Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Red Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this (/forums/showthread.php?t=113050)

Agatha 06-25-2013 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamwiseRed (Post 1006854)
you cannot ban that which has no life.

if you don't think nizzar has like a whole gaggle of 60s untagged just sitting banked on unrelated emu accnts, hah.

Andis 06-25-2013 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lite (Post 1006838)
till we got a poison on him by identifying his exact load in point.

prais guido, the savior

Kraftwerk 06-25-2013 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirken (Post 1006847)
thats fine. im still gonna hold you responsible for them :)

Heheh

SamwiseRed 06-25-2013 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p-niner (Post 1006857)
Sweet chin music from the heart break kid

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4yv68rIZG1qgvz2q.gif

Elderan 06-25-2013 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirken (Post 1006847)
thats fine. im still gonna hold you responsible for them :)

Sirken,

You changed the rule just now. People now know they need to change their bind point when they log in next time to that char.

However does this mean we cannot talk about validity of this rule? The vast majority of people with high end raid experience on this server think that the no binding rule in solb and perma is out dated at this point and should be changed.

p-niner 06-25-2013 12:36 PM

Hey its bad math guy. Sorry just cus ur 60 now and not 50 doesnt invalidate rule.

heartbrand 06-25-2013 12:45 PM

I don't care about the concept of not being able to have your bind there anymore. I do care about it being incorrectly labeled an exploit, the refusal to have dialogue on whether or not the custom rule should continue to exist, be modified or expanded, and the threat of bans for those who would dare question the applicability of the rule going forward.

Elderan 06-25-2013 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heartbrand (Post 1006900)
I don't care about the concept of not being able to have your bind there anymore. I do care about it being incorrectly labeled an exploit, the refusal to have dialogue on whether or not the custom rule should continue to exist, be modified or expanded, and the threat of bans for those who would dare question the applicability of the rule going forward.

Exactly.....

p-niner 06-25-2013 12:51 PM

If u have been illegally bound there since the rule was implemented in classic and used it to gain an unfair advantage in perma pvp and against lvl 52 vox raids you are cheating. Thats what unfair advanatages are - exploits.

Stasis01 06-25-2013 12:54 PM

Sol B binding back in the day was pretty bad when fighting over naggy, and honestly I think it's a good fix - don't let Nizz harass poor 52 force crew tryen to get a couple RBB's.

<3 Nizz tho.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.