Trump “unhinged” but woman who sold the nation ”the secret” our next president

[mickmoranis]

Apparently grifting poor people by selling hem false hope is somehow ok because woman/blaq?

[chadtwoke]

yea globalist depopulation scheming billionaires probably want to meet with her first to see if she's on board with their agenda.


oh wait.

[Lhancelot]

Apparently grifting poor people by selling hem false hope is somehow ok because woman/blaq?

Explain what this means plz.

[mickmoranis]

Winfrey said. “I thought, ‘Oh gee, I don’t have the experience, I don’t know enough.’ And now I’m thinking, ‘Oh.’ "

RE:trump. source (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2018/01/08/oprah-for-president-in-2020-heres-everything-you-need-to-know/?utm_term=.6ffc6b279bb2)

what she says here is, "oh welle veryone is upset that trump is a ding dong, I guess, ding dongs can win!

democrats are like

YEA we want THIS ding dong... not THAT ding dong.

instead of standing by their convictions when they said we dont want A ding dong in the white house at all.

Explain what this means plz.

she sells self help books based off of psudoscience as a solution to lifes problems.

Selling fake solutions is grifting people.

grifting people (incase you didnt know, no disrespect) means to con them.

She is a con artist, as much as trump is. She packages and sells false hope and lies to billions of people over the years.

Just poinging out that she aint no different than trump, and if your democrat friends are stoked on her, then you need to ask them, why are you stoked on someone who is simply a left wing trump? I thought you wanted someone qualified?

[branamil]

Why are you such a boring conservative shill and why is your chosen audience the 50 people reading a 20 year old emulated game forum

[Sage Truthbearer]

Why are you such a boring conservative shill and why is your chosen audience the 50 people reading a 20 year old emulated game forum

I'm sure it is a combination of unemployment and loneliness.

[chadtwoke]

Why are you such a boring conservative shill and why is your chosen audience the 50 people reading a 20 year old emulated game forum

Since it's obvious you're just a dumb cuck wrapped up in the 2 party dichotomy because what Mick has posted is usually just common sense and not some cookie cutter ideology, I'd like to show you the door.

[AzzarTheGod]

chad bringin the woke

[aMindAmok]

The only reason anyone would vote for Oprah Winfrey is because they hope that once a year they will be able to look under their couch and find a new car.

[CyricTheMad420]

as it happens unfortunately, politicians have made it their lifes work and job to lie to the masses and grift people nothing new although it is disappointing humans haven't overthrown the shackles yet. i think the problem is contrary to what the founders might have thought and wrote about people don't want liberty or death they want someone to tell them what to do a nice ruler. they would rather on a mass scale when you look at us as a whole give up their freedom for security and the last two decades have proved it.

[CyricTheMad420]

Proven it* ah whatever you get the point

[JurisDictum]

The founding fathers were mostly rich grifters like any other group of elites.

They meant freedom from taxes the noble class imposed so they can exploit the poor themselves without having to pay tax. That's the kind of freedom they were about. They were interested in freeing any slaves or making any poor person's life more free.

Were not all rich....so no, most people don't value that kind of freedom because its not freedom at all for them, is it?

[CyricTheMad420]

i would mostly agree, "To Ourselves and Our Posterity" didn't mean every average smoe forever after. however i would argue not all of them were elite power grabbers only out for enriching themselves although probably most of em and most of the presidents as well especially in our life time.

Adams had need of his wealthy friends like Jefferson and with Franklin's help they won over more rich people without whom they would never have gotten a rebellion of the ground. Having said all that though, you can't deny the impact their words has had on generations of Americans and while it may have been social engineering and securing power over the masses it also has cause a lot of us to be raised thinking the old slogans are real, all men created equal and all that. they must have had some idea how those ideas would impact future generations of American in positive ways. at least from the stand point of liberty and keeping government small (although we have failed at that)

[CyricTheMad420]

while they were certainly only human and fail-able and not all strictly hero archetypes they weren't all purely villains either.

[skarlorn]

she sells self help books based off of psudoscience as a solution to lifes problems.

Selling fake solutions is grifting people.

grifting people (incase you didnt know, no disrespect) means to con them.

She is a con artist, as much as trump is. She packages and sells false hope and lies to billions of people over the years.

Just poinging out that she aint no different than trump, and if your democrat friends are stoked on her, then you need to ask them, why are you stoked on someone who is simply a left wing trump? I thought you wanted someone qualified?

I think this is really valuable. In my role as a marketing director I primarily do business with personal development companies. I cut my teeth writing sales copy and sales videos for them.

All self-help, personal Dev industry are con artists. I thought that was a bad thing at first, but now I realize it's okay. Confidence Artists boost people's confidence in themselves and ideas in order to get them to take action. And for so many people who have cucked their life into pieces, a little confidence booster (even if it only lasts for a week during your $5,000 in person seminar), is a sweet treacle tart after a long life of eating barley gruel.

Here's the thing, and this is why Mick is right. Presidents are also con artists. If you don't understand this, I'm sorry, I don't have the time to explain right now. Donald Trump is an extraordinary con artist. So is Oprah. If you hate Trump but like Oprah you're just sucking the green milk out of the weird alien on your party's jedi planet.

Oprah is NOT for laborers. Oprah is NOT for socialism. Oprah is a hardcore capitalist and rightfully seeing her chance to angle herself into the next sphere of oligarchy.

[Raavak]

Oprah's next hot movie due out in March, just in time to start her campaign.

[CyricTheMad420]

Oprah runnning with The Rock lol calling it now

[skarlorn]

^ lol at the possibility.

The Democratic party wouldn't allow it tho. They'll need a strong-looking politically backed VP to add legitimacy on Oprah's claim to the throne.

Rock is gonna wait until the 1 after this. He's got a long way to go yet.

[CyricTheMad420]

yeah prob a good point, i dont think he would be foolish to run against her as lib or something but who knows? lol shit is getting silly with all these celebrities like "im going to run for president and try to change things for all of us!" but really they gonna get the same talk trump got lol and each pres before him since atleast woodrow wilson

[CyricTheMad420]

oh man it just dawned on me, its gonna be Oprah and michelle obama isnt it? lol

[CyricTheMad420]

just dawned on me its gonna be oprah and michelle obama isnt it? lol

[CyricTheMad420]

sorry didnt mean to double post.

[skarlorn]

definitely, dude. WIlson also wanted to change the world but he sold out hard and fast and set the stage for us today.

In some way's I would prefer Putin to be our persident. At least you know then the guy in charge is REALLY the guy in charge. Putin is a remarkably effective leader.

[CyricTheMad420]

i have alot of respect for putin, being the head of the second or third biggest mafia in the world is hard i bet, hes got the west to compete with and for a longtime even his own people if half of what we hear is true, not to mention the shadow elites that play all sides against each other. personally ive always thought in a world of white supremacists why are the two most powerful Caucasian controlled countries enemies when should be gang bangin the rest of the schmucks together lol (not a white supremacist if that came off that way just an observation)

[CyricTheMad420]

i mean especially when it comes to china we should totally be teaming up and mercin these mofos

[Raavak]

In some way's I would prefer Putin to be our persident. At least you know then the guy in charge is REALLY the guy in charge. Putin is a remarkably effective leader.Everyone loves a good tyrant, but when you get a bad one there isn't a whole lot you can do about it. For every Caesar Augustus there is a Nero.

[skarlorn]

valid point i always appreciate someone tempering my putin enthusiasm because i know i'm just crushin

[JurisDictum]

Aristotle was the first one to point out that Monarchy is the best if the monarch was good. But it is far to easy to turn into tyranny. Just takes a mediocre ruler really, not even a horrible one.

He decided that Democracy was "tyranny of the poor" and didn't like it...but he further more established a pattern. Democracy was too chaotic and a strongman would be elected to stand up against the excesses of the mob. The strongman would generally be a true monarch, but then it devolves into tyranny.

Aristocracy was how to avoid this. Rule by the rich was more stable than rule by 1 leader. Stability made aristocracy the best forum of government. We live in aristocracy currently. There are a lot of people that basically still agree with Aristotle. That Aristocracy is the best form of government because it is the most stable.

I always was more of a Plato guy.

[hyejin]

Aristotle was the first one to point out that Monarchy is the best if the monarch was good. But it is far to easy to turn into tyranny. Just takes a mediocre ruler really, not even a horrible one.

He decided that Democracy was "tyranny of the poor" and didn't like it...but he further more established a pattern. Democracy was too chaotic and a strongman would be elected to stand up against the excesses of the mob. The strongman would generally be a true monarch, but then it devolves into tyranny.

Aristocracy was how to avoid this. Rule by the rich was more stable than rule by 1 leader. Stability made aristocracy the best forum of government. We live in aristocracy currently. There are a lot of people that basically still agree with Aristotle. That Aristocracy is the best form of government because it is the most stable.

I always was more of a Plato guy.

yawns and types 'meme' into YouTube search

[JurisDictum]

yawns and types 'meme' into YouTube search

I'll have you know i paid something like $600 to know that shit about Aristotle. (well i guess if we prorate it to only the Aristotle lectures were talking more like $100 -- there is also a piece of paper somewhere saying I did it better than anyone in the class).

[skarlorn]

we are in an oligarchy, not an aristocracy...........

[JurisDictum]

That's just the negative version of aristocracy. Like Tyranny vs Monarchy. But good point I guess.

To me...that's all bullshit I guess... I don't think there is such thing as Aristocracy as he articulated it -- maybe in small villages etc. There definitely have been benevolent kings...there has never been an entire nobility that was benevolent.

[hyejin]

i witnessed a normie use the word "kekistocracy" and shake his head sadly. this was after he told me about the gay orgie he'd recently blacked out drunk at.

[skarlorn]

Governments founded by meritocracy which lead to an aristocracy have historically been good until the noble seed is weakened and corrupted.

[JurisDictum]

i witnessed a normie use the word "kekistocracy" and shake his head sadly. this was after he told me about the gay orgie he'd recently blacked out drunk at.


A kakistocracy (English pronunciation: /kækɪsˈtɑkɹəsi/) is a system of government which is run by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens. The word was coined as early as the 17th century. It was also used by English author Thomas Love Peacock in 1829, but gained significant usage in the 21st century.

I think this does indeed happen more than people realize. I first noticed this in MMORPGs....you ever notice how the most incompetent and pathetic fucks in the guild are the highest status, have the most loot, lots of friends...etc?

What happens when a super fast-rising good player tries to shake things up? Well hes kicked of course. Way too threatening.

Imagine my surprise when I find out this kind of how modern corporations work. Kill the threatening people and promote the dumbasses who you can relay on. They know their a piece of shit lucky to have the job. Last thing you need is someone smarter and more capable around challenging you.

Evidence: I was pretty bad at video games but was always in whatever the top MMO guild was on my server with some of the best loot (except that faceless shit - LOL at that).

[hyejin]

thx!

[CyricTheMad420]

i like Job's take on smart people, "you don't hire smart people to tell them what to do, you hire smart people so they can tell you what to do." this always made alot of sense to me as someone who has always been a bit above my average peers.

[maskedmelon]

i like Job's take on smart people, "you don't hire smart people to tell them what to do, you hire smart people so they can tell you what to do." this always made alot of sense to me as someone who has always been a bit above my average peers.

this is why Trump has been successful in the private sector. being "smart" doesn't make one a good leader or even a meaningful contributor. you can be brilliant and impotent at the same time because you lack the ability to wield your own talents.

[zodium]

Governments founded by meritocracy which lead to an aristocracy have historically been good until the noble seed is weakened and corrupted.

Full monarchism now!

[CyricTheMad420]

right off the bat id have to disagree with trump being smart lol. i think what he meant was more along the lines of someone like trump shouldn't hire a real smart guy just to make him conform and do what trump wants the point of hiring smart people is so they can help you make your business better and find new and better ways of doing things. of course i didnt mean to come off like being smart is the end all be all of things i mean obvi look at trump lol trump may be smart depending on how you judge the characteristic is he smart like roger penrose or neil degrasse tyson hell no, but is he smart like a mega church pastor is smart where 1000's maybe 10's of thousands of people give their money so that pastor can live in a mansion, yeah ill give him that.

[JurisDictum]

My biggest complaint about Trump so far is he seems to be a puppet for the Israel lobby. That's causing more permanent damage than anything else so far. That and total abandonment from the pivit to Asia....we like let China be the super power of Asia because Trump voters didn't like Obama...

Trump clearly has outsourced most of his responsibility. He was clearly in control on taxes though.

[maskedmelon]

right off the bat id have to disagree with trump being smart lol. i think what he meant was more along the lines of someone like trump shouldn't hire a real smart guy just to make him conform and do what trump wants the point of hiring smart people is so they can help you make your business better and find new and better ways of doing things. of course i didnt mean to come off like being smart is the end all be all of things i mean obvi look at trump lol trump may be smart depending on how you judge the characteristic is he smart like roger penrose or neil degrasse tyson hell no, but is he smart like a mega church pastor is smart where 1000's maybe 10's of thousands of people give their money so that pastor can live in a mansion, yeah ill give him that.

you seem to have thought i said the opposite of what i said ^^; it's okay though! we agree, trump is not smart ^.~v

[CyricTheMad420]

you seem to have thought i said the opposite of what i said ^^; it's okay though! we agree, trump is not smart ^.~v

indeed at first glance it seemed that way, my b lol

[Patriam1066]

My biggest complaint about Trump so far is he seems to be a puppet for the Israel lobby. That's causing more permanent damage than anything else so far. That and total abandonment from the pivit to Asia....we like let China be the super power of Asia because Trump voters didn't like Obama...

Trump clearly has outsourced most of his responsibility. He was clearly in control on taxes though.

I agree with this. Even worse, we listen to the Saudis. At least Jews are smart, Saudis are camel fucking retards who happened to sit atop oil

IRAN 4LYFE

[skarlorn]

I agree with this. Even worse, we listen to the Saudis. At least Jews are smart, Saudis are camel fucking retards who happened to sit atop oil

IRAN 4LYFE

God bless u and God bless the oppressed peoples of the Middle East who are often beautiful people cucked by camel fucking extremists

[CyricTheMad420]

Extremism is bad mmkay?

[mickmoranis]

hey if the jews are trying to bring on the Apocalypse, at this point i say more power to em.

[Lhancelot]

Winfrey said. “I thought, ‘Oh gee, I don’t have the experience, I don’t know enough.’ And now I’m thinking, ‘Oh.’ "

RE:trump. source (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2018/01/08/oprah-for-president-in-2020-heres-everything-you-need-to-know/?utm_term=.6ffc6b279bb2)

what she says here is, "oh welle veryone is upset that trump is a ding dong, I guess, ding dongs can win!

democrats are like

YEA we want THIS ding dong... not THAT ding dong.

instead of standing by their convictions when they said we dont want A ding dong in the white house at all.



she sells self help books based off of psudoscience as a solution to lifes problems.

Selling fake solutions is grifting people.

grifting people (incase you didnt know, no disrespect) means to con them.

She is a con artist, as much as trump is. She packages and sells false hope and lies to billions of people over the years.

Just poinging out that she aint no different than trump, and if your democrat friends are stoked on her, then you need to ask them, why are you stoked on someone who is simply a left wing trump? I thought you wanted someone qualified?

Ok got it thank you. I never heard that expression, "grifting." :p

That being said, yeah I could think of other celebrities I'd rather vote for other than Harpo. But I honestly think she's slightly more bright than the Donald. I just really find him appalling in so many ways.

[Kaino]

hey if the jews are trying to bring on the Apocalypse, at this point i say more power to em.

you make the leap from the NBC Oprah tweet to Jewpocalypse

seek help

[AzzarTheGod]

i witnessed a normie use the word "kekistocracy" and shake his head sadly. this was after he told me about the gay orgie he'd recently blacked out drunk at.

720

[skarlorn]

jews don't exist

BOOM

[AzzarTheGod]

we are in an oligarchy, not an aristocracy...........

*DAPS SKARLORN*

[AzzarTheGod]

yawns and types 'meme' into YouTube search

*CHEST BUMPS WHALE*

[Ket]

Pretty sure most sane liberals don't want that nut job in office - the same as most sane conservatives look at Trump with dismay.

[citizen1080]

Pretty sure most sane liberals don't want that nut job in office - the same as most sane conservatives look at Trump with dismay.

When trump is the lessor of two evils, you have to question our country in general.

[mickmoranis]

Pretty sure most sane liberals don't want that nut job in office - the same as most sane conservatives look at Trump with dismay.

Most sane liberals didn’t want Hillary either but that didn’t stop the majority of liberals from calling them nazi anti feminists for not goose stepping with them.

[maskedmelon]

TIL what goose step is. ty, mick

[mickmoranis]

daps boob thread

[this user was banned]

WELFARE QUEEN FO LYFE!

[rahmani]

I don't think Oprah would legit want to run, it's fucking satire. It's a satirical comment on the state of politics.

[JurisDictum]

I don't think Oprah would legit want to run, it's fucking satire. It's a satirical comment on the state of politics.

Yea that's the kind of crap people said about Trump.

Anyone who is that rich is probably a power hungry narcissist with absolutely no limit to their ambition...or they would have quit at the first 500 million like Romney.