ScaringChildren |
11-14-2018 11:39 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor
(Post 2808677)
A precedent's been established, and SCOTUS generally follows it. The same logic could be applied to gun insurance as it was to the ACA. Mick's argument (we went through it a day or two ago) of it being poasible that the cost aspect could be interpreted as a means to restrict ownership via cost holds some water since that line ofnlogic could be used to argue that it is infinfringing via an undue burden due to cost. Have to wait and see what comes down the pipe.
|
Well that would be textbook infringement.
As we all know, it shall NOT be infringed (peace be upon his holy Alex Jones) and a Republican controlled SCOTUS will agree with that.
The ACA tax penalty was deemed unconstitutional for similar reasons, and that was when the SCOTUS wasn't right leaning.
|