Project 1999
Page 2 of 13 1 2 3412 Last »
Show 10 post(s) from this thread on one page

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Red Rants and Flames (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=55)
-   -   who ran tmo off red? (/forums/showthread.php?t=394301)

starkind 11-10-2021 08:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tune (Post 3385424)
tmo prob the biggest disappointment in a guild ive ever seen

I did not want to be part of the zerg guild at the time (empire) I wanted competition fun pvp / mass pvp. so i joined TMO

I knew they were probably bad at pvp , I kind of expected that. I was ok with it. I thought they were gonna be actually good at PvE tho. I heard they locked down epics for years on blue etc etc

well they absolutely sucked at pve as well lol. they struggled to kill maestro in hate among others

i quit soon after

Disease 11-10-2021 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tune (Post 3385424)
tmo prob the biggest disappointment in a guild ive ever seen

I did not want to be part of the zerg guild at the time (empire) I wanted competition fun pvp / mass pvp. so i joined TMO

I knew they were probably bad at pvp , I kind of expected that. I was ok with it. I thought they were gonna be actually good at PvE tho. I heard they locked down epics for years on blue etc etc

well they absolutely sucked at pve as well lol. they struggled to kill maestro in hate among others

i quit soon after
We didn't want to keep the same toxic track record as we did on blue so we all(leadership) decided to take it easy since we were all quitting anyway. If we wanted to kill the server, empire would've been gone the first 3 months.

Tunabros 11-10-2021 12:03 PM
TMO wrecked blue because no one cares about red

Hope this helps

starkind 11-10-2021 01:16 PM
TMO was a terrrible guild in 2010 when everthying was even less classic than it is now

nothing has changed

not surprised

i do agree there were like 3 good players in TMO

totmanc 11-10-2021 01:26 PM
TBH they were not terrible at pvp even

https://web.archive.org/web/20150616...uild.php?g=TMO

1 kill for every 2 deaths was not bad you dinguses

Gustoo 11-10-2021 02:02 PM
Ya could be worse.

But honestly GTFO of her with your science and old stats from the web archive no one knew was accessible.

Just kidding good posting.

My first kid was born feb 2015 I was majorly not playing by this time.

derpcake2 11-10-2021 02:38 PM
I absolutely wasn't good at pvp and TMO offered cheap kills, even 1v2 or 1v3.

Quite fun really.

Guessing those involved got suckered in, because the smart people seemed to never have arrived on red, or to have moved on within a few days after doing so.

derpcake2 11-10-2021 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by totmanc (Post 3385528)
TBH they were not terrible at pvp even

https://web.archive.org/web/20150616...uild.php?g=TMO

1 kill for every 2 deaths was not bad you dinguses
If you look into the data just a bit, you'll see that a small group of players had very good K/D ratios, while the rest got shat on.

Aalpha had 33/6, that means other people in TMO died 60 times, to reach the 1:2 ratio, which means some severe dunking of scrubs happened.

Of course you knew that.

Gustoo 11-10-2021 02:53 PM
Aalpha pretty good at getting kills. Nice analysis derpcake2

Tassador 11-10-2021 07:43 PM
The answer to this question was anyone who played on red prior to TMO took TMO out guys were bad at the game. Good at building communities of online friends that can sit online tho.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.
Page 2 of 13 1 2 3412 Last »
Show 10 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.