More people die to car accidents and tobacco smoke and alcohol and Big Macs than illegal immigrants, too. Your argument is retarded.

There is no national emergency. There isn't any more people coming in than before. This is a sham and you know it. Sorry you're buying into the hateful xenophobia that's washing over this country.

I think its great. Now were just going to declare a national emergency for socialist programs.

That was some smart thinkin there Donny.

indeed. btw how much money for the wall? :o

National Emergency to fund Universal Healthcare? Nice.

Which is why I answered the question in the manner that I did. I was not interested in being divisive, I see Fenin and Jabartik are. Not saying you are right or wrong here. I did originally respond to Fenins post about divisiveness in which Jabartik responded to me, that is the chain of posts.

I can't take anything you say seriously since you spent like 2 months straight just posting song memes.

Heard a nice soundbyte by Pelosi where she says declaring a national emergency to bypass Congressional control of power of the purse, war etc is unconstitutional.

Next sentence: why don't you do one for gun control? I hope you do. A democratic president could. REPUBLICANS should be frightened by this.

Respect for rule of law is fading. This preceded empire in that 1 olde example everyone overuses. She just straight up openly does not care and threatens cheerily to play chicken with the expansion of imperial power as though it has no consequences beyond partisan jockeying, and she's one of the most talented operators up there. And nobody else catches it or cares either. We have outlived our nation's foundational memes and our rulers are only very loosely bound by its laws and precedents.

in a 5-4 decision, justice kavanaugh writing for the majority...

I think the republicans are hoping the democrats try something like that just so they can direct their poor people into violence against the "others" who want to take their guns.

Rich people on both sides directing the violence to occur between the poor on both "sides" rather. I don't think there's ever been a case where the rich and poor are together against an injustice. One side is always the benefactor and the other the victim.