What I wouldn't give for a holocaust cloak!

[Hasbinbad]

I want you to think about who produced this movie.

Then I want you to ask yourself if THEY can not be a cunt, why can't YOU?

<object width="640" height="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yokQ0_8__ts?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yokQ0_8__ts?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="480" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

[Hasbinbad]

1:40 btw

[Aadill]

clever girl.

[Hasbinbad]

Thanks for your pity party Aadill.

[Aadill]

I love that movie.. I never noticed that before!

Oh Rob Reiner you delicious devil, you!

[Hasbinbad]

Seriously.. A bunch of liberal elite hollywood jews using the colloquial form of holocaust as a joke?!?!?

OMG ROB REINER IS HOLOCAUST DENIER

[Aadill]

OMG ROB REINER IS HOLOCAUST DENIER

RAAAAAAGE

[Hasbinbad]

I DEMAND THAT ROB REINER RECALL ALL DISTRIBUTIONS OF "THE PRINCESS BRIDE," AND CHANGE THE NAME OF THE HOLOCAUST CLOAK TO FIREPROOF CLOAK BEFORE RE RELEASING IT!!

[pickled_heretic]

pretty childish tbh. you can do whatever you want in your movies, your art, whatever wall of dicks artistic expression you want to climb. but that freedom of expression does not exist equally in all arenas.

you can yell all you like in your house. not in a library. it's the same thing.

[Hasbinbad]

Bahahahahaha.

[Aadill]

This is no different:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_about_the_word_%22*****rdly%22

The Howard incident led to a national debate in the U.S., in the context of racial sensitivity and political correctness, on whether use of *****rdly should be avoided. Some observers noted however that the "national debate" was made up almost entirely of commentators defending use of the word. As James Poniewozik wrote in Salon, the controversy was "an issue that opinion-makers right, left and center could universally agree on." He wrote that "the defenders of the dictionary" were "legion, and still queued up six abreast."[3] Julian Bond, then chairman of the NAACP, deplored the offense that had been taken at Howard's use of the word. "You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding", he said. "David Howard should not have quit. Mayor Williams should bring him back — and order dictionaries issued to all staff who need them."
Bond also said, "Seems to me the mayor has been *****rdly in his judgment on the issue" and as a nation we have a "hair-trigger sensibility" on race that can be tripped by both real and false grievances.

[Aadill]

black person said don't be *****rdly.

jewish director kept in scriptline having actor ask for a holocaust cloak.

[pickled_heretic]

there's no accepted definition of "*****rdly" that is racist. what a complete non sequitur.

[Diggles]

get the fuck out of here you scale faced leezardddd

[Hasbinbad]

non sequitur
http://i.imgur.com/Hd8Mq.jpg

[pickled_heretic]

what do you think it means?

[Diggles]

It sounds like it'd be a fantastic ice cream flavor

[Hasbinbad]

what do you think it means?
Are you referencing the colloquial or logical form (neither applies to what you said)?

[pickled_heretic]

non sequitur - not in sequence. does not follow. A=B, C=D, therefore A=C. non sequitur.

[Hasbinbad]

It's actually A=B, B=C, therefore A=C, you fucking moron.

[Szeth]

Haha, the way he posted it is patently false.

[pickled_heretic]

It's actually A=B, B=C, therefore A=C, you fucking moron.

A=B, C=D, therefore A=C.

this was an example of a non sequitur. one type of logical fallacy. "it does not follow."

[Hasbinbad]

An ant is an animal.
An elephant is an animal.
Therefore an ant is an elephant.

ant = A
elephant = C
animal = B

Get your story straight cunt.

That's also not what happened above, without some circuitous rationalization.

It also was not a colooquial non sequitor, in which a statement makes no sense to what follows, such as:

I did poorly on my math test, I hope berries splatter your face.

L2 Engrish before you attempt to use complex terms.

[Hasbinbad]

this was an example of a non sequitur. one type of logical fallacy. "it does not follow."
That is not the logical breakdown of non sequitor. There is no "d" involved.

All men are humans.
Jane is a human.
Therefore Jane is a man.

A = C
B = C
Therefore B = A

What a moran.

[pickled_heretic]

A=B, C=D, therefore A=C.
this is a perfect example of a non sequitur. any time the conclusion does not match the evidence, that is a non sequitur. what you're referring to is ad absurdum.

[Hasbinbad]

Your educators need to be dragged out into the street and flogged, I hope berries splatter your face.

[pickled_heretic]

Your educators need to be dragged out into the street and flogged, I hope berries splatter your face.

sadly, i am a student of humanity.

[Szeth]

Lost faith in that one years ago.

[pickled_heretic]

It's actually A=B, B=C, therefore A=C, you fucking moron.

and just for the record, this is not a fallacy at all. this is an example of correctly applied transitivity.

[Hasbinbad]

That is why ants are elephants, yea?

Distribute your middles, and pay attention in school.

[pickled_heretic]

That is why ants are elephants, yea?

Distribute your middles, and pay attention in school.

the first time you posted it, you didn't include any other information other than the equation. the SECOND time you posted, you included some other information that would indicate you are providing an example of an inductive fallacy. neither of which are examples of non sequitur.

[Hasbinbad]

They are both the same.

Everything I have posted as non sequitur is in fact non sequitur.

Shut the fuck up.

[pickled_heretic]

They are both the same.

Everything I have posted as non sequitur is in fact non sequitur.

Shut the fuck up.

claiming that an example of transitivity is actually an example of non sequitur is, in fact, a non sequitur, which makes you right in some kind of bizarre metalogical sense.

[Drem]

holocaust cloak is a reference to 1st ed. AD&D equipment. you guys are fuckin retarded

[oblexsis]

Definition of HOLOCAUST
1
: a sacrifice consumed by fire
2
: a thorough destruction involving extensive loss of life especially through fire <a nuclear holocaust>
3
a often capitalized : the mass slaughter of European civilians and especially Jews by the Nazis during World War II —usually used with the

[oblexsis]

b : a mass slaughter of people; especially : genocide

sorry cut the last part off by accident

[Harrison]

HBB arguing about shit no one cares about again, such as what irony is...just shut the fuck up already. You aren't impressing anyone.

[Hasbinbad]

Harrison you're lucky Amelinda pities you.

[Hailto]

What movie is this? I want to know if they make it into the castle walls or not

[Harrison]

Harrison you're lucky Amelinda pities you.

Or what? You'd say things like you're glad my brother is dead? Oh no, not that! Seriously, I take shits worth more to this Earth than the entirety of your existence. The mere fact you resort to such spineless attacks proves more about your lack of character than any of your crybaby whinefest posts combined.

[EnnoiaII]

You never noticed the cloak line? Watched that movie with my g/f last week, which she had never seen before...and had no idea Andre the Giant was in it...almost dumped her on the spot.

Anybody want a peanut?!

[Bappo Boppo]

What movie is this? I want to know if they make it into the castle walls or not

Best post in this thread lol

[Amelinda]

you boys are so silly (or bored) that you have to first fight over the meaning of one word then fight over the meaning of a phrase?

and while i'm talking about that....why endeavor to utilize such eloquence in an rnf post?

i'd rather just use small words. They work just fine and it allows everyone to participate in the argument and i don't end up looking pretentious :P

[pickled_heretic]

you boys are so silly (or bored) that you have to first fight over the meaning of one word then fight over the meaning of a phrase?

and while i'm talking about that....why endeavor to utilize such eloquence in an rnf post?

i'd rather just use small words. They work just fine and it allows everyone to participate in the argument and i don't end up looking pretentious :P

does it really bother you when people have a vocabulary that is larger than 2000 words?

[pickled_heretic]

and for that matter, are you really bothered that some would rather discuss linguistics than spam "u mad bro" over and over?

[Amelinda]

does it really bother you when people have a vocabulary that is larger than 2000 words?

no.

and for that matter, are you really bothered that some would rather discuss linguistics than spam "u mad bro" over and over?

no.

just think it's silly.

[pickled_heretic]

just think it's silly.

u mad