Robe of the Whistling Fists

[Jlpstrtkng]

Anybody with this item able to chime in on how good the JWW insta click is? Duration? Etc..

[Bbeta]

It's decent, definitely not game changing like the fungi or epic click. One could say it's worth getting again after epic for the MR and hp alone, the click is an added bonus. But if I didn't need the MR the click isn't worth taking a fungi tunic off for.

My 2 cents

[monkeydoc]

I found it to be significant. The duration is 12 seconds. It's easy enough to swap it in long enough to click every 12 seconds. That gets annoying eventually, but the return is high.

[bradsamma]

3 ticks, 18 seconds.

Also, there are other options for chest MR like the phase spider carapace if you're not getting hit.

[bradsamma]

It is good for a level 52 naggy box though.

[Kiln99]

Its effect stacks with the epic, except the haste portion that the epic overrides. Questing it again after getting the epic effectively adds 32 str and 15 ac to whatever bp you use... pretty damn useful for soloing

[Jlpstrtkng]

Thanks. Was kinda bummed that the robe you trade in for it had better stats than this one but I see that the proc makes it seem worth it now

[bradsamma]

I would say the ice burrower chest would be better for soloing unless you want to juggle for clicks.

The robe is definitely superior for grouping when you're not taking hits and there is no shaman.

[fastboy21]

In the end you only get the best returns/benefit from this if you are willing to swap it in and out. If you are willing to do that then its nice to have.

If you don't have your epic yet then it is really good, but you probably will end up swapping it even then (for a fungi).

[kjs86z]

once you have epic + fungi...its meh

[Kiln99]

Combined with the epic, it also gives you two instantly applicable, no need to target self buffs to combat dispells... its amazingly useful for a monk that likes to screw around and have fun

[jacobar]

The click is for sure worth it to swap out w fungi and click it for the STR amd AC, "game changing"? maybe not exactly. noticable? Yes, quite so.