.

[mickmoranis]

Men have dominated women historically because men are stronger and scary to women on a physical level.

and women historically have enjoyed the benifit of men taking care of them for hundreds of thousands of years since we began evolving.

which is why when someone says biologically there are reasons why women are not in leadership positions in society are true.

Genetic inheritance is science, its not absolute. LIke a midget may not give birth to a midget.

which is why fat short tempered girls who need to work to live comfortably try to remind us that its not biological. Which is half true, its not ALL biological. But most of it is, but thats an aside.

The reality is you just have to work within the system. Especially when you enter the work force.

Like men do.

But instead they form a union and try to discredit mens accoplishments and try to create a false narrative that men are out to get them and hold them back, when in reality we'd love to have more wome nin the work force, get over yourself and apply yourself while you do it please.

also juris is right, and his info comes from the same source as the google doc guy

[mickmoranis]

also cus mellenials are only intersted in whatever is hot that minuet: https://youtu.be/-Ssz8ajfBA4

[JurisDictum]

It's too bad my background is so A-typical no one in my generation completely thinks like me.

That being said, im 31 and one of older milenials alive right now...give us a bit of time. Young people are too stupid to pay attention to anything but whats hot atm.

Most of these motherfuckers still think their going to be millionaires! LOL...

[Wonkie]

from the retards who brought you race science, here comes gender science!

[mickmoranis]

It's too bad my background is so A-typical no one in my generation completely thinks like me.

That being said, im 31 and one of older milenials alive right now...give us a bit of time. Young people are too stupid to pay attention to anything but whats hot atm.

Most of these motherfuckers still think their going to be millionaires! LOL...

Plenty of people agree with you, you just wont listen to them cus youre hung up on socialism.

[mickmoranis]

from the retards who brought you race science, here comes gender science!

yeah pretty sure the theory of evolution is just a theory eh? And what else vaccinations cause autism and the earth is flat? :rolleyes:

[Wonkie]

yeah pretty sure the theory of evolution is just a theory eh? And what else vaccinations cause autism and the earth is flat? :rolleyes:

evolution and biotruths aren't related

but your parents are

[mickmoranis]

evolution and biotruths aren't related

but your parents are

yea evolutionary biology isnt a thing

[loramin]

Mick when people who don't understand science make stuff up (or blindly repeat made-up stuff they've heard from others), that's not called science, it's pseudoscience.

Real science requires knowledge, training, and that whole scientific method thing: you can't just make up whatever crazy idea you want and then claim SCIENCE!

[mickmoranis]

Mick when people who don't understand science make stuff up (or blindly repeat made-up stuff they've heard from others), that's not called science, it's pseudoscience.

Real science requires knowledge, training, and that whole scientific method thing: you can't just make up whatever crazy idea you want and then claim SCIENCE!

Ahh evolutionary biology is pseudoscience. Got it.

Man came from Jesus!

[mickmoranis]

I forgot to #femenisim #divinecreation

[Swish2]

from the retards who brought you race science, here comes gender science!

Are you suggesting evolutionary theories have no merit at all?

[loramin]

Ahh evolutionary biology is pseudoscience. Got it.

Man came from Jesus!

Are you suggesting evolutionary theories have no merit at all?

Again, bogus "theories" of genetic racial or gender superiority are not science. There are legitimate studies which show differences between races/genders of course. For instance, women have been shown to get breast cancer more, while African-Americans have been shown to get sickle cell more.

But unless you have peer-reviewed research backing up your claims it's not science. When you just say stuff and claim it's true because EVOLUTION! all you're doing is spouting pseudoscientific bullshit.

[Patriam1066]

Women can't parallel park

Men have a larger hypothalamus

It's science

[Patriam1066]

evolution and biotruths aren't related

but your parents are

LOL

[skarlorn]

Women can't parallel park

Men have a larger hypothalamus

It's science

You know, I think the parallel parking thing is more a symptom of Houston.

Go to SF and NY and women can parallel park better than men in the large sprawl cities like LA or Houston.

Women have larger TIDDIES.

It's science.

[Ahldagor]

Parking garages can solve parking issues and generate revenue for a city. Parallel parking in Houston, good luck if you were given a courteous amount of movement space and can find a traffic gap to accomadate pulling into the traffic flow.

[Patriam1066]

I parallel park all the time in H-town y'all n's crazy

Women have less spatial awareness than men, hence can't drive park shoot (or become
President)

NEXT

[Kaight]

I am a parallel parking master. I had a Ford Expedition for a while in NYC. My bf at the time had to get out of the car and let me park it when it was a tight spot. SUCK IT

[skarlorn]

suck teh CLIT patriam

[AzzarTheGod]

I am a parallel parking master. I had a Ford Expedition for a while in NYC. My bf at the time had to get out of the car and let me park it when it was a tight spot. SUCK IT

date less fuckboys

[Kaight]

date less fuckboys

Oh god, this is ironic coming from someone with over 7000 posts on an elf simulator forum. I would love you to say that to my 6'2" former wrestling ex's face :)

[skarlorn]

^cringe

"say that to my ex"

not vry feminist

dunked/10 gg

[Patriam1066]

I am a parallel parking master. I had a Ford Expedition for a while in NYC. My bf at the time had to get out of the car and let me park it when it was a tight spot. SUCK IT

I agree with azzar, I would make you get out and make me dinner while I parked

[Kaight]

not vry feminist


Do tell

[JurisDictum]

Everyone knows that rad. feminist real goals are to gendercide all men except for a small percentage of extremely hot alphas for fighting and breeding.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau tried to warn us about educating women and giving them autonomy, but we didn't listen.

[AzzarTheGod]

Oh god, this is ironic coming from someone with over 7000 posts on an elf simulator forum. I would love you to say that to my 6'2" former wrestling ex's face :)

date less ultimate fuckboys

[Wonkie]

Everyone knows that rad. feminist real goals are to gendercide all men except for a small percentage of extremely hot alphas for fighting and breeding.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau tried to warn us about educating women and giving them autonomy, but we didn't listen.

agreed, its dumb to make it about gender. there's no time for such half measures.

[Patriam1066]

Do tell

Why did you drive an expedition in NYC?

[chadtwoke]

kaight dated chabboo confirmed.

[maskedmelon]

good to see bogus pseudoscience being debunked by 24 year old scientific studies of 16 infants looking at pictures of men with frying pans.

aside from colored delusions of the mad, tolerated only for the brilliance and insight uniquely thereof, a world without women would be a cold soulless hell. the bleak nature of such a world however does nothing at all to quell domain-specific performance disparities between men and women.

Devoting one's life to the propagation of untruths and slander of critical thought is a betrayal of life, critically endangered in an otherwise dead reality.

[Kaight]

Why did you drive an expedition in NYC?

It was my ex's in college, we decided to keep it around. We didn't specifically buy a huge SUV while living in the city or anything.

[mickmoranis]

Again, bogus "theories" of genetic racial or gender superiority are not science.

who said anything about superiority? Yikes you got inner demons that you gotta talk to someone about.

[JurisDictum]

Capitalism implies that people that make more money are superior to those that make less. This is a myth we are all told.

Capitalism implies that men are better than women for this reason. This is why there is an assumption that a guy that makes less than you isn't good enough for you.

So capitalists have found that they can get women triggered about being women and re-direct their hostile energies toward men instead of capitalism.

[JurisDictum]

The pay gap myth is probably the most pervasive and successful idea that capitalist elites use to divide the working and middle classes. While there is a small amount of direct discrimination in female pay...it accounts for like a 2% differential that effects certain women, not every woman. Yet anyone who has spent time around progressive intellectual women knows that there is a huge angst in this demographic over this (largely) fake issue.


Equal Pay Myths (https://www.city-journal.org/html/equal-pay-myths-15818.html)

It probably doesn’t come as news that airline companies pay pilots more than cabin crew—but according to the dogma of the gender wage gap, we’re supposed to find this fact troubling. The British government now requires companies to report their raw gender gap—that is, the difference in the median hourly wages earned by their male and female employees. Ignoring occupational differences, seniority, employment history, hours worked, or any of the countless other factors affecting salaries, these data are misleading at best. Nevertheless, when budget airline EasyJet reported a 51 percent pay gap between its male and female employees, the company knew that its reputation perched on the edge of a PR abyss.

And that’s the whole point of the exercise: simplify statistics to shock people at the seeming injustice done to women and shame companies into action; refuse to compare similar job functions; ignore the fact that, like every other airline, EasyJet’s pilots are disproportionately male, while their cabin crews skew female; forget that almost all carriers compete for the same 4 percent of the world’s female pilots; and whatever you do, don’t mention that the EasyJet CEO, who was in charge of this bigoted organization and also its highest-paid employee until retiring earlier this year, was a woman. The company should be branded with a scarlet “51 percent” until it . . . does what? Cuts pilots’ pay? Hikes the salaries of female cabin crew? Hires male attendants instead of female? Goes bankrupt?

The United States does not—yet—use such a travesty of a reporting system, but it does maintain the same illusion that a gender wage gap is, by definition, proof of injustice. Activists have declared April 10 Equal Pay Day, to protest the approximately 20 percent pay gap between men and women, which, as in the EasyJet example, tells us more about the activists’ false ideology of gender equivalence than about whether women are being treated fairly in the labor market.

We, as in: Men, Women, minority and beleaguered populations are almost ALL having trouble right now. We are almost all dissatisfied with the opportunities presented to us. The amount we get paid for the amount we have to work.

Trust me when I say, It isn't all its cracked up to be to be born a white man. Maybe if you are Trump's son it is...or hell, maybe even just Mick's son will do trick -- how the fuck would I know? My background is completely different.

Where are all these people that respect the hell out of you for being a white man I keep hearing about? Even someone like Zuckerberg...we can't wait to take the piss out of him for looking like Data and being creepy* or whatever. I think it's safe to say it was a damn good thing for him he created something so useful (after stealing a blueprint). He would have a hell of time getting promoted on the basis of his wonderful white man presence from what I can tell.

But if you want to pretend Zuckerberg is where he is at because a white man, I guess I can't stop you with appeals to reason and empirical evidence.

On a slightly different topic, where are all these millennial men getting caught for sexual harassment? The Aziz shit? That's is literally the one scandal that has come to light.

Face it millennials -- the gender thing is a dead end for us. That's your mother's shit your professor's are shoving down your throat. 1/4 college girls aren't raped -- at least anymore.

What you need is what we all need. More security and time to pursue our passions rather thing being enslaved to an arbitrary workday filled with pointless tasks. It's like we are all mostly in a old school FDR make-work program...where they would round up a bunch of poor dudes to dig trench one day, and then hire them all to fill in the next.

Pointless jobs, inequality of wealth, and a slavish work week. We are having a hell of a time addressing these issues when a significant part of women are just blaming men for taking all the good jobs and opportunities from them...it's not just you. There's no special meeting were all invented to after work that makes all the difference.

*That's a bad thing to be called this days...considering the word is associated with being a rapist or killer or something.

[Jimjam]

It makes me think of futurama where job roles are assigned; perhaps to the intention of mandatory equality?

The example of easy jet shows how equality of opportunity won't result in equality of outcome. I don't think equality of out come is so important though; thanks to increased opportunities, and diffused social expectations we now have many more female doctors and male nurses than previously (which in some ways turns the pilot/crew example on its head). I don't think we can argue against people who are competent, capable and motivated going into jobs they love), and it would be wrong to push people jno careers they don't enjoy (momentary nod towards wage/debt/subsistence slaves in the modern world).

[AzzarTheGod]

Capitalism implies that people that make more money are superior to those that make less. This is a myth we are all told.

Capitalism implies that men are better than women for this reason. This is why there is an assumption that a guy that makes less than you isn't good enough for you.

So capitalists have found that they can get women triggered about being women and re-direct their hostile energies toward men instead of capitalism.

damn dat boy ridin around on dunkballs

[loramin]

It makes me think of futurama where job roles are assigned; perhaps to the intention of mandatory equality?

The example of easy jet shows how equality of opportunity won't result in equality of outcome. I don't think equality of out come is so important though; thanks to increased opportunities, and diffused social expectations we now have many more female doctors and male nurses than previously (which in some ways turns the pilot/crew example on its head). I don't think we can argue against people who are competent, capable and motivated going into jobs they love), and it would be wrong to push people jno careers they don't enjoy (momentary nod towards wage/debt/subsistence slaves in the modern world).

Absolutely. But at the same time you also have to remember: for the vast majority of human history half of all humans were considered property. Obviously things have changed a bit in the last century or so, but it's all still very recent in historical terms. Heck, less than a hundred years ago women in America didn't even get their own citizenship: there are still people alive today who were alive back when a woman marrying a non-American meant that they stopped being American!

My point is that systematic oppression like that doesn't just go away overnight, and even though we've seen lots of progress, we shouldn't mistake progress for the problem being solved (more women doctors doesn't mean half our society has equal opportunities to the other half).

You can't have a ref who cheats and throws the game to one team for the almost the entire game, and then two minutes before the buzzer throw in a ref who calls things more fairly (but still not completely fairly), and declare that both teams are equal and can now play the game normally.

[mickmoranis]

Absolutely. But at the same time you also have to remember: for the vast majority of human history half of all humans were considered property. Obviously things have changed a bit in the last century or so, but it's all still very recent in historical terms. Heck, less than a hundred years ago women in America didn't even get their own citizenship: there are still people alive today who were alive back when a woman marrying a non-American meant that they stopped being American!

My point is that systematic oppression like that doesn't just go away overnight, and even though we've seen lots of progress, we shouldn't mistake progress for the problem being solved (more women doctors doesn't mean half our society has equal opportunities to the other half).

You can't have a ref who cheats and throws the game to one team for the almost the entire game, and then two minutes before the buzzer throw in a ref who calls things more fairly (but still not completely fairly), and declare that both teams are equal and can now play the game normally.

loramin you may be born into a white privlaged family (like most socialists) but for most of us, the ref has not been throwing the game for.

So quit it with that bullshit cus all you're doing is making feminism irrelevant to menials by continuing this clearly false narrative.

[Jimjam]

Absolutely. But at the same time you also have to remember: for the vast majority of human history half of all humans were considered property. Obviously things have changed a bit in the last century or so, but it's all still very recent in historical terms. Heck, less than a hundred years ago women in America didn't even get their own citizenship: there are still people alive today who were alive back when a woman marrying a non-American meant that they stopped being American!

My point is that systematic oppression like that doesn't just go away overnight, and even though we've seen lots of progress, we shouldn't mistake progress for the problem being solved (more women doctors doesn't mean half our society has equal opportunities to the other half).

You can't have a ref who cheats and throws the game to one team for the almost the entire game, and then two minutes before the buzzer throw in a ref who calls things more fairly (but still not completely fairly), and declare that both teams are equal and can now play the game normally.
Only half?

For most of history basically everyone has been property. Slowly more people became land owners (mainly men) which granted them a degree of self determination (and political rights).

People talk about how raw deal women got, but it was only a very narrow period where non-land owning men had any significant political or social power before female entitlements also began to arise.

[skarlorn]

hm nice

[loramin]

loramin you may be born into a white privlaged family (like most socialists) but for most of us, the ref has not been throwing the game for.

So quit it with that bullshit cus all you're doing is making feminism irrelevant to menials by continuing this clearly false narrative.

Brilliant logic Mick: because other forms of inequality exist in our society, feminism is irrelevant and a "false narrative" :rolleyes:

[loramin]

Only half?

For most of history basically everyone has been property. Slowly more people became land owners (mainly men) which granted them a degree of self determination (and political rights).

People talk about how raw deal women got, but it was only a very narrow period where non-land owning men had any significant political or social power before female entitlements also began to arise.

I'm no expert on early human societies or anything, but I'm pretty sure even peasant men had some serious power disparities over peasant women.

But, I mean, you are right: human history is the story of more and more people being enfranchised over time, and that includes both men and women. I just think it's more than a little naive to argue that the two have been progressing at the same rate when there is a wealth of historical knowledge to the contrary.

[Jimjam]

If you are saying peasant men had serious power disparaties over peasant women then you are right, the two are not progressing at the same rate; women have progressed faster.

For modern 'peasants' both work bottom tier jobs at the same wage; minimum. And women have better parental rights, so even if they had started at the same base level women have progressed faster.

I think this feeds into mick's point that fixing class, etc, issues will be a bigger boon to most women that working on gender specific issues.

[loramin]

If you are saying peasant men had serious power disparaties over peasant women then you are right, the two are not progressing at the same rate; women have progressed faster.

For modern 'peasants' both work bottom tier jobs at the same wage; minimum. And women have better parental rights, so even if they had started at the same base level women have progressed faster.

You have a very romanticized (read: not accurate) view of the past:

Given the centrality of child support and custody to modern disputes, what is most astonishing about the medieval records of divorce is that they do not echo these aprenhensions: the court documentation rarely even acknowledges the existence of children.
...
The overriding assumption here is that there is no evidence of custody award in the event of a divorce, because custody automatically went to the father.


Women in medieval times were also disadvantaged economically, so "both work bottom tier jobs at the same wage" was not in fact true:

Within a village, women would have done many of the tasks men did on the land. However, they were paid less for doing the same job. Documents from Medieval England relating to what the common person did are rare, but some do exist which examine what villages did. For reaping, a man could get 8 pence a day. For the same task, women would get 5 pence. For hay making, men would earn 6 pence a day while women got 4 pence. In a male dominated society, no woman would openly complain about this disparity.

...

In medieval towns, women would have found it difficult to advance into a trade as medieval guilds frequently barred women from joining them. Therefore, a skilled job as recognised by a guild was usually out of reach for any woman living in a town. Within towns, women were usually allowed to do work that involved some form of clothes making but little else.

On top of all that they were also disadvantaged in many other ways:

The law, set by men, also greatly limited the freedom of women. Women were

not allowed to marry without their parents’ consent
could own no business with special permission
not allowed to divorce their husbands

could not own property of any kind unless they were widows

could not inherit land from their parents’ if they had any surviving brothers

[Wonkie]

You have a very romanticized (read: not accurate) view of the past:



Women in medieval times were also disadvantaged economically, so "both work bottom tier jobs at the same wage" was not in fact true:



On top of all that they were also disadvantaged in many other ways:

yeah well what about Bofa?

[Jimjam]

I didn't say peasant women had it less bad than peasant men.

I said the modern equivalent have equal pay now (minimum wage).

Ergo women's rights among this group have outpaced those of men.

[Patriam1066]

You have a very romanticized (read: not accurate) view of the past:



Women in medieval times were also disadvantaged economically, so "both work bottom tier jobs at the same wage" was not in fact true:



On top of all that they were also disadvantaged in many other ways:

In economic times where agriculture formed the basis of all production and surplus, where labor was an asset, perhaps having societies that forced women into reproductive relationships was advantageous to human survival and societal order? In other words, could the motivation behind inequality, PERHAPS, have been pragmatism as opposed to men imposing dominion? I'm asking rhetorically. I know the right answer but I suspect you don't

[loramin]

In economic times where agriculture formed the basis of all production and surplus, where labor was an asset, perhaps having societies that forced women into reproductive relationships was advantageous to human survival and societal order? In other words, could the motivation behind inequality, PERHAPS, have been pragmatism as opposed to men imposing dominion? I'm asking rhetorically. I know the right answer but I suspect you don't

Obviously other things matter to humans than equal rights for all ... things like (for instance) the survival of the species. And obviously it's idiotic to impose modern values on medieval times.

But I didn't include all that because I wanted to shit on medieval people: I did it because I care about the present, and the past impacts the present. A lot of the anti-feminist arguments here stem from a lack of knowledge about the way the world has been. You honestly can't (or at least I can't) fault someone for having a bad opinion if that person doesn't have all the facts, so I'm just trying to battle ignorance with facts.

Ergo women's rights among this group have outpaced those of men.

Ok, sure, but ... let's say we're on a staircase. I'm on step 1, but you're on step 100, and I go from step 1 to step 50 while you go from step 100 to step 101. I've absolutely made more progress than you: that's true. But at the same time, that doesn't mean we're equal, because I'm still 51 steps behind you.

Women are still not equal in our society, and feminism is still far from irrelevant.

[AzzarTheGod]

Ok, sure, but ... let's say we're on a staircase. I'm on step 1, but you're on step 100, and I go from step 1 to step 50 while you go from step 100 to step 101. I've absolutely made more progress than you: that's true. But at the same time, that doesn't mean we're equal, because I'm still 51 steps behind you.

Women are still not equal in our society, and feminism is still far from irrelevant.

Thats dunkey cok man u advocate reparations

[Jimjam]

Mate, I was just pointing out that it wasn't just people of one gender that were property (it was most).

And that the working class didn't get to vote until the same time as many women. And that females have better parental rights, and that there is no pay discrimination for minimum wage employment.

I wasn't saying we live in an equality utopia, so I don't know why you try to refute my posts from that angle.

Indeed I acknowledged there is plenty of discrimination and addressing these issues will improve equality for women even when the inequality for women might not stem from gender issues.

I think there is some talking past each other as each time I try to narrow the conversation to specific points (ownership of people and modern equivalents to peasant workers) you broaden the scope to be about all women again.

[AzzarTheGod]

suicide rate.

homicide.

depression.

death.

poverty.


all male issues. gross disparity. next

[JurisDictum]

Gabriel Hays writes (https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/gabriel-hays/2018/04/12/hateful-hip-hop-top-us-rbhip-hop-songs-objectify-women-55)

In the #MeToo era, many in the music industry have been producing and awarding sexually exploitive lyrics.

In eight of the 20 songs, singers used the word “bitch” a total of 55 times, with 15 blatant instances of women being treated as sex objects. Cardi B, a woman and a wanna-be #MeToo activist, had a new Top-20 song about dominating “bitches” and giving them drugs. Newly minted rap star Post Malone and Ty Dolla $ign rapped that they “can take yo’ bitch,” and receive oral sex from “hoes.” And Kendrick Lamar’s “King’s Dead” (which used “bitch” seven times) grossly detailed oral sex.

It's very simple why hip-hop wont catch hell for any of this... It doesn't advance the narrative that conservative white men in your office setting are the ones mostly responsible for objectifying women and holding them back.

Vladimir Lenin thought if you just wait for a spontaneous revolution...it will never happen. So he proposed forming a Vanguard -- this Vanguard would agitate the workers and then guide their thoughts and ideology toward Marxism.

I think it is safe to say he never created the social utopia he was trying to. But he discover some useful ways to manipulate popular dissatisfaction...What was the response to the Trump election?

#Metoo. This was not spontaneously directed by the people. This was directed by Vanguard of elites who thought it was a great opportunity to get rid of Bill'O and Roger Ales. That's about it.

These things go in stages. You create the villains out of some easy targets and call upon the masses to do something about it. Then the enforces inevitably go too far (Aziz)...then you purge the enforcers. Cycle complete. The media and government elites come out smelling like roses, all the hostility being successfully channeled to a couple of patsies.

This is how corporations run. There is a bottom line that must be reached god damnit! We need those shoes NOW -- for less money...then Nike out and claims they didn't know that company was hiring children to make shoes...and then forcefully condemn their horrible actions.

Except what do you think is going to happen when you set the environment for some nameless people to stand up and do what needs to be done? Why does Nike go to the third world and not open factories -- but rather offer contracts to those ready to make shoes? Why would strategy like that be cheaper than vertical integration?

[JurisDictum]

There has been a big study on race and inequality recently done by Harvard. I'll try to read the study myself and do a proper post later. But for now this really caught my eye...not in the article posted at the nation...but in the comments section:

The black-white income gap is entirely driven by differences in men’s, not women’s, outcomes.

Among those who grow up in families with comparable incomes, black men grow up to earn substantially less than the white men. In contrast, black women earn slightly more than white women conditional on parent income. Moreover, there is little or no gap in wage rates or hours of work between black and white women.

We find analogous gender differences in other outcomes: black-white gaps in high- school completion rates, college attendance rates, and incarceration are all substantially larger for men than for women. Black women have higher college attendance rates than white men, conditional on parental income. For men, the gap in incarceration is particularly stark: 21% of black men born to the lowest-income families are incarcerated on a given day, far higher than for any other subgroup.”

It also neglects to mention that Hispanics are upwardly mobile or that Native American men have worse outcomes than black men. But then nuance doesn’t make great headlines.

[mickmoranis]

Brilliant logic Mick: because other forms of inequality exist in our society, feminism is irrelevant and a "false narrative" :rolleyes:

youre getting good at trolling cus its apparent you are replying to me but talking about something completely different. I applaud your determination to be a big dog.

what YOU TALK ABOUT is not feminsm, you talk about newfem, and all it is is dick sucking fat chicks so you can get acceptance into the adult child version of the higschool clicks you were not accepted by in higshcool.

new fem, all that shit, its just high school popularity contets by losers that were un popular in highschool but are trying to make up for it way past their prime.

[loramin]

I think there is some talking past each other as each time I try to narrow the conversation to specific points (ownership of people and modern equivalents to peasant workers) you broaden the scope to be about all women again.

Fair enough.

When I respond to you or anyone else I assume it's part of the larger conversation that's been going on for 70-odd pages now. I'm not trying to avoid talking about specific points at all, it's just not always clear when someone wants to discuss something specific and when they're making specific arguments for their larger point.

[mickmoranis]

I think a lot of you new fem supporters and socialists have these like good intentions, but what you either chose to ignore or just dont see is that the other 30 million people that you are on the same side with think really stupid dumb idiot versions of your hopefull optimistic ideology. That's why you cant seem to understand the points made by the other side, cus the reality they talk about you have erased from your peripheral vision.

[Wonkie]

https://i.imgur.com/8lFt0zE.png

[azeth]

I think a lot of you new fem supporters and socialists have these like good intentions, but what you either chose to ignore or just dont see is that the other 30 million people that you are on the same side with think really stupid dumb idiot versions of your hopefull optimistic ideology. That's why you cant seem to understand the points made by the other side, cus the reality they talk about you have erased from your peripheral vision.

^

[loramin]

I think a lot of you new fem supporters and socialists have these like good intentions, but what you either chose to ignore or just dont see is that the other 30 million people that you are on the same side with think really stupid dumb idiot versions of your hopefull optimistic ideology. That's why you cant seem to understand the points made by the other side, cus the reality they talk about you have erased from your peripheral vision.

the reality they talk about you have erased from your peripheral vision

Mick you talking to anyone else about being out of touch with reality is like George W. Bush calling someone else stupid, or Dick Cheney calling someone else a bad shot.

[loramin]

your jokes are dated. this 1 grates especially because your posts generally feel middle-aged & bald. I hope this sincere offer of perspective helps.

You're new here, so I'll just assume you haven't read Mick's idiocy for the past four years like I have.

[loramin]

P.S. I will never get tired of making fun of Bush and Cheney, no matter how old it gets.

[Pope Hat]

P.S. I will never get tired of making fun of Bush and Cheney, no matter how old it gets.

It will never get old.

[JurisDictum]

Lol...Cheney shot a guy in the face.

[mickmoranis]

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/women-feel-pain-more-intensely/

b-b-b-ut its pseudoscience

meanwhile:

Guns are involved in every mass shooting so its obvious that it is a FACT that the guns are the cause.

[mickmoranis]

the false narrative that women dont do to is another reason why fem is irrelevant https://youtu.be/W2bov6kY7ko

[Wonkie]

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/women-feel-pain-more-intensely/

b-b-b-ut its pseudoscience

meanwhile:

Guns are involved in every mass shooting so its obvious that it is a FACT that the guns are the cause.

my penis is 3/4 the circumference of a beer

it says "I am become Chode, Bringer of Pain"

[AzzarTheGod]

my penis is 3/4 the circumference of a beer

it says "I am become Chode, Bringer of Pain"

U know the whales packin a chode y don't u measure up with him if ur so tough ?

[Patriam1066]

your jokes are dated. this 1 grates especially because your posts generally feel middle-aged & bald. I hope this sincere offer of perspective helps.

720

You're new here, so I'll just assume you haven't read Mick's idiocy for the past four years like I have.

No he's not

[mickmoranis]

"when people say climate change is real, its a fact but when someone says there is biological variance between a German Shepherd and a English Bulldog, its pseudoscience" -loramin

[loramin]

"when people say climate change is real, its a fact but when someone says there is biological variance between a German Shepherd and a English Bulldog, its pseudoscience" -loramin

:rolleyes:

Dude, it's really not very hard: if there's a scientific experiment which backs up some bit of knowledge, that knowledge is scientific. It's not guaranteed to be right (people make new discoveries all the time), but it's far, far more likely to be right than something without scientific backing.

Meanwhile, when you just make up some claim, and then justify it with ... reasons (none of which are in any way supported by scientific evidence) that's not science, it's pseudoscience.

Oh, and back on the "women have higher pain tolerance" thing, I looked it up and you are absolutely right: it seemed to be true ten-ish years ago (when I must have heard it), but then they did some more studies and it turns out it's not true ... or at least people have realized that asking study respondents to rate their own pain is not a good way to get objective information, and that they need to do some studies with MRIs or whatever to really find out the answer.

So hey, there's a perfect example of scientific evidence suggesting something is right, then more/better evidence coming along to challenge it. But that whole process is still a million times better than just having a bunch of idiots arguing over their own biased opinions without a shred of evidence to support them.

[Wonkie]

"when people say climate change is real, its a fact but when someone says there is biological variance between a German Shepherd and a English Bulldog, its pseudoscience" -loramin

chihuahuas are the best people on the planet

[AzzarTheGod]

I try to be respectful of loramin just because he's the only poster of his class on this forum. I sort of curbed the indiscriminate thing after I dumped Daywolf (another one-of-a-kind like Loramin) accidentally.

I typically don't read his posts simply because I have no interest in trolling him or throwing boulders to knock his head askew.

I am a respectful folk.

[loramin]

I try to be respectful of loramin just because he's the only poster of his class on this forum. I sort of curbed the indiscriminate thing after I dumped Daywolf (another one-of-a-kind like Loramin) accidentally.

So I'm an anomaly here because I know the difference between scientific and unscientific knowledge? Not sure whether to laugh or to cry over that fact.

But you need not worry about offending my delicate liberal sensibilities and scaring me off the forums. About the worst you could do is annoy me into staying away from RnF for a month (and honestly if you somehow managed to do that you would actually be doing me a favor).

lol @ thinking holesum is new here

I can barely keep track of y'all by your name and avatar, let alone follow people through their new accounts. Heck, when you switched from the fat cat to "Swajen" it must have taken me at least a month to make my brain associate you with the Deadwood bartender.

[maskedmelon]

The idea that truth bares herself for any book ready to watch and record is absurd. Truth is shy.

[Wonkie]

So I'm an anomaly here because I know the difference between scientific and unscientific knowledge? Not sure whether to laugh or to cry over that fact.



no. off topic is mostly pvp. sincere posting puts blood in the water.

I'm feeling a little pokier than usual is all. Having experienced the consequences of extinction hunting before on this board, p99 Red, etc, I too have adopted the conservationist's stance on the loramin/kayyte/shrubwise/katriks for some time. I promise I will only subsistence hunt the normfauna.


how can u be whale if u not in danger? ;)

[mickmoranis]

:rolleyes:

Dude, it's really not very hard: if there's a scientific experiment which backs up some bit of knowledge, that knowledge is scientific. It's not guaranteed to be right (people make new discoveries all the time), but it's far, far more likely to be right than something without scientific backing.

Meanwhile, when you just make up some claim, and then justify it with ... reasons (none of which are in any way supported by scientific evidence) that's not science, it's pseudoscience.

Oh, and back on the "women have higher pain tolerance" thing, I looked it up and you are absolutely right: it seemed to be true ten-ish years ago (when I must have heard it), but then they did some more studies and it turns out it's not true ... or at least people have realized that asking study respondents to rate their own pain is not a good way to get objective information, and that they need to do some studies with MRIs or whatever to really find out the answer.

So hey, there's a perfect example of scientific evidence suggesting something is right, then more/better evidence coming along to challenge it. But that whole process is still a million times better than just having a bunch of idiots arguing over their own biased opinions without a shred of evidence to support them.

you have a severe case of non comprehension

[mickmoranis]

didnt read the rest of the last page but did just now lol you cucks

[JurisDictum]

Next time you get caught grabbing ass, I would go for the only excuse proven to work during #metoo,

"I'm just old fashioned" (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/laurettabrown/2018/06/08/bill-clinton-defends-franken-it-was-a-difficult-case-and-the-snl-women-defended-him-n2488880)

Women love classy guys grabbing their ass. Obviously. It's just this new breed of harpies that has a problem with it.

[Wonkie]

malevolence

male violence

makes u think

[mickmoranis]

HERE'S YOUR ANSWER:

https://youtu.be/y9LlCwDK2NA

children do worse in 70 different areas when they are raised without a father lmao

[mickmoranis]

https://i.imgur.com/Xvk0lUO.png

[maskedmelonpai]

https://i.imgur.com/Xvk0lUO.png

aside from the pretty nails, what this have to do with feminism, micks?

[mickmoranis]

aside from the pretty nails, what this have to do with feminism, micks?

Feminism is based off how people made chicks feel when they get roasted.

[azeth]

Literally work in a office with 90% women and god forbid you correct one of those approAching her chIldless 30s with senior in her title. Micro-aggression central lol

This quote kills me. So so fucking accurate and funny.

[Wonkie]

too much

[clevergirl]

Feminism is irrelevant to me.

If a fat bitch yells at me for sitting comfortably, she's getting the hand of god across the face.

If you think masculinity is toxic now, wait until we regress back to caveman mode.

I'll shit, piss, and cum wherever I want and if you try to interrupt that, I will kill you.

This happens to me all at the same time simultaneously when I have anal sex all the time dwarfbro. It's OK. Feminism shouldn't have a problem with that. Except for maybe the killing people part. But only if you're killing woman only. If you kill anyone equally who interrupts you. I think you'll be OK.

P.S. It's ok for woman to say "cum" or to claim to "cum". Or say like "I came". "I'm cumming".

Nothing you're talking about is really gendered, sorry.

[MagpieRockyl]

There are no girls on the internet only trannys

[mickmoranis]

https://youtu.be/3NJUYZmxLbs

[Wonkie]

Mike Cernovich posted:
We were in the back seat of her car hooking up. She let me pull her shirt up but wouldn’t let me take it off. She also wouldn’t let me take off her pants.
Anyone who has dated Indian girls know how annoying they are, and how hard they are to close. I knew this girl wasn’t going to let me fuck her in the back seat of her car, and that she was going to require some secret moves.
“My dick hurts,” I told her, as I unbuttoned my own jeans, exposing it to her. She looked at it but didn’t move.
“You aren’t just going to leave me like this, are you?” I pulled her hand towards me, but she pulled it back.
Indian girls are selfish teases, and she would have no problem leaving me hanging.
“Fine then. I’ll take care of it myself.”
I started playing with her tits, spit in my hand, and started masturbating.
She still wouldn’t join in the fun, but she wasn’t freaked out. “Don’t get any of this on my seat,” she told me as I was about to cum.
Often finding myself in sketchy situations, I wear a tight American Apparel ribbed tank top under my shirts. It comes in handy when you need to clean up bodily fluids.
I came into my tank top, zipped up, and said, “Let’s go.”
She drove me home, and parked her car, “I don’t want to risk a DUI,” she said, and walked upstairs with me.
The next morning I had one of those, “Does the notch count if…” discussions with my boy.
“Hey, man,” I asked, “Does it count if you get it halfway in, but can’t get it all the way in, because she’s too tight?”
“Ah, man, that’s a tough one. You had the intent. She had the intent, but you weren’t fully in.”
“Yeah, but I was halfway in. Do I gotta be balls deep? She told me she had only been with two other guys, and I believed her. My dick would only go halfway in before she started screaming in pain. I did like 3 or 4 half pumps. Does it count?”
“I don’t know. We should ask some other guys.”
How did I take a girl who had only had sex with two other guys – with a tight pussy to prove it – and get an arguable one night stand out of her?
By masturbating, I took advantage of the anchoring heuristic:
The anchoring and adjustment heuristic was first theorized by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. In one of their first studies, the two showed that when asked to guess the percentage of African nations that are members of the United Nations, people who were first asked “Was it more or less than 10%?” guessed lower values (25% on average) than those who had been asked if it was more or less than 65% (45% on average). The pattern has held in other experiments for a wide variety of different subjects of estimation.
If we had just made out in her car, anything else sexual would have been anchored to the make out. Going from making out to sex is a big jump.
By masturbating in her car while playing with her tits, we had created a new anchor. We had gone farther than making out, thereby bringing us closer to boning.
Next time, don’t settle for the make out. If possible, at least pull out your dick. If you can get her to touch it, even better. If not, just let her know that your cock is too swollen to go back into your jeans, and that, “Either you’re taking care of this, or I am.”
Masturbating will set your anchor nearer the desired destination – pussy port.

[mickmoranis]

that's too long for me to read, but after my scan picked up word "heuristic" I truly made an honest try

It basically is just a rambling of the thoughts literally 100% of normal men have.

If anyone doesnt have these thoughts they are a girl(im sure youre just as filthy though so you prob sound the same) tranny or they have inside down syndrome (that means on the outside you look fine and you think you are normal, you play games as an adult and basically wish it was the 1980s again) but you are on a retardation scale of down syndrome, just on the inside.

Wonike is inside out downsyndrome for example, altho honeslty he legit could be outside out if u know what im saying