Yeah, I laughed so hard at myself, I typed out lawls on my keyboard quoting you.

It is pretty obvious you arent well read. You cant even pay attention for one paragraph here let alone a book with a few hundred pages in it.

Interesting...so now you finally get it?

You make this basis off what? Me quoting

"Evolution is the change in the inherited characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Evolutionary processes give rise to diversity at every level of biological organisation, including species, individual organisms and molecules such as DNA and proteins."

Does this somehow make your vagina bleed?

Also point out more contradictions from leewrong.

was directed at Glenzig for apparently not knowing the definition of faith, according to the dictionary. Says though that religion isn't relevant, according to the dictionary, when trying to define what falls under that category.

No, I make that assumption off of every post I have seen you make. I have no qualms with you quoting me. I do have a problem when you dont understand what I said and reply with nonsense.

Going through his post history is just disgusting, anyone and everyone who disagrees with him (not just me) has very poor reading comprehension.

Please show me the post where I said religion was absolutely necessary when considering faith. I have ALWAYS defined faith as "belief without evidence". Nothing more...nothing less.

No, you just have bad reading comprehension. Somehow you have misread.

Eliseus, is too busy rooting through my post history to respond now. Talk about obsessed.