Impeaching President Trump

[Teppler]

There's a whole world outside of your red state and your frequented websites Teppler. May James Madison have mercy on your soul.

I live in NY, Long Island, very wealthy area. Nice personal attacks though.

Like I point out every day, liberal ideas cannot survive in the war of ideas. They always resort to personal attacks like this when they fail to appeal to censorship. Every single time. Their ideas aren’t strong enough to survive scrutiny.

[Teppler]

Isn't the republican/democrat split like 30% 30% (with rest being independent)?

Are you really saying 30% of America hates America and wants it to fail? That's a pretty extreme claim.

Liberals are split between a few different factions.

Their elites which has overlap with their Zionists.

Zionists could be there own group though because not all of them are elites.

Democrats have a large portion of useful idiots which you most likely fall into. The useful idiots have overlap with another faction- liberals that are getting paid. Usually through things like welfare.

Then there’s people with all sorts of single issue like abortion and furthering pedophile rights.

Democrats make up an unholy alliance between all these groups. Notice how none of them are about valuing America or putting America first.

[Ripp]

Funny how that whole 'Quid Pro Quo' and 'Bribery' false charges are all but forgotten and tossed out the window.

Just keep moving those goal posts lol.

What a sham. I can't wait to get the House back and get these insane Socialists/Communists out of office.

[rebeccablack]

rabble rabble rabble

[Teppler]

rabble rabble rabble

Another great addition by a resident liberal. These people post in bad faith.

[rebeccablack]

derailing the /pol/ rss feed for one post is a small victory but i will take it

[Wonkie]

Another great addition by a resident liberal. These people post in bad faith.

lol dude

[Teppler]

derailing the /pol/ rss feed for one post is a small victory but i will take it

Well we are posting and arguing, you are here to disrupt and post in bad faith. Nice you admit that even though it’s not new news.

Pointing out again that liberal ideas cannot live under scrutiny. They rely on safe spaces and censorship. The minute you beyond surface level with them, they will vanish or personally attack you like I keep pointing out.

[Teppler]

lol dude

More evidence. ^

[feniin]

Well we are posting and arguing, you are here to disrupt and post in bad faith. Nice you admit that even though it’s not new news.

Pointing out again that liberal ideas cannot live under scrutiny. They rely on safe spaces and censorship. The minute you beyond surface level with them, they will vanish or personally attack you like I keep pointing out.

Can't believe Howard Stern said that.

[Wonkie]

More evidence. ^

take the compliment i really did laugh it was a funny

[Teppler]

Interesting how you guys enjoy insulting and attacking people without posting arguments.

Also interesting how it seems to be a norm when it comes to liberals and their arguing tactics.

I hear you're on your final warning now feniin. I had a chat with galach today.

[Wonkie]

Interesting how you guys enjoy insulting and attacking people without posting arguments.

Also interesting how it seems to be a norm when it comes to liberals and their arguing tactics.

I hear you're on your final warning now feniin. I had a chat with galach today.

How many levels of cynicism are you on that you would do that to galach?

[rebeccablack]

They rely on safe spaces and censorship.
I hear you're on your final warning now feniin. I had a chat with galach today.

[BallzDeep]

Well considering the majority of Americans didn't vote for him, I'd say its pretty warranted to complain.

Not really. This same argument took place back in 1824 when Adams won the Presidency. The rule stuck then and sticks now almost 200 years later. It sticks 200 years later because it has merit. The people who didn't vote for him can complain but doesn't mean they aren't a bunch of whiners that are going against the precedent since the electoral college. What happened back in 1824? People whined and created the Democratic party from the Democratic-Republican party.

[Domo]

https://i.imgur.com/6LiUsYl.png

[Teppler]

Is that the narrative of the week handed down by CorrectTheRecord? Bitch about Trump mishandling classified info?

Sounds like they are abandoning the quid pro quo accusation that was never going to stick.

Also wondering, why did you include your fetish for black men on the bottom though? I’m not sure what Trevor Noah has to do with any of this.

[Teppler]

Hey Rebecca,

Moderators are here to make sure your side doesn’t turn the conversation into pure name calling and insults, which your side here has tried to do. Over and over and over. Ask galach. That is not calling for a safe space.

Your side is simultaneously attacking people like rabid animals WHILE calling for a safe space because they have repeatedly appealed to have other arguments deleted and silenced. Arguments that don’t break the rules of insulting or name calling but they are arguing points that liberals and democrats can’t handle so they call for silencing. That’s what a safe space is. Not asking people to follow the rules so we can have a discussion. Hope this helps. Sorry you can’t hijack these discussions with personal attacks.

[Khorza]

Interesting how you guys enjoy insulting and attacking people without posting arguments.

It's page 277. The evidence is out there. The conclusions are obvious. There's nothing to argue or debate at this point.

Anyone still trying to claim that the president's conduct in office has been completely legal and proper is just so obviously delusional that they're not even worth talking to.

These people (such as Teppler), are the most gullible people in the world. They actually believe Trump's ridiculous campaign promises. They actually believe the illogical and factless "news" that Fox peddles them. They believe that there's some underground renegade within the administration who leaks top secret information to 4chan, of all places. They believe that Hillary Clinton has secret pedophile pizza parties.

They don't have evidence of any of that shit, but they'll argue on the internet until no one wants to have anything to do with them anymore, and then claim that as a victory.

So yeah, no discussion needed here. They worship Trump in the same way a mid-20s single mother worships Scentsy. And they're both buying snake oil by the truckload. So who cares if they think that bribing a foreign leader to interfere with our election process is okay or not?

Fuck em. It's a waste of time to have a conversation with someone who values the schemes of a professional hustler over the country's constitution and the safety of its citizens.

you are here to disrupt and post in bad faith

https://i.imgur.com/C87xx6T.jpg

[Teppler]

I don’t worship trump. I don’t even really like him that much. He’s just that much better than the other choices and he’s not doing that bad considering his circumstances.

Who else are you going to vote for in America? Who was a better choice in 2016? Who is a better choice in 2020?

Sure maybe he’s not that effective, but what did he do that’s really that bad?

What other candidate was ever willing to talk about the illegal immigration problem besides trumps? I think you are forgetting how hopeless politics was before he came on the scene. How close we were to a future of Jeb vs Hillary with Hillary winning and naming all these democrat justices. Do you know how ridiculously fucked the us would be right now? I am grateful to trump for that too.

[rebeccablack]

Moderators are here to make sure your side doesn’t turn the conversation into pure name calling and insults, which your side here has tried to do. Over and over and over. Ask galach. That is not calling for a safe space.
you whined passive aggressively about censorship and safe spaces and then flexed about trying to get someone banned for hurting your feelings 2 posts later. there is no universe where that isnt hilarious. i dont expect you to understand this, im just documenting as an unbiased observer.

[feniin]

you whined passive aggressively about censorship and safe spaces and then flexed about trying to get someone banned for hurting your feelings 2 posts later. there is no universe where that isnt hilarious. i dont expect you to understand this, im just documenting as an unbiased observer.

Don't upset him. He's got Galach on speed dial.

[feniin]

Did you talk about that on your podcast?

[Teppler]

you whined passive aggressively about censorship and safe spaces and then flexed about trying to get someone banned for hurting your feelings 2 posts later. there is no universe where that isnt hilarious. i dont expect you to understand this, im just documenting as an unbiased observer.

I'm sorry that you don't see the nuance but luckily brighter minds do. I'm not asking anyone to bend the rules to make this a safe space. I'm asking you guys to follow the rules so the entire thread isn't destroyed.

Again, you'll see examples of people calling for a safe space when liberals in these threads call for arguments devoid of personal attacks to be deleted.

[Wonkie]

Theres no denying podeastas art collection is creepy

Not an argument tho

[feniin]

Theres no denying podeastas art collection is creepy

Not an argument tho

Because your guys do it, my guys can do it too. But let's jail your guys.

[Teppler]

Because your guys do it, my guys can do it too. But let's jail your guys.

Yikes. Supporting ultra wealthy pedophiles and not even trying to deny it.

[Khorza]

Who else are you going to vote for in America? Who was a better choice in 2016? Who is a better choice in 2020?

I voted for Bernie Sanders and will do so again in 2020.

Sure maybe he’s not that effective, but what did he do that’s really that bad?

If you don't know "what he did that's really that bad" by this point, then you're willfully ignoring facts because you can't cope with the fact that you were swindled by a conman. So it would be a waste of time to type out the laundry list of crimes that you could easily Google yourself. These impeachment hearings only scratch the surface.

What other candidate was ever willing to talk about the illegal immigration problem besides trumps?

Just all of them. Obama deported a shit ton of people and he was still vilified, so don't act like this is all about immigration.

I think you are forgetting how hopeless politics was before he came on the scene. How close we were to a future of Jeb vs Hillary with Hillary winning and naming all these democrat justices. Do you know how ridiculously fucked the us would be right now? I am grateful to trump for that too.

Yeah how could our country possibly continue with a supreme court full of judges who might actually consider the concerns and needs of the actual people who live here, instead of lobbyists, corporations and the ultra wealthy. What a dystopian hellscape that would be.

Also, Obama's supreme court nomination was stolen by the Republican party in a disgusting display of partisan politics and in complete contempt for the Constitution of the United States.

[Teppler]

Obama stat padding his deportation #'s at a time when the other side wasn't shrieking at him. His deportations were at the border where they were simply throwing to the other side to try again and continue padding the #s. You'll notice a lot of Obama's #s are misleading like this. Like how his supporters say he had a hot economy but fail to mention the stimulus of trillions of dollars injected into the economy that we'll pretty much never pay back.

Illegal immigration was significantly worse under Obama which got to the breaking point that allowed Trump to be elected when he uttered the words "build the wall".

Bernie is a weak soul. Can't hold his own rallies without social justice types hijacking it. Never worked a real job in his life besides politicians or maybe writing his rape stories. The ultimate cuck.

https://i.imgur.com/eOIegsP.jpg

You're actually criticizing my political opinions when you support people like this and viewpoints like you've exposed above? Hah.

[feniin]

It's really hard to have a conversation with you when you come from a place of absolute hatred, Teppler.

[Khorza]

Do you have any guilt about supporting and empowering these people and their interests?

First of all no, I don't feel guilty since I don't support nor "empower" John Podesta. I have no idea where this is coming from, but I guess it's just a crazy person jumping to crazy conclusions.

To be honest, I don't know much about the guy. Is there any evidence of molestation? Any accusations? As far as I'm aware the answer is no and the evidence here begins and ends with crackpot 4chan theories. I have no idea.

But here you are, going off the deep end and claiming that every Democrat supports the systemic rape of children because John Podesta owns some questionable paintings. This is why no one wants to engage in conversation with you people.

Couple this with the all the Epstein stuff and how you deny what the democrats have obviously been up to.

Wait, what? You realize that Jefferey Epstein and Donald Trump were friends, right? In fact, a couple women have accused Donald Trump of raping them when they were 13, while Trump was attending one of those Epstein kiddy parties he was fond of.

So... what does this have to do with Democrats again?

You realize that this idea that if you're a pedophile or criminal then you must be a Democrat is just totally pants-on-head insane right? There's probably a pretty equal distribution of pedophiles across all political parties.

[Wonkie]

Obama stat padding his deportation #'s at a time when the other side wasn't shrieking at him. His deportations were at the border where they were simply throwing to the other side to try again and continue padding the #s. You'll notice a lot of Obama's #s are misleading like this. Like how his supporters say he had a hot economy but fail to mention the stimulus of trillions of dollars injected into the economy that we'll pretty much never pay back.

Illegal immigration was significantly worse under Obama which got to the breaking point that allowed Trump to be elected when he uttered the words "build the wall".

Bernie is a weak soul. Can't hold his own rallies without social justice types hijacking it. Never worked a real job in his life besides politicians or maybe writing his rape stories. The ultimate cuck.

https://i.imgur.com/eOIegsP.jpg

You're actually criticizing my political opinions when you support people like this and viewpoints like you've exposed above? Hah.

Bit of a glib description of quantitative easing, it's usage, purpose, and effects.

That's what you're talking about right?

[Wonkie]

Please stop with the gross pics.

[Teppler]

Please stop with the gross pics.

Don't you think it's important we see the facts about major democrat players like that? You don't want to see it but that's what the liberal elites are thinking about.

[Teppler]

Lots of democrat elites are really fucked up like this. Gloria Vanderbilt(one of the richest families to ever exist) and her two sons-

https://i.imgur.com/6fAQs7q.jpg

One of them is a young Anderson Cooper. The other I believe eventually committed suicide. Anderson Cooper ended up working with the CIA and now he gives out their talking points via CNN. These people literally worship demons. Who the fuck puts something like that above their childrens bed?

[Wonkie]

Don't you think it's important we see the facts about major democrat players like that? You don't want to see it but that's what the liberal elites are thinking about.

Not here please.

[feniin]

Don't you think it's important we see the facts about major democrat players like that? You don't want to see it but that's what the liberal elites are thinking about.

Sounds like that's what's on your mind. Like when Throndor ranted about pedophiles for weeks on end. Give it a rest.

[feniin]

Lots of democrat elites are really fucked up like this. Gloria Vanderbilt(one of the richest families to ever exist) and her two sons-

https://i.imgur.com/6fAQs7q.jpg

One of them is a young Anderson Cooper. The other I believe eventually committed suicide. Anderson Cooper ended up working with the CIA and now he gives out their talking points via CNN. These people literally worship demons. Who the fuck puts something like that above their childrens bed?

Literally worship demons? Jfc.

[Teppler]

Sounds like that's what's on your mind. Like when Throndor ranted about pedophiles for weeks on end. Give it a rest.

I'll rant about the pedophiles you support to my hearts content, thank you very much.

[Teddie1056]

If you don't believe Trump obstructed justice, you need to be lobotomized.

That's a crime that is worth impeachment.

Add in the fact that he actively is working with hostile foreign powers for personal gain...


If you support trump, you are a fucking moron, and deserve calamity.

The day that Orange fucker croaks from his cholesterol encrusted heart is the day I have a party. Republicans will probably ruin it by shooting up some minority churches, however.

[Teppler]

Not here please.

I'm sorry you are so disturbed by the art of major liberal democrat elites.

[Teppler]

If you don't believe Trump obstructed justice, you need to be lobotomized.

That's a crime that is worth impeachment.

Add in the fact that he actively is working with hostile foreign powers for personal gain...


If you support trump, you are a fucking moron, and deserve calamity.

The day that Orange fucker croaks from his cholesterol encrusted heart is the day I have a party. Republicans will probably ruin it by shooting up some minority churches, however.

Hey Teddie do you mean hostile to foreign powers for personal gain like this?

https://i.imgur.com/K1rjDee.jpg

Because the quote from Trump I saw wasn't that at all.

[Khorza]

Obama stat padding his deportation #'s at a time when the other side wasn't shrieking at him.

Irrelevant. You claimed that no other president addressed immigration before Trump. That was a lie.

Illegal immigration was significantly worse under Obama which got to the breaking point that allowed Trump to be elected when he uttered the words "build the wall".

This is another lie. The rate of illegal immigration has increased at a steady rate since the 80s, until the Obama administration where it actually decreased for the first time.

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/PH_2018.11.27_Unauthorized-Immigration-Estimates_1-01.png

Bernie is a weak soul. Can't hold his own rallies without social justice types hijacking it.

Lie #3.

I'm assuming you're referencing the Seattle rally from 2015 when his rally was interrupted by protesters.

Any other candidate would have called for security to have the people removed. Trump would have asked his audience to commit violence against them.

But instead of silencing them, Bernie instead gave up a bit of his time to give a platform for the American people to speak and air their concerns.

The weak think that the use of force is a show of strength. It's not, it's the easy way out. Bernie showed incredible strength by allowing the protesters to speak during his rally.

Never worked a real job in his life besides politicians or maybe writing his rape stories. The ultimate cuck.

Lie #4 and #5. Bernie has had jobs in carpentry and teaching before becoming a full time politician. He also has not written any "rape stories." I know exactly what you're trying to reference, and once again you know nothing about what you're talking about.

You're actually criticizing my political opinions when you support people like this and viewpoints like you've exposed above? Hah.

Well it's evident that you don't know his viewpoints, so how could you possibly criticize them? Anyone who's read even a few of your posts in this thread would recognize that you don't know fucking anything about politics. All you can do is copy/paste the most insane alt-right ramblings, which have zero foundation in any sort of truth.

And now you've broken down into full defense mode where all you can do is spew lies and hope one of them sticks, so there's absolutely no point in continuing this conversation any further.

Come back when you're willing to do even 30 seconds of research before contaminating this forum with your hate-fueled drivel.

[Teppler]

If you can't bear to look at the fantasies of liberal democrat leaders, how can you support them?

When you look into power broker Podesta's mind, I agree, it's some of the ugliest stuff imaginable..... utilizing kids.

Remember, he's no small fry.

John David Podesta Jr. (born January 8, 1949) is an American political consultant who served as White House Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton from October 20, 1998 until January 20, 2001 and as Counselor to President Barack Obama from January 1, 2014 until February 13, 2015. Before that he served as the White House Staff Secretary and White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations for the Clinton Administration between January 20, 1993 until October 20, 1998.

He is the former president, and now Chair and Counselor, of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a think tank in Washington, D.C., as well as a Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center and was chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.[1][2] Additionally, he was a co-chairman of the Obama-Biden Transition Project.[3][4]

Now are you beginning to understand why I get so upset about these people being empowered?

[BallzDeep]

First of all no, I don't feel guilty since I don't support nor "empower" John Podesta. I have no idea where this is coming from, but I guess it's just a crazy person jumping to crazy conclusions.

To be honest, I don't know much about the guy. Is there any evidence of molestation? Any accusations? As far as I'm aware the answer is no and the evidence here begins and ends with crackpot 4chan theories. I have no idea.

But here you are, going off the deep end and claiming that every Democrat supports the systemic rape of children because John Podesta owns some questionable paintings. This is why no one wants to engage in conversation with you people.



Wait, what? You realize that Jefferey Epstein and Donald Trump were friends, right? In fact, a couple women have accused Donald Trump of raping them when they were 13, while Trump was attending one of those Epstein kiddy parties he was fond of.

So... what does this have to do with Democrats again?

You realize that this idea that if you're a pedophile or criminal then you must be a Democrat is just totally pants-on-head insane right? There's probably a pretty equal distribution of pedophiles across all political parties.

[feniin]

Let's see who comes out of the woodworks...

[BallzDeep]

If you don't believe Trump obstructed justice, you need to be lobotomized.

That's a crime that is worth impeachment.

Add in the fact that he actively is working with hostile foreign powers for personal gain...


If you support trump, you are a fucking moron, and deserve calamity.

The day that Orange fucker croaks from his cholesterol encrusted heart is the day I have a party. Republicans will probably ruin it by shooting up some minority churches, however.

Hmm..Teppler talking about crazy conspiracies and calling people Pedophiles banned. Guy says he can't wait for someone to die, puts the blame of any church shooting as republican and that's normal behavior. You guys have lost it. So much hate you wish someone dies, have to casually throw out mass murder to validate any point and completely ignore mass murders has been committed by all walks of life. But hey don't let me stop you from being a hateful person.

[rebeccablack]

well this is a plot twist

[BallzDeep]

well this is a plot twist

What that this isn't always an echo chamber or something? Are you suggesting I'm Teppler lol?

Who would of guessed a bunch of people that enjoy an addictive game that allows you to not deal with life's responsibilities for long extended periods of time and is created from liberal arts has a bunch of leftists. Based on the types of personalities and mental disorders that have been exposed from the small population here, whatever the majority is, I'd go the opposite just for concern of mental health.

[solleks]

Nerve struck

[rebeccablack]

What that this isn't always an echo chamber or something? Are you suggesting I'm Teppler lol?
what the fuck? no. i was just laughing that mr hall monitor got hall monitored. please direct your meltdown elsewhere.

[BallzDeep]

what the fuck? no. i was just laughing that mr hall monitor got hall monitored. please direct your meltdown elsewhere.

Well, it seems to be a common problem with you. Putting context on something, you know. You seem pretty immature that you care so much to hang on a point of Teppler saying he talked to galach. Doesn't mean he is asking for bans, just means he talked to him. Context is everything. I also don't agree with Teppler but outside of his crazy conspiracy theories a couple of his points strike true and that applies mostly to the common denominator between your comments on the left and context. You also don't even know why he was banned, think it might of been ban evading or he could of even made up the galach part. Who knows, who cares.

[Teppler]

I had a talk with galach. I will no longer post the art work of liberal elites. I agree it's way too triggering pedophilia for the public.

[Wonkie]

I had a talk with galach. I will no longer post the art work of liberal elites. I agree it's way too triggering pedophilia for the public.

But buddy, if youre following his rules doesn't that make you contr - haha nah man I'm not gonna say it I won't do you like that :p

[feniin]

Prosecutors: Mueller Witness Whose Testimony Doomed Manafort Was Offered Money Not to Cooperate (https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/prosecutors-mueller-witness-whose-testimony-doomed-manafort-was-offered-money-not-to-cooperate/)

[BallzDeep]

Prosecutors: Mueller Witness Whose Testimony Doomed Manafort Was Offered Money Not to Cooperate (https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/prosecutors-mueller-witness-whose-testimony-doomed-manafort-was-offered-money-not-to-cooperate/)

"Holy crap. According to federal prosecutors, Gates was promised “monetary assistance” if he did not cooperate? By who?? That’s a lay-down-your-hand obstruction case."

If you can't even answer that question, how credible would you say that is? Obstruction case against who? I'd wage this is just as bad as the alt-right shit you seem to hate. You are just on the other end of the spectrum.

[feniin]

"Holy crap. According to federal prosecutors, Gates was promised “monetary assistance” if he did not cooperate? By who?? That’s a lay-down-your-hand obstruction case."

If you can't even answer that question, how credible would you say that is? Obstruction case against who? I'd wage this is just as bad as the alt-right shit you seem to hate. You are just on the other end of the spectrum.

Would guess it's someone still under investigation if they aren't releasing a name.

[Wonkie]

Cons, would you have peace on these terms:

Trump removed, hello President Grassley

?

[Teppler]

Cons, would you have peace on these terms:

Trump removed, hello President Grassley

?

A RINO and deep state mess. lol. He's exactly who we are rebelling against. We hate the McCain, Romney types as much as we hate liberals.

[feniin]

A RINO and deep state mess. lol. He's exactly who we are rebelling against. We hate the McCain, Romney types as much as we hate liberals.

Hate? Really?

[Wonkie]

A RINO

You say that about everybody

[Teppler]

Hate? Really?

You saw the pictures earlier. I’m not playing around with this “well gee we just have a difference of opinion but you’re a good guy”. How could you after you see stuff like that?

He was as deeply entrenched into the Clintons And Obama family and admins as you can get.

[Wonkie]

You saw the pictures earlier. I’m not playing around with this “well gee we just have a difference of opinion but you’re a good guy”. How could you after you see stuff like that?

Very carefully.

[feniin]

You saw the pictures earlier. I’m not playing around with this “well gee we just have a difference of opinion but you’re a good guy”. How could you after you see stuff like that?

He was as deeply entrenched into the Clintons And Obama family and admins as you can get.

Oh, wow. You're not playing around? :eek:

Tim Nolan was once riding high as a top-ranking judge and Donald Trump’s campaign manager in Kentucky, but now he is headed to prison for the next 20 years after being convicted on several counts of child sex trafficking.

How about:

• Rob Porter
• Steve Wynn
• Roy Moore
• Steve Bannon
• Bill O’Reilly
• Corey Lewandowski
• Roger Ailes
• Andrew Puzder
• Donald Trump

:rolleyes:

[BallzDeep]

Oh, wow. You're not playing around? :eek:



How about:

• Rob Porter
• Steve Wynn
• Roy Moore
• Steve Bannon
• Bill O’Reilly
• Corey Lewandowski
• Roger Ailes
• Andrew Puzder
• Donald Trump

:rolleyes:

Those people were charged with child sex trafficking?

[BallzDeep]

Liberal logic:

https://i.imgur.com/91rSsrB.jpg

[feniin]

Those people were charged with child sex trafficking?

Oh, I'm sorry - I forget - was John Podesta charged with child sex trafficking?

[feniin]

[img]https://i.imgur.com/91rSsrB.jpg[img]

What is this garbage collage?

[Ripp]

Libruls are psychotic, insane, and will not stop REEEEEEEEEEing ever. I shudder to think of what they'll be like when Trump wins re-election. They're gonna completely lose their minds and brains will go POOF. :cool:


98 THINGS DEMOCRATS HAVE SAID TRUMP COULD BE IMPEACHED FOR

1 For potentially ignoring court orders on his travel ban 02/01/2017 MSNBC Joaquin Castro
2 Because "we have to" 02/06/2017 Grabien Maxine Waters
3 For "creating chaos and division" 02/06/2017 CNN Maxine Waters
4 For potentially supplying damaging information 02/20/2017 MSNBC Jerry Nadler
5 For trying to "undermine Hillary Clinton and therefore undermine our democracy" 03/23/2017 Grabien Maxine Waters
6 Because his "motives and actions are contemptible" 04/15/2017 NTK Network Maxine Waters
7 For "collusion" 05/11/2017 MSNBC Maxine Waters
8 Because "he regards himself as above the law" 05/14/2017 ABC Lawrence Tribe
9 For firing Comey 05/15/2017 MSNBC Al Green
10 For allegedly disclosing classified info to Russia 05/16/2017 The Washington Free Beacon Maxine Waters
11 For Comey saying Trump asked him to drop Flynn probe 05/17/2017 MSNBC Jerry Nadler
12 For being "mentally unstable" 05/22/2017 MSNBC Ron Reagan
13 Because they've been able to "connect the dots" 05/28/2017 MSNBC Maxine Waters
14 Because "a plurality of polls" supports it 06/07/2017 ABC News Al Green
15 For being "abnormal" and possibly "crazy" 07/07/2017 NTK Network Maxine Waters
16 For banning transgenders from serving in the military 10/11/2017 Grabien Al Green
17 For "disrespecting and disparaging women" 10/11/2017 CSPAN Al Green
18 For saying NFL athletes should stand for the national anthem 10/19/2017 CSPAN Al Green
19 For being "friends" with Putin 10/24/2017 CNN Maxine Waters
20 For being "a clear and present danger" to Americans 10/25/2017 MSNBC Tom Steyer
21 For "putting the health and safety of Americans at risk" 10/28/2017 MSNBC Tom Steyer
22 For being an "inciter" of "ethnocentrism" 11/08/2017 CSPAN Al Green
23 For promoting "xenophobia" 11/08/2017 CSPAN Al Green
24 For inciting "bigotry" 11/08/2017 CSPAN Al Green
25 For being an "inciter" of "hatred" 11/08/2017 CSPAN Al Green
26 For "undermining the federal judiciary" 11/15/2017 Grabien Steve Cohen
27 For mocking a disabled journalist 11/16/2017 Bloomberg Maxine Waters
28 For the "Access Hollywood" tape 11/16/2017 Bloomberg Maxine Waters
29 For "threatening the media" 11/18/2017 MSNBC John Yarmuth
30 For "taking money from foreign governments" 11/26/2017 CNN Tom Steyer
31 For "dereliction of duty" 12/03/2017 MSNBC Ted Lieu
32 For being incompetent 12/04/2017 MSNBC Ezra Klein
33 For bringing "dishonor" upon the United States 12/06/2017 CSPAN Al Green
34 For being "psychologically deranged" 12/16/2017 MSNBC Richard Painter
35 For being "racist, sexist, and Islamaphobic" 12/30/2017 MSNBC Anushay Hossain
36 For not believing in the Constitution 12/30/2017 MSNBC Karine Jean-Pierre
37 For being "unfit" for office 01/08/2018 MSNBC Tom Steyer
38 For saying some countries are "shitholes" 01/14/2018 MSNBC Al Green
39 For his aides talking to Russians 01/26/2018 CNN Cory Booker
40 For urging Sessions to investigate Hillary 02/28/2018 MSNBC Chris Hayes
41 For not being respectful 03/04/2018 MSNBC Maxine Waters
42 For being "the most dangerous president in American history" 03/05/2018 MSNBC Tom Perez
43 For name calling 03/12/2018 MSNBC Maxine Waters
44 For A.G. Sessions firing Andrew McCabe 03/16/2018 MSNBC Danny Cevallos
45 For violating the "emoluments clause" 03/20/2018 MSNBC Tom Steyer
46 For possibly considering "firing" Mueller 03/23/2018 CNN Ted Lieu
47 For being "unwilling to make it clear" Russians can't hack America's "critical infrastructure" 03/26/2018 MSNBC John Garamendi
48 For being "unworthy" and "despicable" 03/27/2018 MSNBC Maxine Waters
49 Because "we have the grounds to do it" 06/27/2018 CNN Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
50 For staffing Trump Tower with park rangers 01/16/2019 MSNBC Rashida Tlaib
51 For the BuzzFeed report on Cohen 01/18/2019 MSNBC Eugene Robinson
52 For the "so many things" he has done 01/20/2019 MSNBC Maxine Waters
53 Because Virginia's governor wore blackface 02/08/2019 CSPAN Al Green
54 To prevent his re-election 05/04/2019 MSNBC Al Green
55 Because the "system of checks and balances is at risk" 05/15/2019 C-SPAN Al Green
56 To prevent a "monarchy" 05/15/2019 C-SPAN Al Green
57 For not releasing his tax returns 05/16/2019 Campaign Ad Tom Steyer
58 To put a "stain" on his presidency 05/25/2019 MSNBC Karine Jean-Pierre
59 Because it's "critical to our national security" 05/27/2019 MSNBC Richard Painter
60 Because it would be "crazy not to do it" 05/30/2019 CNN John Hickenlooper
61 In order to "set a precedent" for future presidents 06/01/2019 MSNBC Karine Jean-Pierre
62 Because we have a "moral obligation" 06/02/2019 CNN Cory Booker
63 Because it will help "educate" and "inform" the American public 06/03/2019 MSNBC Mike Quigley
64 Because the president "is leaving us no choice" 06/04/2019 CNN Dan Kildee
65 Because it's our "constitutional duty" to "have this debate" 06/08/2019 MSNBC Seth Moulton
66 For failing to "produce evidence" 06/10/2019 CNN Steve Cohen
67 For saying the press is the "enemy of the people" 06/10/2019 CNN Steve Cohen
68 For saying he'd take "dirt" on rivals from foreigners 06/13/2019 CNN Steve Cohen
69 For Kellyanne Conway's alleged Hatch Act violation 06/14/2019 MSNBC Richard Painter
70 To ensure Robert Mueller's work is continued 06/19/2019 NTK Network Katie Porter
71 For being "above the law" 07/11/2019 C-SPAN Al Green
72 For "inhumane" conditions at the border 07/15/2019 MSNBC Rashida Tlaib
73 For "high crimes and misdemeanors" 07/15/2019 MSNBC Ilhan Omar
74 For administration officials defying congressional subpoenas 07/16/2019 C-SPAN Ann Kirkpatrick
75 For saying fellow Americans should "go back to other countries" 07/17/2019 C-SPAN Al Green
76 For Trump crowd's "send her back" chant 07/18/2019 CNN Al Green
77 For attacks on the judiciary 07/19/2019 MSNBC Steve Cohen
78 Because we're in a "constitutional crisis" 07/25/2019 C-SPAN Al Green
79 For offering to host G7 summit at Doral 08/31/2019 MSNBC House Judiciary Committee
80 For influencing the decision of the new FBI building's location 08/31/2019 MSNBC Mike Quigley
81 For publicising his own assets 08/31/2019 MSNBC Mike Quigley
82 For suggesting a company for Army Corps to award wall production contract 08/31/2019 MSNBC Richard Painter
83 For talking like Hitler 08/31/2019 MSNBC Richard Painter
84 Because every new impeachable offense makes it harder to take action 08/31/2019 MSNBC David Cicilline
85 To ensure "our democracy" is "saved" 09/10/2019 MSNBC Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
86 For investigating Hunter Biden 09/22/2019 CNN Adam Schiff
87 For "hijacking" American foreign policy 09/23/2019 MSNBC Chris Hayes
88 For betraying his oath of office 09/24/2019 Politico Nancy Pelosi
89 For "coercing" a foreign government 09/25/2019 MSNBC Matthew Miller
90 For "extorting" a foreign government 09/25/2019 MSNBC Matthew Miller
91 For "intimidating" the whistleblower 10/01/2019 ABC Jon Karl
92 For Kurt Volker's text messages with Ukraine 10/04/2019 CNN Jim Himes
93 For being a "traitor" 10/06/2019 CNN Joe Walsh
94 For blocking US ambassador to EU from testifying 10/08/2019 Washington Examiner Adam Schiff
95 For likening impeachment to "lynching" 10/22/2019 CSPAN Al Green
96 For pronouncing November 'National American History and Founders Month' 11/05/2019 Twitter Rashida Tlaib
97 For "intimidation" of witness Yovanovitch with tweets 11/15/2019 CNN Eric Swalwell
98 For 'trying to use the court system' 11/22/2019 Washington Free Beacon Pramila Jayapal

[Wonkie]

Liberal logic:

https://i.imgur.com/91rSsrB.jpg

Name the candidate. Don't cheat, I'll punish you.

Gun Control: Gun control legislation should ultimately fall on individual states, with the exception of a federal ban on assault weapons and instant background checks to prevent firearms from finding their way into the hands of criminals and the mentally ill.

[BallzDeep]

What is this garbage collage?


It's pretty easy to read isn't it? It looks like Occupy Democrats is claiming that New Jersey is a NRA war zone. New Jersey is the least NRA friendly and requires a state license. Majority of the comments are from uneducated people that are saying that gun laws would stop it. It didn't. Another idiot is claiming it is mental health. It wasn't. It was a drug deal gone bad. These were criminals. They most likely owned the guns illegally and did not support the NRA. You see how the story can easily make people who are less inclined to have a deeper level of thinking to believe that gun laws would make a difference in a place with gun laws already in place for even owning a gun and then AR's and 30 round mags are banned.

These are the types of arguments you consistent hear from occupy democrats. They are full of holes and have the less uneducated reading "NRA war zone, gun bad" like a bunch of cave man idiots.

On your Podesta point, my point is are you just randomly throwing out names now of people that might of had a questionable piece of history that may or may not of been charged and if so should I just go down a list of Democrats or what are we doing here?

[BallzDeep]

Name the candidate. Don't cheat, I'll punish you.

Gun Control: Gun control legislation should ultimately fall on individual states, with the exception of a federal ban on assault weapons and instant background checks to prevent firearms from finding their way into the hands of criminals and the mentally ill.

Probably Butt I'd assume but not really sure. Already have issues with it though. What classifies as an assault weapon and what classifies as mentally ill. Are we talking at one point you had depression, PTSD, anxiety? That's kinda a questionable line.

Other portion of that is the states already regulate the right to own firearms.

"Texas is classed as a "shall Issue" state with the law regulating ownership of firearms to any person at least 18 years old. Texas gun laws do not regulate the possession of firearms so any person, no matter what age, can possess a firearm as long as they are not a felon."

[Wonkie]

Probably Butt I'd assume but not really sure. Already have issues with it though. What classifies as an assault weapon and what classifies as mentally ill. Are we talking at one point you had depression, PTSD, anxiety? That's kinda a questionable line.

That's Bernie. We had an Assault Weapons Ban (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban) from 1994 to 2004, but you know, the Democrats have moved left and all. :rolleyes:

Agreed on the other points.

[Ripp]

BTW, the term 'assault weapon' is a made up term devised to remove rights from individuals.

If you assault someone with a spork, it's still assault.

Interestingly enough, violent crime increases dramatically in librul-run states where gun rights are enacted.

So, the only people who adhere to gun laws are... take a deep breath... law abiding citizens. See, criminals love gun restriction laws because they know their prey won't have guns.

Shocker.

[Wonkie]

BTW, the term 'assault weapon' is a made up term devised to remove rights from individuals.

If you assault someone with a spork, it's still assault.

Interestingly enough, violent crime increases dramatically in librul-run states where gun rights are enacted.

So, the only people who adhere to gun laws are... take a deep breath... law abiding citizens. See, criminals love gun restriction laws because they know their prey won't have guns.

Shocker.

I don't know shit about guns but I do know the country was better, in the 90s, when I was a child.

[Ripp]

I don't know shit about guns but I do know the country was better, in the 90s, when I was a child.

Did you ever consider why that is historically?

Research what JFK and the democrats stood for back then and how your party has changed, you'll find part of your answer there.

Or you could just rely on what the media tells you how to think.

[feniin]

On your Podesta point, my point is are you just randomly throwing out names now of people that might of had a questionable piece of history that may or may not of been charged and if so should I just go down a list of Democrats or what are we doing here?

Your boy Teppler is the one that brought it up.

[BallzDeep]

That's Bernie. We had an Assault Weapons Ban (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban) from 1994 to 2004, but you know, the Democrats have moved left and all. :rolleyes:

Agreed on the other points.

We did but if you look up statistics it had no actual effect on homicide rates or crime whatsoever. If you look up campus carry and schools that have allowed campus carry, there was recently an article released that absolutely no increase in violent crimes or homicide has occurred since campus carry and in some cases, decreased.

Bernie did a bit on Rogan about guns after the whole El Paso shooting. His statement was he was against assault weapons and wanted to implement broader mental health checks. I don't feel just because you suffered depression, PTSD or anxiety at some point in your life, you shouldn't be able to defend yourself if needed. Moreover, if you start teaching people the consequence is death for committing heinous crimes, they are less likely to incur. You also need to stop people from believing humanity is shit. The people that commit these mass shootings always have one thing in common from every spectrum. Left or Right. They hold no value for human life. They think a certain race is a miserable piece of shit. They think all humans are miserable pieces of shit. This is probably the case for all mass shooters. Other than that people who disregard the law and commit crimes need to face the will of law abiding citizens and the law.

[feniin]

Libruls are psychotic, insane, and will not stop REEEEEEEEEEing ever. I shudder to think of what they'll be like when Trump wins re-election. They're gonna completely lose their minds and brains will go POOF. :cool:



TBH he shouldn't have been inaugurated in the first place. He was breaking the Emoluments clause from day one.

[feniin]

We did but if you look up statistics it had no actual effect on homicide rates or crime whatsoever. If you look up campus carry and schools that have allowed campus carry, there was recently an article released that absolutely no increase in violent crimes or homicide has occurred since campus carry and in some cases, decreased.

Bernie did a bit on Rogan about guns after the whole El Paso shooting. His statement was he was against assault weapons and wanted to implement broader mental health checks. I don't feel just because you suffered depression, PTSD or anxiety at some point in your life, you shouldn't be able to defend yourself if needed. Moreover, if you start teaching people the consequence is death for committing heinous crimes, they are less likely to incur. You also need to stop people from believing humanity is shit. The people that commit these masses always have one thing in common from every spectrum. Left or Right. They hold no value for human life. They think a certain race is a miserable piece of shit. They think all humans are miserable pieces of shit. This is probably the case for all mass shooters. Other than that people who disregard the law and commit crimes need to face the will of law abiding citizens and the law.

Do you think an AR-15 that should be locked in a safe when not in use is going to protect your home?

[Ripp]

TBH he shouldn't have been inaugurated in the first place. He was breaking the Emoluments clause from day one.

You can add that to the list of scams I posted. What does that make it, 99 reasons now? Hard to keep track. ;)

[Wonkie]

We did but if you look up statistics it had no actual effect on homicide rates or crime whatsoever. If you look up campus carry and schools that have allowed campus carry, there was recently an article released that absolutely no increase in violent crimes or homicide has occurred since campus carry and in some cases, decreased.

Bernie did a bit on Rogan about guns after the whole El Paso shooting. His statement was he was against assault weapons and wanted to implement broader mental health checks. I don't feel just because you suffered depression, PTSD or anxiety at some point in your life, you shouldn't be able to defend yourself if needed. Moreover, if you start teaching people the consequence is death for committing heinous crimes, they are less likely to incur. You also need to stop people from believing humanity is shit. The people that commit these mass shootings always have one thing in common from every spectrum. Left or Right. They hold no value for human life. They think a certain race is a miserable piece of shit. They think all humans are miserable pieces of shit. This is probably the case for all mass shooters. Other than that people who disregard the law and commit crimes need to face the will of law abiding citizens and the law.

I think that's well-decided. We can remove rights from the mentally ill, so there's not a lot of reason left to not remove them from other problem groups.

*gas lights you*

[feniin]

You can add that to the list of scams I posted. What does that make it, 99 reasons now? Hard to keep track. ;)

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8

The language of the Emoluments Clause is both sweeping and unqualified. See 49 Comp. Gen. 819, 821 (1970) (the "drafters [of the Clause] intended the prohibition to have the broadest possible scope and applicability"). It prohibits those holding offices of profit or trust under the United States from accepting "any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever" from "any . . . foreign State

[Ripp]

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8

The language of the Emoluments Clause is both sweeping and unqualified. See 49 Comp. Gen. 819, 821 (1970) (the "drafters [of the Clause] intended the prohibition to have the broadest possible scope and applicability"). It prohibits those holding offices of profit or trust under the United States from accepting "any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever" from "any . . . foreign State

Right.

Perhaps you can explain to all of us what happened to Quid Pro Quo, bribery and all the other false accusations first.

I'm sure Harvard will loan your expertise out to us unlearned peons for a few hours. ;)

[Wonkie]

I'm sure Harvard will excise your loans out to us unlearned peons. ;)

;)

[feniin]

Right.

Perhaps you can explain to all of us what happened to Quid Pro Quo, bribery and all the other false accusations first.

I'm sure Harvard will loan your expertise out to us unlearned peons for a few hours. ;)

They went for the most basic charges that can't be disproved or disputed. Abuse of Power of Office will include the QPQ demand. Maybe if you would have paid any attention to any of the inquiry and testimony you would have noticed that's what they were aiming for.

Not going to defend the violation of the Emoluments clause? The constitution doesn't seem to matter to you unless it's 2A.

[BallzDeep]

Do you think an AR-15 that should be locked in a safe when not in use is going to protect your home?

No but I carry a Smith & Wesson .38 SPL on my appendix and an Arsenal AK SBR in my trunk. You'd also be surprised at the ways they come up with guns safes. I've got a few RFID safes that are disguised as art or night stands. Put your keys on your night stand, have a lower compartment that opens via RFID on your keys and voila you can pull out whatever SBR, Folding shotgun, pistol you want.

[feniin]

No but I carry a Smith & Wesson .38 SPL on my appendix and an Arsenal AK SBR in my trunk. You'd also be surprised at the ways they come up with guns safes. I've got a few RFID safes that are disguised as art or night stands. Put your keys on your night stand, have a lower compartment that opens via RFID on your keys and voila you can pull out whatever SBR, Folding shotgun, pistol you want.
Why do you need weaponry? Do you live in a war zone?

[BallzDeep]

They went for the most basic charges that can't be disproved or disputed. Abuse of Power of Office will include the QPQ demand. Maybe if you would have paid any attention to any of the inquiry and testimony you would have noticed that's what they were aiming for.

Not going to defend the violation of the Emoluments clause? The constitution doesn't seem to matter to you unless it's 2A.

Sorry but "The judges were particularly swayed by Mooppan’s assertion that the congressional Democrats did not represent the entire legislative branch, and as individuals they could not show that they had been harmed by the ongoing nature of the president’s business relationships with foreign countries"

Nope and also care about every amendment. We just have a lot different interpretations of how those are played out. You believe in somehow gaining rights by restricting rights, I don't really believe that to be true.

[Ripp]

They went for the most basic charges that can't be disproved or disputed. Abuse of Power of Office will include the QPQ demand. Maybe if you would have paid any attention to any of the inquiry and testimony you would have noticed that's what they were aiming for.

Not going to defend the violation of the Emoluments clause? The constitution doesn't seem to matter to you unless it's 2A.

I have been paying attention, to the leadership before Trump as well. If you knew what you were talking about you'd know that Obama did the same things and more than Trump is doing.

See, the thing is, they have nothing. NOTHING. There is NO Quid Pro Quo. There is NO bribery. There is NOTHING. They keep moving the goal posts to keep fanatics like yourself wringing your hands and drooling in your lap.

It's pathetic. And sad. You allow yourself to be propagandized over and over and over again and you have no clue that it's being done.

I know you think you're winning now but when you lose the House and the White House you'll feel defeated. Another four years of REEEEEEE. Good times.

[BallzDeep]

Why do you need weaponry? Do you live in a war zone?

Because as a great quote from Thomas Jefferson "“A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks."

I shoot a lot. My belief is that a gun is a tool. It is a dangerous tool but also a useful tool. If you train with a dangerous tool on a regular basis, it sharpens your mind. You need to always be aware of trigger control, your surroundings and timing with breathing. The more you utilize those functions for sports and exercise, the sharper you become. I also believe that the world is in a great place. Go back 80 years ago, it wasn't. Go back 20 something years before that, it wasn't. Even in-between there have been some bad times across the globe with diseases and wars.

The world is becoming way better. 50% of the world was pulled out of poverty in 15 years with a goal of 30 years. It is a better time to be alive today than ever before. People are self oppressed for the most part. I hope not but, if I ever need guns to defend myself, friends and family. I have them and have utilized those tools for years.

[Wonkie]

I also believe that the world is in a great place. Go back 80 years ago, it wasn't. Go back 20 something years before that, it wasn't. Even in-between there have been some bad times across the globe with diseases and wars.

The world is becoming way better. 50% of the world was pulled out of poverty in 15 years with a goal of 30 years. It is a better time to be alive today than ever before.

Who is the Final Man and why is he a soyboy? :D

[BallzDeep]

Who is the Final Man and why is he a soyboy? :D

Lol lost me there.

[Ripp]

Why do you need weaponry? Do you live in a war zone?

It seems you don't understand why the Second Amendment was created in the first place.

[Wonkie]

Lol lost me there.

The End of History; Globalism. Liberalism is the Final Man. Not Commies like Hegel?Engel? a German guy thought.

[BallzDeep]

The End of History; Globalism. Liberalism is the Final Man. Not Commies like Hegel?Engel? a German guy thought.

Ah yeah sadly I'd say majority of my knowledge or philosophy itself comes from more modern day philosophers but surely regurgitated knowledge from many different philosophers over history. I've dabbled through early some of the 1700's-1800's when I find something that has carried over through philosophy. Need to dive some more into idealism and that era.

[Ripp]

The End of History; Globalism. Liberalism is the Final Man. Not Commies like Hegel?Engel? a German guy thought.

Liberalism leads to Socialism which leads to Communism. The globalist idea is the catalyst.

BTW, do you know what party Hitler belonged to?

[feniin]

I have been paying attention, to the leadership before Trump as well. If you knew what you were talking about you'd know that Obama did the same things and more than Trump is doing.

See, the thing is, they have nothing. NOTHING. There is NO Quid Pro Quo. There is NO bribery. There is NOTHING. They keep moving the goal posts to keep fanatics like yourself wringing your hands and drooling in your lap.

It's pathetic. And sad. You allow yourself to be propagandized over and over and over again and you have no clue that it's being done.

I know you think you're winning now but when you lose the House and the White House you'll feel defeated. Another four years of REEEEEEE. Good times.

Who is "propagandizing" me?

[BallzDeep]

But if anything, Epistemological Idealism or Transcendental Idealism seems more like a reality. Not sure how Kant or Descartes described how to conduct life outside of those philosophies of idealism vs materialism(world independent of ideas) but the philosophies behind both of those could have some merit.

[Ripp]

Who is "propagandizing" me?

I asked that same question 15 years ago. ;)

[Wonkie]

I asked that same question 15 years ago. ;)

You've been mad at the TV for 15 years?

Sad!

[feniin]

I asked that same question 15 years ago. ;)

So, you're just making things up? Know it's happening but can't explain who, how, or why it's happening.

[Ripp]

You've been mad at the TV for 15 years?

Sad!

Is the the best you can do or is that the limit?

[Ripp]

So, you're just making things up? Know it's happening but can't explain who, how, or why it's happening.

What are you asking me for? I know my past. I know the things I've learned and come to realize over the years.

Do the research for yourself if you care. If not, don't bother.

[Wonkie]

Is the the best you can do or is that the limit?

I like to play down to my competition.

the the rhymes with reeeee reeeee

[feniin]

What are you asking me for? I know my past. I know the things I've learned and come to realize over the years.

Do the research for yourself if you care. If not, don't bother.

You're the one suggesting I'm being fed propaganda but can't say who would be doing it.

[Rader]

Right.

Perhaps you can explain to all of us what happened to Quid Pro Quo, bribery and all the other false accusations first.

I'm sure Harvard will loan your expertise out to us unlearned peons for a few hours. ;)

Bring it on libturds

As you satisfy your base, you expose yourselves as partisan hacks to independents and NeverTrump-er RINOs

I rejoice in your feeble attempts at claiming this is all based in some objective outrage at a destruction of the norms of decency. Your F ing fails at making this a legit attack only expose you as partisan hacks out to destroy the Constitution. Your wails of despair expose you, we all know you hate Trump, you will do and say whatever it takes to bring him down and you are justified because he is so evil and mean

[Ripp]

I like to play down to my competition.

the the rhymes with reeeee reeeee

I see. Apparently your grammar and word association doesn't scale though. Perhaps you should train/level that.

[Ripp]

Bring it on libturds

As you satisfy your base, you expose yourselves as partisan hacks to independents and NeverTrump-er RINOs

I rejoice in your feeble attempts at claiming this is all based in some objective outrage at a destruction of the norms of decency. Your F ing fails at making this a legit attack only expose you as partisan hacks out to destroy the Constitution. Your wails of despair expose you, we all know you hate Trump, you will do and say whatever it takes to bring him down and you are justified because he is so evil and mean

Lol, I believe you mis-quoted there friend? ;)

/cheers

[Ripp]

You're the one suggesting I'm being fed propaganda but can't say who would be doing it.

Because you're unable to comprehend as you're unable to question your perceived reality.

You're not interested in the truth, otherwise you'd be asking questions instead of spewing propaganda you've been programmed with.

Been there, done that.

[Ripp]

And for someone who proclaims to be a parent (stay at home dad), I find it difficult to believe because you spend countless hours on here instead of taking care of said child and/or whatever RL duties you might have.

Case in point, you'll be on here shortly to respond as you can't stand someone else getting the last word.

Amiright? Yep. ;)

[Wonkie]

I see. Apparently your grammar and word association doesn't scale though. Perhaps you should train/level that.

the grammar error was yours, my good dingus

Is the the best you can do or is that the limit?

[Ripp]

the grammar error was yours, my good dingus

Correct. Perhaps you could teach me correct capitalization and punctuation since you're the master of English.

Oh wait... ;)

[Wonkie]

Correct. Perhaps you could teach me correct capitalization and punctuation since you're the master of English.

Oh wait... ;)

?

[Rainlord]

Case in point, you'll be on here shortly to respond as you can't stand someone else getting the last word.

Amiright? Yep. ;)

Four posts in a row? Are you sure you're alright?

[Ripp]

?

You don't see the hypocrisy in your own post? I thought it was funny. :D

[Ripp]

Four posts in a row? Are you sure you're alright?

I'm doing well, how are you officer?

[Ripp]

Hypocrisy is a child's argument.

No, a child would say "nani-nani", an adult would label it hypocrisy.

But I digress.

[Wonkie]

Anyway, primary filing dates are coming up soon. That's soon enough that Mitch can do the needful to drag out Trump's trial and his posse won't get primary'd by the right.

It's Gonna Be Grassley.

[Ripp]

Every day on CNN is “historic” when Trump’s being impeached (https://youtu.be/Ut15gyWLbHQ)

Lol.

And that folks is why they call it TV programming.

It's all scripted. It's all fake news. ;)

It's no wonder why their viewership is tanking.

[feniin]

You don't think this Impeachment will be documented and remembered historically? The day The House tried to save democracy.

[Domo]

https://i.imgur.com/1jA6lHM.png

[solleks]

It will go down in fake history that's for sure. What you think all those books in school are filled with?

[Ripp]

You don't think this Impeachment will be documented and remembered historically? The day The House tried to save democracy.

Lol.

First, this is a Republic which Libruls don't talk about much because they don't want to save that.

Second, what will be remembered is how the silly, corrupt Democrats sunk their ship with sham after sham after sham on their way to losing the House.

And third, fake news is a powerful tool used against the minds of the willfully ignorant.

And finally, even other news outlets are starting to see the writing on the wall.

CNN's primetime ratings hit three-year low amid impeachment coverage (https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/dec/7/cnns-primetime-ratings-drop-three-year-low-amid-im/)


Lol. Good times. People are finally waking up to the sham. ;)

[feniin]

And third, fake news is a powerful tool used against the minds of the willfully ignorant.

Maybe the only honest thing you've said, ironically.

[Teppler]

How does it feel to no longer have complete control of the narrative though bought and paid for news channels?

That used to be the only way people got their political news. Those were good times for the democrat pedophile elite.

Then came the internet and memes and twitter and trump making a fool of your polls. Must be very sad times in comparison feniin.

Their lack of control through media now might have something to do why they tend to act like rabid animals now.

[Hoppkins_Wytchfinder]

lol in control. The only people in control are the people with money. Anyone who kids themselves that any of the leaders cares about them or even know they exist is kidding themselves. We are and will always be expendable peons to them.

You play no part in the moving of the pieces. You're just a spectator like at a football game.

Exactly why trump didnt want to goto war (vietnam). Why would he? He considers himself (as do almost all wealthy people) above us. Die as one of the people? PFFT thats for proles.

If it served his purposes somehow he would sell all his supporters out.. They are all the same. Our concerns and their concerns are so different we may as well be a different species.

If things are going the way you want, it's only because they will it.

[feniin]

How does it feel to no longer have complete control of the narrative though bought and paid for news channels?

That used to be the only way people got their political news. Those were good times for the democrat pedophile elite.

Then came the internet and memes and twitter and trump making a fool of your polls. Must be very sad times in comparison feniin.

Their lack of control through media now might have something to do why they tend to act like rabid animals now.
How many times can you call people you don't agree with rabid animals before you start believing it? You're quite disgusting. Talk about the politics, not some weird fantasy you have of genocide.

[Teppler]

How many times can you call people you don't agree with rabid animals before you start believing it? You're quite disgusting. Talk about the politics, not some weird fantasy you have of genocide.

The rabid animals things has to do with the fact that you can't stop personal attacks. You've been warned many times, banned, your buddies are serving bans. I see it as animalistic because it's moving far away from 'reason' and 'argument' which, to me, define, humanity.

[feniin]

The rabid animals things has to do with the fact that you can't stop personal attacks. You've been warned many times, banned, your buddies are serving bans. I see it as animalistic because it's moving far away from 'reason' and 'argument' which, to me, define, humanity.

You haven't talked about a single political point or topic in a about 2000 posts. Everything you post is purposefully inflammatory. It's all "the establishment this, the Zionists that, the globalists ate my dog and stole my taxes" instead of actually addressing anything based in reality. You'd rather upload some of your personal pictures and pass them off as artwork.

[Ripp]

CNN and MSNBC covered every single impeachment hearing live.

But somehow they conveniently ignore the FISA hearing today. Oh wait, MSNBC has it in a little box and they're talking over it. :rolleyes:

If you can't figure out how corrupt they are and are only a propaganda machine for the Democratic party, you are willfully ignorant.

What a joke. But hey, CNN will probably be a cooking channel in a few years after the rest of their sad viewers abandon them.

[feniin]

Because the FBI and IG agreed there was nothing improper. Your alt-right echo chamber has you fooled into believing every conspiracy theory that comes across your Twitter feed.

[Ripp]

Because the FBI and IG agreed there was nothing improper. Your alt-right echo chamber has you fooled into believing every conspiracy theory that comes across your Twitter feed.

The FBI? They are the culprits lol.

William Barr: FBI Falsified Documents to Continue Spying on Trump & Co. After Election (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/10/william-barr-fbi-falsified-documents-to-continue-spying-on-trump-co-after-election/)

Attorney General William Barr says the FBI falsified documents to continue its surveillance of President Donald Trump and his associates after winning the 2016 election, revealing a detail not found in the Inspector General’s review of the Bureau’s “Crossfire Hurricane” operation in a Tuesday interview with NBC News reporter Pete Williams.

But hey, don't let the truth get in the way of your fake news. ;)

[Wonkie]

The rabid animals things has to do with the fact that you can't stop personal attacks. You've been warned many times, banned, your buddies are serving bans. I see it as animalistic because it's moving far away from 'reason' and 'argument' which, to me, define, humanity.

Everyone has their reasons, their rationale. The men responsible for the Reign of Terror had some arguments, but they were still monsters. It's not some discrete objective quality, you have to explain your reasoning, not just proclaim it. And then see how it plays.

It is ours to decide which ones slap and which are jive.

[feniin]

The FBI? They are the culprits lol.

William Barr: FBI Falsified Documents to Continue Spying on Trump & Co. After Election (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/10/william-barr-fbi-falsified-documents-to-continue-spying-on-trump-co-after-election/)

Attorney General William Barr says the FBI falsified documents to continue its surveillance of President Donald Trump and his associates after winning the 2016 election, revealing a detail not found in the Inspector General’s review of the Bureau’s “Crossfire Hurricane” operation in a Tuesday interview with NBC News reporter Pete Williams.

But hey, don't let the truth get in the way of your fake news. ;)

Horowitz concludes that the “FBI had an authorized purpose when it opened Crossfire Hurricane to obtain information about, or protect against, a national security threat or federal crime.”

The report acknowledges that the bar isn’t incredibly high to launch an investigation, but that the requirements were met. In multiple instances, Horowitz said he failed “to find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation” directed decisions when it came to opening the investigation or authorizing investigations into individuals associated with the campaign or in the wiretapping former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

[Ripp]

The FBI? They are the culprits lol.

William Barr: FBI Falsified Documents to Continue Spying on Trump & Co. After Election (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/10/william-barr-fbi-falsified-documents-to-continue-spying-on-trump-co-after-election/)

Attorney General William Barr says the FBI falsified documents to continue its surveillance of President Donald Trump and his associates after winning the 2016 election, revealing a detail not found in the Inspector General’s review of the Bureau’s “Crossfire Hurricane” operation in a Tuesday interview with NBC News reporter Pete Williams.

But hey, don't let the truth get in the way of your fake news. ;)

revealing a detail not found in the Inspector General’s review of the Bureau’s “Crossfire Hurricane” operation in a Tuesday interview with NBC News reporter Pete Williams.

Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? ;)

[Teppler]

Because the FBI and IG agreed there was nothing improper. Your alt-right echo chamber has you fooled into believing every conspiracy theory that comes across your Twitter feed.

It was nice of the fbi to clear themselves.

Gee I can’t figure out why the swamp won’t drain itself.

[Hoppkins_Wytchfinder]

So what you guys going to do if Trump gets charged with something?

March? Rally the troops and resist? Or complain on an Everquest forum.

[Ripp]

It was nice of the fbi to clear themselves.

Gee I can’t figure out why the swamp won’t drain itself.

ROFL. Right?! :D

It's all so absurd. So corrupt.

[Wonkie]

ROFL. Right?! :D

It's all so absurd. So corrupt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman

[feniin]

So what you guys going to do if Trump gets charged with something?

March? Rally the troops and resist? Or complain on an Everquest forum.
Probably double down on the insanity and claim it's all a deep state hoax.

[rebeccablack]

idk why anyone would take barr at his word at this point when hes already engaged in misinformation to give political cover to this admin. is there any actual evidence? not giving breitbart clicks

[Teppler]

idk why anyone would take barr at his word at this point when hes already engaged in misinformation to give political cover to this admin. is there any actual evidence? not giving breitbart clicks

There’s been giant abuses of power by the elites. Trump tries to look into them and they start global harassment campaigns.

[rebeccablack]

There’s been giant abuses of power by the elites. Trump tries to look into them and they start global harassment campaigns.
ok any evidence of this specific claim or no?

[Hoppkins_Wytchfinder]

I'm going to assume people saw my post and the answer to "What are you going to do if gets impeached/charged etc" is

Nothing bar posting on an Everquest forum

[Teppler]

ok any evidence of this specific claim or no?

There’s a million directions we can take this but I think one single question can sufficiently really get to the heart of this-

When Joe Biden was extorting the Ukraine with us tax dollars on behalf of his druggy son where was our intelligence community?

If I were on your side, and honestly cared about America’s welfare, that question would disturb me.

[rebeccablack]

i am talking specifically about the claim that the fbi falsified information to continue surveillance of campaign members

[feniin]

Remember when Barr covered up Iran Contra?

[feniin]

There’s a million directions we can take this but I think one single question can sufficiently really get to the heart of this-

When Joe Biden was extorting the Ukraine with us tax dollars on behalf of his druggy son where was our intelligence community?

If I were on your side, and honestly cared about America’s welfare, that question would disturb me.

Are you going to keep peddling that hoax forever?

[Teppler]

i am talking specifically about the claim that the fbi falsified information to continue surveillance of campaign members

Did you look into how they got the fisa warrant?

It was a couple of hardcore lefties and never Drumph republicans passing bullshit rumors to each other.

Never Drumph foreigner Steele passes internet rumor(the existence of a Russian piss tape) to establishment mess John McCain after McCain paid him to dig up dirt. John McCain passes info to his buddy Barry Hussein. Barry Hussein sends it to his partisan team of spooks- Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Rice and they use this obviously ridiculous dossier for grounds for surveillance.

Of course none of it ended up being true and they spied on Trumps campaign, which they denied for a long time and called crazy, without justification. They didn’t think they’d ever get caught. They didn’t think trump would win and look into this.

Hand caught in the cookie jar just like Biden and the Ukraine.

[feniin]

Who cares if they're "never Trump" if they're following the rules for their job (which they were)?

All aspects of the Dossier were confirmed factual, afaik

[rebeccablack]

is there any specific evidence of barrs claim that the fbi fabricated evidence to continue surveillance outside of the ig report?

[Wonkie]

I remember when the IG was /our guy/ and gonna drain the swamp, according to Q-theorists

[Ripp]

Are you going to keep peddling that hoax forever?

Hoax? Lol!

Biden is on video admitting he used Quid Pro Quo to get a prosecutor fired. I've never seen someone so willing to throw out any and all evidence to protect your beloved democrat. It's really sad. You have absolutely no shred of honesty in you.

Foreign Affairs Issue Launch With Joe Biden (https://youtu.be/Q0_AqpdwqK4)

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

JOE BIDEN, 23 JANUARY 2018: And that is I’m desperately concerned about the backsliding on the part of Kiev in terms of corruption. They made—I mean, I’ll give you one concrete example. I was—not I, but it just happened to be that was the assignment I got. I got all the good ones. And so I got Ukraine. And I remember going over, convincing our team, our leaders to—convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees. And I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kiev. And I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t.

So they said they had—they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You’re not the president. The president said—I said, call him.

(Laughter.)

I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.


You are so dishonest. :cool:

[Teppler]

is there any specific evidence of barrs claim that the fbi fabricated evidence to continue surveillance outside of the ig report?

Do you think a bunch of 4channers discussing that there might be a piss tape of Trump in Russia is sufficient proof to justify spying on a political rival and presidential candidate?

[feniin]

Hoax? Lol!

Biden is on video admitting he used Quid Pro Quo to get a prosecutor fired. I've never seen someone so willing to throw out any and all evidence to protect your beloved democrat. It's really sad. You have absolutely no shred of honesty in you.

Foreign Affairs Issue Launch With Joe Biden (https://youtu.be/Q0_AqpdwqK4)

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

JOE BIDEN, 23 JANUARY 2018: And that is I’m desperately concerned about the backsliding on the part of Kiev in terms of corruption. They made—I mean, I’ll give you one concrete example. I was—not I, but it just happened to be that was the assignment I got. I got all the good ones. And so I got Ukraine. And I remember going over, convincing our team, our leaders to—convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees. And I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kiev. And I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t.

So they said they had—they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You’re not the president. The president said—I said, call him.

(Laughter.)

I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.


You are so dishonest. :cool:
Got any more fabrications? Any more 4chan conspiracy theories? They make for good reading on the toilet.

[rebeccablack]

Do you think a bunch of 4channers discussing that there might be a piss tape of Trump in Russia is sufficient proof to justify spying on a political rival and presidential candidate?
can you address my actual question instead of trying to change the subject again?

[Ripp]

Got any more fabrications? Any more 4chan conspiracy theories? They make for good reading on the toilet.

I see. So, you're willing to throw out any and all evidence that I posted because it doesn't fit your agenda.

Well, at least we know how dishonest you really are, thanks for clearing that up. It's a waste of time talking to you. ;)

[Wonkie]

Any more 4chan conspiracy theories? They make for good reading on the toilet.

Why is corruption so common in Ukraine? Examine and flush.

[feniin]

I see. So, you're willing to throw out any and all evidence that I posted because it doesn't fit your agenda.

Well, at least we know how dishonest you really are, thanks for clearing that up. It's a waste of time talking to you. ;)

If that's what you call evidence then yes it is a waste of time

[Ripp]

Horowitz Trips Up Comey's Victory Lap: "Nobody Vindicated Who Touched This FISA" (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/11/live-updates-senate-judiciary-committee-holds-fisa-abuse-hearing/)

A day after a smug-sounding James Comey tweeted that the IG's report vindicated him:

“So it was all lies. No treason. No spying on the campaign. No tapping Trumps wires. It was just good people trying to protect America.”

Howoritz, in one short sentence, destroyed the former FBI Director's credibility by explaining simply...

"I think the activities we found here don't vindicate anybody who touched this FISA."

Uh oh, Comey has a problem. :D

[feniin]

Can you post something from an actual news service please?

[Kaveh]

Horowitz Trips Up Comey's Victory Lap: "Nobody Vindicated Who Touched This FISA" (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/11/live-updates-senate-judiciary-committee-holds-fisa-abuse-hearing/)

A day after a smug-sounding James Comey tweeted that the IG's report vindicated him:

“So it was all lies. No treason. No spying on the campaign. No tapping Trumps wires. It was just good people trying to protect America.”

Howoritz, in one short sentence, destroyed the former FBI Director's credibility by explaining simply...

"I think the activities we found here don't vindicate anybody who touched this FISA."

Uh oh, Comey has a problem. :D

Don’t you mean Corney?

[Domo]

linking to Breitbart says a lot about someone lol

[feniin]

linking to Breitbart says a lot about someone lol

He thought Stormfront would be too on the nose

[Ripp]

linking to Breitbart says a lot about someone lol

So does linking to fake news CNN. ;)

[feniin]

So does linking to fake news CNN. ;)

Did you listen to the most recent TDS?!

[feniin]

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1204782833119748106?s=09

[Teppler]

linking to Breitbart says a lot about someone lol

What was more accurate with 2016 coverage Breitbart or CNN? Which had the greater pulse on the US? The side that said Hillary would win with 99% chance of victory or the side that was constantly try to tell you there were major problems with her and the American public is sick of it all?

I think it’s time we really address this guy referring to breitbart in that way. Are they right about anything, ever?

[feniin]

What was more accurate with 2016 coverage Breitbart or CNN? Which had the greater pulse on the US? The side that said Hillary would win with 99% chance of victory or the side that was constantly try to tell you there were major problems with her and the American public is sick of it all?

I think it’s time we really address this guy referring to breitbart in that way. Are they right about anything, ever?

We should really get all of our news from The Right Stuff and TDS, right?

[Teppler]

We should really get all of our news from The Right Stuff and TDS, right?

At the very least, stop getting your news that the elites are paying for you to view. You can get just as much information watching informercials regularly as watching CNN. Probably less harmful.

[feniin]

At the very least, stop getting your news that the elites are paying for you to view. You can get just as much information watching informercials regularly as watching CNN. Probably less harmful.

Except I don't even have CNN. Or any sort of cable news network. Hell, I don't even have OTA channels on my TV. Next random assumption? Who is controlling my mind now? Soros have a giant telepathy machine?

[Ripp]

What was more accurate with 2016 coverage Breitbart or CNN? Which had the greater pulse on the US? The side that said Hillary would win with 99% chance of victory or the side that was constantly try to tell you there were major problems with her and the American public is sick of it all?

I think it’s time we really address this guy referring to breitbart in that way. Are they right about anything, ever?

The ratings are clear, fewer and fewer people are buying into CNN fake news propaganda. Ironically, CNN is force-fed in every airport in America and they still can't beat out FOX. :D

Fox News Ends 2019 With Biggest Prime Time Ratings Ever (https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2019/12/11/fox-news-ends-2019-with-highest-rated-prime-time-ratings-ever/#374e8ed63347)

Overall, Fox was up compared to 2018, with prime time ratings rising 2%, while both CNN and MSNBC saw declines—CNN, which finished third overall with 972,000 viewers was down 2%, while MSNBC, which finished second, was down 3% with a total prime time audience of 1.753 million viewers.


You can only fake news for so long before people figure out they're getting played lol.

[feniin]

At the very least, stop getting your news that the elites are paying for you to view. You can get just as much information watching informercials regularly as watching CNN. Probably less harmful.

I liked your last podcast about why Italians aren't white. Really informative.

[feniin]

The ratings are clear, fewer and fewer people are buying into CNN fake news propaganda. Ironically, CNN is force-fed in every airport in America and they still can't beat out FOX. :D

Fox News Ends 2019 With Biggest Prime Time Ratings Ever (https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2019/12/11/fox-news-ends-2019-with-highest-rated-prime-time-ratings-ever/#374e8ed63347)

Overall, Fox was up compared to 2018, with prime time ratings rising 2%, while both CNN and MSNBC saw declines—CNN, which finished third overall with 972,000 viewers was down 2%, while MSNBC, which finished second, was down 3% with a total prime time audience of 1.753 million viewers.


You can only fake news for so long before people figure out they're getting played lol.

Are television ratings your basis for factual news reporting?

[Domo]

https://i.imgur.com/YvYdSKg.jpg

If the President of the United States would have the balls to testifie it would be the biggest TV event ever.

[feniin]

https://i.imgur.com/YvYdSKg.jpg

If the President of the United States would have the balls to testifie it would be the biggest TV event ever.

Butterymales :confused:

[Ripp]

As the investigation continues they're going to find more and more corruption. This is just sad. :(


Ten Disturbing Findings in the Justice Department Inspector General Report (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/11/ten-disturbing-findings-in-the-justice-department-inspector-general-report/)

Here are ten of the most disturbing findings in the report:

1) The FBI’s Counterintelligence Division (CD) Assistant Director E.W. “Bill” Priestap considered whether the FBI should conduct defensive briefings for the Trump campaign to warn the campaign of Russian interference in the 2016 election but “ultimately decided that providing such briefings created the risk that ‘if someone on the campaign was engaged with the Russians, he/she would seek to cover-up his/her activities, thereby preventing us from finding the truth.’”

2) The FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team tasked to investigate the Trump campaign sought help from a foreign intelligence agency to surveil Trump campaign members.

3) DOJ and FBI policy did not require the FBI to consult with any DOJ official before using confidential human sources — or spies — involving advisers to a major party candidate’s presidential campaign, and the FBI did not do so.

4) The FBI wanted a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant on former Trump campaign member Carter Page in August 2016, but the FBI’s Office of General Counsel (OGC) and its National Security Division’s Office of Intelligence (OI) determined more information was needed to support probable cause that Page was an agent of a foreign power.

5) The Crossfire Hurricane team failed to inform department officials of significant information that was available to the team at the time that the FISA applications on Page were drafted and filed.

6) The FBI made false assertions on their FISA applications.

7) FBI leadership supported relying on Steele’s reporting to seek a FISA order on Page even after being advised it was political dirt paid for by the Clinton campaign and there could be blowback.

8) FBI personnel fell “far short” of a requirement to ensure that “all factual statements” in the FISA application were “scrupulously accurate.” “Our review found that FBI personnel fell far short of the requirement in FBI policy that they ensure that all factual statements in a FISA application are ‘scrupulously accurate.’

9) The FBI knowingly continued seeking information from Steele even after he was fired as a source — 13 times. “The FBI closed him as a CHS for cause in November 2016. However, as we describe below, despite having been closed for cause, the Crossfire Hurricane team continued to obtain information from Steele through Ohr, who met with the FBI on 13 occasions to pass along information he had been provided by Steele.”

10) The FBI sent an investigative agent to a Trump campaign briefing specifically because it knew Michael Flynn would be there, and it had deemed him a subject of an investigation — in other words, the FBI used a campaign briefing to spy on Flynn.

[feniin]

I'm deeply disturbed (that you keep posting Breitbart articles).

[Teppler]

I liked your last podcast about why Italians aren't white. Really informative.

Look how much leeway these people like feniin get to be racist and personally attack people all so they can support and empower their pedophile elites in peace without disruption.

[feniin]

Look how much leeway these people like feniin get to be racist and personally attack people all so they can support and empower their pedophile elites in peace without disruption.

It was your podcast. TDS is you, isn't it?

[Domo]

https://i.imgur.com/UaEkXKM.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/OyuWgnJ.jpg

[Teppler]

Trump was bitching about Comey and the fbi in 2016 too actually.

[feniin]

Trump was bitching about Comey and the fbi in 2016 too actually.

After he caught wind that the investigation was targeting him instead of Hillary.

[Jimjam]

Trump was bitching about Comey and the fbi in 2016 too actually.
Corney.
https://i.imgur.com/UaEkXKM.jpg
In fairness, who is more trustworthy. An embittered nerd in a sweater or the POTUS?

[Kaveh]

Did you listen to the most recent TDS?!

What is TDS?

[feniin]

What is TDS?

Teppler's podcast

[Kaveh]

Is it an actual podcast? What is this TDS