Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Rants and Flames (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Drama (/forums/showthread.php?t=10616)

oldhead 06-27-2010 11:01 AM

they had the camp imo.

You were wrong for forcing a bargin upon them by saying "I'll leave after one PH"

On the other hand if it were me being how you were pretty chill with your attitude I would have agreed to the one spawn to maintain good fellowship.

They were wrong in the fact that they agreed to your deal and did not stand by it but were honorable in letting you roll for the item. I believe they would have given you the sword had you rolled a win

All in all it sounds like Slappie is the major asshat in the whole ordeal. He sounds like a bad apple that should be watched for guild removal.

YendorLootmonkey 06-27-2010 11:12 AM

So, original group zones (yes, they're on CR, but the fact remains they zone and are not at camp for X amt of time because they could not hold the camp) and then camp isn't theirs.

OP zones (and not at camp for Y amt of time, because OP technically couldn't hold the camp either), camp is still OPs?

Phallax 06-27-2010 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agaron (Post 86149)
When you wipe, and cr you lose the camp, especially if all mobs are up. So, Skewz had the camp, and that's a dick move to say it was theirs. Skewz could have kept the camp instead of making a deal to just take 1 more spawn. Typically if someone is hovering in my camp spot while I'm camping it I'd tell them to gtfo. You can only take over a camp if there's no one engaging mobs, and all the mobs are up. Making a deal that he could take 1 more spawn, then ninja'n it is the second dick move. I'd be pissed too.

Whos Skewz?!

This whole post should have never happened, they died, they lost the camp. Trying to bully your way back into the camp, you supposedly died at, is a dick move to start with, not to even mention the whole letting him clear it all till king +1 is left. Double dick move on your part here.

guineapig 06-27-2010 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agaron (Post 86149)
. You can only take over a camp if there's no one engaging mobs, and all the mobs are up.

I think the point was that he was given at least 2 chances but kept zoning out. In other words despite the fact that he left the camp they still let him try again, and then again. Third time they took it.

That's way more than most other people in Lguk would do.

Despite all that he was given the item in the end which is even more rare.

Agaron 06-27-2010 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey (Post 86154)
So, original group zones (yes, they're on CR, but the fact remains they zone and are not at camp for X amt of time because they could not hold the camp) and then camp isn't theirs.

OP zones (and not at camp for Y amt of time, because OP technically couldn't hold the camp either), camp is still OPs?

But they made a deal that he could have 1 more spawn, regardless if he zones or not, which case it was the named with item, and they decided to ninja it aka making them assholes.

guineapig 06-27-2010 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agaron (Post 86160)
But they made a deal that he could have 1 more spawn, regardless if he zones or not, which case it was the named with item, and they decided to ninja it aka making them assholes.

Zoning had nothing to do with the deal from what I gather. how are they supposed to know that he will keep coming back over and over again?
And like I said he got the item in the end anyway. Even after a roll for it that he agreed to. How often do you see that from so called "dicks"?

Agaron 06-27-2010 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guineapig (Post 86159)
I think the point was that he was given at least 2 chances but kept zoning out. In other words despite the fact that he left the camp they still let him try again, and then again. Third time they took it.

That's way more than most other people in Lguk would do.

Despite all that he was given the item in the end which is even more rare.

That's about the equivalent if someone is kiting a camp, and I walk into the camp and see mobs gone, and claim it, because no one is there at said time. I'd wait till mobs fully spawn before I claim it, because you can't assume someone isn't engaging a camp regardless if they zone. If you make a deal stick to it, or else you should have just taken it the same way he took it from you. Seeing a mob with loot, and jacking it is a dick move. You should have just let him lose the camp the same way you did on the cr, instead of making a deal.

P.S. I love how I got the deny from this rnf thread. Lol.

http://i45.tinypic.com/160yh34.jpg

Phallax 06-27-2010 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guineapig (Post 86162)
Zoning had nothing to do with the deal from what I gather. how are they supposed to know that he will keep coming back over and over again?

Because thats how an enchanter solos the camp...everyone knows this.

guineapig 06-27-2010 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phallax (Post 86167)
Because thats how an enchanter solos the camp...everyone knows this.

Last thing I will say about this:

Read the camping rules...


(and chanter has the stupid sword... probably to sell for plat)

Agaron 06-27-2010 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guineapig (Post 86162)
Zoning had nothing to do with the deal from what I gather. how are they supposed to know that he will keep coming back over and over again?
And like I said he got the item in the end anyway. Even after a roll for it that he agreed to. How often do you see that from so called "dicks"?

Skewz could have simply said I died and I'm not coming back, or I'm giving up, or you could have asked if Skewz was done attempting at mob? I guess a /t is too hard to do?

Looks like item was given after this thread was made. Did the rep thing make them give in? Darn recruits. Lol.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.