View Full Version : Mitt Romney's Campaign Cancels Staffers Credit Cards In The Middle Of The Night
dredge
11-09-2012, 02:17 AM
.
Reiker000
11-09-2012, 03:24 AM
not surprising in the least.
Reiker000
11-09-2012, 03:36 AM
I guess his staff never saw the video.
<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dBOqLxzGTx8?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dBOqLxzGTx8?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Clark
11-09-2012, 03:45 AM
lol
Alawen
11-09-2012, 09:11 AM
Well, they're moochers, not job creators.
Tanthallas
11-09-2012, 11:18 AM
Clearly didnt create jobs.
falkun
11-09-2012, 12:10 PM
If he would have let his women out of their binders he might have been able to win at least the women's minority vote.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 12:49 PM
I voted for Gary Johnson
What? In another thread, you say you trust the government more than the free market. You may want to understand what you're voting for next time. You had 2 pro-government candidates to choose from and you picked the one completely antithetical to your economic views.
dredge
11-09-2012, 01:25 PM
.
Extunarian
11-09-2012, 02:08 PM
I was really wanting him to get the 5% so we could move away from the retarded 2 party system.
Happened in '92 and '96...didn't really change anything.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 02:12 PM
I never said any of that, you implied it because I believe the FDA has a job to do.
From the other thread, where you were given a choice of either trusting a government testing agency (FDA) or a free market testing agency:
I would choose the FDA
quido
11-09-2012, 02:14 PM
A memory of happier times:
http://www.dicktaters.net/mitt.jpg
How brash, Mitt!
Ferok
11-09-2012, 02:58 PM
I guess his staff never saw the video.
Personally I'm a pretty big fan of being stuck getting a good or service from the same person, no matter the merits.
dredge
11-09-2012, 03:04 PM
.
Greegon
11-09-2012, 03:08 PM
A memory of happier times:
http://www.dicktaters.net/mitt.jpg
How brash, Mitt!
LOL can anyone explain? I had doubts about the guy but now.. wish i had actually gone to vote
dredge
11-09-2012, 03:15 PM
.
dredge
11-09-2012, 03:17 PM
.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 03:20 PM
dude I don't know why this is so hard for you to comprehend. There are govt. agencies that are the authorities on safety and other things.
I would choose FDA approved meat over Billy Bob's approved meat or and other bullshit idea you can come up with. Drop it.
I'm sure you'd love for me to drop it as it exposes a complete contradiction in your thinking. I guess you believe that the free market works fine except for safety issues? Can you explain how Underwriters Laboratories fits in with your theory? Or how about all the safety features added to cars that are not mandated by governments in any way? You make this exception without any rational explanation as to why it is an exception.
What if I said free markets are best for providing all products except for desk chairs? Do you not see how an exception doesn't make sense unless you give some kind of reasoning for it?
dredge
11-09-2012, 03:23 PM
.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 03:28 PM
http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL1243/4327470/24218261/404570119.jpg
Choke on it!
Interesting, this is completely antithetical to everything else he's ever said in relation to government. If you expand public safety to mean the government may intervene in any activity which has any risk at all, then you have once again a government with unlimited powers. There are no activities in this world that contain zero risk. I'd want a fuller explanation of his position on this issue before I believed that he'd permit unlimited government power under the guise of protecting the people. He's smarter than that.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 03:30 PM
you must have missed this part:
put that in your pipe and smoke it
Perhaps you should explain your own position on this and why you make an exception in this case rather than just repost the same picture you posted 8 minutes prior.
dredge
11-09-2012, 03:38 PM
.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 03:40 PM
http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL1243/4327470/24218261/404570119.jpg
Also, why did you edit the picture to take out the words that indicate that his stance on this issue is not perfectly clear?
Here is the original:
http://s16.postimage.org/ow6kt5nid/johnson.jpg
The magic of Google means you probably shouldn't try to selectively edit an image to only support your argument. Fucking owned.
dredge
11-09-2012, 03:42 PM
.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 03:44 PM
I know it's hard but read the words
He doesn't say a thing about GMO labeling. He talks about gluten labeling, which is a related issue, but not precisely the same. This why the website where you pulled this image from made the judgment that he's not clearly pro or con on the GMO labeling issue. I don't even care if you admit that you're an idiot who tried to pass off an edited image. All I want is a reasonable argument on why you believe the market is inferior to the government when it comes to the issue of food labeling. And please, try to use logic and reason, if you can.
Diggles
11-09-2012, 03:45 PM
orruar are you fucking retarded? they say the same thing
dredge
11-09-2012, 03:48 PM
.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 03:56 PM
here let me help you sound it out...."knowing what we are eating is not a matter of preference or convenience; rather, it is an issue of basic safety"-Gary Johnson
See, I actually watched the debate between Johnson and Stein, so next time you accuse someone of not knowing how someone stands on an issue you might want to know yourself first.
Public safety is a legitimate government function.
You are still avoiding the question, for like the 18th post in a row. What about food labeling makes the free market function worse than government in this specific case? "Public safety" is an overly generic term that could refer to just about anything. Be specific.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 03:58 PM
orruar are you fucking retarded? they say the same thing
Procon.org itself says that he is not clearly pro or con on this issue. There is a difference between a food product that is dangerous to a certain group of people due to disease, and one that may be dangerous to everyone as a whole. It may not be likely that one would hold opposing views on labeling laws in these two cases, but I'd rather not read too much into this, especially considering it goes against everything else the man believes. And trust me, I'll ask him to clarify on this issue the next chance I get.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 04:00 PM
Also, check out this gem:
http://s14.postimage.org/h3ysr49n5/Obama.jpg
Guess you can add that to the broken promises list.
Orruar
11-09-2012, 04:03 PM
Procon.org itself says that he is not clearly pro or con on this issue. There is a difference between a food product that is dangerous to a certain group of people due to disease, and one that may be dangerous to everyone as a whole. It may not be likely that one would hold opposing views on labeling laws in these two cases, but I'd rather not read too much into this, especially considering it goes against everything else the man believes. And trust me, I'll ask him to clarify on this issue the next chance I get.
Also, to add to the distinction, we're not even sure if GMO food is bad. Apparently quite a few of the hippies in California didn't think so. And if you can't convince Californians to vote against Monsanto, that makes me think the case is very weak. Many people could care less if the food has GMO labeling, and GMO labelists are pushing this issue because people may then just assume that GMO = bad because it's labeled as such.
There's actually a gulf of difference between forcing labeling because an ingredient can kill those with a certain disease, and forcing labeling because a product may possibly give you cancer in 40 years, though we're not sure about that.
dredge
11-09-2012, 06:12 PM
.
Llodd
11-09-2012, 11:36 PM
I think he's a refreshing change from the usual drivel tbh.
What's more amusing is how you fight over petty squabbles that have no impact, cuz lets face it Gm is here to stay for good or bad (its already 'polluted' into the wild and can never be retracted).
A bit like pixels in an outdated game!
Orruar
11-09-2012, 11:36 PM
Orruar is the epitome of the typical pendantic Libertard.
Well-formed and cogent analysis full of insight and wisdom.
Sodapop
11-10-2012, 05:06 AM
I'm going to modify your food ourrruoaur. stupid vegan gay republican.
Autotune
11-10-2012, 12:38 PM
I'm going to modify your food ourrruoaur. stupid vegan gay republican.
watch out soda, someone is linking RnF threads to outside RnF.
Orruar
11-10-2012, 12:59 PM
Don't make me pull in Ambrotos, forum cop. He's the magical man who can ignore a thousand infractions and then delete posts that aren't even breaking the rules.
Uthagain
11-12-2012, 07:40 PM
Bruce campbell should sue mitt romney for making both their faces look bad.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.