This doesn't ring true to me because I have been using /who all lfg for a while with it working, and like I say, sometimes it doesn't work. Perhaps this is a data point the devs can use to nail down the issue.

This doesn't help the thread, but the subject line got me thinking... I would like to see "/who all LFG unreliable" added so we know who not to add to our groups when looking for more.

dunno if this helps:

I saw some people mentioning sol b. When I was in Sol B, I had the same problem with this command. When I zoned out to Lavastorm, the problem went away.

are you guys using the SoF client?

/ all lfg 40 50 worked every time i used it, i am using the titanium client.

I have also been using "/who all LFG 34 50" without any issues ever. Most recently I did it about 10 times in a row in LGuk yesterday morning.

If you accidentally hit your spacebar twice doing a "/who all LFG 40 50" will actually return results for "/who all LFG". I don't know about a possibly bug in SolB this this could be what some people are accidentally doing.

It works 95% of the time. Recently, however (in the last few days), it sometimes fails to work (returning /who all instead of /who all lfg). It's fairly intermittent, although when it fails to work, it seems to affect many people at the same time.

Titanium

So I'm guessing that if you try it once and it does not produce the correct results, you can try again to return the proper search results?

Is this an accurate assessment?

no, it does it consecutively. Not sure what happens to make it work again.

When this happens to me, if I type it in the same way again it works fine.

My who usually looks like this: / cle lfg all