Strict Gun Laws Will Eliminate Mass Shootings (Japan Version)

[Castle2.0]

Something something common-sense gun laws something something think of the children.

I mean.. it's gotta work, right?

[Castle2.0]

And yes, media attention + outrage on social media compared to 20 people being killed in Chicago on a normal weekend qualifies this as a mass shooting.

[starkind]

NJzUVKpjhVc

p.s. would love a translation of this

[nostalgiaquest]

It's gross that you revel in death.

[peterpal]

https://i.imgur.com/lXlPl76.png

3 mass shootings since 1938?

[Reiwa]

Time is a flat circle. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Archduke_Franz_Ferdinand)

MHioIlbnS_A

[Kaveh]

It's gross that you revel in death.

[Botten]

It's gross that you revel in death.

[Skarne]

It's gross that you revel in death.

[Elizondo]

Same folks whining that OP revels in death were out in full meltdown mode over abortion

The Left is mentally ill

[Skarne]

So proud and such a boy.

[nostalgiaquest]

Same folks whining that OP revels in death were out in full meltdown mode over abortion

The Left is mentally ill

Triggered bro

[Skarne]

https://imgur.com/227Kdwo

[Jibartik]

Turn on CERN 2.0 and every single day something crazy happens

[Jibartik]

Dude all the people that really think war is honorable are talking about how this guy is reveling in death.

lol

[peterpal]

https://i.imgur.com/hvh0Q9T.png

The same vilifying the left with made up information happening not just in America

[loramin]

It's gross that you revel in death.


https://i.imgur.com/lXlPl76.png

3 mass shootings since 1938?

Yeah, you really proved a point here: gun laws are pointless :rolleyes:

[peterpal]

Yeah, you really proved a point here: gun laws are pointless :rolleyes:

You thought I was making a point against gun laws? Japan had 5 gun related deaths last year and America over 20k. 13 if Japan had the same population as US

[Jibartik]

When they come to arrest us for playing everquest instead of the latest MMO, the people that watch will think that it was for the greater good.

[Kaveh]

Triggered bro

[Elizondo]

Mentally ill libtards shitting up another thread

[Kaveh]

Zondo you get a job yet? How many onlyfans you paying for?

[Elizondo]

Zondo you get a job yet? How many onlyfans you paying for?

lol stay mad Grandpa

I can't stop laughing at idiots who compare human babies to bugs straddling their high horse regarding gun laws

Can't make this shit up. Clearly it's mental illness. Always has the link to the wiki at the ready though so that's something I guess.

[nostalgiaquest]

lol stay mad Grandpa

I can't stop laughing at idiots who compare human babies to bugs straddling their high horse regarding gun laws

Can't make this shit up. Clearly it's mental illness. Always has the link to the wiki at the ready though so that's something I guess.

Karenzondo still obviously triggered. Sad.

[Elizondo]

Karenzondo still obviously triggered. Sad.

Bro you obviously triggered

Nice try tho

[Kaveh]

Karenzondo still obviously triggered. Sad.

He needs to get laid

[Elizondo]

He needs to get laid

Sad grandpa posting like a 5 year old

Hilarity ensues

[Kaveh]

Sad grandpa posting like a 5 year old

Hilarity ensues

Lol triggered. You going outside today?

[Jibartik]

Job reports breaks expectations so inflation is because people are making too much money lol

[Elizondo]

Lol triggered. You going outside today?

lol k

[Reiwa]

Job reports breaks expectations so inflation is because people are making too much money lol

Are we back to 2019 level yet? ✌️

[Castle2.0]

Not reveling in death, just making a point, your overzealous gun laws are like China's "zero COVID policy." They don't work and do more harm than good.

If people think gun laws are going to stop violence/death in America, they don't understand the problem.

If they take away guns, we'd see more bombings, cars ramming public gatherings, acid attacks, knife attacks, etc.

The left has tipped their hand: complete removal of guns. Numerous dem politicians have explicitly stated as much.

The people reveling in death are the ones okay with tens of millions of murdered children.

Wouldn't the party of "nazis" be the ones supporting a holocaust? ^

Also, history. We can stop 20,000 murders a year from guns... maybe we get 20,000 murders from knives?

But then what about the tail risks?

50 million dead from a dictator? It's 2022, we'd top the 20th-century numbers. 100 million? 200 million?

"That will never happen here."

LOL ^

Just like Canada would never enact wartime powers on non-violent protestors and lock bank accounts of political opponents.

I don't revel in death, but 20,000 murders per year? There are more than 1/2 the number of alcohol-related driving deaths (a.k.a. humans abusing alcohol and killing someone else.) Do we ban alcohol?

It's not about life and death for the left. It's about fear and control. Fear for their constituents and control for their leaders.

[Castle2.0]

It takes 2,500 years of gun murders in America to equal 1 dictator in a handful of years.

What is the likelihood America has a "tyrant" in the next 2,5000 years?

Oh wait, the left already said we have had a "tyrant" and "dictator".

Thanks for proving my point ;)

[Reiwa]

I don't revel in death, but 20,000 murders per year?

Be precise with your words, young lobster.

[Jibartik]

Lets have the idiot goverment distribute heroin to citizens, and also manage the gun ownership lmao wtf kind of dystopia are we trying to build here.

[Rainik Stormseeker]

^ One that they want

[Castle2.0]

Be precise with your words, young lobster.

Be precise with your reading.

I am sure you are for prohibition. 11,000+ alcohol-impaired driving traffic deaths every year.

Their lives matter, right?

[Elizondo]

Lets have the idiot goverment distribute heroin to citizens, and also manage the gun ownership lmao wtf kind of dystopia are we trying to build here.

xAkXumSGRxM

[Jibartik]

So wait, a woman is someone who votes more?

That's what a woman is?

[Reiwa]

Be precise with your reading.

I am sure you are for prohibition. 11,000+ alcohol-impaired driving traffic deaths every year.

Their lives matter, right?

You're surrendering a point you don't need to. That's all.

[Castle2.0]

You're surrendering a point you don't need to. That's all.

I am a generous guy, what can I say. When prohibition?

[Reiwa]

I am a generous guy, what can I say. When prohibition?

Idiot. :rolleyes:

[Castle2.0]

Idiot. :rolleyes:

Thank you for tacitly admitting defeat from such a simple point.

Cheers.

If we ban alcohol, people will not drink it, then we can save 11,000 people!

Don't these lives matter?

Why can't we have common sense prohibition laws?

The constitution does not guarantee the right to drink alcohol!

[Castle2.0]

41,000 second-hand smoke deaths every year in the US.

Bob smokes, Bill dies.

Doesn't Bill's life matter?

When do we ban smoking?

[Kaveh]

Conflating guns with cigarettes is genius, you’ve outdone yourself

[Castle2.0]

Conflating guns with cigarettes is genius, you’ve outdone yourself

One group enjoys a personal freedom which causes the death of 41,000 people.

Another group enjoys a personal freedom which causes the death of 11,000 people.

Can you explain why we don't ban smoking and drinking?

[Castle2.0]

The reason Reiwa nor anyone else will answer those questions in-depth is their supposed logic leads to the conclusion of banning drinking and smoking.

They don't have a gun cabinet, but they have a wine cabinet.

Maybe they aren't as selfless and so concerned about others as they want to signal?

[Castle2.0]

They will make every argument under the sun a gun owner makes, except it's not enshrined in the Constitution.

"I drink responsibly. Why should I give up my wine because someone else can't handle their wine?"

I would let them make every argument, then say.. ok.. replace "wine" with "gun."

Then their NPC brain shuts down or they get red-pilled and join the good guys.

G I JOOOOOOEEESSSSSSS!

[Kaveh]

You conflated a gun to a cigarette while defending guns. That’s pretty dumb haha

[Skarne]

Don’t forget the wine!

[Jibartik]

Yeah but when you ban the wine, everyone shot each other up.

If you ban the guns we dont know they might drink themselves to death.

Is what happened in russia.

[Castle2.0]

You conflated a gun to a cigarette while defending guns. That’s pretty dumb haha

I know you are, but what am I?

C5P5eQiKNQs

But first one to go pure ad hominem loses. So, I win.

[Jibartik]

Man, simpler times.

[Castle2.0]

Connoisseurs of the original may appreciate the play on words.

[Elizondo]

Libtards don't have any kind of foundation for their beliefs

Hence, they constantly hold views with contradictions from one issue to another

They are mentally ill sad people

[Reiwa]

The reason Reiwa nor anyone else will answer those questions in-depth is their supposed logic leads to the conclusion of banning drinking and smoking.

They don't have a gun cabinet, but they have a wine cabinet.

Maybe they aren't as selfless and so concerned about others as they want to signal?

That's what I get for trying to help. 😿

[Jibartik]

lets ban guns so the aliens will land already im sick of waiting and pretending they dont exist when it's obvious.

[Elizondo]

lets ban guns so the aliens will land already im sick of waiting and pretending they dont exist when it's obvious.

This week: BAN GUNS TO SAVE LIVES

Last week: KILL BABIES IN THE WOMB UP TO THE MOMENT OF BIRTH. THEY ARE JUST BUGS AND SHOULD BE STEPPED ON AND GROUND UNDER THE HEEL OF MY BOOT

Sad mentally ill people

Totally unaware how utterly retarded their beliefs are

[peterpal]

If you're already comparing consumer products and cars with guns instead of killing instruments, why not have a gun school and a test as requirement like you have for cars?
Why are shotguns available for 18 year olds and they're allowed to drink at 21?

You guys are too funny trying to interpret Thomas Jefferson's tea leaves to decide what's good for today's society

[Castle2.0]

That's what I get for trying to help. ��

When prohibition?

#SoberLivesMatter

Until someone genuinely answers why not ban cigs and wine, I'll just drop this question any time it comes up to encourage the conversation ;)

[Jibartik]

Jesus is like, "no way last time the nailed me to a cross with hammers, I do not want to see what they do to me with those guns!"

[Reiwa]

Yeah but when you ban the wine, everyone shot each other up.

If you ban the guns we dont know they might drink themselves to death.

Is what happened in russia.

Today on Poke ruins everything (https://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html)

Second, alcohol consumption declined dramatically during Prohibition. Cirrhosis death rates for men were 29.5 per 100,000 in 1911 and 10.7 in 1929. Admissions to state mental hospitals for alcoholic psychosis declined from 10.1 per 100,000 in 1919 to 4.7 in 1928.

Arrests for public drunkennness and disorderly conduct declined 50 percent between 1916 and 1922. For the population as a whole, the best estimates are that consumption of alcohol declined by 30 percent to 50 percent.

Third, violent crime did not increase dramatically during Prohibition. Homicide rates rose dramatically from 1900 to 1910 but remained roughly constant during Prohibition's 14 year rule. Organized crime may have become more visible and lurid during Prohibition, but it existed before and after.

Prohibition did not end alcohol use. What is remarkable, however, is that a relatively narrow political movement, relying on a relatively weak set of statutes, succeeded in reducing, by one-third, the consumption of a drug that had wide historical and popular sanction.

This is not to say that society was wrong to repeal Prohibition. A democratic society may decide that recreational drinking is worth the price in traffic fatalities and other consequences. But the common claim that laws backed by morally motivated political movements cannot reduce drug use is wrong.

[peterpal]

When prohibition?

#SoberLivesMatter

Until someone genuinely answers why not ban cigs and wine, I'll just drop this question any time it comes up to encourage the conversation ;)

I'm waiting until someone goes on a mass killing spree with cigarette smoke

[Jibartik]

The suspected killer, Tetsuya Yamagami, 41, was tackled to the ground just moments after he allegedly opened fire on the 67-year-old former leader as he delivered a campaign speech in the western region of Nara.

In an interview with investigators, Yamagami allegedly admitted to plotting to kill Abe because he thought the ex-prime minister was connected to an organization that he bore a grudge against.

Police did not reveal the name of the organization or elaborate on what it believed in, adding it wasn’t clear if the group even existed.

The alleged assassin’s grudge did not appear to be about politics, according to police.

Is the organization the Bilderberg's? The Illuminati? What?? This could be Q anon related for all we know.

[Castle2.0]

I'm waiting until someone goes on a mass killing spree with cigarette smoke

Ah, lives only matter if they are killed suddenly in one big event. Got it.

Oh wait, that's just what makes sensational news headlines. I see how you are informed and motivated. Narrative, not facts. Noted.

I guess the death penalty (just not multiple with firing squad) is back in the good graces of the left?

Annually 41,000 people die from secondhand smoke. 2x the murder rate from guns. Does it matter if they die suddenly in one big event or not?

Try using your brain.

[peterpal]

Ah, lives only matter if they are killed suddenly in one big event. Got it.

Oh wait, that's just what makes sensational news headlines. I see how you are informed and motivated. Narrative, not facts. Noted.

I guess the death penalty (just not multiple with firing squad) is back in the good graces of the left?

Annually 41,000 people die from secondhand smoke. 2x the murder rate from guns. Does it matter if they die suddenly in one big event or not?

Try using your brain.

Bro, I can either ask the person to move away or go myself from the smoke. Try asking a cold blooded murderer not to shoot or just dodge the bullet. Good luck

Your arguments are so thin and non-existent it's no surprise why no one bothers to answer you

[Castle2.0]

Bro, I can either ask the person to move away or go myself from the smoke. Try asking a cold blooded murderer not to shoot or just dodge the bullet. Good luck

You're either not very smart or don't take much time to think.

Also, not very inclusive of other people who may not be able or willing to ask others to move away or be able to move away themselves.

Do you ask drunk drivers to move out of your way?

Do 8-year-old kids ask their chainsmoking parents to move away?

Do you ask a cold-blooded murderer not or stab or just dodge the knife?

Do you ask the guy driving a car into a crowd to swerve?

I mean, think of the children!

When do we have a common-sense ban on personal vehicles, smoking, and drinking?

[Kaveh]

Your arguments are so thin and non-existent it's no surprise why no one bothers to answer you

Exactly

[Castle2.0]

If they were so thin people would knock them flat in a few sentences. Funny enough, no one has any good answers.

Any good answer they make is actually just a pro-gun answer but applied to a personal freedom they choose to enjoy. Usually one that is not enshrined in the Constitution.

When people run away from a debate or turn immediately to exclusive ad hominem it's clear they have no real answers.

[Elizondo]

If you're already comparing consumer products and cars with guns instead of killing instruments, why not have a gun school and a test as requirement like you have for cars?
Why are shotguns available for 18 year olds and they're allowed to drink at 21?

You guys are too funny trying to interpret Thomas Jefferson's tea leaves to decide what's good for today's society

Jefferson didn't write The Constitution or The Bill of Rights

Hope that helps

[Castle2.0]

"Your argument is so thin, I am not going to waste any time addressing it. I mean, I could totally defeat it in one sentence. However, I would rather take 3 sentences to explain why I won't waste my time..."

[DeathsSilkyMist]

If you're already comparing consumer products and cars with guns instead of killing instruments, why not have a gun school and a test as requirement like you have for cars?
Why are shotguns available for 18 year olds and they're allowed to drink at 21?

You guys are too funny trying to interpret Thomas Jefferson's tea leaves to decide what's good for today's society

The reason for this is historical. The majority of states are against gun registries. If you had to take a test and receive a license, that is basically a gun registry at that point. The government would have a list of every person who owns a gun, or who is thinking about owning a gun because they received a license.

The reason why gun registries are bad is because the government NOT knowing who has guns is a security measure against tyranny.

The Supreme Court also ruled against New York's hand gun public carry licensing law, so I doubt you will see any Gun tests/licensing in the near future.

[Rethalis]

The same people that promote gender ideology in kids and adults as some normal healthy and sane thing that totally abides by natural law also wants to remove guns from totally sane normal people who live within natural law.

[Rethalis]

If you're already comparing consumer products and cars with guns instead of killing instruments, why not have a gun school and a test as requirement like you have for cars?
Why are shotguns available for 18 year olds and they're allowed to drink at 21?

You guys are too funny trying to interpret Thomas Jefferson's tea leaves to decide what's good for today's society

Reducing the greatest human document in history to "tea leaves" is pretty dumb.

[Jibartik]

"Shall not be infringed"
https://i.imgur.com/D3FlVlI.png

*checks notes
https://i.imgur.com/Zf8TbeF.png

"hmm I think this means well regulated!"
https://i.imgur.com/fvtAHdE.png

[Castle2.0]

This convo ended when I brought up wine, cigs, and personal cars.

"But many people find utility and enjoyment in those things."

"But I am responsible."

Guess you just don't care about all those dead people.

Get dunked on. You have no answer.

[Mblake1981]

No constitution, there is no debate to start with.

[Reiwa]

Jefferson didn't write The Constitution or The Bill of Rights

Hope that helps

Jefferson was an anti-federalist tho. Loved the frogs.

Therefore you are a confederate and I can throw rotten fruit at you online.

[Castle2.0]

Jefferson was an anti-federalist tho. Loved the frogs.

Therefore you are a confederate and I can throw rotten fruit at you online.

But when liquor, cigs and personal car ban to protect all the peoples?

[Reiwa]

But when liquor, cigs and personal car ban to protect all the peoples?

I think unless you live in Kansas anymore, you're the subject of a unitary state so /shrug

[Castle2.0]

I think unless you live in Kansas anymore, you're the subject of a unitary state so /shrug

Do you support equally strict bans on liquor, cigs, and personal cars similar to guns? If not, why not?

[nostalgiaquest]

So you’re saying you should need to be 21 to own a gun, they should be banned indoors, and that you should need a license to own them? Not bad ideas Castle!

Edit - disclaimer : I’m not in favor of banning guns, but trying to make these comparisons is stupid.

[Reiwa]

Do you support equally strict bans on liquor, cigs, and personal cars similar to guns? If not, why not?

I'm only saying they could! They just don't choose to do so right now. In my personal capacity I do think it would be effective, as earlier demonstrated.

No matter where you go you live by the magnanimity of tyrants. :p

Except Kansas, Toto.

[Jibartik]

idk bout you guys but everytime I go to the grocery store in america I think, man I wish I had a gun right now.

we live in a fricken war zone. Im not gonna let some freak keep his just because he doesnt care about his life so he can use it to end mine and his together randomly one day.

just get the guns out of Chicago. Just do it. Show us how it can be done. Prove it.

Then expand from there.

But dont start in the Livingroom of MY house.

[Mblake1981]

idk bout you guys but everytime I go to the grocery store in america I think, man I wish I had a gun right now.

we live in a fricken war zone.

idk bout you guys but everytime I go to the grocery store in america I think, man I am going to grill some steaks.

we live in fricken flavor country.

[nostalgiaquest]

I think you start by helping lift them out of poverty. When gangs and violence is all you’ve ever known, it’s no surprise that you end up in a gang and violent.

[Jibartik]

I do wtf you create some fake argument so you can continue to support politicians that do nothing and you can feel more superior?

If you think your side not helping the poor after all this time is an excuse for them to spend all the time and money they could to take my guns is gonna help your argument, WRONG!

If we spent half as much energy as we did on gun control, as we could on helping the poor we wouldnt fucking need gun control.

[nostalgiaquest]

I didn’t mention sides you nut.

[nostalgiaquest]

I also didn’t mention guns. Stop being combative for no reason. I even said a few posts back that I’m not in favor of banning guns.

The only way to help reduce violence in these hell hole neighboorhoods and cities is the help elevate the people in them. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue.

[nostalgiaquest]

Same thing goes for mental health. Is either side even trying to address that?

[Jibartik]

I think you start by helping lift them out of poverty. When gangs and violence is all you’ve ever known, it’s no surprise that you end up in a gang and violent.

Ok so here's the solutions we got on the table then:

Take away my rights.

or

Give criminals lots of money.

Those are the two offerings so far.

But why not give all the kids who might become mass shooters free money too?

Like the solution is to just give everyone basic income and there will be no mass shootings?

Meh.. I might buy that.

But it seems a little wreckless.

[nostalgiaquest]

And your solution is?

[Jibartik]

I also didn’t mention guns. Stop being combative for no reason. I even said a few posts back that I’m not in favor of banning guns.

The only way to help reduce violence in these hell hole neighboorhoods and cities is the help elevate the people in them. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue.

yeah yeah you're right if we all lived as children in the garden of eden there wouldnt be mass shootings.

[Jibartik]

And your solution is?

throw anyone who comits a crime with a gun in chiacgo into jail for life for the next 10 years.

See what happens.

[Mblake1981]

The only way to help reduce violence in these hell hole neighboorhoods and cities is the help elevate the people in them. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue.

Squeaky wheel getting the grease. Take note all you inbred hillbilly folk, if you want traction in this country then you need to leave the farm and head to town to burn that fucker down.

They might move you from that shit-shack to a two story home with a brick foundation, so you can finally experience dignity.

[Rethalis]

Same thing goes for mental health. Is either side even trying to address that?

One side is trying to normalize it

[nostalgiaquest]

I think hillbillies need help too. Appalachia is a drug ridden shit hole

[Mblake1981]

I think hillbillies need help too. Appalachia is a drug ridden shit hole

I was talking about NY and Cali, my area is all stretch limo and champagne. My uncle Cleetus just got back from a Egyptology tour and soon will be going on a European trip.
He flew on Duck Dynasty airlines.

[Jibartik]

We should build a shitload of mental hospitals and rehab centers if we want to solve the problem the good guy way.

Devote all the anti gun people to hospital care work.

Wont ever do that in a million years, so I say lock someone up, onto a container ship, send them to a lithium mine, and throw away the keys to their shackles, if they commit a crime with a gun.

[Castle2.0]

I could create an ad for my 7-days to pwn a lib self-help program.

This ONE simple trick will stump your liberal friends!

Ask them why they don't want to ban wine, cigars, and personal ownership of cars. Then tell them those are all the reasons you don't want to ban guns.

Boom.

Dunkin on these noobs.

[Jibartik]

Ask them why they don't want to ban wine, cigars, and personal ownership of cars. Then tell them those are all the reasons you don't want to ban guns.

Boom.

Dunkin on these noobs.

Hey castle, thanks for this one. I been wondering where the wine part of the revelations black horse we're currently living in came from, but this must be it! Thanks!

Then I heard what sounded like a voice among the four living creatures, saying, 'Two pounds of wheat for a day's wages, and six pounds of barley for a day's wages, and do not damage the oil and the wine!'

[Castle2.0]

Reiwa, peterpal, Kaveh.. my stump-trump-dunk list grows

[Rainik Stormseeker]

... killing instruments...

please define, provide a list.

Here's some-

hammers*
knives*
cars
bricks
curbs
fists
pressure cookers*
baseball bats*
chainsaws*
axes*

*amazon prime 1-2 days to your doorstep!

, why not have a gun school and a test as requirement like you have for cars?

You mean to acquire a state-issued license to drive a car?

Because you need one of those to buy (or steal) a used car and drive it around? what's to stop that person from just mowing people over? drinking and driving and killing innocents? Nothing, happens all the time.

Also, something like 1 in 8 drivers on the road today are uninsured (see: the IRC), so don't bother throwing liability insurance around.

Also also - see amazon list of goodies.

BTW - have you ever purchased a firearm?

Why are shotguns available for 18 year olds and they're allowed to drink at 21?

Because every citizen of the United States of America enjoys the unalienable right to self-defense and to defend their minor children, thanks to the 2nd Amendment. Even the lefty WaPo agreed .. although 2014 seems decades ago- https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/12/26/self-defense-is-a-constitutional-right/

buying/consuming alcohol isn't, last i checked, used for self-defense.

You guys are too funny trying to interpret Thomas Jefferson's tea leaves to decide what's good for today's society

And "you guys" are too pretentious and obtuse to know any better.

[Jibartik]

I think you start by helping lift them out of poverty. When gangs and violence is all you’ve ever known, it’s no surprise that you end up in a gang and violent.

hey also we gotta talk about how in the 1980s all the gang dads were like, "we used to use our hands!"

like your argument that they are poor so they use guns is not really true if you look at history, the italian district when they were the gangsters of the time were not rife with gun violence either.

Something culturally has changed recently to increase the rate of gun use, and ignoring that but having such confidence in your solutions is annoying.

Like straight up manditory church might stop gun violence, why is that unfair but taking away guns and forcing your beliefs on me ok?

[Mblake1981]

drinking and driving and killing innocents? Nothing, happens all the time.

https://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/caitlyn-jenner-driver-blame-crash-article-1.2528840

[Reiwa]

I could create an ad for my 7-days to pwn a lib self-help program.



Ask them why they don't want to ban wine, cigars, and personal ownership of cars. Then tell them those are all the reasons you don't want to ban guns.

Boom.

Dunkin on these noobs.

All that tells me is you're too dumb to distinguish between colors of animus.

Hope this helps.

[Mblake1981]

Jesus is like, "no way last time the nailed me to a cross with hammers, I do not want to see what they do to me with those guns!"

https://i.imgur.com/4S6CpWJ.png

[Castle2.0]

All that tells me is you're too dumb to distinguish between colors of animus.

Hope this helps.

I shot another pirate ship once. He didn't have his flag up. Tough luck. You made the list. Can't weasel your wait out now, pal.

[nostalgiaquest]

hey also we gotta talk about how in the 1980s all the gang dads were like, "we used to use our hands!"

like your argument that they are poor so they use guns is not really true if you look at history, the italian district when they were the gangsters of the time were not rife with gun violence either.

Something culturally has changed recently to increase the rate of gun use, and ignoring that but having such confidence in your solutions is annoying.

Like straight up manditory church might stop gun violence, why is that unfair but taking away guns and forcing your beliefs on me ok?

My argument that they are so poor so they use guns? Dude, are you high?

Again. I don’t want to ban guns. It’s not realistic. Would be like trying to ban bikes in the Netherlands.

I’m just saying if you want to reduce the violence, and by proxy probably the number of guns, in places like Chicago and Detroit, you need to help those places. It’s not going to help itself. It’s sad because these were once great cities of America. But they got the rug pulled out from under them. Same with Apalachia. The ones that could leave left and the ones that stayed were left in the rubble.

What do you do when you’re born to a crackhead mom and a gang member dad? Anything you can to survive. Surrounded by violence, poverty, and drugs from the day you’re born. Can you truly imagine how terrible that must be? Are these kids supposed to pull themselves up from bootstraps they don’t even have and go to night school? Do you have that amount of focus and drive? Probably not, cuz you’re here posting with me lol.

I concede on banning guns. Let’s not ban guns. Now what?

Also. I’m going to bed, cuz like you Jibroni, I am high ;) Night night

[Jibartik]

Im saying why did we not help those places from 1900-1960 and gun deaths were 100-400% less than they are today per year in the usa?

we've had poor ghettos since the founding fathers moved here and kicked homer out of their treehouse and made the first no homers club.

And I do agree if we lived in paradise there would be no crime but I dont think we could pull that off without it naturally happening over time through a series of failed attempts at greatness.

I concede on banning guns. Let’s not ban guns. Now what?

I said, anyone who uses a gun in a crime is sent to the lithium mines. Or mandate church.

What do you do when you’re born to a crackhead mom and a gang member dad? Anything you can to survive.

not necessarily true, lots of kids have made it out of the ghetto.

gang culture was down in the 2000s it suddenly got a huge rise again in the 2010s and now ganster rap is back to flashing guns and all that shit what happened?

Tupac almost ended that. Until they ended him. (the illuminati whos mission is to brainwash kids to turn into MK ultra'd murderers)

And in the past, there have been other gang cultures like gang culture culture now, Italians were exactly the same 100 years ago, and they became privlaged now, and we didnt give them any handouts that I can remember.

Same with the irish.

No MK ultra back then though, so that's maybe why they made it out and gangbanging made a comeback.

edit: (gn good morning if its then)

[Elizondo]

IUbn5ss8j9c

[Jibartik]

My argument that they are so poor so they use guns? Dude, are you high?

Again. I don’t want to ban guns. It’s not realistic. Would be like trying to ban bikes in the Netherlands.

I’m just saying if you want to reduce the violence, and by proxy probably the number of guns, in places like Chicago and Detroit, you need to help those places. It’s not going to help itself. It’s sad because these were once great cities of America. But they got the rug pulled out from under them. Same with Apalachia. The ones that could leave left and the ones that stayed were left in the rubble.

What do you do when you’re born to a crackhead mom and a gang member dad? Anything you can to survive. Surrounded by violence, poverty, and drugs from the day you’re born. Can you truly imagine how terrible that must be? Are these kids supposed to pull themselves up from bootstraps they don’t even have and go to night school? Do you have that amount of focus and drive? Probably not, cuz you’re here posting with me lol.

I concede on banning guns. Let’s not ban guns. Now what?

Also. I’m going to bed, cuz like you Jibroni, I am high ;) Night night

I think it's the violence in video games, and media, and music.

Take the same logic to someone being influenced to do crime, because they are poor.

And then imagine you're poor and everything you consume is like SHOOT SHOOT kill kill GANGSTA fight FIGHT FIGHT money money get yours get yours!!

[Mblake1981]

Im saying why did we not help those places from 1900-1960 and gun deaths were 100-400% less than they are today per year in the usa?

odd end date there, are you pointing to the rise of American counter culture?

During the 1960s, the foreign-born percentage of the U.S. population hit its lowest levels, hovering around just five percent, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Still, the decade would lay the seeds of a lasting change in the nature of U.S. immigration. The Civil Rights movement and a burgeoning counterculture helped to pull society away from racial and ethnic discrimination and from the policies that had typified the post-World War II establishment. Since the 1920s, U.S. immigration policy had focused on a quota system that strongly favored northern European residents. In the early 1960s, residents of Ireland, Germany, and the United Kingdom received almost 70 percent of available quota visas.

The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 changed all that. Sponsored by Representative Emanuel Celler of New York and Senator Philip Hart of Michigan and signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson at a ceremony on Liberty Island, the Act abolished the quota system in favor of a regime that established immigration preferences by categories. The 1965 law reserved 6% of visas for refugees, 10% for professionals, scientists, and artists, 10% for needed workers, and 74% for family members of naturalized U.S. citizens. This policy favoring family reunification would result in significant demographic changes over the coming decades, as immigration from Europe declined and the U.S. welcomed an increasing flow of migrants from Asia and Latin America.

[Jibartik]

yes I do believe post modernism has completely destroyed this country.

Holden Caulfield is literally the poster child for everyone since then and he was a completely useless slug who hated everything.

[Rainik Stormseeker]

odd end date there, are you pointing to the rise of American counter culture?

My guess is he's pointing to LBJ's "we'll have them <bleeps> voting Democrat for 200 years" 'Great Society' you-can-marry-the-state generational homewrecking programs,

but /shrug.

[Reiwa]

odd end date there, are you pointing to the rise of American counter culture?

We did try the Italians but they went a-killin (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNKg54bvObQ)

[Jibartik]

That and social decline of post modernism and the reduction of church attendance.

[hobart]

OP is so fucking stupid.

Let me paraphrase "LOL we'll have strict gun control laws and only have one national tragedy per generation..."

Most "libs" would sign up for that, retard.

[Elizondo]

OP is so fucking stupid.

Let me paraphrase "LOL we'll have strict gun control laws and only have one national tragedy per generation..."

Most "libs" would sign up for that, retard.

Most libs would savagely butcher millions and millions of babies in the womb up to the moment of birth

Hope that helps

[Jibartik]

Lets throw the left a compromise.

Gun control.

But you cannot buy or sell unless you hold up your hand and say say hail jesus at the register.

[Castle2.0]

OP is so fucking stupid.

Let me paraphrase "LOL we'll have strict gun control laws and only have one national tragedy per generation..."

Most "libs" would sign up for that, retard.

And what about a dictator every few hundred years that kills tens of millions.

Learn to read. Learn to math. 2,500 years of current gun murder rate to equal 1 dictator. Sorry pal, you don't really care about people's lives, just your position.

CNN told you to be scared. You obeyed.

When do we ban cigs, liquor and personal car ownership?

You do want to save lives, right?

[Jibartik]

PClTPqwx12c

[Lune]

America has 40,000 gun deaths a year, Japan has like 1-10, in spite of Japan having roughly 1/3 or 1/4 the population or some shit.

This is why you should only be allowed to vote and post on the internet if you have an IQ at or above 80.

Not that "gun laws" are even our problem

[Reiwa]

America has 40,000 gun deaths a year



How many are murders?


This is why you should only be allowed to vote and post on the internet if you have an IQ at or above 80.

[Botten]

Most libs would savagely butcher millions and millions of babies in the womb up to the moment of birth

Hope that helps

Karenzondo…

Biden to announce executive action to protect abortion access (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3549678-biden-to-announce-executive-action-to-protect-abortion-access/)

Get Triggered!!!

https://i.imgur.com/JQB7k.gif

[Mblake1981]

Karenzondo…

Biden to announce executive action to protect abortion access (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3549678-biden-to-announce-executive-action-to-protect-abortion-access/)

Get Triggered!!!

https://i.imgur.com/JQB7k.gif

Oh no, they will kill more people before they annoy me.

[Elizondo]

lol Sad Botten excited babies will be murdered

[Castle2.0]

America has 40,000 gun deaths a year, Japan has like 1-10, in spite of Japan having roughly 1/3 or 1/4 the population or some shit.

This is why you should only be allowed to vote and post on the internet if you have an IQ at or above 80.

Not that "gun laws" are even our problem

Hehe, looks like you didn't read. Go back and re-read then come join the convo.

We got people who want to keep cigs, wine, private car ownership, and private gun ownership legal. Then the other side that wants to band it all because tens of thousands of people die every year due to people abusing the aforementioned freedoms, only 1 of which is enshrined in The Constitution.

Also, dictators.

[Jibartik]

I cant wait for the next presidents executive action to ignore the supreme court and constitution!

[Botten]

Oh no, they will kill more people before they annoy me.

Trumptards would be okay with abortion if liberal families practiced it but some how they are pissed because it is preventing them from getting more imbred white voters.

Trying my Best to Imitate Castles 2.0’s and his means of arguing.
Oh forgot his fool proof means of winning; Castle 2.0, if you don’t respond I win.

Now I am off to lose $20,000 in Bitcoin. Derrrrrrrrr

Here’s to Karenzondo’s family tree continuing to look like a flag pole!
(Only shorter after Biden’s executive order )

[Mblake1981]

Trumptards would be okay with abortion if liberal families practiced it but some how they are pissed because it is preventing them from getting more imbred white voters.

Trying my Best to Imitate Castles 2.0Â’s and his means of arguing.
Oh forgot his fool proof means of winning; Castle 2.0, if you donÂ’t respond I win.

Now I am off to lose $20,000 in Bitcoin. Derrrrrrrrr

HereÂ’s to KarenzondoÂ’s family tree continuing to look like a flag pole!
(Only shorter after BidenÂ’s executive order )

Don't put your mental health problems on me.

[Botten]

lol Sad Botten excited babies will be murdered

Let’s get this straight they aren’t US babies until they are born, it is your political party who likes the AR in schools.

[Rainik Stormseeker]

Let’s get this straight they aren’t US babies until they are born, it is your political party who likes the AR in schools.

Considering that, after 6 weeks of gestation, 90-95% of them would survive to term and be delivered, if not murdered first, your point is moot.

And who wants AR's in schools? Concealed carry w/ volunteer school employees (background checks, training) is the way to go, since, you know, the cops are practically accessories to school shooting murders nowadays.

[Elizondo]

Let’s get this straight they aren’t US babies until they are born, it is your political party who likes the AR in schools.

lol Botten mentally ill

[Botten]

Considering that, after 6 weeks of gestation, 90-95% of them would survive to term and be delivered, if not murdered first, your point is moot.

Yet still not a US baby with any rights.

And who wants AR's in schools? Concealed carry w/ volunteer school employees (background checks, training) is the way to go, since, you know, the cops are practically accessories to school shooting murders nowadays.

because guns in the home don't lead to the most gun accidents right?

[Reiwa]

Considering that, after 6 weeks of gestation, 90-95% of them would survive to term and be delivered, if not murdered first, your point is moot.



Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)

uhhh

Did Biden's EO today just federalize emergency room abortion up to the moment of birth?

It says active labor after all!

[Rethalis]

Yet still not a US baby with any rights.

is that really how you justify killing an unborn child?

[Mblake1981]

Considering that, after 6 weeks of gestation, 90-95% of them would survive to term and be delivered, if not murdered first, your point is moot.

And who wants AR's in schools? Concealed carry w/ volunteer school employees (background checks, training) is the way to go, since, you know, the cops are practically accessories to school shooting murders nowadays.

I don't want any guns in school, but even then we had students who were hunters and would get Principal permission to keep them locked in the trucks. Things have slipped so far in 20 years its alarming.

[Botten]

is that really how you justify killing an unborn child?

Not a US baby or child with no rights. ~ Castle 2.0 Q.E.D.

[Rainik Stormseeker]

Yet still not a US baby with any rights.

OH okay, then why is the murder of a pregnant woman deemed a double homicide?

at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

because guns in the home don't lead to the most gun accidents right?

https://i.imgur.com/3PsjR1b.gif

[Reiwa]

OH okay, then why is the murder of a pregnant woman deemed a double homicide?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rae_Carruth

he served 18 years of an 18-to-24-year sentence in the North Carolina state prison system and was released from the Sampson Correctional Institution in Clinton, North Carolina, on October 22, 2018.

[Elizondo]

Sad Botten always fails so badly when he tries to debate someone

Endless source of comedy

[Botten]

…
… fetal …

If you can relate fetal to US baby you can add the additional brain cells to relate the same to a parent with a gun in the home vs a teacher with a gun in a classroom.

[Jibartik]

what is a US baby?

[Botten]

what is a US baby?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHLJfxfXHBg&t=96s

[Reiwa]

what is a US baby?

US is unique in in the world for having unrestricted jus soli and jus sanguinis simultaneously

[Jibartik]

What's a US baby? A baby that has divine colonial rights against 3rd world adults?

Same people that tried to cut the country in half for slavery are trying to make US babies like, some special holy species now?

[Botten]

*sigh

Jibartik and Rainik Stormseeker

Double homicide or murder of a pregnant woman still does not justify calling it a baby.

There is a entire case in Arizona where they are trying to give 'fetal personhood' to a fetus (embryo or fertilized egg).

To break it down so even Jibartik can understand... they are trying to actually create the policy mandates that "hundreds of civil and criminal provisions be 'interpreted and construed' to 'acknowledge' the rights of fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses at any stage of development. (https://apnews.com/article/abortion-us-supreme-court-arizona-phoenix-american-civil-liberties-union-36fc6be3058e283bd17625951d114a43)

So no we aren't there yet. Regardless of ... your analogy Rainik Stormseeker

When we do get there maybe this will be legit. Pregnant Woman Cited for HOV Violation Says Her Unborn Baby Should Count as Second Person (https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/pregnant-woman-cited-for-hov-violation-says-her-unborn-baby-should-count-as-second-person/3010193/)

[Mblake1981]

Now we know why Alex always had documents.

[Jibartik]

So like if I have a US baby it has more rights than other babies because manifest destiny?

[Mblake1981]

So like if I have a US baby it has more rights than other babies because manifest destiny?

Constitution maybe.

"It's just a piece of paper.."

"That isn't what the documents say.."

[Jibartik]

Well they have a point, toilet paper is just paper too, so if thats the case maybe the constitution is disposable?

Idk why you cant follow this logic paste eating fuck face.

sorry by the time I finished typing that I suddenly became a nice empathetic liberal :o

[Jibartik]

I was just trying to make a nice guy meme but with im an empathetic guy.

and I realized that hassan is going to look like the nice guy meme in like 15 years when his hair falls out

https://i.imgur.com/hRfQ7Tt.png

https://i.imgur.com/QN2wAJc.png

[hobart]

And what about a dictator every few hundred years that kills tens of millions.

Learn to read. Learn to math. 2,500 years of current gun murder rate to equal 1 dictator. Sorry pal, you don't really care about people's lives, just your position.

CNN told you to be scared. You obeyed.

When do we ban cigs, liquor and personal car ownership?

You do want to save lives, right?

I'm a gun owner. I'm not for most of the more commonly proposed gun control regulations. Haven't watched CNN in almost two decades.

I was just pointing out that you posted something stupid. Again.

[Reiwa]

*sigh

Jibartik and Rainik Stormseeker

Double homicide or murder of a pregnant woman still does not justify calling it a baby.

There is a entire case in Arizona where they are trying to give 'fetal personhood' to a fetus (embryo or fertilized egg).

To break it down so even Jibartik can understand... they are trying to actually create the policy mandates that "hundreds of civil and criminal provisions be 'interpreted and construed' to 'acknowledge' the rights of fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses at any stage of development. (https://apnews.com/article/abortion-us-supreme-court-arizona-phoenix-american-civil-liberties-union-36fc6be3058e283bd17625951d114a43)

So no we aren't there yet. Regardless of ... your analogy Rainik Stormseeker

When we do get there maybe this will be legit. Pregnant Woman Cited for HOV Violation Says Her Unborn Baby Should Count as Second Person (https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/pregnant-woman-cited-for-hov-violation-says-her-unborn-baby-should-count-as-second-person/3010193/)

Arizona is currently 15 weeks by Governor EO(unitary mind you :rolleyes:) and Texas is 6 weeks but tied up in court. So the Brandy lady, who has probably already delivered her baby and has the good sense not to tweet, would no longer qualify for the infraction protection.

Anyway, no real point, here's a video.

_b7bgtu2O4E

[Jibartik]

if you mix sperm and an eg in a Petri dish, it is a human upon fertilization.

[Jibartik]

question can I can kill foreigners because they are not human because they are not US babies?

[Reiwa]

question can I can kill foreigners because they are not human because they are not US babies?

I dunno and I sure hope so, but the ACLU is suing to make it ok to do to US babies too.

🇺🇲

[Botten]

question can I can kill foreigners because they are not human because they are not US babies?

Sure join up and see the world. Partake in a war or two. US marines are waiting for you. Just don’t kill any US babies (where ever you are; nut case)

[Mblake1981]

question can I can kill foreigners because they are not human because they are not US babies?

Only if you have enough money or its Government backed. For everyone else we have the rule of law. Who would be crazy enough to challenge that? considering they not only have full-automatic guns but F-16s and Stealth Bombers, maybe even some space equipment. We have our little cultural thing where some Billy-Bobs fire their Wal-Mart (before the ban) AR15s with some upgraded parts ordered online. Him and his buddies drink Michelob Ultra while shooting the living-shit out of an embankment. I guess due to numbers it holds off the Abrams tanks. Foreigners online are hardest hit witnessing this and consider us all insane.

F-mztxHgYQo

[Reiwa]

Him and his buddies drink Michelob Ultra

Please make you satire a little bit believable.

[Castle2.0]

Please make you satire a little bit believable.

At least your didn't say "you're"

[Reiwa]

"you're"

https://i.imgur.com/JewVnXE.png

[Castle2.0]

ts;dr

too small didn't read

But I am glad you have come around to a total ban on cigs, wine, and personal cars.

Well done, comrade.

[Jibartik]

Following a racist joke that linked Hideo Kojima to the assassination of Japan's former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Kojima Prod. has threatened legal action against those who contribute to the "spread of fake news and rumors that convey false information."

https://www.ign.com/articles/kojima-productions-threatens-legal-action-against-those-who-claim-hideo-kojima-was-linked-to-shinzo-abe-assassination

[Jibartik]

A man on the verge of a horrific act has a long discussion with a hotel bible.

HoeMgV3ipC0

[Mblake1981]

Please make you satire a little bit believable.

https://twitter.com/kwilsondesign/status/1571347148192747522